From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. N.W., Washington,

D.C. 20006.



   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is June 6, 1981, and

this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 65.



   Wednesday afternoon May 13 was a beautiful sunny afternoon in Rome.

At the Vatican thousands of people were gathered in St. Peter's

Square. They were waiting for the regular Wednesday afternoon audience

by the man known to the world as Pope John Paul II. Right on time he

made his appearance. As usual, he was standing in a special jeep-like

vehicle, waving to the crowd as the vehicle drove slowly around the

Square. Inside the walls of the Vatican that afternoon it was a scene

of peace and cheer. It was as if the insane rush of a troubled world

had been locked outside for a few precious moments. Filled with a sea

of smiling faces, St. Peter's Square seemed immune from the presence

of evil. Suddenly the illusion was shattered. There was the sound of

gun fire, and the man known as the Pope crumpled and fell. As the

crowd looked on in disbelief, the papal vehicle sped up and rushed out

of St. Peter's Square. In a matter of moments the scene of tranquility

had been transformed into one of tragedy. Gone were all the smiles;

and in their place, tears. For days afterward people the world over

were asking just one question: "Why would anyone shoot the Pope?"



   My friends, the answer to that question will never be revealed by

the controlled major media. The Vatican has become just one more

battleground in the secret war now raging world-wide. The stakes

involve the fate of over 700,000,000 Roman Catholics--one-sixth of the

human race.



   The man accused of the shooting reportedly said right away that he

had acted alone. As an excuse he said he was protesting against the

turmoil in Afghanistan and El Salvador. Then there were reports,

especially here in the United States, that perhaps he was tied in with

the Palestinians in some way. One story followed another in rapid

succession. Meanwhile the Italian police quickly found many clues that

the would-be assassin Mehmet Agca could not have acted alone. All the

evidence pointed clearly to a conspiracy. In Europe conspiracies are

known and recognized to be a fact of life and so they are not

pooh-poohed when they are discovered, but here in America it is

different. We're treated like gullible children and taught that the

legal word "conspiracy" is a No-No. We must never think that greedy,

powerful men would ever work together to carry out their plans.



   My friends, there's a very good reason why we are never allowed to

think seriously about conspiracies. The reason is that a very small

elite number of people are trying to control all the rest of us. There

are an awful lot of us, and only a few of them. The only way they can

corral us and herd us around like sheep is to keep us ignorant of what

they are doing. Keeping you ignorant is the very essence of their

power. That, my friends, is why plots and conspiracies of all kinds

are kept secret, and that's why the biggest conspiracy of all is the

conspiracy of SILENCE. It's a conspiracy to keep you and me in the

dark so that the forces of darkness can continue unhampered. The one

thing they fear most is the TRUTH, known and understood by the people,

because the Truth is the Sword of our Lord Jesus Christ.



   My friends, I live to know the truth, to understand the truth, and

to speak the truth. I want to do my part so that the truth will

continue to have a life of its own throughout our universe. I believe

there is nothing more important than to look for the truth, and keep

an open mind to receive it, because without the Truth people perish.



   My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:



Topic #1--THE POPE, THE PRESIDENT, AND ASSASSINATION POLITICS Topic

#2--THE AFTERMATH OF THE SHUTTLE "COLUMBIA" DISASTER Topic

#3--MOUNTING WORLD CRISES AND "ACCIDENTAL" NUCLEAR WAR.



Topic #1--In August 1978 the Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church

were called into conclave at the Vatican. Pope Paul VI had died

earlier that month, and the Cardinals faced the task of choosing his

successor--a new pope. From all around the world the Cardinals

converged on Rome for the papal conclave. As they did so, the news was

filled with speculation about the presumed leading candidates for the

papacy. Many were convinced that the conclave would be a long one;

instead, it turned out to be one of the shortest papal conclaves in

history. Voting by the Cardinals began on August 26, 1978, and that

very same day there was white smoke from the Vatican. The Catholic

Church had a new pope.



   Vatican watchers were astonished at the speed of the papal

election. They were even more astonished by the identity of the new

pope. He was not one of the acknowledged front runners but a complete

outsider to the Vatican power structure. The little known Cardinal

Luciani of Venice had become pope--Pope John Paul I. The following

day, August 27, 1978, I recorded my AUDIO LETTER No. 37. In that

report I gave a warning about the true significance of the stunning

surprise at the Vatican.



   The atheistic Bolsheviks, who have lost their former power in

Russia, will stop at nothing in their frenzy to regain that power. To

that end, the Bolsheviks were launching a ruthless campaign to seize

control of a tremendous weapon, the Roman Catholic Church. The

Bolshevik goal was, and still is, to turn some 700,000,000 Catholics

actively anti-Russian.



