From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington, DC

20006.



   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is May 31, 1982, and

this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 75.



   Here, in the United States, today is a major holiday, Memorial Day.

For most of us it's a day off from our jobs, a day for picnics or to

visit friends and relatives. The Memorial Day week-end is famous for

traffic jams, highway accidents, and the Indianapolis 500 Auto Race.

And Memorial Day is a seasonal turning point, marking the beginning of

the traditional summer vacation season. Most of us tend to welcome

Memorial Day as the gateway to summer, but Memorial Day also has a

more solemn meaning which we sometimes forget. It's the day we have

set aside to honor the Servicemen who have died fighting for our

country. Memorial Day is a reminder that war has become a stark

reality for America time after time, and each time the cost in human

lives has been tragic.



   As I look ahead to the summer of 1982 now beginning, it's with

mixed feelings. Like most other Americans, I'm looking forward to the

activities that make the summer vacation season a time to enjoy; but

the summer ahead will also be a time of increasing danger for America.



   The timetable for nuclear war which I made public three months ago

in AUDIO LETTER No. 72 is still in effect, my friends. That timetable

calls for NUCLEAR WAR ONE to erupt by mid-September 1982, barely three

months from now. The American Bolsheviks who now control the United

States Pentagon are not slowing down in their war preparations. This

is true in spite of the fact that part of their war plan has been

crippled, as I detailed last month.



   The covert warfare that spawned the so-called Falklands crisis has

all but ruined the Pentagon plans for final victory in the coming war;

but the Bolshevik war-planners here have a suicidal streak in their

thinking, and they are bent on war regardless of the consequences.



   As I say these words, headlines are growing larger and larger about

the Falklands war between Argentina and Britain. Since I spoke to you

last month, heavy losses have been reported on both sides. Argentina

has lost her only cruiser, the General Belgrano, plus several minor

vessels and a number of aircraft. Britain has so far admitted losing

five major ships--two destroyers, two frigates, and a container ship

full of war materiel. These reports reflect the scale of the present

fighting somewhat but they are incomplete and distorted. As in every

war, the truth has become the first casualty.



   My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:



Topic #1--THE PENTAGON COUNTDOWN TOWARD NUCLEAR WAR ONE Topic #2--THE

ECONOMIC ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Topic #3--BILLY

GRAHAM VERSUS THE BOLSHEVIK WAR LOBBY.



Topic #1--In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 two months ago I revealed that an

entire new nuclear war strategy against Russia is being developed here

in Washington. It is being worked out by an elite military-planning

group in extreme secrecy under the code name "PROJECT Z." It's a rush

project calling for NUCLEAR WAR ONE itself to begin by September of

this year 1982.



   Last month I reported that PROJECT Z was continuing to move fast at

the secret war-planning room here in downtown Washington. As I stated,

the process of flushing out the basic war plan was already under way.

Now, my friends, the first complete draft of the total PROJECT Z war

plan is ready. The plan is essentially completed with nothing left to

do but make minor refinements here and there. And now the existence of

this major new United States nuclear war plan is creeping into the

news. Just yesterday, May 30, an article about it appeared for the

very first time in the New York Times. The article, by Richard

Halloran, carries the headline, "PENTAGON DRAWS UP FIRST STRATEGY FOR

FIGHTING A LONG NUCLEAR WAR." The article begins, quote:



  "Defense Department policymakers in a new five-year defense plan

have accepted the premise that nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union

could be protracted, and have drawn up their first strategy for

fighting such a war."



The article goes on to mention that the plan is laid out in an

unpublished document of 125 pages. It's been drafted for approval by

Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger.



   My friends, I've reported many times now that the United States

Pentagon is controlled by the Bolsheviks who formerly controlled

Russia. I've also identified Weinberger as the highest visible agent

of the Bolsheviks here in the United States Government today.



   The nuclear war plans of the Bolsheviks here are moving fast; but

as I have also reported before, the United States Government today is

a house divided. The Bolsheviks are opposed by their bitter rivals,

the Rockefeller cartel. Their top visible operative in the federal

government today is Secretary of State Alexander Haig. The often

visible feuding between Haig and Weinberger is only a pale shadow of

this deadly power struggle behind the scenes. Unlike the Bolsheviks

here, the Rockefeller faction do not want nuclear war. In a word, they

cannot afford it. They would lose everything, and so the Rockefeller

faction here is working feverishly to head off the Bolshevik nuclear

war plan.



   The new anti-Bolshevik rulers of Russia are also against nuclear

war. The anti-Bolshevik, anti-nuclear-war attitudes of the Rockefeller

cartel and the Kremlin has led to a limited coalition between them in

recent months. The most spectacular result so far from this

Rockefeller-Russian coalition is the Falklands war now raging between

Argentina and Britain. In AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last month I reported

what the Falklands war is all about. It is the visible aftermath to

covert warfare which took place during April. The Rockefeller cartel

and the Russians joined forces to destroy certain major military

installations and weapons reserves. These were key ingredients in the

final phase of the PROJECT Z war plan.



