From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington, D.C.

20006.



   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 30, 1980,

and this is my AUDIO LETTER No. 60.



   Four days ago the New York Daily News published an interesting

article about a coming motion picture. It's called "The Formula", and

deals with an international oil conspiracy. And even before seeing the

picture, Mobil Oil is reported to be acting very nervous. Supposedly,

Mobil is threatening to sue the movie maker, MGM, if Mobil is

mentioned in any way. Somehow the whole situation seems to symbolize

our situation today. The movie is about oil companies hiding the

truth, and at least one real life oil company would apparently like to

hide the movie.



   "Big Oil" always operates behind a wall of secrecy, deception, and

stealth; and in the election just passed, Big Oil has succeeded for

the moment in its grab for the White House. And so a temporary change

of style is brewing in American politics. The Bolsheviks who have been

in power favor active propaganda to mislead us. By contrast, Big Oil

generally prefers to tell us nothing at all. So, as the so-called

Reagan Administration takes over, we will tend to have a "Say nothing"

government for a while. But whether our government is controlled

behind the scenes by Big Oil or by the Bolsheviks, you and I lose

because they all operate "in the dark" where they cannot be watched.

We are living in an age of stealth, and it is leading toward disaster

for us all.



   My three topics this month are:



Topic #1--THE GREAT ELECTION SURPRISE OF 1980 Topic #2--THE PLANNED

COLLAPSE OF AMERICA'S BANKING SYSTEM Topic #3--THE NEW AGE OF WARFARE

BY STEALTH.



Topic #1--For weeks now Washington has been buzzing about the great

election surprise of 1980. Right up to the last minute all the Opinion

Polls were saying the same thing--"Too close to call." But when the

television networks began their election night coverage, they told a

radically different story. Fifteen minutes after the polls closed on

the East Coast, NBC declared the entity Ronald Reagan the winner. On

the West Coast, polls were still open but voters began drifting away.

Even more shocking, the alleged President Carter himself conceded

defeat less than two hours later. West Coast polls still had an hour

to go at that point, but many remaining voters just gave up. By then,

it was fast becoming clear that voting machines nation-wide had

registered a landslide in the name of Ronald Reagan. It was an

unprecedented state of affairs. The Republican landslide apparently

was enormous, and yet we are told it was a complete surprise. On all

sides, political analysts are still rubbing their eyes in disbelief.

They're trying out all kinds of excuses to explain why the polls were

wrong. "Maybe the pocketbook issue did it", they say; or "Maybe all

those undecided voters before the election were really closet

Conservatives"; or then again, "Maybe it was just a plain old protest

vote"; or, "Would you believe it was Billy Carter maybe?"



   My friends, last month I reported that there was one issue that

could help defeat the present Bolshevik Administration. That was the

breakdown of the hostage release ploy just before the election, and it

may be that many voters were affected in that way that I mentioned

last month. But the apparently surprise landslide was brought about by

entirely different means.



   My friends, it was not the Opinion Polls that were wrong this time.

It was the tally of votes on Election Day. To bring home what I am

about to tell you, I would like to tell you a personal story. It's a

story of my own race for the governorship of my home state of West

Virginia 12 years ago.



   The idea that I run for Governor came from a political leader in

West Virginia. I was then in my sixth year as Legal Counsel to the

United States Export-Import Bank here in Washington. I had been

appointed to that position in 1961 by President Kennedy, and

apparently there were those who remembered my efforts in helping

Kennedy win in West Virginia in 1960. In any case, I decided to accept

the suggestion. On May 1, 1967, I resigned from the Export-Import Bank

and returned to my native State of West Virginia. For the next year I

carried out an exhausting grass-roots campaign throughout the state.

My wife Lilly and I went everywhere and spoke to everyone, or so it

seemed. There was not a county we missed and there was hardly a hand

that I had not pressed, and from every indication my campaign was

going very well. Then one night two weeks before the election, the

telephone rang. When I picked up the telephone, a voice said, "This is

(so and so)." I asked what I could do for him, and he replied: "Well,

you'd like to have your votes counted, wouldn't you?" Still half

asleep I said, "Of course. What are you talking about?" His answer

was: "Well, you know politics is a business. You'd like to have your

votes counted, wouldn't you?" By that time I was wide awake. I replied

that there were plenty of county officials and precinct workers to

take care of the vote counting. Then I asked him what he was driving

at. He said, "Well, in those precincts which have machines you have to

make sure your votes are counted. Don't you understand? This is just

how it's done. If you want your votes counted, it'll cost you

$250,000." I was flabbergasted and said I would not pay a cent; I

didn't do things like that. At that point the caller said, "Well, it

looks like we can't do any business then", and hung up. After putting

the telephone down I just sat there astonished. My wife Lilly said,

"What was that?" and I told her: "We just lost the election."



