SUBJECT: MORE ON ABDUCTION OF DECEMBER 8 FILE: UFO3283 ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ³ The following file is courtesy of HUFON REPORT, ³ ³ the newsletter of the Houston UFO Network. ³ ³ For more information, contact Ron Joseph at ³ ³ HUFON's BBS, UFOnline - (713) 558-5342. ³ ³ ---------------------------------------------------------------- ³ ³ Technical Analysis Report ³ ³ prepared by Dr. Rod Lewis ³ ³ ³ ³ Date: April 20, 1993 ³ ³ ³ ³Investigators: ³ ³ ³ ³Dr. Rod Lewis ³ ³Acting Technical Analyst, Houston UFO Network ³ ³ ³ ³Derrel Sims, C.H.T. ³ ³Chief Abductions Investigator, Houston UFO Network ³ ³ ³ ³ ³ ³HISTORY: This specimen was obtained from a female subject on ³ ³December 11, 1992. The subject will herein be referred to as ³ ³DS92009LT. The subject reported recovering the object from ³ ³her eye on the morning of December 11, 1992. She stated that ³ ³she awakened with an irritation and while rubbing her eye, ³ ³a small particle, about the size of a mustard seed, was ³ ³recovered. The specimen was turned over to Derrel Sims, Chief ³ ³Abductions Investigator, Houston UFO Network. The specimen ³ ³was photographed and stored in a plastic case. ³ ³ ³ ³Subject DS92009LT reported to have been part of a mass ³ ³abduction in Houston, Texas on the night of December 8, 1992. ³ ³The subject reports that an implant was placed behind one of ³ ³her eyes during the abduction. The complete report on the ³ ³mass abduction of December 8, 1992 can be obtained under ³ ³separate cover. ³ ³ ³ ³PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: The specimen has been viewed ³ ³under a standard light and stereoscopic microscopes. It ³ ³appears flesh toned with an "egg" shape, approximately ³ ³1 - 1.5mm in length, and has a hollow interior. The apex has ³ ³been truncated and lateral splitting from the apical area ³ ³distally is noted. ³ ³ ³ ³The exterior of the specimen appears different from the ³ ³interior. The exterior is smooth and non-porous with a ³ ³mottled appearance. The interior has a spongy "honey- ³ ³combed" appearance, and is lighter in contrast to the exterior. ³ ³The specimen is resilient and does not permanently deform ³ ³with pressure or manipulation. ³ ³ ³ ³PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS: ³ ³Length: 1-1.5mm ³ ³Height: .25-.5mm (at highest point) ³ ³Width: .25-.5mm (at widest point) ³ ³Weight: N/A ³ ³Specific Gravity: N/A ³ ³Tensile Strength: N/A* ³ ³Melting Point: N/A* ³ ³Solubility: N/A* ³ ³ ³ ³N/A* = potentially destructive measurements ³ ³ ³ ³TAXONOMY: The specimen was taken to the Department of ³ ³Biology at the University of Houston. It was examined by ³ ³several doctoral and post-doctoral students. The specimen did ³ ³not fit any known taxonomic classification. It was determined ³ ³that the specimen was not biological. ³ ³QUALITATIVE ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS: Qualitative elemental ³ ³analysis was performed on April 14, 1992 at the ³ ³Superconductivity Laboratory, University of Houston, using an ³ ³electron microprobe. A small sample was taken from the ³ ³specimen for analysis. Microprobes were taken from various ³ ³locations on the sample, and are considered to be ³ ³representative of the specimen. ³ ³ ³ ³The following elements were found throughout the probe. This ³ ³list does not reflect any particular order or percentages. ³ ³ ³ ³1) Carbon* ³ ³2) Oxygen* ³ ³3) Silicon** ³ ³4) Titanium** ³ ³5) Barium** ³ ³6) Beryllium*** ³ ³7) Sulphur*** ³ ³8) Aluminum*** ³ ³ ³ ³* Primary constituents ³ ³** Secondary constituents ³ ³*** Tertiary constituents ³ ³ ³ ³Although absolute percentages of elements cannot be ³ ³determined with this method, the specimen appeared to be ³ ³carbon rich, suggesting that it is organic. The other earth ³ ³elements are suspected to be present in trace quantities ³ ³only, but have been determined to be part of the specimen and ³ ³not contaminants. However, this hypothesis cannot be ³ ³substantiated without quantitative analysis. ³ ³ ³ ³The probe also determined that the material was electrically ³ ³non-conductive. ³ ³ ³ ³ANOMALIES: There are a few notable anomalies in the ³ ³specimen. It is unusual for titanium and silicon to be present in ³ ³a compound which is carbon rich and containing oxygen. It is ³ ³also not consistent with the textural features of the ³ ³specimen. Compounds containing titanium and silicon tend to ³ ³be much more rigid and brittle. Also, the presence of ³ ³beryllium is unusual in that it is normally found only in ³ ³compounds which are electrically conductive. ³ ³ ³ ³SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The specimen obtained from ³ ³subject DS92009LT is an ovoid, flesh-toned object approximately ³ ³1-1.5 mm in length with a hollow core. Based on taxonomic ³ ³examination it is non-biological. Qualitative analysis ³ ³suggests a carbon rich non-conductive material with some ³ ³unusual combinations of trace elements. The substance is most ³ ³likely a high molecular weight organic compound. Polymers ³ ³(plastics) are the most likely compounds to fit the elemental ³ ³profile. ³ ³ ³ ³RECOMMENDATIONS: ³ ³ ³ ³1. Determine if the specimen is a polymer. This may be ³ ³ accomplished through HPLC (high pressure liquid ³ ³ chromatography) if a sample of the specimen is soluble in ³ ³ an organic solvent. ³ ³ ³ ³2. Consultation with a polymer chemist for additional tests ³ ³ which may be available. ³ ³ ³ ³End of File ³ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ********************************************************************* * -------->>> THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo <<<------- * *********************************************************************