   The whole operation began at South Georgia Island on April 3. With

the help of Argentina a joint Rockefeller-Russian commando team was

able to knock out the giant hidden naval base there. The base, built

during the 1960s, was originally controlled through the United States

Government by the Rockefeller cartel, but the Bolsheviks here acquired

control of the bases about three years ago when they seized control of

the American Pentagon.



   Last month I detailed how the attack on the base was carried out.

It was contained within a giant man-made cavern hollowed out inside a

mountain near the water. With the camouflaged ship entrances sealed

up, the base was bombproof; but the joint Rockefeller-Russian commando

team succeeded in attacking the base by drilling a shaft through the

mountain. Then a compact Russian neutron bomb was inserted through the

shaft and detonated inside the cavernous naval base. The process took

several weeks. The Thatcher government, which  like the United States

Pentagon is Bolshevik controlled, dispatched the Royal Navy. First, it

was supposed to dislodge the heavily-armed Rockefeller-Russian

military force before it could destroy the naval base; then it was to

move on to the Falkl ands for the publicly-admitted fighting.



   The Royal Navy arrived several days too late to save the secret

base on South Georgia Island, as I reported last month; but by that

time the panicking Thatcher government had already committed some

two-thirds of the Royal Navy to the South Atlantic. On top of that, at

least one British ship had already been sunk by Russia in connection

with the secret South Georgia operation. That left the Thatcher

government with no choice but to engage Argentina in battle, otherwise

it would have been impossible to explain away Britain's huge

deployment to the South Atlantic, much less the heavy losses which had

been sustained.



   When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last month on April 30 the

British blockade of the Falklands was just beginning. Later that day

the entity President Reagan announced that the United States was

actively siding with Britain. The announcement was a victory for the

Pentagon war faction. Right away warfare around the Falklands started

heating up fast. On May 1 the British launched bombing raids against

the airport at Port Stanley, and on May 2 a British submarine

torpedoed Argentina's second largest ship, the cruiser General

Belgrano. It sank within 24 hours, leaving a death toll of more than

300 Argentine sailors. The sinking of the Belgrano was expected to

demoralize the Argentines, but instead it enraged them. The Belgrano

had been sunk at a time when it was not threatening the British

forces. The Argentines decided it was time to start playing their ace

in the hole against Britain.



   Last month I reported that Argentina had been given certain

promises in return for making the secret South Georgia operation

possible. One of these was the promise of covert military assistance

by Russia against Britain. Specifically, it was pledged that the

Russians would intervene in parallel with Argentine air and naval

operations in ways designed to even the odds. In this way Argentina's

military leaders can take full credit for both their own and covert

Russian attacks on the British. At the same time, this procedure is

designed to keep Russia's role in the fighting obscure.



   On May 4 the Argentine Air Force decided to put Russia's promises

to the test. A pair of Fighter bombers headed out over the Atlantic to

attack the Royal Navy. Acting on reconnaissance data provided by

Russian Spy Satellites, they headed straight for the fleet. As the two

low-flying Argentine jets appeared on the horizon, they were picked up

by British fleet radar. At the same time, a Russian Cosmosphere

hovering many miles above the fleet took final aim at one of the

ships. The ship was one of Britain's newest, most modern, most

sophisticated ships, designed specifically to shield the fleet against

air attack. The ship was a Type-42 guided missile destroyer, H.M.S.

Sheffield. Long before the two Argentine jets were close enough to

attack, the Cosmosphere fired its charged particle beam-weapon

downward at the ship. The white-hot beam of subatomic particles

blasted through the aluminum superstructure just behind the bridge

near the top of the ship. In a split second the beam seared through

layers of metal downward into the bowels of the ship. The aluminum of

the ship itself was instantly ablaze. The Argentine Fighter pilots

witnessed the spectacular explosion and intense white flames from

nearly 20 miles away. They promptly turned back toward home, having

expended no missiles. Bewildered survivors from the Sheffield later

said there had been no warning before the blast.



   Argentina's leaders are being coached by Rockefeller cartel

operatives in what to say publicly about war developments. They claim

that a French-made missile called the Exocet had been used to sink the

Sheffield; but to those who know the characteristics of the Exocet

missile, the Sheffield disaster remained a mystery.



   The Exocet, my friends, is a type of missile known as a

sea-skimmer. It's designed to skim along just above the water,

striking a ship almost at the water line. File films of the Exocet

which have been shown on TV clearly show this behavior. But the

Sheffield was blasted close to the very top of the superstructure; in

fact, that is said to be the reason for the relatively low casualty

toll in the destruction of H.M.S. Sheffield. Had the same blast been

aimed low close to the waterline, the ship probably would have heeled

over and sunk fast. Had that happened, very few of the crew would have

escaped.