   My friends, in the counties and precincts where old-fashioned paper

ballots were used, I did receive votes; but without exception in every

location where voting machines were used, I received no votes. Not one

single vote!



   That seemed incredible to me at the time, but I had no

evidence--nothing but a telephone call which I could not prove. Then

about two weeks after the election I received a phone call from a

Baptist minister. He was asking to meet me because something important

had come to his attention, so the next day I met the minister in a

town near Beckley, West Virginia. He had another man with him. The

good minister told me that the man with him had asked him (the

minister) to forgive him for something he had done to me. The minister

had replied that it was not up to him to forgive the man, but up to

Mr. Beter. So I asked the minister's friend what it was that he had

done to me, and he said: "Mr. Beter, I fixed the voting machines

against you." Then he blurted out the whole thing.



   He said that he was known as a repair man for these machines, but

he explained that when he went to the factory school in another state,

he was also taught other things. He was taught how to adjust the

machinery to record whatever is wanted. For example, voters who pulled

the lever for me thought that they were voting for me; but inside the

machine, the machine was adjusted to transfer the vote to another

pre-selected candidate. I could hardly believe my ears. Over a year of

grass-rooting the state down the drain!! And all because of a

specialized slot machine known as a Voting Machine. I asked him why he

did such a thing. He answered, "For the money, Mr. Beter. I really

need the money." Then he added that he was not the only one, that

there were others all over the country doing the same thing. Then he

broke down and cried. He said he wanted me to know and to decide if I

wanted to forgive him. Really I felt no revenge, only sorrow for him;

and I knew what poverty could do to a person. By this time all three

of us were in tears. I placed my hand on his shoulder and said that I

did forgive him.



   Later I went to the Frauds section of the United States Department

of Justice here in Washington. They told me that a Governor's race was

merely a local matter so the federal government could not investigate.

I also looked into other avenues for possible redress, through the

courts; but throughout the United States there have been many cases

taken to court over election rigging, and in the end the courts always

do nothing. So ended my governorship race in West Virginia in 1968.



   I learned the hard way that politics has become a "business." In

every presidential election since voting machines have been used,

there have been charges of voting fraud in certain states. Sometimes

more votes are counted than there are registered voters. There are

people nicknamed "The Lever Brothers" in West Virginia who go around

and pull the levers before the actual voting begins. There are others

who tamper with the machines in their warehouses before they are

delivered to the polling places, and there are corrupt officials who

know all these things but keep their mouth shut for fear or for money.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 1 I reviewed some of the background of voting

machines. My friends, this is very important. Voting machines are not

regulated in any way. They were developed from slot machines, and they

were controlled at first by organized crime. But then long ago, they

were absorbed into the hands of the Rockefeller Cartel, as I detailed

in AUDIO LETTER No. 1. And in the secret struggle over the election,

which I reported last month, voting machines were the decisive secret

weapon. For the moment they have carried the day for the Rockefeller

Oil Cartel.



   As the voting began on November 4, 1980, the entity President

Carter was in Plains, Georgia to vote. Reporters on the scene said

later that he almost broke down and cried as he spoke to townspeople,

because the outcome was already known before the voting began. That is

also the reason for the unprecedented concession an hour before West

Coast polls closed. Word had reached the White House only the day

before about what was going to happen. There was massive "fixing" of

voting machines in nine states--New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,

Florida, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Texas, and California. The machines

were also "fixed" but on a less complete scale in Indiana and

Missouri. In addition, there was selective "fixing" of machines in key

districts of more than 20 other states. It was all over before it

started.



   The Opinion Polls beforehand were actually far more accurate than

the voting tallies on Election Day. Opinion Polls can be "fixed" too,

but in this case they were not. All the Polls found a general apathy

about the candidates, dissatisfaction with all of them; and that

apathy was reflected by the low turn-out on Election Day. In spite of

good weather nation-wide, the turn-out was the lowest in 30 years.

That spells apathy, my friends, and apathy does not create landslides.

