From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



This is the Dr. Beter Audioletter, Box 16428, Ft. Worth, Texas 76133



   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 22, 1977,

and this is my Audioletter No. 29. Three days from now will be

Christmas Sunday, 1977. On that day my family and I will join millions

of others around the world in celebrating the birth of our Lord Jesus

Christ. Like other proud parents, I look forward especially to

watching my three small children as they open their gifts. For them,

Christmas is a time of pure joy, and that helps to make it so for us

grown-ups as well. Even so this Christmas they will not be receiving

the one present I wish they could have most of all, the gift of a

future to look forward to--a future of freedom, instead of slavery; a

future of plenty, instead of scarcity; a future of real peace, instead

of deliberate war. If I had the power to grant my children an abundant

future of freedom and peace all by myself, I'd do it, but that is not

possible. They cannot look forward to a future like that unless all of

our children can do the same; and, my friends, the future which we as

a nation are bequeathing to our trusting children is one for which we

deserve to be chastised severely by our Lord. Much has been entrusted

to us, and we have not measured up to that trust.



   We in America have always looked back at the tragedy Nazi Germany

became and said to ourselves: 'How could such a thing have happened?

Couldn't the German people see that they were headed toward disaster?

Why didn't they do something to stop it?' But apparently we as a

nation learned nothing at all from their example or from any of the

other lessons in history because, my friends, the United States is

headed for a disaster that dwarfs what happened to Germany, or Japan,

or Russia, or China. It is about us that future generations will say:

'How could such a thing have happened? Couldn't the American people

see that they were headed toward disaster? Why didn't they do

something to stop it?'



   More and more Americans can sense now that something is definitely

wrong. If nothing else, our survival instinct is ringing a muffled

alarm inside all of us, warning of imminent danger. But so far, most

Americans are still on the side lines, forfeiting all our rights and

failing our responsibilities under the United States Constitution.

Instead of analyzing the facts that are already before us, most of us

choose the false wisdom called Wait and See. Instead of going to the

effort to challenge our rulers about matters that are deciding our

fate, we deceive ourselves with the notion that at the next election

we can discharge our whole duty by casting a vote. Meanwhile we just

sit on the fence while we wait and see. Those who are waiting to see

do not have much longer to wait.



   At the beginning of this year in Audioletter No. 20, I pointed out

that we are in the period of undeclared warfare that history will

record as Pre-War, leading up to the planned Nuclear War One. Today as

1977 is on the wane, the Pre-War period is also on the wane. The first

stages of war itself are intended to erupt soon, beginning in the

Middle East. When I resumed recording the Audioletter in August of

this year after a silence of three months, I warned you that we are

now in a new phase as we watch increasingly the fulfillment of

man-made plans for disaster in war. Having squandered and wasted the

days of grace God gave us to prevent disaster, we as a nation are

going to suffer by our own choice.



   My three topics for today are: Topic #1--CYCLONES, AIR QUAKES, AND

SOVIET INTIMIDATION OF AMERICA; Topic #2--THE DISMANTLING OF THE NATO

ALLIANCE; and Topic #3--AMERICA'S BETRAYAL INTO A NEW BOLSHEVIK

REVOLUTION.



Topic #1--Last month I told you the locations of the Soviet Particle

Beam weapon installations that are now operational on the moon, and I

warned you that "...if the normal Soviet pattern is followed, we can

expect a test of a moon-based Particle Beam weapon against some earth

target in the very near future. If this is done, it will probably take

place under circumstances where its effects can be explained away as

having some other cause." Events are now moving very fast, my friends.