   On the evening of May 4, Admiral Martin Wemyss, former director of

the British naval warfare, was interviewed about the Sheffield

disaster on ABC Nightline. Ted Koppel began with the words:



  "Admiral Wemyss, how is it that such a modern ship would not have

been able to first of all detect and then destroy that Argentine

aircraft?"



Admiral Wemyss answered, quote:



  "I think that's an extremely good question, and I cannot give you a

straight answer. In my book, this should not have happened."



   For the next two weeks talks between Argentina and Britain

continued with United Nations Secretary General Perez de Cuellar

attempting to mediate.



   Meanwhile, the Thatcher government continued to add to the British

armada in the South Atlantic. Even the luxury liner Queen Elizabeth II

was commandeered and turned into a troop ship. It sailed with some

3200 troops aboard on May 12.



   The strategy of the Bolshevik-dominated Thatcher government is very

simple, my friends. They know very well they are sending the Royal

Navy into a trap, but they believe that by multiplying naval strength

in the South Atlantic virtually beyond reason, they will win. They are

making the British commitment so huge compared to that of Argentina

that a total Argentine rout of the British would look unreasonable. It

would enable the question of covert Russian aid to Argentina to be

raised openly and credibly, and that could help set off the very

nuclear war which they know Russia is trying to avoid.



   Following this brute-force strategy, the Thatcher government has

continued to pour every available ship into the South Atlantic fray.

As of now, over 100 British ships are either in the war zone or

heading toward it. That's almost the entire Royal Navy! The attitude

is: for every ship the Russians and Argentineans sink, the Thatcher

government will just send two more--anything to make sure Britain

retakes the Falklands because if that is not accomplished, the

Thatcher government will fall and that will be a setback to Bolshevik

power in Britain.



   On May 19 the last ditch talks at the United Nations finally

collapsed. Britain was ready at last to invade. After talks ended that

evening, it was announced that the British War Cabinet would meet the

following morning. Supposedly the meeting would decide whether to give

the go-ahead for invasion--but it was all a ruse to help create an

element of surprise against Argentina and against Russia.



   The first stage of an elaborate invasion strategy was already going

into action. On the evening of May 19 the British invasion fleet was

divided up into two groups--one group was 150 miles due east of Port

Stanley; the other, 100 miles to the northeast. Shortly before

midnight Washington time, both invasion forces started heading toward

shore. Russian Cosmospheres and submarines went into action working

together. Both British assault groups came under fire. At least two

ships critical to the assault were hit and heavily damaged. By 2:00

A.M. Washington time both assault forces aborted their moves toward

the Port Stanley area. In response, Russian forces disengaged. The

Russians believed they had thwarted the British invasion; but, my

friends, they were wrong.



   The two large invasion groups threatening Port Stanley the night of

May 19 were actually carrying out a diversionary action. British

strategists knew that the Russians had the muscle available to stop

any invasion. The only chance of success lay in convincing the

Russians that they had stopped the invasion, and then somehow sneaking

troops ashore. So the two large invasion forces of May 19 actually

were st aging a decoy action! Most of the British invasion troops were

no longer aboard the troop carrier Canberra or the assault ships.

Instead, they had been transferred to other ships which normally are

not used for amphibious purposes.



   On the morning of May 20 the elaborate British deception continued.

Up until the previous day, British statements had been referring to an

imminent all-out invasion, but on the morning of May 20 the statements

changed abruptly. British Defense Ministry spokesmen suddenly started

saying that the British would confine themselves to small hit-and-run

raids for a while. The Bolshevik military planners in London wanted to

further convince Russia that the invasion had been stopped the

previous night. It worked.



   Small groups of British ships began moving around the Falklands as

if to plant small raiding parties here and there. In the early morning

darkness of May 21 one of these small groups of ships moved into the

north end of Falkland Sound between the Islands. Contrary to press

reports, the troop ship Canberra was not among them, nor was an

assault ship. Those ships would have tipped off the Russians

monitoring everything from Cosmospheres far above that a major landing

was afoot. Instead, the key ship that moved into San Carlos Bay was

the hospital ship Uganda. Under cover of darkness the Uganda moved

close to shore. British assault troops, crammed like sardines into the

Uganda, clambered down the sides of the ship on rope ladders into

motor launches. The launches ferried the troops a short distance

ashore, one group after another. As soon as they were ashore, the

troops had orders to spread out fast. In that way they rendered

themselves unsuitable targets for any attack by the Russian

Cosmospheres patrolling miles above. Particle beam-weapons are

devastating against concentrated targets but very inefficient against

personnel scattered over a wide area. By dawn other ships had also

disembarked troops in the same manner. By the time daylight revealed

what was really going on, it was too late. The British invasion of the

Falklands was underway. Once the British got ashore with a sizeable

number of troops, Britain's chances of regaining control of the

Islands started increasing fast. Covert Russian help for the

Argentines is much more feasible at sea and in the air than on land.