Instead, apathy about candidates leads to a "flip the coin" attitude:

Heads, it is candidate "A"; Tails, it's candidate "B". Both

candidates, or in this case both major candidates, just about split

the vote; so apathy leads to a very close race, just as the Polls

predicted; but thanks to fixable voting machines, a landslide was

created out of thin air. Last month I reported some of the factors

pointing to a last minute election surprise. As I explained then, it's

a mild setback for the Bolsheviks here. Right now Big Oil is preparing

to run the country with a free hand. The figurehead called Reagan is

being programmed to behave like a new Eisenhower, delegating

everything to agents of Big Oil. But the Bolsheviks here are working

fast. They're in a hurry to seize control of the so-called Reagan Team

themselves. Once that happens, the so-called Reagan era may end

abruptly. The Reagan image is tailored to fit the Corporate Socialist

plans of Big Oil, so the Bolsheviks will prefer a new face, a new

figurehead to program their own way; and so some day sooner than you

think we Americans may be in for a shock. We will be told that the

entity President Reagan has met with an unfortunate accident, or a

sudden fatal illness. Then we will be seeing a new face, saying new

things. The face will seem to be that of George Bush speaking from

Washington, but his words will come straight from Bolshevik

headquarters in New York City--and that, my friends, will be the last

and greatest surprise in the stolen election of 1980.



Topic #2--Last month I gave you suggestions for an awful lot to do. I

offered you not one, but two major steps in our ACTION plan to SAVE

AMERICA. "Action Step #4", you will recall, involves another letter to

Senator William Proxmire, and it's the most important so far in spite

of the election results because this Proxmire letter is an important

weapon as we open up the Second Front in our battle. In "Action Step

#5" I outlined how we can do this. We're going to the very heart of

America's banking system, the privately-owned FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.



   This month, my friends, I want to give you a breather. It's vitally

important that you follow through on the things I suggested last

month, so I want to make sure that you have enough time to do all

those things. The letters which I have urged you to write to the

Federal Reserve System are more important than you can imagine, so in

spite of the holidays, I ask you: "Please, write those letters as soon

as possible." Nothing less than our survival as a nation is at stake.



   Let me mention one footnote to my suggestions of last month. If you

should have any trouble getting the names of the Federal Reserve

officials from your bank, don't give up. You can call the Federal

Reserve Bank in your region and ask for the Library. Ask the Librarian

for the names of the President, the officers, and all the Directors.

Several listeners have already done this and got the names without any

difficulty. Beyond this I would make no new suggestions for what you

can do this month, but I do want to take a few moments to remind you

where we are heading IF we do not act.



   We are once again watching interest rates explode like bombs on the

American economy, and on all sides we're hearing about the disastrous

effects which are coming in automobiles, construction, and business in

general. Already it appears that Chrysler might go under; and when

financial analysts mention this, they say in the same breath a

forbidden word--DEPRESSION. But, my friends, interest rates are not

the only way in which America's major banks are leading us into a

depression with inflation.



   America's banking system itself is becoming shakier by the day. The

seeds of trouble have been there for many years now. They are all

related to the grand design to destroy our money and our economy. It's

the same grand design which involved the theft of America's monetary

gold supply, but the process began speeding up nearly two years ago in

early 1979. That was when the Bolsheviks here staged their hidden coup

d'etat against the Rockefellers. In AUDIO LETTER No. 44 for March

1979, I gave my listeners an early warning about this process. I

explained how the stage was being set for a collapse of America's

entire banking system, and I revealed that the failure of the giant

Chase Manhattan Bank may well trigger it all. For various reasons many

people considered my warning about the banks just too incredible to

believe at that time.But ju st like the coming nuclear war, the

coming bank collapse is now coming closer to the surface; and as it

does so, danger signals are inevitably showing up here and there.



   For example, Fortune magazine recently said, and I quote: "There

can be no doubt that banking is entering a period of crisis. In one

way or another the industry's troubles could lead to the passing of

many banks, perhaps including some of the biggest and most

prestigious." And four months ago, at the end of July 1980, the

Christian Science Monitor carried two "Page 1" reports about the

situation. They focused attention on the disastrous new Act which I

told you about last month, the so-called "Monetary Control Act of

1980." It pointed out that the Act has drastically reduced the ratio

of insurance reserves to savings. There is now only about a penny to

back up every dollar you have in a bank or Savings & Loan savings

account. The collapse of just a few large banks could wipe out the

whole Savings Insurance system; and if that happens, my friends,

collapsing confidence will bring down America's entire banking system.

The second special article in the Monitor contained a hint at

something even more basic. It said, quote: "The sleeper monetary

provisions of the Act continue to nag at gold and precious

metals-oriented Conservatives. They see the danger that the 'Fed' and

Administration facing a possible bank crash at some point might throw

the doors open to hyper inflation of the United States economy."