When I recorded those words last month on November 21, the first

Soviet test shot at the earth had already taken place, but

intelligence about it had not yet reached me. The perfect opportunity

for Soviet purposes was provided by a huge cyclone in the Bay of

Bengal as it approached the southeast coast of India. Soviet

cosmonauts at two of the Particle Beam installations on the moon

readied their weapons and waited for the angry storm to reach the best

possible position for the test. This occurred on the evening of

November 19, 1977, as the cyclone was lashing the coast line of the

Indian State of Andhra Pradesh. As millions of Indians were struggling

against the powerful winds and driving rain of the cyclone, two Soviet

Particle Beam weapons a quarter million miles away silently swung

around to point in their direction. The weapons were aimed at two

nearby locations at sea within the storm. To avoid any chance that the

beams might interfere with one another on the way to the target, they

were not fired simultaneously but in quick succession. Traveling at

virtually the speed of light, each beam reached the earth in less than

two seconds. As I told you in Audioletter No. 26, a charged Particle

Beam rips apart the atoms of anything it strikes, causing it to

explode. That's why, as I said then, it's an all-weather weapon--it

blasts its way through air, cloud, water, armor plate, and anything

else it strikes. When each beam aimed at the cyclone reached its

target, it produced a brilliant air flash and a tremendous explosion

at the water surface. A portion of the water itself was made to

explode by the beam, creating a localized artificial tidal wave. The

result, as described by victims who lived through it, was broadcast

over the BBC on December 13, earlier this month. A relief worker who

had just returned from the scene described what she called complete

devastation along the coastal area. Everything, including even

strongly-built houses, had been flattened, and the loss of life was

staggering; and what had transformed a bad storm into a total

disaster, my friends, was a single tidal wave that suddenly swept

ashore in the midst of the storm. I now quote the exact words of the

British relief worker as she described what eye witnesses had told

her: "There were two enormous blinding flashes and the whole sky

lighted up as though on fire, then this vast tidal wave about 30 miles

in length along the coast and 18 feet high just bore down upon them."

My friends, a tidal wave is not a normal part of a cyclone--high

waters, yes; fl ooding, yes; and normal wind-driven waves, yes--but

not tidal waves. And yet, if you will study the news reports from all

sources, you will discover that a single devastating tidal wave was

reported consistently. Eye witnesses describe it as something that

came suddenly, sweeping away everything in its path, including loved

ones; and it caused devastation inland to unheard-of distances where

people have never had reason to fear cyclones before. For example, a

ferryboat man in the village of Penumudi is quoted in the NEW YORK

TIMES for December 12 as saying, "All my life I have never been

frightened so much. We are 20 miles from the sea, and yet the wave

came all the way to destroy our boats and our living." With at least

10,000 dead, over 2,500 villages destroyed, and 2,000,000 homeless,

it's no wonder that this cyclone is rated as the worst to hit India in

more than a century. From the Soviet viewpoint, the test was a

complete success. The ability of their lunar-based charged Particle

Beams to blast an earth target with devastating force, has been

confirmed; and by carrying out their test in the midst of a violent

cyclone, they succeeded in camouflaging the man-made disaster by

combining it with a natural one. Both the lunar and earth orbital

Particle Beam weapons of the Soviet Union must now be regarded as

fully operational and tested. But the lunar Particle Beam test was

scarcely completed before tests began with yet another secret Soviet

weapon!



   Last month I reminded you of the lightning pace of weapons

advancement that was still publicly visible up until the early 1960's;

but at the secret level, military technology was advancing even

faster. As early as 1962, top military officers were seriously worried

about a future threat to America that was then already visible on the

technical horizon. This threatened future development consisted of

space platforms capable of levitating in stationary positions over our

major cities or other strategic locations. These platforms would not

be in orbit like normal earth satellites; instead, they would actually

hover for long periods of time over a single spot. This cannot be done

with orbiting satellites except for those stationed over the earth's

equator about 22,000 miles out in space. So the United States already

had the capability long ago to build these hovering platforms if

desired, manning them with forty-man crews who would remain aboard for

two months at a time. Therefore it was obvious that some day the

Soviet Union would also develop this capability, and our military

leaders wanted to be in a position to interdict any Soviet platforms

that might some day invade the space over our country. But their

urgent pleas for authority and funds to develop a defense against the

expected threat of floating platforms, were rudely turned aside--they

didn't fit in with the two-pronged program for world military

domination that I explained for you last month. On the surface,

America was to be gradually stripped of its known weaponry; while in

total secrecy, the moon program was to provide America's secret rulers

with the unadmitted ability to destroy the Soviet Union in a final

double-cross.



   Now it's 15 years later, the grand design of our secret rulers lies

in ruins--shattered less than three months ago by Russia's upset

victory in the Battle of the Harvest Moon on September 27. The men and

women of America's secret moon colony in Copernicus Crater lie

entombed where they died, bombarded by a Soviet neutron Particle Beam

weapon orbiting the earth--and now, the Soviet Union controls the moon

and from it the earth. Furthermore, spurred on by the danger of losing

the decisive Particle Beam race, the Kremlin has spent fantastic

amounts of money to develop a bewildering array of military weapons of

every type. Wherever possible they have borrowed and exploited whole

technologies developed in the West at our cost. They have bought

critical hardware to fill gaps in their own technology, paying for it

with United States financed loans guaranteed by American taxpayers.