   In the past 10 days we've heard about a number of devastating air

attacks by the Argentines. Up to now the British have admitted losing

at least five ships plus several helicopters and Harrier Jump-jets,

but slowly the British ground forces have been reinforced and started

advancing across East Falkland Island towards Port Stanley. As of

today, May 31, British ground forces are said to be closing in on the

main Argentine garrison at Port Stanley. The operation is being

portrayed in the news here as a relatively easy task, but that is far

from true.



   British casualties in land battle have been far greater than

admitted, and at sea the Royal Navy has taken very heavy losses that

are not even hinted at so far in the news. Many ships have been badly

damaged; and all--I repeat, ALL--of the original contingent of the Sea

Harrier Jump-jets have been put out of action. Both British aircraft

carriers, the Hermes and the Invincible, have been rendered incapable

of launching jets. The Harriers now operating around the Falklands are

a different type from the sharp-nosed, blue-painted Sea Harriers. They

are painted in green and brown camouflage. My friends, they are United

States Marine Corps Harriers, and they are operating from an American

ship!



   The things I am revealing here, my friends, are at variance with

official stories, but this is the war you never see. Photos of British

amphibious exercises taken at Ascension Island were passed off as

pictures of the Falklands invasion. British Broadcasting Corporation

broadcasting facilities on Ascension Island were taken over weeks ago

by British military. Now we hear daily reports from Ascension Island

that are claimed to be originating with the task force. Even more than

usual, the truth has been the first casualty in the Falklands war.



   The Bolshevik military planners here and in the Thatcher government

in Britain are trying to find some way to use the Falklands war for

their own purposes. Up to now they still are not slowing down in their

fast timetable for NUCLEAR WAR ONE.



   Within a few short weeks there will be a highly visible clue to the

status of the Bolshevik nuclear war schedule. I am referring, my

friends, to the upcoming fourth space shuttle flight. All the space

shuttle flights up to now have been military in nature, as I have

detailed in the past. The space shuttle is the Pentagon's only hope to

regain a military toe hold in space for the coming war. Now for the

first time it is even being admitted that the next shuttle flight will

be military.



   Shuttle flight #4 is presently scheduled for June 27, less than a

month from now. If some excuse is found to delay the flight, it will

reflect a slowdown in the nuclear war plans of the Pentagon; but if

Shuttle #4 takes off on schedule, it will indicate that the Bolsheviks

here are still sticking to their September war-deadline.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 I reported that for the first time the

shuttle had been successful in its prime military mission. A hardened

laser-armed Super-Spy Satellite was orbited in March to obtain fresh

reconnaissance data on Russia. It's the first updating of Russian

target data since Russia destroyed America's Spy Satellites some four

years ago. Target data from the new satellite has now been integrated

into the PROJECT Z nuclear war plan which I made public in AUDIO

LETTER No. 73.



   Now, Space Shuttle #4 is being prepared for a different mission.

Under the PROJECT Z war plan, the coming nuclear war will begin with a

surprise nuclear attack by American Stealth planes into Russia. They

will attempt to knock out all of Russia's space bases--four

Cosmodromes for rockets plus Cosmosphere installations in Siberia. If

all goes as planned, all of these installations will be blown up with

H-bombs simultaneously. As soon as that happens, the rest of America's

nuclear arsenal is to be launched at Russia, as I have described

before.



   But there remains one weak point in the Bolshevik first-strike plan

against Russia. As it stands now, the Bolsheviks here will have to

assume that the first phase of the attack plan has succeeded as of a

given time. The reason is that the United States currently has no

means of verifying if the initial Stealth attack has succeeded. When

Russia destroyed America's Spy Satellites four years ago she also

destroyed our high-flying Early Warning Satellites. That leaves the

Bolshevik war planners hare without any way to tell if their bombs

have exploded in Russia. Space Shuttle #4 is intended to solve that

problem within weeks from now!



   The supersecret Department of Defense pay load is a cryogenic

infrared Sensor System. It's designed to look down at Russia from

geostationary orbit. It will detect the explosions of American H-bombs

in Russia when it happens. The moment that it flashes a signal

confirming the explosions to the Pentagon, the rest of the American

nuclear first-strike against Russia will be set in motion.



   In order to do its job, the Air Force infrared Sensor has to be

placed in geostationary orbit. That orbit is over 22,000 miles high

over the equator. The shuttle itself cannot go that high; it can only

go to low Earth orbit, perhaps 150 miles up. To take the Air Force

Sensor System the rest of the way, it has to be mounted on a rocket.

The shuttle will carry the whole assembly--Sensor System, rocket, and

all--into low Earth orbit. From there the rocket will take the Sensor

System out to the desired location far above the equator.



   My friends, as of now the countdown toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE is still

being continued by the Bolshevik war planners in the Pentagon. The

Falklands crisis began as an effort to prevent or delay nuclear war,

but it may instead end up helping to set off that very war! If so,

America's fourth  space shuttle flight could turn out to be America's

final manned mission into space.