   For the next few weeks there was no visible hint about the secret

conspiracy which I had reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 37. Instead, Pope

John Paul I quickly endeared himself to millions as the "smiling

Pope." Then came the shock of September 28, 1978. After a mere 33 days

we were told that Pope John Paul I had died, suddenly and

unexpectedly, and the man who succeeded him 2-1/2 weeks later was

another surprise. He was the first non-Italian pope in 455 years and

the first Slavic pope ever. He was from bitterly anti-Soviet Poland,

and his reputation was that of a man who stands up to the Soviets. On

October 16, 1978, the former Cardinal Wojtyla of Poland became known

as Pope John Paul II.



   The Bolshevik intrigues and maneuvering in the Vatican continued

right on track. By late 1978 more and more of the pronouncements

issued in the name of Pope John Paul II were anti-Soviet in tone. The

public signs of rapid change in the Vatican were dramatic. Meanwhile

behind closed doors, the forces at work were far more sinister and

revolutionary than most people could ever imagine. I reported on these

developments in AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 39, 41, and 42.



   The Vatican, my friends, had become the setting for assassination

politics in the spiritual warfare between East and West. It had begun

with the surprise election of Cardinal Luciani as Pope John Paul I in

August 1978. He had been thrust into the papacy by forces of which he

was not even aware--Bolshevik forces. They intended to use him for

transitional purposes to begin the anti-Soviet transformation of the

Church, but he had turned out to be hard to manipulate intosaying and

doing what the Bolsheviks wanted, so the Bolshevik agents in the

Vatica n cut short the interim papacy of Pope John Paul I by

assassinating him.



   When the next pope was selected, the Bolsheviks made certain that

his image was made to order for their purposes. When Cardinal Wojtyla

of Poland became Pope John Paul II, it was only his image that the

Bolsheviks wanted. The man himself was strong-minded and independent.

He also had plans for restructuring the Vatican in ways that the

Bolsheviks could not afford. To make sure that Pope John Paul II never

carried out those plans, the Bolsheviks once again resorted to

assassination. The preparations had been made far ahead of time, and

they were carried out without a hitch. In mid November 1978, Pope John

Paul II, the most visible pope in history, virtually dropped out of

sight for a while. As I reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 41, he was being

poisoned, and on November 20, 1978, he succumbed.



   Immediately he was replaced by a "Bolshevik look-alike", an actor;

and the very next day the Vatican announced that the Pope had

re-appointed all of the top officials in the Vatican hierarchy known

as the Curia. The Vatican restructuring, which had been planned by the

late real Pope John Paul II, was snuffed out. The Bolshevik actor-Pope

then proceeded to make maximum use of the anti-Russian image of the

man he had replaced. Doing exactly as he was told, he was stoking up

bitter feelings toward Russia in heavily Catholic Eastern Europe; and

most of all these bitter feelings were being encouraged in Poland, the

most heavily Catholic of all.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 42 I was able to make public where all this was

intended to lead. The Bolsheviks were trying to make Poland explode

against Russia in an uprising to be known as the "Pope's Revolution."

It was to be triggered during a papal visit to Poland in May 1979. The

actor-Pope himself was to provide the spark for revolution in a way

which he himself was not being told. At a critical emotional moment

during his coming trip to Poland, the actor-Pope was to be

assassinated.



   When I made the details of the plan public in AUDIO LETTER No. 42,

the momentum toward a Pope's Revolution was building fast; but if

there is one thing the Russians do not intend to allow, it is a

Bolshevik revolution in Poland. Having learned of the "Pope's

Revolution" plan, the Kremlin directed Poland's leaders to take all

possible steps to minimize the risk. Poland even announced that

foreign journalists entering Poland to cover the Pope's visit would

have to pay very high fees for the privilege. Meanwhile Russian

Intelligence operatives went to work to undo the plan altogether.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 46 I reported that Russia had finally succeeded

in stopping the "Pope's Revolution" plot. In early May 1979 the

Bolshevik actor-Pope was eliminated and replaced by a Russian actor,

another "double." Immediately the Vatican announced that it would

agree to a one-month delay in the papal visit to Poland, as requested

by the Polish government. In that way, a crucial emotional stimulus

for revolution was eliminated.



   As I detailed in AUDIO LETTER No. 42, the original timing of the

papal visit for St. Stanislaus Day had been essential to the plot.

With the threat of revolution averted, Poland then dropped its earlier

demands for high fees by visiting journalists. A month later the

Russian actor-Pope known to the world as Pope John Paul II visited

Poland without mishap.



   The Bolshevik plan for a "Pope's Revolution" in Poland two years

ago was thwarted by the Russians, but the Bolsheviks never give up in

their agitation for revolution and war. Soon they were at work on

Poland through another avenue, the so-called "Solidarity" labor

movement, and at the same time the Bolsheviks have never given up on

their dream of seizing control of the Roman Catholic Church.