They have contracted for western multi-national corporations to build

whole manufacturing facilities in Russia--factories that are

unparalleled here at home; and, relieved of the need to develop so

many things for themselves, they have been able to concentrate on

advanced projects that leapfrog ahead of our own technology in certain

areas. And one of these areas is the hovering space platform, which

certain of our military leaders were worried about 15 years ago.



   For many years the Soviet Union has led the world in the field of

high-energy physics and in many areas of advanced mathematics as well.

This enabled them to win the race for the Particle Beam weapon, and

has also enabled them to develop a hovering space platform design that

operates on more advanced principles than those our military

anticipated 15 years ago.



   The Soviet hovering-platform concept is built around a branch of

physics most people have never even heard of called Electrogravitics.

At the present time the Soviet Union is using electrogravitic vehicles

both on the moon and in space close to earth. Theoretically these

vehicles will some day be able to travel directly between earth and

the moon and even over inter-planetary distances, but the transition

from the gravitational field of the earth to that of the moon, among

other things, is potentially hazardous so this is not being done yet.

Instead, rockets are being used by Soviet cosmonauts to travel between

the earth and the moon, but the electrogravitic levitation is being

used on the moon itself. The electrogravitic vehicles developed so far

by the Soviet Union are still very crude--they can lift themselves

vertically up or down, using their levitation field they produce, but

have to use small rocket motors to move sideways; but crude or not,

the Soviet Union now has these hovering space platforms and we do not;

nor do we have any means of combating them, since our secret masters

have refused ever since 1962 to allow any means of defense to be

developed.



   I can now reveal that the Kremlin has begun deploying hovering

space platforms over the United States, and elsewhere, armed with

Particle Beam weapons. AT THIS MOMENT SEVEN (7) SOVIET HOVERING SPACE

PLATFORMS ARE ALREADY ON STATION OVER NORTH AMERICA AND THE WATERS

NEARBY!



Platform No. 1 is hovering 672 miles above a spot in the Atlantic

Ocean about 170 miles east of Charleston, So. Car. No. 2 is 821 miles

above a spot in the Pacific 256 miles southwest of Los Angeles,

California. No. 3 is floating 784 miles above a spot about 42 miles

west of the so-called Four Corners of Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New

Mexico. No. 4 is 821 miles directly above the intersection of the

borders of Idaho, Montana, and Canada. No. 5 is hovering 597 miles

above a spot that is about 50 miles east-northeast of Denver,

Colorado. No. 6 is 560 miles above Illinois over a spot about 80 miles

southwest of Chicago and 50 miles east of Peoria. No. 7 is at the same

altitude, 560 miles, over a spot about 10 miles northwest of

Morgantown, West Virginia, at the border of southwest Pennsylvania.



The first four platforms are manned, the other three, launched more

recently, are still being checked out by remote control prior to being

manned by crews who will be carried there by electrogravitic shuttle.



   Early this month on December 2, 1977, the crew of Soviet Platform

No. 1 received the orders they had been waiting for from Moscow. They

were to commence de-focused beam tests. A de-focused beam expands out

over a broader and broader area as it flashes through space; and as a

result, when the broad beam strikes the atmosphere, most of the energy

is spent in the air itself. (This is the exact opposite of the

situation on November 19 when the lunar Particle Beams created tight

shafts of energy that passed through the Indian cyclone to strike the

sea with great power.) The crew adjusted their Particle Beam weapon to

de-focus the beam to a prescribed amount, then at approximately 10:00

A.M. they aimed their weapon at a spot in the sea about 50 miles of f

the South Carolina coast and fired. The air itself over the ocean east

of South Carolina was made to explode with the force of a hundred tons

of TNT. Along the South Carolina coast thousands of people heard the

tremendous rumble from the blast at sea, dishes rattled, and some

windows broke. At the Lamont-Doherty Geological Laboratory north of

New York City, acoustic monitoring instruments jumped off scale.