   The Air Force sensor to verify success of America's coming initial

attack on Russia will eventually be destroyed by Russian space

weapons. Before that can happen, the Bolshevik planners in the

Pentagon will try to set off NUCLEAR WAR ONE.



Topic #2--For two months now the Falklands crisis has dominated the

news. Likewise, the growing threat of nuclear war and mounting

anti-nuclear sentiment have been making headlines; but for millions of

Americans, a different crisis seems far more important. It is a

long-term crisis which has been with us for many years now. This

mounting crisis, my friends, is that of the crumbling United States

economy and the United States dollar.



   Just this month, May 1982, there has been all sorts of bad news on

the economic front. On May 7 the Government announced that

unemployment, as officially calculated, had reached 9.4 per cent, the

highest level since the Great Depression. And just five days later

there was another shock--Braniff Airlines abruptly terminated

operations and filed for bankruptcy. It was the first time ever that a

United States trunk airline had failed. Braniff, like more and more

other businesses, was brought down by a mountain of debt. With

interest rates remaining sky high in the midst of a deep recession,

more and more companies simply cannot survive. Production cutbacks,

layoffs, and bankruptcies are continuing to spread, and more and more

people are losing their jobs. This recession is especially cruel

because it is an inflationary recession.



   We're now living in the STAGFLATION era which I warned about in my

book THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR nearly ten years ago. The

deliberate plans which were set in motion long ago to destroy the

United States dollar are now far advanced.



   Since 1970 the combined effects of inflation and taxes have cut the

purchasing power of the dollar by 55 per cent. A family of four living

on $10,000 in 1970 would need well over $23,000 in 1982 just to stay

even, and this historically unprecedented collapse of the dollar is

continuing even as people are thrown out of work.



   For months now the battle over the federal budget has been dragging

on, day in, day out. We're told constantly that the budget is the key

to bringing down the incredible interest rates that are killing the

economy, and yet somehow it seems that no one can agree about what the

budget should be. One budget proposal after another has come up for

consideration only to be voted down. First, there was the Reagan

Administration budget which went nowhere. Then all kinds of

alternative budgets started being proposed. There have been Republican

budgets, Democrat budgets, Conservative budgets, Liberal budgets,

compromise budgets; and every single budget proposed so far has been

voted down. There is more and more talk that the federal budget

process has gone sour, that there is something fundamentally wrong. On

May 28 the entity President Reagan denounced the budget process while

he was in Santa Barbara, California, to make a speech. He said, quote:



  "The United States Government's program for presenting a budget, or

arriving at a budget, is about the most irresponsible, Mickey-Mouse

arrangement that any governmental body has ever practiced. It's called

the 'President's Budget' and yet there is nothing binding about it. It

is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to consider it."



   My friends, please note carefully how this criticism by the

President was phrased. I suggest you stop your recorder and play it

back again because the entity Reagan was not just delivering a

standard political tongue-lashing at his political opponents. He was

condemning the process itself, and he added, quote:



  "I think that some real solid thinking should be given now to a

budgeting process that befits the great government of a great nation."



   My friends, Reagan's choice of Santa Barbara, California, for this

statement was symbolic. It so happens that the so-called "solid

thinking" he recommended for a new budgeting process has already been

done; and as the President knows very well, that thinking was done in

Santa Barbara at a tax-exempt foundation called the "Center for Study

of Democratic Institutions." That is where the secret new Constitution

for America was written, including detailed new provisions for the

budgeting process!



   Seven years ago in 1975 I published a pamphlet in which I reviewed

the secret new Constitution from a legal perspective. The entire text

of the new Constitution is contained in the pamphlet. If you have a

copy, you can read about the proposed new budget process for yourself.

It's all there in black and white. Important passages to look at

include:



   ARTICLE IV--THE PLANNING BRANCH, Sections 2, 4, and 7;

   ARTICLE V--THE PRESIDENCY, Section 1, and

   ARTICLE VI-(b)--THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Section 8.



   What you will discover if you trace through the budget process

described in the new Constitution is very significant. When all the

legal-sounding mumbo jumbo is stripped away, the whole budget process

turns out to be firmly under the thumb of the President.



   For example, Reagan complained in Santa Barbara that the

"President's Budget", quote:



  "...is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to

consider it."



   My friends, the secret new Constitution would fix that. ARTICLE

VI-(b), Section 8 begins, quote:



  "The House shall consider promptly the annual budget."



What's more, the House is given no role in formulating the Budget. If

they dare to object to anything, the Budget goes back to the Planning

Board, so called, controlled by, you guessed it, the President.



   The Reagan blast about the budget process is just the latest of an

on-going series of covert moves to pave the way for the new

Constitution. What makes this one more significant is that it is tied

in with powerful economic forces which are intended to speed up the

process.