   My friends, those are exactly the stakes I was warning you about

last month. There is no gold to back up the Federal Reserve I.O.U.s

which we use as money. The Federal Reserve System is claiming assets

which do not exist. Those who have conspired to destroy our money have

planned all along to bring on a bank crash. They want the banks to

collapse when the time is ripe, but they don't want you to know what

is happening. They dare not let you know the truth about our missing

gold, and so certain key Treasury and Federal Reserve officials are

meeting right now to plan a counterattack against our "Preventive War

of Truth." As always, their plan is to use the big lie; and as you

know, they were liars from the beginning, and they are liars now. It

is a lie, my friends, that the Treasury today holds 270,000,000 ounces

of Federal Reserve gold in its vaults. That's what Treasury and

Federal Reserve books show, but those books are a complete fraud, a

lie; and more and more people are having doubts about it. But there's

an old psychological trick that is about to be used on us all. That

trick is: If people start to suspect a lie, make the lie even bigger.

Most people are taken completely off guard by this technique. If a lie

becomes big enough, people think it has to be the truth. No one, we

think, would have enough nerve to tell a lie that big.



   So here is the trick that is now being planned. Right now our gold

reserves are officially valued at the old official price of $42.22 per

ounce. That's the price reflected in the gold stock listings by the

Treasury and Federal Reserve balance sheets which I discussed last

month. But watch for the nonexistent gold reserves to be revalued at

current market prices. In terms of dollars, our fictitious gold

reserves will suddenly look 15 or 20 times bigger. The plan is also to

capitalize on talk in Congress about returning to the Gold Standard.

First, the controlled major media will publicize talk about the Gold

Standard idea; then will come the spectacular gold re-valuation

publicity stunt. Finally, any return to a true Gold Standard will

quietly be squashed, because we don't really have all that gold.

Instead, they are trying to devise some trick which will require only

a token amount of gold. What that will be has not yet been decided,

but the net result will be powerful propaganda to impress people to

believe the big lie about America's alleged giant gold hoard.



   My friends, many people would rather put their head in the sand

about our missing gold. They would rather not know the awful truth.

That is exactly why the big lie will work with so many people. But

that is like having cancer and not wanting to be told about it,

because the United States dollar has terminal cancer and it will die

soon if the truth about our missing gold remains hidden.



   Sometimes my enemies argue that the truth about our missing gold

should not be revealed. According to their argument, exposure of the

truth about our missing gold will itself bring down our economy; but,

my friends, that argument says that a lie is better than the truth.

And it is wrong, dead wrong; and here's why: If the scandal of

America's missing gold breaks into the open, it can well set the stage

for international action to prevent disaster. There could be an

immediate international monetary conference to resolve the crisis. The

hidden power of the Bolsheviks here who are bent on disaster would be

broken by the gold scandal; so the conference could put an end to the

disastrous system of floating currencies now in effect. Instead, they

could establish a new system of fixed yet flexible rates of exchange

which would be stable. At the same time, the conference should fix

interest rates on an international basis. That would tend to stop the

world-wide interest rate war now going on to attract hot money from

one country to another.



   With the pressure off interest rates, inflation could be controlled

and industry could revive. Inflation is international in scope; and

because the gold scandal here is international in scope, it could be

investigated on an international basis. There would be a real chance

of tracking down our gold and tracking down the people who have done

this to us.



   Meanwhile there could be a kind of Marshall Plan in reverse to save

the United States dollar. To tide us over the crisis, foreign Central

Banks could lend us some gold for international transactions. "Why

should they bother to do that?" you ask. Very simple. Our trading

partners have hundreds of billions of dollars in their hands. If the

dollar goes, so do their own economies. So it is in their own self

interest to take international action to save the dollar.



   But, my friends, all that can happen only--and I repeat only--if

the gold scandal breaks before the coming bank crash, because that is

the only way to set our monetary affairs free of the grasp of the

Bolsheviks here. If they can keep the gold scandal under cover for

just a little longer, they will get their way. They will win; and, my

friends, you and I will lose everything.



Topic #3--Several months ago there were big headlines about a supposed

new American secret weapon. It's called the "Stealthplane." The weapon

which is actually involved is a specialized hybrid machine called a

"Subcraft." It's the same weapon that I made public two years earlier

in AUDIO LETTER No. 37; and early this year, January 1980, the

Bolsheviks here tried to use it against Russia. The result was a

disaster, as I reported in AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 53 and 54. So now the

spectacular sounding Stealthplane has become just a publicity tool to

make nuclear war sound less suicidal.