Everyone who heard it wondered what had happened. About 3:45 that

afternoon, the crew of Platform No. 1 were ready for a second test

shot. The target area this time was the sea off the New Jersey

coast--650 miles to the north-northeast of Platform No. 1. The

Particle Beam weapon had been re-adjusted to compensate for the

greater distance involved, and then it was fired. At points along the

coast from Cape May, New Jersey, to Connecticut, thousands heard the

powerful blast as more dishes rattled and more windows broke. Again

acoustic monitors were driven off scale. On December 15, Platform No.

1 began firing again. At least five blasts were fired into the air

over the Atlantic that day. On December 20, just two days ago, still

more blasts took place; but the major news media had begun to treat

the whole matter as if it were a joke. Most Americans do not live on

the east coast, of course, and have not heard these explosions for

themselves. But listen to these words that a housewife in Manhattan

used to describe one of the explosions to me: "It was a bright sunny

day and my older kids were in school. I was at home when suddenly

there was a tremendous, tremendous boom. It sounded like it could have

been next door, or it could have been a million miles away--you just

couldn't tell. It was a low, thundering, deep, all-encompassing noise.

It sounded like a bomb, but I thought it might be an earthquake. I

grabbed the kids, my younger kids who were at home, and ran to the

wall. I glanced at the clock and it was just after 1:00 o'clock. I

waited to see what else would happen, but nothing did. I turned on the

radio to find out what had happened, but there was nothing on the

radio, nothing about what had happened. The kids in school were all

scared. The teacher said: 'It's Con-Edison.' But of course if it had

been Con-Edison, the whole neighborhood would have blown up. It just

sounded as if something had hit the bottom of the earth."



   Soviet acts of intimidation are becoming more frequent and more

vicious. Only last night around 7:00 P.M. another series of so-called

mystery explosions were heard off the east coast, and only today two

grain elevators--one in Louisiana, the other in Mississippi--exploded

within hours of one another. The first explosion took place this

morning, December 22, at the huge Continental Grain Company elevator

on the west bank of the Mississippi River, a few miles upstream from

downtown New Orleans. Eye witnesses said: "It went up like an H-bomb."

The ground shook for several seconds as though in an earthquake, a

huge mushroom cloud stretched perhaps a mile into the air, and debris

from the structure kept falling like feathers into the river. The

entire facility, storing $100,000,000 worth of grain, was ruined and

there were scores injured, perhaps two dozen killed. The portion of

the elevator nearest the river was completely blown off.



   My friends, when I resumed recording my Audioletter last August

with issue No. 25, I warned that there were 158 Soviet nuclear

mines--that is, small H-bombs--buried under water along the

Mississippi River. The destruction of the grain elevator near New

Orleans this morning resulted from the detonation of the first of

these bombs, which was located in the River near the south end of the

loading dock. Other Soviet nuclear mines are still waiting to be

exploded within a few miles of that location. One is just across the

river from the site of today's explosion in an area known as Carrolton

Bend. Another is about a mile in the upstream direction from the

ruined grain elevator under the southeast end of the Huey P. Long

Bridge. Looking downstream, another Soviet nuclear mine is lurking in

the water beneath the Greater New Orleans bridge. Further down stream

there is one at the entrance to Chalmette Ship Wharf No. 2. There are

two in the inner harbor navigation canal--one just north of the lock,

and another about three-quarters of a mile north of that. And not only

is the River mined--for example, there is a nuclear mine in Lake

Pontchartrain near the south end of the Pontchartrain causeway. It has

now been four months since I revealed the situation in the Mississippi

River. Since that time I have never been contacted by a single

official having jurisdiction of any kind along the Mississippi River

to find out more about the situation. No one has made the slightest

effort to take action, and now many have lost their lives and many

more are injured. About two hours later, the second grain elevator

suddenly exploded in Tupelo, Mississippi. Like the first, it was

destroyed by a Soviet nuclear mine; but Tupelo is not on a river, and

the mine was buried in the ground nearby.



   Having first sabotaged America's water resources, then important

governmental and military sites, the Soviet agents are still

criss-crossing our land unhampered and far advanced in sabotaging our

food-warehousing facilities. Major grain elevators throughout the

Midwest, the Great Plains, and other grain-producing areas, have been

mined already like the one that exploded today at Tupelo, Miss.