   Through months of contrived haggling, the "kept" Congress has been

sensitizing Americans to the budget problem and they have been doing

it at a time when uncertainty over the Budget is being blamed for

worsening economic woes!



   Now along comes the President saying that the solution is to change

the whole process.



   The growing Budget crisis is also tied in with another major change

which the entity President Reagan has been publicly advocating. That

change, my friends, is the proposed "Balanced Budget Amendment" to our

present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.



   There is a drive underway right now to call a Constitutional

Convention in order to introduce a balanced budget amendment. Already

most of the required number of states have ratified the call for such

a convention! At the moment, if just three (3) more states ratify it,

a Constitutional Convention will be legally required to be called. The

excuse for calling a Constitutional Convention would be to introduce

the Balanced Budget Amendment. The problem is that once a convention

is called, there's no way to keep it from turning into a runaway

convention, re-writing the entire CONSTITUTION! In fact, that's

exactly how our present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION was created. The

original idea was to simply amend the "Articles of Confederation"; but

once the Convention was through, a totally new constitution emerged.



   Those who are behind the drive for a new Constitutional Convention

now want the same thing to happen again; and if it does, they have

their model for a carefully manicured  DICTATORSHIP Constitution ready

to go!



   In the past there have been several other drives like the present

one to call a Constitutional Convention. Each has been built around

some pet idea of one kind or another, but each time the drive has

fizzled out. Enough people have recognized the danger of a runaway

Constitutional Convention to prevent its happening. This time, though,

the danger is much greater than ever before because this time the

excuse for the proposed convention is tied directly to people's

pocketbook s.



   We're being told by various financial spokesmen on television that

high interest rates are responsible for our economic woes, which is a

half truth. We are also told that government deficits are responsible

for keeping those disastrous interest rates high. Then we are treated

to the spectacle of a government seemingly unable to decide on a

budget. And, finally, whenever a budget is passed, it will contain the

biggest deficits in history--well over one hundred billion dollars.



   Against that background, the promise of relief by way of the

Balanced Budget Amendment may prove too tempting to resist. If so, the

drive to call a Constitutional Convention will succeed, and in the

process we Americans will have sold our birthright for a mess of

pottage!



   My friends, all of this may sound almost irrelevant right now in

view of the specter of possible nuclear war by the end of summer, but

never forget that the plans for war are the plans of men, nothing

more. Those plans have a way of going awry in many cases; and in the

case of those nuclear war plans, feverish attempts are underway to

make them go awry.



   The Bolshevik war planners who control the Pentagon want nuclear

war; but their anti-Bolshevik enemies who now rule Russia don't want

war and are trying to prevent it. Likewise, the Rockefeller cartel

here in America is in a power struggle against the Bolsheviks in an

attempt to stop the war plan.



   If the Rockefeller interests do succeed in regaining control of the

United States Government, they plan to stop the Bolshevik war

countdown. But the Rockefeller group are fighting this battle only for

themselves, my friends, not for you or me! It is they who are behind

the secret new Constitution and the drive for a Constitutional

Convention. If they succeed in beating the Bolsheviks here, they

intend to capitalize. With their secret new Constitution they plan to

bring us under their domination more completely than ever before.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 72 three months ago I reported that a military

coup d'etat was in gestation here in Washington. This is to be a coup

by the Rockefeller cartel operatives within the Government against

Bolshevik operatives. The man in charge is a four-star

General--Alexander Haig.



   Up to now the anti-Bolshevik coup has not been accomplished, but it

is gaining ground. One major gain for the Rockefeller faction occurred

last month while all eyes were on the Falklands crisis. On April 21 it

was announced that Admiral Bobby Inman, Deputy Director of the CIA,

had "resigned" (quote) effective immediately. Inman was forced out by

the Rockefeller faction. He was replaced with lightning speed by John

McMann, a career professional with the CIA!



   It was the Rockefellers who created the CIA long ago as their own

private detective agency, and now they are working fast to

re-establish the control which they lost over the CIA three years ago.



   The infighting between the Rockefeller and Bolshevik factions

within the Government is growing more intense as the war fuse burns

shorter and shorter. President Reagan and Secretary Haig are both

under tight security. This summer of 1982 will be dangerous for them

and for America.



Topic #3--On the evening of May 16 millions of Americans tuned their

television sets to NBC to watch the first installment of a special

mini-series. It was a lavish portrayal of the travels and adventures

of Marco Polo. For the next four nights viewers were treated to a

spectacular re-enactment of Marco Polo's experiences as he traveled to

China. Interspersed with those scenes of adventure and splendor were

brief scenes depicting what happened to Marco Polo after he returned

home to Venice. He dared to speak of places he had been and things he

had seen that conflicted with the dogma of the day, and so he was

tried for heresy.