   For the past two years the Catholic Church has been moving quietly

in the opposite direction to that desired by the Bolsheviks. The man

known as Pope John Paul II has initiated overtures toward eventual

reunification of the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. If

that were to happen in the present circumstances, it would be an

unmitigated disaster for the Bolsheviks. Catholics in the West and

Russian Orthodox believers in the East would consider themselves

"spiritual brothers" instead of enemies. Worse yet for the Bolsheviks,

a papal visit to Russia has been in the works very quietly in the

Vatican. The Bolsheviks are determined to prevent that from happening;

and, as usual, the Bolsheviks turned to one of their favorite

political techniques--assassination. Early last month the Russian

actor-Pope celebrated a special mass for new Swiss Guards. As if in a

premonition, he warned them that they might be faced with giving their

lives in their role as his protectors. A scant week later, inside the

walls of the Vatican, he was cut down by the bullets of a professional

killer. This time he survived; but as I said before, my friends, the

Bolsheviks never give up.



   My friends, we are once again plunging into an era of assassination

politics. For Americans, the shooting in the Vatican on May 13 created

a sense of deja vu. We had seen it all before as recently as six weeks

earlier right here in our own land. It all looked horribly

familiar--and no wonder. The Satanic forces responsible for the

shooting of the actor-Pope are the same ones who were behind the

shooting of the President. These dark forces, as I have said many

times, are the Bolsheviks. Having lost control of Russia, they now

have a stranglehold on America's government instead.



   When news of the Pope's shooting reached Washington, reporters

asked for reactions from the White House. The resulting national

television news reports that evening were very strange. We were shown

only a "still photograph" of the President with the alleged quote: "I

will pray for him." By contrast, we were then shown the Vice-President

talking with reporters on the White House lawn about the tragedy in

Rome. We saw and heard seemingly heartfelt words of anguish at such

brutal and senseless violence. It was the Vice-President, not the

President, whom we saw expressing the feelings most Americans wanted

to hear.



   This is just one example, my friends, of a subtle but important

pattern in our news these days. A sophisticated program of

psychological conditioning is now under way directed at you and me. It

is a disarming soft-sell, but it is also using powerful subliminal

techniques to insure success. It's a program to build up the George

Bush image in our minds while letting the Ronald Reagan image slowly

recede. We're being prepared to accept it easily when the so-called

Reagan era comes to an abrupt end soon!



   What's happening now is a preliminary phase in the plan which I

first reported just after the election last November 1980. In AUDIO

LETTER No. 60 I gave a warning that we would soon be told that the

President had met with, quote: "an unfortunate accident, or a sudden

fatal illness." Then we would see a change in the policies of the

White House built around the image of George Bush.



   Just over two months ago on March 30 this plan of the Bolsheviks

here almost succeeded on the first attempt. Outside the Washington

Hilton Hotel the entity President Reagan was led into an ambush, about

which I will have more to say in a few moments. It was intended to cut

down the President on the spot, just as several others were cut down.

The assassination attempt did not succeed in that goal, but it was a

partial success even so, because from that day onward the image of

George Bush has been shining brighter and brighter in the public eye.



   First, the period of hospital confinement of the President was

exploited. It was an opportunity to show off a restrained,

statesmanlike image on the part  of the Vice-President. This

image-building began immediately during the first hours after the

shooting. First, the entity known as General Alexander Haig rushed

into the White House briefing room and seized the podium. His voice

quivering with intensity, he announced, "I am in charge here." It was

a virtuoso per formance, an act calculated perfectly to create

headlines, furrowed brows, and a source of jokes for comedians.

Stories of a power tug of war between Haig and Bush automatically

focused attention on the Vice-President in a favorable light. In

contrast to the Haig outburst, the Bush entity acted humble and

deferential. News reports said Bush refused even to sit in the

President's seat in Cabinet meetings. The Bush image grew as a model

of judgment and restraint. As the President recovered, public opinion

polls were taken to judge what effect the shooting had on people. They

found a dramatic rise in people's favorable rating of the President;

but for the Vice-President the improvement was astronomical--from 31%

to 69% favorable in just a few weeks, according to NBC.



   As I say these words, the subtle image-making is continuing. On

Memorial Day almost two weeks ago it was not the President we saw in

news reports laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown, but the

Vice-President. And that same evening the entity Bush popped up again.

Millions tuned into a Bob Hope Special that evening, and the closing

act was none other than the Vice-President. It was prime time exposure

of the supposedly non-political kind that is most valuable of all in

politics. Those who are building the image of George Bush before us by

way of news guidelines are setting us up for things to come.



   What happened last March 30 outside the Washington Hilton was a

warning, and we should not ignore it. It all began that day when the

entity President Reagan emerged from the special VIP exit of the

Hilton. The VIP exit is around the corner from the rest of the hotel.