   To judge by all the recent publicity, one would think that stealth

is a radical new concept in warfare; but stealth, trickery, deception,

and surprise have been the prime ingredients in military strategy

since ancient times. And today, my friends, we live in an age of

stealth--stealth in politics, stealth in economics, and above all

stealth in weaponry in warfare. During the past six years or so I have

made public many secret developments in weapons and warfare. I

revealed the secrets of both Russia and the United States because I

believe you need to know, and knowledge is power.



    A secret war is raging right now, and already you and I are

suffering the consequences; and if it is not stopped, it will soon

explode into all-out thermonuclear war. There's only one way to stop

the deadly cycle of war now under way. That way is to put an end to

stealth and trickery, and replace it with the TRUTH--the truth about

America's gold scandal, the truth about stealing of elections with

unregulated voting machines, and the truth about a whole new age of

secret weapons which are unknown to the public. The new age of stealth

in warfare is everywhere today. It makes up a complete spectrum from

deep beneath the sea to outer space.



   To begin with, consider Submarines. From the very beginning

submarines have always been weapons of stealth. Their outstanding

advantage has always been their ability to escape detection. The

modern age of nuclear submarines was inaugurated by the United States

in 1954; and it was America that conceived a ballistic missile

submarine, first launched in 1959. Today our leaders still reassure us

that American submarines remain second to none. They have to admit

that Russia has several times more "subs" than we do, but they gloss

over that with stories that Russian subs are noisy, or leaky, or their

crews are not very smart. So, in effect, they tell us, "Don't worry.

We can handle a submarine war with Russia." There was a time when

quality was in our favor, but that time is long gone. Today the United

States is losing badly in the secret war to control the world's

oceans.



   New generations of Russian submarines are entering a new era of

their own. For example, there are the new Oscar Class Cruise Missile

Submarines. These can launch Cruise Missiles to attack our Aircraft

Carriers and other surface ships. They can do this while still

submerged, far beyond the horizon. And there are the new Alpha Class

Attack Submarines which are without parallel in the world. Submariners

always say that a submarine's worst enemy is another submarine, and

Russia's new Alpha Subs are the worst enemy yet to our subs. Unlike

the United States, Russia has mastered the use of titanium for

submarine construction. And unlike America, Russia has big supplies of

titanium for use in all kinds of new technologies--and Russia no

longer sells titanium to the United States. So the new Alpha Subs have

double hulls of titanium, and they are now the deepest diving, fastest

operational submarines on earth. It's speed has been estimated in the

West at 45 knots; but, my friends, it is actually well over 60 knots!

In most situations it can actually outrun America's best torpedo, the

Mark 48; and it can dive almost a mile deep to escape attack and slip

away under complex ocean currents.



   But the biggest shock so far in Russia's submarine program took

place earlier this fall of 1980. It's a submarine launched from a

shipyard near Archangel on the White Sea. When Western Intelligence

officials got their first look at it they could hardly believe their

eyes. Traditionally submarines have been known as boats rather than

ships because of their relative smallness, but not this submarine.

It's a giant, a ballistic missile submarine about the size of an

American World War II Aircraft Carrier. Western Intelligence officials

are mystified as to why it is so large, but I can reveal the reason to

you right now. The giant new Russian submarine, code named "Typhoon",

is another "first." It's the world's first ballistic missile submarine

with a re-load capability. It can empty all 20 of its ballistic

missile tubes at a target in war, then it can re-load the tubes with

20 more missiles carried aboard. So, if need be, Russia's Typhoon Sub

can mount two nuclear attacks. Like the Alpha Subs, Russia's awesome

new Typhoon has a titanium hull. It's not as fast as the sleek Alpha

Sub but very fast even so, and it can dive extremely deep.



   Meanwhile, what does the United States have to answer all that? The

answer is America's new Trident Missile Sub. It carries 24 missiles,

compared to the Typhoon's 40. It's slower and cannot dive nearly as

deep with its non-titanium hull, and it's also three years behind

schedule and still slipping--and there are several reasons for that,

some of which have been mentioned in the news lately. But one major

reason for our crumbling Trident Submarine program is not in the

news--it's the widespread use of narcotics among Trident shipyard

workers! Many workers are not involved, but many are; and as a result,

there is a tremendous turnover in personnel. Another result is

defective welds and mistakes in critical piping. When the mistakes are

found they have to be done over, sometimes more than once. And, my

friends, absolutely nothing is being done about it.