   Today in 1982 we like to think of ourselves as too enlightened to

close our minds like the inquisitors of Marco Polo, but the fact is

that even today those who challenge preconceived notions are quickly

branded as heretics and the like. There was a perfect example of this

on Sunday morning May 16. Ironically it was the same day as the

beginning of the Marco Polo series. My friends, I'm referring to the

interview of evangelist Dr. Billy Graham on the ABC news program "This

Week with David Brinkley."



   Dr. Graham had just returned to England from participating in a

five-day religious conference in Moscow, Russia, of all places. He was

one of more than 400 religious leaders from 80 nations who attended

the conference. They were there at the invitation of the Russian

Orthodox Church which sponsored the Conference. A large fraction of

those who attended were Christian leaders such as Dr. Graham, but

there were also many representatives of the world's other great

religions. They were not there to convert, to compete, or to condemn

one another. Instead it was a rare opportunity for these leaders to

form bridges of mutual understanding, something which is all too often

neglected in our world.



   It was a religious conference the likes of which the world has not

seen for more than 80 years. The last time anything like this took

place was before 1900. It was held here in America, in Chicago, and it

was called "The Parliament of Religions." There were some who feared

that historic meeting of the minds and have condemned it ever since.

As a result, it has never been repeated here in America; but I submit,

my friends, that those fears were groundless. The Parliament of

Religions did not destroy Christianity or turn Americans overnight

into Buddhists, Moslems, or Hindus. What it did do was to establish

bonds of understanding and respect for a while where they had been

lacking before. My friends, it is a psychological fact that it is

usually hard to hate another person if you get to know him. That is

why any government bent on war tries to dehumanize and depersonalize

the enemy.



   From the turn of the century onward, the United States Government

has been controlled by elements who cherish war as an instrument of

policy, so we see no more Parliaments of Religion here in America.



   By contrast, the government of Russia has undergone a drastic

transformation in recent years. Russia's new rulers are Christians, as

I have been reporting for nearly five years. After an agonizing

struggle of six decades, these tough native Russians have finally

gained the upper hand over the Satanic Bolsheviks there. Over three

years ago the growing power of the Kremlin Christians started

producing startling changes in public. For example, for Easter 1979

Handel's "Messiah" was performed in Russia for the very first time

since the Bolshevik Revolution! And several months before that, in

January 1979, the first legal shipment of Bibles into Russia since

1917 had taken place. The American Bible Society had asked the Russian

government for permission, and it had been granted.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 44 over three years ago I issued an appeal to

America's Christian leaders to take a stand for peace before it was

too late. What I suggested was a "Pilgrimage for Peace" to Moscow.

It's purpose would have been to begin new ties of trust and

understanding with the new Christian rulership of Russia. In that way

America's churchmen had the opportunity to take the initiative in a

concrete way to help head off nuclear catastrophe. The response, as I

reported later, was pathetic. To the everlasting shame of America's

Christian community, only a tiny handful of Christian leaders

expressed any interest at all! The Christian leaders of America by and

large refused to hold out the hand of Christian fellowship to their

brothers in Russia.



   But now, a pilgrimage for peace has been made to Moscow after all.

Since America's Christian leaders would not bother to take the

initiative, those of Russia did so instead! They invited religious

leaders the world over to make a pilgrimage for peace to Moscow, and

they called their five-day assembly the, quote:



  "Conference of Religious Workers for Saving the Sacred Gift of Life

from Nuclear Catastrophe."



   When Billy Gra ham and some other Western Christian leaders arrived

in Moscow, they soon discovered that it was not as they had beenled

to expect. Dr. Graham discovered that there was no attempt to restrict

him in his religious messages. He was also allowed more freedom of

movement than he had expected. On the Saturday evening before the

Conference began, Dr. Graham decided to pay unannounced visits to

several Moscow churches. He went to three different Russian Orthodox

Churches and was shocked to find that they were filled to capacity

with worshippers. As he said later in a news conference, quote:



  "You would never get that in Charlotte, North Carolina."



Dr. Graham made a number of statements about his experiences in Moscow

which all seem to add up to one thing: there is a lot more Christian

worship going on in Russia than he apparently expected and with

greater freedom.



   When Billy Graham returned to the West he must have felt a little

like a religious Marco Polo. He had journeyed to the forbidden East

and discovered that it is not populated by gremlins and horrible

beasts. Instead he had come away with his heart strangely "warmed"

(quote). Perhaps he expected that the folks back home would welcome

his unexpected good news. After all, our whole Christian faith is

built on Good News--the Gospel of our LORD Jesus Christ. But if that

is what Billy Graham expected, he was sadly mistaken.



   When he returned to the West, he came back not to people eager to

hear more of his good news, but to hostility and condemnation! We're

always told that Russia is an atheistic country and beyond redemption,

and so by definition Billy Graham's words about even limited religious

freedom in Russia constituted heresy. He ran into a buzz saw of

critics determined to cut him down for saying a good word about

Russia!



   It began right away with slanted reports about his statements in

the major media. At one point Dr. Graham mentioned that in Russia his

comments had been reported accurately in the press. By contrast,

reports here in the United States were distorted, and quoted him out

of context.