The hotel itself is many stories high, but the VIP entrance is set

into a stone wall only about 15 feet high. At the top of the wall is a

handrail with a walkway and trees behind it. In other words, the VIP

exit from the Hilton comes out under a small park-like area. The exit

itself is unmarked except for a concrete canopy extending out to the

curving driveway. A good photograph of the scene appeared on page 30

of People magazine for April 13, 1981.



   My friends, the whole idea behind the Hilton's VIP entrance is to

provide security for important visitors. The natural and prudent thing

from the security standpoint would have been to park the presidential

limousine directly opposite the door at the end of the short canopy.

That way there would have been only a few short steps from the door to

the limousine. And that is how things are done by highly trained

security forces. But, my friends, everything was done differently on

March 30. Someone had arranged for the President to walk into a

classic ambush.



   The limousine was not parked at the curb next to the VIP exit.

Instead, it was parked at least 20 feet farther away to the left as

the presidential party walked outside. The car was parked opposite a

rounded corner in the stone wall, which curves away from the street.

Back around that corner waiting to see the President stood the press

and various onlookers, including allegedly John Hinckley, Jr.; and

just behind and above them there were the numerous windows and

balconies of the hotel itself. I have been informed by certain

professionals whose business is the protection of VIPs that the

pattern in all this is unmistakable. The President walked into the

perfect setup for assassination--a cross fire. As he approached the

limousine, the President became an easy target from two directions at

once--one direction was the sidewalk above the overhanging canopy of

the VIP exit, the other direction was from behind and above the press

and onlookers, which included John Hinckley.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 63 I quoted an early NBC television news report

by Judy Woodruff. She had been with the presidential party inside the

hotel and had walked out the exit. She had not rounded the corner to

the area where Hinckley and the cameras were waiting, so she could not

have seen Hinckley. That's clear both from her own eyewitness account

on NBC and from replays of the video tapes; yet she said, quote: "I

noticed there were some shots fired from an overhanging, from a

sidewalk that was above where the President's car was." If you will

look at the photograph in People magazine, which I mentioned earlier,

you'll see very clearly the area that Judy Woodruff was describing.

It's not the area where Hinckley was.



   As for Hinckley himself, we are supposed to believe he did it all

by himself. Always it's a "lone assassin", always he's portrayed as "a

nut", and always there's a note left behind conveniently by the

otherwise nutty assailant to avoid loose ends. We are also supposed to

believe that Hinckley squeezed off six (6) shots in only two (2)

seconds and hit four (4) targets in that time. We're not supposed to

think about the fact that every time a pistol is fired, even a small

caliber pistol, it kicks. It deflects upward, spoiling the aim

briefly.



   If that were not enough, we're supposed to forget about the

bystander who jumped on Hinckley as soon as he started firing. Alfred

Antonucci, a carpenter's union official from Cleveland, had arrived

too late for the President's speech, so he waited outside for a

glimpse of the President. He was standing right next to Hinckley. On

April 13 Antonucci was interviewed on ABC's "Good Morning, America" by

David Hartman. Hartman mentioned the alleged six shots by Hinckley,

and Antonucci said, quote: "Well, let me say this. He fired the first

shot; and whether it was the second, the split second of the second, I

was on top of him to break the aim." Then on May 1 the New York Daily

News published an interview of Antonucci. Antonucci is quoted as

saying, quote: "I hit him on the back of the neck as hard as I could;

and his gun, which he held with two hands aimed right at Reagan, came

down. He kept shooting with one hand. I was told later by high

authorities that four of the six shots hit the sidewalk."



   My friends, we saw for ourselves on television the scuffle to

subdue Hinckley as soon as he started shooting. Mr. Antonucci's story

fits perfectly with what we saw ourselves, but we're supposed to

ignore what we saw and just believe the official story that Hinckley

fired six very accurate shots. Now, suppose we do a little simple

counting. On TV we saw four (4) men wounded--that's at least four

bullets. Four (4) bullets also hit the sidewalk, thanks to Mr.

Antonucci; that brings the total to at least eight, and from other

reports at least two more bullets hit the limousine. That's a total of

at least 10 bullets that we know of. Hinckley's revolver, my friends,

was only a six-shooter.



   Those who plotted the assassination attempt on March 30 are pulling

all kinds of strings to cover up the truth. A perfect example of this

was Time magazine for April 13, 1981. The lies began with the cover

itself. It's a painting, not a photograph, depicting the moment of the

President's wounding. It shows the President viewed across the roof of

the limousine--left arm raised, grimacing in pain. It is accurate

except for one thing. You will see what is wrong with the Time cover

if you will compare it with the photograph I mentioned in People

magazine. On the cover of Time the stone wall is drawn as if it were a

tall building. There's no hint of the overhanging sidewalk from which

NBC's Judy Woodruff said shots were fired.



   My friends, we're living today in an "Alice in Wonderland" world.