   My friends, how long will we continue to just wait and see? How

many will die before the rest of us open our eyes to the truth as it

really is? Will it go on this way until the day destitute survivors of

Nuclear War One are picking their way through the smoking ruins of

America with 160,000,000 dead?



Topic #2--Last May in Audioletter No. 24 I quoted at length from the

warnings of General George Keegan, who retired at the beginning of

this year as the Chief of Air Force Intelligence. Gen. Keegan is as

great a patriot as he is an intelligence analyst, and it was he who

first warned America that Russia was developing the awesome Particle

Beam weapon. Earlier this month, on December 14, General Keegan was

interviewed on the Bob Snyder radio show, Station WDCL in Clearwater,

Florida. General Keegan described the bleak military picture we now

confront in graphic terms. As his final question to General Keegan,

Bob Snyder asked General Keegan: "You already said that the Russians

could possibly capture Europe in 36 hours. If war broke out between

the United States and Russia, I said 'if'--who would win?" General

Keegan's answer was: "There is no question in my mind that the Soviet

Union would win." (For more information about General Keegan's

comments, I strongly suggest that you write to Mr. Snyder directly. He

publishes a very timely and informative newsletter, and you can write

to him at:

   The Bob Snyder Newsletter, Box 15,

   Safety Harbor, Florida, zip 33572)



   For those who are willing to open their eyes and see, more and more

bits of the truth are surfacing here and there that point to our true

situation; but so far only one major newspaper, the CHICAGO TRIBUNE,

has seen fit to do an in-depth job of alerting its readers to the

possible magnitude of the silent war that is already going on. When I

revealed the Soviet underwater missile crisis of 1976 during July and

August of that year, I alerted you to the major emphasis that the

Soviet Union now puts on its navy. And in a Sunday edition earlier

this month, the CHICAGO TRIBUNE ran a series of articles in the

special report section (Note: Section 2 "Perspective/Business")

entitled "UNDERSEA WARFARE." Originally the articles were to have run

over a period of days beginning on December 7, the anniversary of

Pearl Harbor; but rather than run the risk of being pressured to halt

the series after it began, the TRIBUNE had the courage to run them all

at once on Sunday, December 4, 1977. I strongly recommend that you go

to your library and read the CHICAGO TRIBUNE articles on "Undersea

Warfare" in their entirety, and read them closely, my friends.



   To give you some idea of what you will find, I'll now quote some

passages from the various articles including both the special report

section and the lead article, which appeared on page 1:



   "The cold, dark war underseas is an expensive and essential element

of allied military planning at all levels. Occasionally its muffled

sounds have reached the ears of the public, but not often. The

underseas war is rigged for silent running." "The reason the ASW (Anti

Submarine Warfare) programs are cloaked in so much secrecy, officials

said, is that defending the sea has become the weakest link in the

chain of American preparation for both conventional and nuclear war."

Two paragraphs later: "The high stakes involved have also produced a

continuing mini-war on and below the high seas as ships, submarines,

and planes of the United States and its allies fence with Soviet

forces testing each other's systems. One arena for these so-far

bloodless encounters is the North Atlantic, where the U.S. has

positioned its most effective ASW forces and equipment." Later in the

same article: "But it was learned that the system is far from

completely effective. Frequently, U.S. hunters lose Soviet submarines

after tracking them for a while. As a result, the U.S. command is

confident it knows how many Soviet submarines are at sea, but little

confidence about their whereabouts."



   I might mention, my friends, that 2-1/2 years ago, in May 1975,

Admiral Gorshkoff, the head of the Soviet navy, declared that the

Soviet Union has solved the problem of tracking and neutralizing our

submarines. In September 1976 I revealed that a Soviet

missile-planting mini-submarine had become trapped in Chesapeake Bay

due to a mechanical malfunction. I urged that it be captured by the

United States Navy and the incident used to expose to the whole world

the Soviet preparations for surprise nuclear attack. But as I reported

the following month in Audioletter No. 17, President Gerald Ford

knuckled under to Soviet demands in the Red Friday Agreement of

October 1, 1976, and the Soviet Navy was allowed to enter Chesapeake

Bay under cover of night to retrieve the mini-sub, whose crew had died

by then. The very idea that a Soviet submarine could penetrate so

deeply into American territorial waters, struck some of my listeners

as incredible at the time; and the idea that we would let them get

away with it, may have seemed even more far-fetched to those who do

not understand what is really going on behind the scenes.