   A perfect example of the treatment now being given Dr. Graham was

his May 16 interview on ABC's "This Week with David Brinkley." It was

called an interview, but inquisition would be a better description.

Every suggestion that Christians may be better off in Russia today

than in the past was met with hostility. Time after time after time

Dr. Graham was interrupted and attacked before he could even finish

making his point, and many of the questions in the best tradition of

heresy trials were designed to declare Graham guilty before he could

even answer!



   To take just one example: at one point the ideological writer

George F. Will mentioned an incident in which a peace protestor was

subdued by Russian police. Then he asked--and this is an exact quote:



  "Given that evidence that there is no, and is not about to be, any

peace movement in the Soviet Union, wasn't it clear to you from the

start that this propaganda festival to which you were going was used

simply to encourage a unilateral peace pressure and disarmament

pressure in the West?"



My friends, a so-called question like that is the tool of a

prosecutor, not an objective reporter. In one breath he claimed that

there is no peace movement in Russia as if it were a fact, accused Dr.

Graham of knowingly cooperating in Soviet propaganda, implied that all

the world religious leaders who attended were stooges, and ignored the

world-wide representation at the Conference saying it was all aimed at

the West. Accusing questions like that were fired at Dr. Graham

throughout the program. The only break in this inquisition came when

Dr. Graham was removed from the discussion for a while--then everyone

else sat around and ripped him up one side and down the other in his

absence, for his 'heresies.'



   In spite of the grossly unfair treatment, Rev. Graham made some

very telling points. He mentioned that many other American Christian

leaders were also at the Moscow Conference and that still others have

gone there separately, and he said there are many, quote:



  "...that would hold different viewpoints than what is being

expressed here today. I'm a little surprised that we don't have some

of those people."



Perhaps Dr. Graham's most telling comment came fairly early in the

program; perhaps it was partly responsible for the frenzied bitterness

of some of the attacks on him later in the program. Rev. Graham said,

and I quote:



  "Now when people go to China today, for example, they are applauded

for going to China. It's wonderful to go to China, but there is not as

much religious freedom in China as there is in the Soviet Union."



   My friends, Billy Graham was exactly right in that statement. I

have reported the same thing in my AUDIO LETTER reports. The favorable

image now being given to Red China is purely political and military in

its origins. Unfortunately some church-related groups are being used

for these political purposes!



   What Dr. Graham may not know is the reason for the violent attacks

he has endured lately. My friends, he has run afoul of the American

Bolshevik nuclear-war lobby here. They want to use you and me to do

their dirty work for them against Russia. That is what their

nuclear-war plans are all about, and so at all costs they must not let

us know that Christianity is reviving today in Russia. Even more, they

dare not let the American people know that the true leadership of

Russia today is Christian because if we all knew that, my friends, we

would never agree to their plans to destroy Christian Russia in a

thermonuclear war.



                       LAST MINUTE SUMMARY



   Now it's time for my Last Minute Summary. In this AUDIO LETTER I've

tried to bring you up to date on the progress of plans to throw

America into nuclear war against Russia. The countdown by the

Bolshevik war planners who now control the Pentagon is still

continuing. Their war plans have been damaged by the Falklands war,

but they are trying to turn that conflict to their own ends.



   Meanwhile, the countdown for Space Shuttle Flight #4 with its

secret military pay load is still on schedule. If the mission

succeeds, the danger of nuclear war will increase dramatically.



   The summer of 1982, my friends, promises to be a dangerous time for

America. As of now, NUCLEAR WAR ONE could be as little as three months

away, but the Bolsheviks here have enemies who are trying to stop the

war-countdown.



   Here in the United States the Rockefeller cartel is continuing its

power struggle to take back control of the Government from the

Bolsheviks. As part of that struggle, the preparations for a military

coup d'etat led by General Alexander Haig are making progress.

Likewise, the Russians are continuing to try in their own ways to

prevent the war. Unlike the Rockefeller cartel, the Russians are doing

this for moral reasons.



   This month, May 1982, religious leaders from around the world

gathered in a religious conference to take a stand for peace. If the

conference had been held, say in Washington, D.C., we would be hearing

nothing but praise about it; but it was held instead in Moscow,

Russia, and for that reason alone it has been condemned here in the

United States. Those who dare to honestly report the favorable

surprises they encountered there are being castigated as heretics. The

most visible of these is Rev. Billy Graham. For describing what he

actually saw and experienced, honestly and without prejudice, he is

being crucified on all sides.



   My friends, the same thing will happen to you if you dare to speak

up about the things you know; but if you do not speak up to your

friends, to your neighbors, to your relatives, they may never know why

we are heading toward nuclear catastrophe. So I urge you to speak now,

and remember the promise of our LORD Jesus Christ. He said:



  "Blessed are they who are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for

theirs is the kingdom of heaven."



   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and

may God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