We're supposed to believe three impossible things before breakfast, if

that is what the controlled major media report to us. Only those who

are determined to search for the truth will be able to see it in the

days ahead.



Topic #2--On Tuesday evening April 28 millions of Americans tuned in

their TV sets to watch the entity President Reagan address Congress.

The speech was to build support for the Administration's Budget, but

most people were interested for a different reason. It was the first

speech by the President since the assassination attempt nearly a month

earlier. Many people were too absorbed in the dramatic re-appearance

of a wounded president to p ay much attention to anything else. No one

cared very much that the space shuttle "Columbia" supposedly arrived

back in Florida that day, nor did many people give a second thought to

the fact that it was a full week overdue. After all, as far as the

public was concerned, the Columbia was a great success. We had seen it

for ourselves on television.



   Based on one space shuttle flight, we are being told on all sides

that we are once again on top in space. We are told that now we are

five, ten years ahead of those poor dumb Russians. It would be nice if

all those things were true, but unfortunately they are not true. In

AUDIO LETTER No. 62 I was able to make public ahead of time the real

mission of the Columbia, which was Military! I described the plan for

us to see the Columbia lift off from Florida, but to see a different

shuttle, the "Enterprise", land two days later in California.



   Meanwhile the Columbia was to have carried out a secret military

mission unseen by you. The deception built into the original flight

plan was bad enough; but as it turned out, the flight of the Columbia

ended very quickly in DISASTER; and you and I were supposed to believe

otherwise. The secret disaster of the space shuttle Columbia and the

television hoax which we were shown to hide it were events of great

importance. That is why I devoted my entire AUDIO LETTER No. 64 to

giving you the details. The space shuttle "Columbia" is no more!



   The shuttle which we saw landing at Edwards Air Force Base in

California was the training shuttle "Enterprise." It had simply been

relabeled with the name "Columbia" on its side. When the shuttle

landed in California on April 14 we were initially told that it would

be flown to Florida just a few days later; but as the days went by,

the shuttle just stayed there. NASA cooked up one excuse after another

to explain away the delays to the public.



   Meanwhile, frantic meetings were going on involving key joint

military and NASA personnel. Things had not gone according to plan,

and they were not sure what to do. One faction insisted that NASA

should go ahead according to the original plan. That plan called for a

switch in shuttles between California and Florida. On Day One a

modified "747" would take off from Edwards Air Force Base, California,

with the shuttle "Enterprise" riding piggyback. News cameras would be

on hand to record the take-off. The Enterprise would then be flown to

its home base at White Sands, New Mexico. Meanwhile the public would

be told that the "747" with the shuttle had made an over-night

stopover. Then on Day Two another modified "747" carrying a different

shuttle would take off from White Sands and fly to Florida. Once again

reporters would be on hand to watch the landing at Cape Canaveral. The

new shuttle, of course, would have the name "Columbia" on the side

just as the Enterprise does. In that way the training shuttle

Enterprise was to be returned to home base and a fresh orbital-rated

shuttle sent to Florida. The switch would be made without the public

suspecting a thing.



   In meetings behind closed doors about the situation, others

protested that it would be foolish to go ahead as originally planned

without more information. It was obvious that somehow the Russians had

destroyed the Columbia, but the question was: "How?" The military

shuttle planning group agreed that they needed the answer to that

question, otherwise there would be no way to devise countermeasures to

give the next shuttle flight a better chance. Finally it was agreed

all around that the first urgent need was to buy time, so NASA

spokesmen were told to give the press a series of stalling stories

about the post-flight shuttle procedures in California. Meanwhile

every available avenue of Intelligence world-wide was pressed to come

up with an answer to that crucial question: "What happened to the

space shuttle Columbia?"



   Day by day we saw brief news reports about the post-flight checkout

of the space shuttle at Edwards Air Force Base. The shuttle was lifted

onto the back of the "747" but the take-off kept being pushed back one

day after another. The military shuttle planning group was drawing a

blank from their Intelligence sweep about the Columbia. The shuttle

stayed on the ground in California a week longer than originally

planned, and still no answer came about the Columbia. NASA ran out of

excuses for further stalling without raising unwelcome questions. The

secret shuttle planning team was still in no position to prepare for a

second orbital mission, and yet appearances have to be maintained.



   The United States Government is crowing loudly about the supposed

stunning success of the shuttle because it is the only hope left for

America in space. The space shuttle is the only program other than

Defense which has been given increased funding by the so-called Reagan

Adminstration.



   Before the shuttle Enterprise left California aboard its "747", the

shuttle planning group had to make a decision: Should they, or should

they not, make the planned switch between shuttles at White Sands.