   But listen now to quotations from the CHICAGO TRIBUNE page 1 lead

story about undersea warfare by Jim Coates and Jack Fuller. The

headline is: "U.S., Soviet subs prowling dangerous waters." "United

States spy submarines have been penetrating Soviet territorial waters

for the last 30 months despite a widespread belief inside the

government that the controversial maneuvers had stopped, sources have

told the TRIBUNE." Two paragraphs later, after assigning "Holystone"

as the code name for the program: "On one occasion before the 1975

disclosures, the TRIBUNE learned, a U.S. spy submarine was temporarily

grounded beneath the busy port of Vladivostok. Holystone critics

attempted to demonstrate the seriousness of the penetrations by

speculating what American reaction would be if a Soviet submarine were

discovered aground in San Diego Harbor. While few details were

available about the Vladivostok incident, sources said it apparently

occurred when the vessel was running on low power to avoid detection

and struck the harbor bottom." Further on: "Intelligence insiders said

that the Russians have known about the U.S. missions for years even

when they were carried out under tight security. Because the Soviets

have never publicly complained about the U.S. undersea forays, some

analysts have suggested that a similar Russian probing of American sea

space is under way." And one more quotation: "Several former

government officials agreed to shed light on the silent battles under

the seas. Some said they were willing to speak in an effort to

illustrate the dangers of the current situation."



   My friends, the undersea bombs and missiles I've told you about now

for well over a year multiply these dangers many times over. So do

their close relatives, the underwater mines that are now planted all

around the United States as well as in other countries. But what makes

them most deadly is the failure to take counteractive measures. It's

now been proven that undersea missiles and bombs as well as underwater

nuclear mines planted near our dams can be located and removed, given

the proper equipment and the will to use it. Last month I warned that

the Kensico Reservoir, Tarrytown Reservoir, and Pocantico Lake north

of New York City all contain Soviet nuclear mines, as did the Hudson

River near the east end of the Tappan Zee Bridge. On December 7, I

received an important call from an official of Westchester County. It

was only the first call, but for once someone was taking the threat

seriously. Within days, action was quietly being taken to find and

remove the bombs in the three bodies of water, and by late last week I

received word that all three had been successfully located and

removed. Meanwhile, the so-called Federal Dam Inspection Program has

suddenly shifted into high gear, providing a perfect opportunity for

the Army Corps of Engineers to find and remove many more nuclear mines

nationwide. So far I can only confirm that Westchester County, the

home of the Rockefellers, has benefitted from such quick action.



   As for the undersea cobalt bombs that now dot the ocean floor

worldwide, the Union of South Africa has become the first nation to

take action. In late September, I informed the government through

intermediaries of the locations of 10 Soviet cobalt bombs planted off

the South African coast. They were planted along the coast from a

point about 200 miles northwest of Cape Town, around the Cape of Good

Hope, and around to the east to a point about 160 miles east-northeast

of Durban. I also relayed the locations of two bombs within South

Africa--one near Johannesburg, the other close to Kimberley. The South

African government is taking measures to remove these bombs, and so

far four bombs from Cape Town to Port Elizabeth have been found and

removed. That's the good news, my friends; but the bad news is that

nowhere is the public being let in on what is happening. As a result,

it's only a matter of time until Soviet agents secretly replace the

bombs that have been secretly removed from the two reservoirs and the

lake in Westchester County--just as the Soviet Navy has always

replaced undersea missiles wherever they were picked up. By the same

token, bombs secretly removed by South Africa will eventually be

replaced.