   The other side of the coin in undersea warfare is Anti-Submarine

Warfare, or ASW. Lately we have heard brave stories that there have

recently been ASW breakthroughs by the United States. These are based

on extremely complex computerized sonar-listening networks; but as I

first revealed some time ago, all new Russian submarines produce

artificial noises in normal operation. That's why the new Alpha Subs

are thought to be so noisy--the noise is deliberate. When war comes,

the noise-makers called "Cavitators" will be retracted. The American

sonar nets will listen in vain for the familiar noises. Instead, Alpha

Subs and others will swim at high speed toward America whisper quiet;

and as they do so, the Russian subs will strike as submarines always

strike, by stealth.



   The true condition of America's Antisubmarine Warfare was summed up

in the New York Times last month on October 5. A senior American naval

officer was quoted as saying: "To find a submarine you need to know

where to look. Otherwise you'll have to use a large share of your

antisubmarine resources just to find and kill one submarine, and in

wartime that is not practical. You're better off waiting for him to

attack." He explained that then we could more easily detect the sub;

but he added that a ballistic missile sub could fire its missiles

before being caught, quote: "so it probably doesn't matter."



   My friends, it would still be a standoff in submarines if Russia

had the same problem we do in finding subs; but they don't. Five years

ago in 1975 the head of the Russian Navy announced a breakthrough in

ASW, and it was not a bluff. He was talking about Psychoenergetic

Range Finding, or PRF. I first reported on Russia's PRF in AUDIO

LETTER No. 42. It was the key to Russia's destruction of American

Subcraft early this year, and Russian manned space satellites use PRF

to keep track continuously on all United States submarines. When war

comes, the positions of our own submarines will be relayed to Russian

Attack Submarines. This will be done by means of the world-wide

Submarine Communication System, which I revealed in AUDIO LETTER No.

16. Russian Attack Submarines, including the new Alphas, will be

vectored in toward our own Ballistic Missile Subs. Our own subs, older

and slower, will be caught by surprise and unable to escape. And

without warning, Russian nuclear torpedoes will destroy our Ballistic

Missile Submarines.



   When I mentioned Russia's world-wide Submarine Communication System

in AUDIO LETTER No. 16, a crisis was under way. It was the Underwater

Missile Crisis of 1976. At that time the Russian Navy was planting

underwater missiles within our own territorial waters, and they were

using submarines to do it. The missiles involved were small,

short-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Once planted, these

missiles can be launched from their own underwater resting places by

satellite command, and they were planted very close to their coastal

targets. The result would be zero warning time for an underwater

missile attack. The missiles were planted in bays and coves along

America's shoreline by a special type of submarine. This was the

Missile-planting Mini-Sub which I described in AUDIO LETTER No. 16. I

mentioned in that tape that, quote: "These special submarines are very

difficult for our undersea sonar detection nets to pick up because the

hull is treated in such a way that it absorbs sonar signals instead of

reflecting them."



   Four years later we hear an echo of this concept in the so-called

Stealthplane. For aircraft, the treatment is to absorb radar instead

of sonar, but otherwise it's the same idea. Russia was planting

underwater missiles along our shores by stealth, and our own l eaders

were responding with equal secrecy instead of warning you. When I made

these things public over four years ago, certain newsletter writers

and others went into a frenzy. For whatever reason they did their best

to tell their readers not to listen about the missiles. They tried to

say that waterproof missiles lurking under water are impossible.

Likewise they pooh-poohed the very idea of sonar-absorbing submarines.



   But today we are four years closer to NUCLEAR WAR ONE; and the

closer catastrophe looms over us, the more it casts its shadow. The

New York Times article of last month which I mentioned earlier is a

good example. It mentioned, quote: "Soviet subs are usually coated

with a material that absorbs sonar impulses." And as for the

underwater missiles, listen to some words from a recent letter "To the

Editor." It was published on September 25, 1980 in the Washington

Star. The writer is Captain John E. Draim, formerly program manager of

the Navy's project "Hydra." He says, quote: "We can easily waterproof

missiles such as MX, and launch them from a vertical floating

position. The United States Navy's project Hydra demonstrated this

launch technique with test missiles of ICBM size in the early 1960's."

And a further quote: "A Hydra-type missile can also be floated up from

a submerged submarine to the surface and launched from there, the

technique used for Soviet SLBMs."



   In light of these words recently published, what I first reported

in the summer of 1976 becomes almost routine. The things I reported

then were well known to be feasible in Intelligence circles; but out

of the sheer ignorance, if nothing else, certain Newsletters and

organizations wanted people to ignore my warnings. Fortunately large

numbers of my listeners did not ignore those warnings. They applied

heavy pressure to the Joint Chiefs of Staff as I suggested, and action

was taken for a while to defuse the crisis.



   In the letter "To the Editor" I just quoted by Captain Draim, the

reference to ICBM-size missiles is interesting, because a few months

after I reported on Russia's underwater missiles, I learned about our

own.