There are three more orbital-rated shuttles at White Sands, and a

specific mission has been planned for each one. One of the planners

summed up the dilemma in the words, and I quote:



  "How can we send an orbital bird to the Cape? STS-2, 3, and 4 may

require major modifications in order to get past the Russians. We

won't know what those modifications are until we get the missing

feed-back on STS-1. I say send the Enterprise. We can keep it

sub-orbital by faking an abort--shut down one engine before

press-to-MECO and let Enterprise return to Kennedy. That will keep

Enterprise out of danger from Ivan. It will also keep the ball rolling

while giving us more time to set up a successful orbital shot."



Someone else asked:



  "What about the public relations impact? One thing we don't need is

to abort a mission this early in the program."



The reply was:



  "Would you rather lose another orbital bird to Ivan? Besides, if we

do it right, we could end up with even more public support. You know

what I mean--the idea that the shuttle is safe even if something does

go wrong, and so on."



There was a long silence, followed by more discussion, but finally the

suggestion was adopted. On Monday April 27 the "747" bearing the

shuttle Enterprise took off from Edwards Air Force Base, California.

The following day we saw the same shuttle, the training shuttle

Enterprise, landing in Florida. There was no switch.



   The secret shuttle planners are still feeling their way. The plan

could be changed, but as of now it will be the training shuttle

Enterprise that rolls out to the launch pad at Cape Canaveral later

this summer. It will look just like the Columbia did before its April

launch, mated to a giant fuel tank and huge solid-rocket boosters.



   NASA is presently shooting for the very early launch date of

September 30, 1981. According to the present plan the launch is to

proceed smoothly for the first few minutes. Unlike the Columbia, the

Enterprise will not veer north toward the kind of orbit forbidden by

Russia. Then, one engine will shut down prematurely. It will be

earlier in the flight than the point at which contact with Columbia

was lost last April. Then, as we are still watching on television, the

Enterprise will return for its alleged "emergency" landing at Kennedy.

By now the Enterprise has made so many computerized landings that NASA

has confidence that the landing will be made safely.



   There will be an uproar about the aborted space flight, but it will

not last long. Aided by the controlled major media, NASA will convince

most Americans that the safe outcome of the supposed "emergency" is

what counts. It will be said that this just proves how reliable the

shuttle really is. By staging an aborted shuttle mission this fall of

1981, the joint military and NASA shuttle team will be buying time.

They will not he expected to launch another mission until early 1982.

By then they are hoping to have learned what they must do to get past

the Russians into space.



Topic #3--When news of the presidential assassination attempt here in

Washington flashed around the world last March 30, ittriggered an old

concern in many minds. America was caught in a vulnerable moment.

Would some other country try to take advantage in some way? Most of

all, would Russia decide to invade Poland? At that time headlines were

telling us that an invasion might be imminent. As it turned out then,

our worries were unfounded. Russia had made no move toward Poland;

instead, they were in the process of cooling down the latest

"Solidarity" labor crisis. Likewise other nations around the world

generally acted with restraint following news of the shooting--that

is, all the world's nations except one. The lone exception was Israel.



   The timing could not have been more precise, my friends, if it had

been planned in advance. As the first shocking bulletins of the

shooting flashed across America, Israeli war planes were starting

their engines. As White House spokesmen were gathering to brief the

press, Israeli fighter bombers were gathering over Lebanon.



   Through the afternoon and evening we Americans huddled around our

television sets for the latest word from George Washington University

Hospital. Meanwhile Lebanese villagers were huddling in basements and

bombed-out shelters as Israeli missiles and bombs exploded all around

them. On the BBC World Service and other short-wave radio news reports

around the world, the sudden new Israeli raids on Lebanon that day

were big news. Not so here in America. News of the presidential

shooting and its aftermath drowned out everything else. It was not

until Syrian troops began making moves in response to the Israeli

raids that Lebanon began to enter our consciousness here. Day by day

the Israelis and Syrians lashed out at one another more and more,

directly and through surrogates in Lebanon.



   On April 28 Israeli jets shot down two Syrian helicopters over

Lebanon. It was big news overseas. Here in the United States though it

was overshadowed by the presidential speech to Congress that evening.

It was not until the following day, April 29, that the Lebanon crisis

received top billing in America's controlled major media. The Syrians

had moved Russian SAM-6 anti-aircraft missiles into the Bekaa valley

of Lebanon. This was Syria's answer to Israel's downing of two of her

helicopters the day before over Zahle. Thus the Middle East missile

crisis was born.



   Another mounting crisis is the growing feud between the United

States and Japan. Lately it seems as if Washington can't do anything

right towards the Japanese. On the morning of April 10, 1981, the

first attempt to launch the space shuttle "Columbia" took place at

Cape Canaveral. It ended in failure due to a computer problem, but it

was the top story that day here in America. It all but drowned out the

news story that was No. 1 that day in Japan.