   The end of all this secret jockeying is demonstrated by the current

plight of the United States, and now Great Britain as well. Over a

year ago the United States Navy was forced to cease and desist from

removing each round of Soviet undersea missiles from our territorial

waters as they were planted. Now over 200 short-range Soviet nuclear

missiles infest our territorial waters, including over 50 in the Great

Lakes. Great Britain held out for a full year longer than the United

States, but she too has finally succumbed. For a year and more the

Royal Navy kept locating and extracting Soviet undersea missiles from

her own waters, but this fact unfortunately was never made public

officially. America's disastrous loss of the Space Battle of the

Harvest Moon in late September rendered the situation untenable, and

in early October British Foreign Minister David Owen went to Moscow to

capitulate; and now as a result, the British Isles are surrounded by

no fewer than 60 Soviet underwater missiles--52 around England, Wales,

and Scotland, and 8 around Ireland. As in August 1976, Great Britain

is once again more densely targeted by Soviet undersea missiles than

any other spot on earth; and Britain, the only other power to join the

United States and the Soviet Union in the so-called SALT talks, is now

joining the Un ited States in the process of surrender through

disarmament. The badly weakened NATO Alliance is now in the process of

being neutralized and dismantled completely. For years the growing

might of the Warsaw Pact nations has been tipping the military balance

in Europe ever more heavily against NATO, but the process that is now

splitting and destroying NATO is not the Warsaw Pact threat. The coup

de grace is being delivered by the controlled Carter administration.

Obediently doing as it is told by the Soviet Union, the Carter

administration is abandoning NATO, and the Europeans know it.



   Very much the same process had been planned anyway under the

Rockefeller grand design that I've detailed for you in the past. But

now, since the Rockefeller plans unraveled in late September, the

Soviet Union is in control; and like a judo throw that enables a

person to use his opponent's strength to defeat him, the Soviet Union

is now using the Rockefeller brothers' own machinations against them.

NATO badly needs the ground-launched Cruise Missile in order to offset

the sheer numerical superiority of Warsaw Pact forces. Originally, the

Cruise Missile was intended to be what is called a theater weapon,

whether used in the air, on the ground, or at sea. For that purpose

the Cruise Missile would be very useful; but in order to provide an

excuse for the scrapping of the B-1 Bomber, a true strategic weapon

system, the image of the Cruise Missile was upgraded to that of a

fearsome new strategic weapon, which it is not. And now, the range of

the Cruise Missile is being restricted in the SALT talks so as to

cripple its effectiveness. Our NATO allies are watching helplessly as

the Carter administration bargains away their dwindling hopes for

continued survival. The same is true of the Neutron Bomb which has

been given an image that makes it very hard for European politicians

to defend to its public. Yet NATO military planners see it as the only

effective way to erase the ability of the Warsaw Pact to roll over

their countries and conquer them in a blitzkrieg. The massive armored

might of the Warsaw Pact forces would be neutralized by the Neutron

Bomb because the radiation it produces would penetrate the armor plate

and incapacitate or kill the crews inside, and they would not lay

waste their own countries in the process of defending them if the

Neutron Bombs were used. But Radio Moscow hammers away every day

against the Neutron Bomb, and the Carter administration is now

throwing away the right to give NATO the Neutron Bomb in the SALT

talks. Meanwhile the security of western Europe grows more precarious

by the day. Certain forces within the CIA have already lit the fuse

that is intended to make the Middle East explode into war by

programming President Sadat of Egypt to seek a separate peace with

Israel. At the same time, reports have reached the West of a rare

conference in Moscow of the Soviet Union's top military leaders in

Europe, the Far East, and around the Soviet frontiers. The entire

purpose of the conference was to alert all Soviet forces to be on

continuous alert to go to war at a moment's notice.



   Events are moving steadily forward to the stage of the horrendous

act of terrorism which I warned last March which will throw all three

major religions into turmoil while triggering a war. Consider these

words of Israeli Prime Minister Begin on Sunday, December 18, just a

few days ago. Appearing on the CBS program "Face the Nation" Begin

said, "If we reach an agreement, as I hope we shall, then I would

suggest that President Carter invites both President Sadat and myself

to come to Washington and then we shall be, let me say, a cycle of

friendship and faith--a Christian President, a Moslem leader, and the

Jewish Prime Minister--and announce to the world 'Peace unto you.'"



   When war comes in the Middle East, the Soviet Union now plans to

pick up all the pieces yet leave the United States to receive the

blame of world opinion for helping bring about the war. The Carter

administration is not master of its own house, and has now been drawn

into position of being a party to the separate peace negotiations that

are leading to war. Radio Moscow, meanwhile, is speaking out

continually against the treachery that has divided the Arab world as

never before. When the Middle East war comes, it will cripple the

heart of Europe which depends on the Middle East for most of its oil.

It will be the final straw for western Europe, which will fall into

Russia's hands like a ripe plum, either by military invasion or by

going the way of Finland and tacitly joining the Soviet sphere of

influence. Southern Africa will be dealt a mortal blow as well, cut

off from European supplies and support and 90% of its oil from Iran.