   America's underwater missiles are radically different from those of

Russia. I first revealed them in AUDIO LETTER No. 20 for January 1977.

Unlike the Russian missiles which are small, America's underwater

missiles are huge. They are giant waterproofed ICBMs deployed on the

ocean floor, but they share one thing in common with those of Russia.

America's secret fleet of underwater missiles were deployed by

stealth. It was done in a supersecret operation known as "Operation

Desk Top", and in the spring of 1978 Operation Desk Top was

reactivated off America's east coast. America's secret government told

you nothing about these hush-hush preparations for war; instead, they

said they were drilling for oil! The Baltimore Canyon area of the

Continental Shelf was publicized as if it were an underwater Alaska,

full of oil. But before the alleged oil drilling even began, I told my

listeners not to expect any oil bonanza because they were planting

missiles, not searching for oil. And sure enough, after the missiles

were planted, we were told it was all a big flop--no oil of importance

had been found.



   These are some of the things going on under the seas of the world;

but if we look up instead of down, the pace of stealth warfare is no

less frantic. For example, we've heard recently about the so-called

stealth technique for evading radar. America's Cruise Missile is

actually a stealth weapon intended to sneak into Russia underneath

radar. But ever since radar was invented by the British in World War

II, counter measures against it have been of interest. It started with

the dropping of metallic chaff into the air by attacking bombers. That

blinded the crude radar of those days. Then the radars were improved

to see through the chaff, so next came Electronic Countermeasures, or

ECM. ECM gadgets create radar waves of their own in such a way as to

cancel out radar reflections off the plane. Using ECM, a 10-foot

missile can be made to look like a small bird on radar, and that was

accomplished long ago by the mid 60's. Now we are suddenly hearing

about radar-absorbent coatings and rounded surfaces. Rounded surfaces

tend to diffuse radar waves instead of bouncing them back to the radar

antenna. That makes an aircraft hard to detect until it gets very

close.



   My friends, those techniques can be applied to some extent to

airplanes, but they are made to order for another type of machine in

the air above us. Rounded surfaces diffuse radar, and the ultimate in

a rounded surface is a sphere. As a result, Russia's electrogravitic

weapons platforms, the Cosmospheres, are natural stealth weapons. I

first revealed Russia's deployment of Cosmospheres in late 1977 in

AUDIO LETTER No. 29. The first few were used in an attempt at

intimidation by Russia. They created giant rumbling air booms along

our east coast and elsewhere; but later as more Cosmospheres were

deployed, they shifted to a stealth-mode of operation.



   Normally, Cosmospheres on patrol overhead hover at an altitude of

around 100 miles. At that height they are invisible to all normal

radar, but on several occasions the Russians have wanted the

Cosmospheres to show up on American radar. It's one way to send a

message in a crisis; and so in tense conditions, the Cosmospheres are

sometimes ordered to descend to low altitudes. Low, for a Cosmosphere,

usually means from 5 to 7 miles up. As they descend, they come closer

and closer to ground-based radar. As a result, they gradually become

visible on radar as they near the ground. If the Cosmospheres are

ordered to descend rapidly, the effect on radar is very dramatic. One

minute our radar shows nothing; the next minute, blips appear all over

the screen. The Cosmosphere blips seem to materialize out of nowhere.

I first reported low-altitude threats by Cosmospheres as long ago as

AUDIO LETTERS 30 and 32, and they have happened again several times

since then.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 46 I also reported that Russia has a smaller

fleet of second generation Cosmospheres. These can hover like all

Cosmospheres, but their greatest advantage is speed. They are stripped

of weapons and operate as high-speed transports just above the

atmosphere. If need be, they can accelerate all the way to orbital

speed; and operating far above the earth as they do, they are

invisible to radar.



   At least twice in the past year the Russians have made use of their

high-speed Cosmospheres for satellite snatching. The first occasion

was almost a year ago, on December 11, 1979. It was an American

satellite called "Satcom 3" made by RCA. It had been in orbit for five

days without trouble, but suddenly it just disappeared from radar

screens and stopped communicating. That was the last we ever heard

from Satcom 3. A Russian high-speed Cosmosphere had cruised up and

matched orbits with it. Then the Cosmosphere cargo bay was opened and

Satcom 3 was pulled inside. When the door was closed, it cut off the

signal of Satcom 3; and as it was gobbled up by the radar-invisible

Cosmosphere, Satcom 3 seemed to disappear. Last May 9, 1980, it

happened again. That time it was a Japanese satellite, called Agami 2.