   The previous day, an American submarine had sunk a small Japanese

freighter, supposedly by ramming it. Then the submarine had left the

scene without making any attempt to rescue survivors. Worse yet, the

United States had not even admitted the incident to Japanese

authorities until 36 hours later. In the weeks that have passed since

the incident took place, the episode has raised more and more

questions in Japanese minds. The United States Navy issued a report

about it which differs drastically from the testimony of the 13

Japanese survivors. The Navy report even puts the location of the

collision 3-1/2 miles away from where it actually happened. The

Japanese want to know WHY.



   To this and many other puzzling questions about the incident, the

Japanese are demanding answers, but they are not getting those

answers. The supposedly accidental sinking of the Japanese freighter

was only the opening gun in the Washington-Tokyo feud. Since then

Japan has been rocked by one shock after another at the hands of the

United States. American naval vessels have sailed through Japanese

fishing fleets, cutting fishing nets to ribbons. Suddenly there are

revelations that American ships with nuclear weapons aboard have been

using Japanese ports regularly in secret. Secretary of State Haig

canceled a visit to Japan. Even the visit of Prime Minister Suzuki to

Washington recently backfired on him. He agreed to language in a joint

communique that led to accusations in Japan that Suzuki was making a

secret military alliance with the United States. The irony of it all

is that Suzuki's troubles are due to the fact that he is resisting any

such military alliance.



   The Bolsheviks here in America want Japan to re-arm, to become the

policeman of the Western Pacific. Suzuki's predecessor, Prime Minister

Ohira, was ready to go along with America's Bolsheviks despite stern

warnings from Russia not to. Then Ohira died suddenly a year ago, and

Suzuki replaced him. Suzuki does not want to re-arm Japan, and so

America's Bolsheviks want him out of office. Japan has endured all

kinds of shocks in recent months, but they all have one common

denominator. They all have involved loss of face for Japan as a whole

and especially for Prime Minister Suzuki.



   In Asia, loss of face is a very serious matter. By using it as a

political weapon, America's Bolsheviks believe they can bring down the

Suzuki government. Whoever follows Suzuki will have to talk "peace"

for domestic consumption, but he will have to prepare for war if he is

to get along with Washington.



   Elsewhere in Asia, Red China and Vietnam have supposedly recently

engaged in very heavy border fighting with many casualties. Meanwhile

the so-called Reagan Administration is preparing to declare openly

that it will sell America's most sophisticated weapons to Red China.

The United States Government, my friends, has gone insane from the

cancer of Bolshevism, and is leading America from folly to greater

folly.



   In Europe, too, there is turmoil at the hands of Bolshevik agents.

The government of Italy has just been brought down in a tremendous

scandal involving a massive conspiracy of many of the country's

leading citizens. In West Germany, Chancellor Helmut Schmidt is under

fire from forces who want to undo the balance he has struck between

East and West. And in France the Bolsheviks won a tremendous victory

in the election last month. Until now, France has enjoyed a special

relationship with Russia as well as with the West. The relationship

has been one of trust built up laboriously beginning with the late

President Charles de Gaulle; but the new French president, Mitterrand,

is working as fast as possible to change that. Mitterrand will try to

bring France into the anti-Russian camp, headed by the Bolsheviks here

in America.



   My friends, crises large and small are multiplying all around us,

and by and large they are not accidental. They are part of the

deliberate war build-up strategy of the Bolsheviks here, which I made

public in AUDIO LETTER No. 63. By turning the world into a caldron of

crises, they are setting the stage for NUCLEAR WAR ONE. The whole

world is becoming like the uneasy Balkans just before World War I.



   World War I was set off seemingly by accident by the assassination

of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria by a terrorist. Today, we are once

again in the era of terrorism, assassination, and turmoil. Like World

War I, NUCLEAR WAR ONE will erupt suddenly from an unexpected spark,

seemingly by accident. But World War I was brought about deliberately,

my friends, and the same will be true of NUCLEAR WAR ONE.



   All of this is not lost on the new rulers of Russia. Russia's

rulers are convinced that it is only a matter of time until all-out

war breaks out between the United States and Russia, so the Russians

are continuing to whittle away at America's ability to damage Russia.



   When the space shuttle "Columbia" took off on its ill-fated flight

last April 12, a fleet of special airplanes were aloft to help track

it. The United States was depending heavily on its fleet of advanced

range instrumentation aircraft. These are flying radar and

communication stations known as "Droop Snoots" for their huge bulbous

nose . This special airplane is a modified military Boeing 707

designated EC-135N. When they are not involved in space shots, the

EC-135N's also have many other uses, including the tracking of Russian

satellites. There are only a few EC-135N's, so they are all important.

When the space shuttle "Columbia" took off last April, there were only

eight of them.