Like Satcom 3, it just seemed to disappear without a trace. Russia was

sending a message to Japan not to play too cozy with America's secret

war build-up.



   When it comes to stealth in space, the Russians are old hands.

About three months ago, on September 1, 1980, a fascinating letter was

printed in the Cleveland Plain Dealer. It was written by A. L. Jones,

the director of the Sohio Radio Satellite Tracking Station from 1958

to 1964. He said, quote: "The technology for making aircraft invisible

to radar detection is neither new nor is it proprietary with the

United States Military. In mid summer of 1962, the Soviet Union made a

public announcement that it was launching a Cosmos Earth-orbiting

Satellite which would be invisible to radar detection. The satellite

was successfully launched, and it carried on board a radio tra

nsmitter which could be used to confirm that it was in orbit." He

mentions that NORAD requested radio-tracking data from the Sohio

Station; and continues, quote: "Normally radio tracking data is not

needed by NORAD unless radar and optical methods prove ineffective.

Apparently this was the case. After approximately two months, the

radio transmitter in the satellite ceased to operate, and the space

vehicle became invisible to all methods of tracking."



   My friends, for more than three years now, Russia has controlled

the military use of space. Russia now has many satellites, including

manned satellites which are not even being tracked in the West. For

this and other reasons, America's military plight has become

untenable, and yet the Bolsheviks here are still bent on nuclear war

against Russia! They believe they will survive, as I explained in

AUDIO LETTERS 56 and 57, but they don't care how many of the rest of

us suffer and die. One way or another they are determined to set off

an American nuclear first strike against Russia.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 55 last June I revealed one of the keystones of

Bolshevik nuclear war planning. It is America's secret mobile missile,

the Minuteman TX, the traveling Minuteman. TX Missiles are already

deployed along existing railroad tracks in our northern states.

Meanwhile the elaborate publicity cover-up for the Minuteman TX

program is continuing. This includes controversy over the alleged MX

Missile, as I reported in AUDIO LETTER No. 55. And now it also

includes stories about a possible speed-up of the mobile missile

program. On November 18 the New York Times reported that this could

include, and I quote: "making some Minuteman Missiles mobile." As

usual, the news is far behind the facts.



   I can report that the initial deployment of Minuteman TX Missiles

is now virtually completed. Now a second phase is under way. In AUDIO

LETTER No. 55 I described the special mobile-launch car that carries

each Minuteman TX. Now one by one each TX car is being joined by a

second car. On the outside it looks just like the TX car, but the

missile inside is totally different. The missile in the second car is

an Anti-Cosmosphere Missile, or ACM; and it is armed with a cobalt

ionization bomb, which I first described in AUDIO LETTER No. 42.



   In AUDIO LETTER No. 55 I described the launch sequence that is

being planned for the TX Missiles, but now something extra will also

be taking place. When the order comes to launch the TX Missiles, the

ACM will go into action first. Without waiting to slow down, the cover

will be blasted off the ACM railroad car. That will expose the ACM

Missile itself resting on its launcher. The ACM is far smaller than

the Minuteman, and its launcher is angled upward slightly, so the

moment the cover flies off, the ACM will be launched. When the ACM

takes off, it will accelerate with 100 times the force of gravity.

Less than one (1) second after launch, the ACM will be traveling more

than 1000 miles per hour; and because it takes off almost

horizontally, it will be an impossible target for the Cosmosphere

overhead to aim at. Less than 10 seconds after launch, the Cobalt

Ionization Bomb will explode in the upper atmosphere. That is supposed

to disable the Cosmospheres briefly, as I described in AUDIO LETTER

No. 42. And with the Cosmospheres neutralized, the Minuteman TX

Missiles themselves will be launched at Russia--at least that is the

plan of the Bolsheviks here.



   But Cosmosphere crews have already been given orders intended to

nullify the plan. When the ACM is launched, they will not even try to

shoot at it. Instead, they will start firing their Charged Particle

Beam weapons at the Minuteman TX railroad car. They will have about 10

seconds to destroy it before the Cobalt Ionization Bombs explode, and

that should be more than enough time to vaporize every TX and its

locomotive. But by that time the kamikaze nuclear first strike against

Russia may be impossible to stop; and if it is, the consequences for

America will be total destruction. Stealth and secrecy will end in

complete disaster.



   My friends, I have nothing more to add at this time as a "Last

Minute Summary." I hope to record my next AUDIO LETTER, No. 61, around

mid January 1981. Until then, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. I wish

you all a Merry Christmas and a happy, holy New Year.



   Thank you, and may God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