   The Space Shuttle Program is an indispensable key to the current

war plans of the Bolsheviks here, and the EC-135N's are crucial to the

Shuttle Program. On May 6, 1981, an EC-135N nicknamed the "Boss Hog"

took off from its base at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. It

headed east on what was to be a routine training flight. As the

modified "707" flew eastward, it was heading for an unexpected

rendezvous. Hovering high over the rolling hills of western Maryland,

a lone Cosmosphere was waiting for the Boss Hog. At 10:51 A.M. Eastern

Time the pilot of the jet radioed the words "Flight level 290" to

flight controllers on the ground. The plane was at 29,000 feet.

Moments later the Cosmosphere fired its Charged Particle Beam weapon

downward at the jet plane passing miles below it. The beam blasted a

hole through the top of the fuselage and another out through the

bottom. Explosive decompression emptied the cabin of its air. The

blast also set off a secondary explosion of some kind, turning the jet

into a ball of flames. At the same time control cables through the

tail were destroyed, and the jet turned violently nose down. Instead

of gliding to a crash many miles away, the ruined airplane dropped

like a rock, almost straight down. Radar traffic controllers were

startled to see the plane disappear suddenly from their screens. It

was all over before they even knew anything had happened. On the

ground, eye witnesses heard a boom-boom-boom, and moments later a

giant ball of fire came screaming downward out of the clouds. For 10

more minutes small pieces of debris from the plane kept settling

earthward for miles around.



   In any air disaster as violent as this one, the investigation

usually extends over a period of months--but not this time, my

friends. On Friday May 29, just over three weeks after the crash, the

Air Force quietly announced that its investigation was already over.

They knew what had blown their radar plane out of the air, but they

also declared that for the time being the results will not be made

public.



   While the Air Force was still reeling from the crash of the

EC-135N, it became the Navy's turn. Once again Russia's target was a

highly sophisticated electronic warfare jet. The plane involved was an

EA-6B Prowler based on the nuclear supercarrier USS Nimitz.



   On the night of Tuesday May 26, the Nimitz was engaged in

night-landing exercises just off the East Coast. Carrier landings are

always dangerous, and night landings especially so; but the EA-6B has

a special advantage. It is equipped with an Automatic Carrier Landing

System to permit safe landings even in conditions of zero visibility.

Partly as a result, the Prowlers are known as some of the safest of

all carrier aircraft; but on that night of May 26 one of Russia's new

Jumbo Cosmospheres was hovering high above the Nimitz. It was one of

the two which I described in AUDIO LETTER No. 64 armed with a Neutron

Particle Beam. As an EA-6B approached the Nimitz to land, the

Cosmosphere waited. At a critical moment of the final approach, the

Cosmosphere fired. The invisible neutron beam instantly killed the

crew of three and temporarily deranged the airplane's electronic

systems. Being suddenly without guidance, the jet veered to the right

and crashed into a deck full of airplanes. The toll: 14 dead, 48

injured, and 20 aircraft destroyed or damaged. It was the Navy's worst

flight-deck disaster since 1953.



   Day by day, my friends, the stakes are steadily increasing. The

closer we get to all-out war, the more incidents like this we will

see; yet, somehow, we seem oblivious to the real cause. Our leaders

are telling us that we have to act "tough" to keep the peace.

Meanwhile our supposedly "tough" actions are leading to the exact

opposite of peace--NUCLEAR WAR ONE!



                       LAST MINUTE SUMMARY



   Now it's time for my Last Minute Summary.



   My friends, these days we hear constantly about something called

National Security. What does that mean to you? Can there be any such

thing as National Security without National Survival? If not, then our

national security hangs by a thread, because our national survival is

in dire jeopardy. Our leaders keep telling us that the threat to our

security is Russia. Then, while we are not looking, they turn right

around and taunt the Russian Bear. I have a last minute report to pass

on to you in this very vein.



   As you know, the supercarrier Nimitz entered port only very briefly

after the fiery crash of the EA-6B. It entered port on May 28 and left

again just two days later, May 30. The official story was that it was

heading for the Caribbean for continued exercises.



   I must now report to you that the Nimitz was ordered to the north,

not to the south. In a drastic departure from normal procedure, an

American carrier group has been ordered into the Norwegian and Barents

Seas, right on the doorstep of Russia. This deployment is expected to

be brief, but it is very dangerous. It is an insane act of bravado by

the Bolsheviks here, like walking up to a bully and knocking the chip

off his shoulder. Probably the Nimitz will get away with it, this

time; but one of these days we will cross that invisible line in the

dust--and the world will be at war!



   My friends, what is called National Security today is a lie. The

more we spend on national security, the less secure we become. True

security can be built only on the foundation of mutual trust and

mutual respect, and those things in turn can be built only on the

TRUTH. Those who secretly control America's destiny today cannot stand

the truth. They are the enemies of our Lord Jesus Christ, and as He

said long ago: They were liars from the beginning.



   We must seek the Truth, cherish the Truth, and pass on the Truth to

others. Only in that way can we break free of the Satanic power that

now grips America.



   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and

may God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