And the Middle East itself, thanks to the unceasing Soviet

denunciations of what is happening now, will slip back under more

complete Soviet domination than ever before. It will be another

Vietnam for the United States, only far worse. NATO will be no more;

and after expending American lives and losing billions of military

hardware, America's only reward will be the fruits of a cut-off of oil

from the Middle East. Manipulation of the resulting shortages will

make them seem far worse than they really are, and emergency economic

controls will be imposed by our outlaw government to grind us all down

under ever more complete control.



   My friends, the situation is grave. The only significant reservoir

of patriotism and loyalty to America that still exists at the top

levels of our government is in the ranks of the military. In the

Soviet underwater missile crisis of 1976, it was the Joint Chiefs of

Staff--not Congress and not the President--who were responsible for

preventing a nuclear Pearl Harbor attack on America. General George S.

Brown, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, took action only within the

constraints of law, but it was he who argued mightily and successfully

for President Ford to overrule Henry Kissinger and give the order for

the Soviet missiles to be removed. The Kremlin can smell the scent of

victory and does not intend to be tripped up again, so the Carter

administration has been ordered by Russia to dismantle the Joint

Chiefs of Staff by making drastic changes that will destroy its

effectiveness. Preparations to do this are now underway, and already

articles critical of the Joint Chiefs are appearing in order to

prepare the public to accept any such change without giving it a

second thought. If anything at all is to be done to arrest the

headlong tumble of our country into disaster, it will have to include

superb strategy and expert coordination of our weakened military

forces. Once the Joint Chiefs of Staff structure is gone, that chance

will be gone with it. But unless the "Wait and See" attitude of many

Americans changes very quickly, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are

finished.



Topic #3--AMERICA'S BETRAYAL INTO A NEW BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION



My friends, recently I have challenged the four Rockefeller brothers,

now that their grand plan has been upset by the Soviet Union, to turn

over a new leaf. I have urged them to cast their lot with us, the

people of the United States of America, and to begin using their

wealth and resources for the good of us all. Even at this late date a

sincere new beginning might enable their names to go down in history

with honor instead of with a curse; but I must tell you now, my

friends, that we have their answer. I have told you in the past about

the role of the Rockefeller empire in helping to finance the Bolshevik

Revolution to take over Russia in 1917, and I have told you about the

Rockefeller-Soviet alliance that grew out of that, and since the

spring of 1976 I have been chronicling for you the collapse of this

alliance in mutual double-cross. What an earlier Rockefeller

generation spawned has gotten out of control of the third generation.

But having learned nothing from this, the four Rockefeller brothers

are now preparing to attempt a repeat performance--that is, a new

Bolshevik Revolution right here in the United States of America.



   Last month I let you in on the sec ret of understanding the Kremlin

today. The Kremlin isnow run, not by the atheistic Communists known

as Bolsheviks but self-proclaimed Spiritual Communists. Unlike the old

Bolsheviks, who were always internationally minded and cooperated with

the Rockefeller empire, the Spiritual Communists are strong

nationalists who want Soviet Russia to rule the world. As the alliance

between the Rockefellers and the Soviets has been disintegrating, so

too has the internal alliance between the old Bolsheviks and Spiritual

Communists in Russia. More and more the old Bolsheviks are being

expelled from Russia, only to be welcomed into the United States with

open arms; and the key federal regulatory agencies which govern

Americans' lives and commerce are rapidly being packed with hundreds

and hundreds of these arrivals from the Soviet Union. Just as

outsiders sealed Russia's fate in 1917, the stage is being set here

and now in the United States for a new Bolshevik Revolution. The old

Bolsheviks flooding into our country from the Soviet Union are bitter

enemies of the current regime in Russia. The positions of power and

control which they once enjoyed there have been lost. The Rockefeller

brothers too are now the Kremlin's bitter enemies, so the alliance

between them is a natural one, continuing in fact, an alliance that

used to link Washington and Moscow. The Rockefellers believe that the

flood of Bolsheviks into our government is the fastest way they have

of rooting out the large number of Soviet agents whom they placed in

our government in the first place and who still take their orders from

Moscow. But, my friends, this unholy alliance within our own land,

while it is directed against Russia, is also directed against you and

me. The freedom we love, our Constitution, our entire way of life is

to be destroyed and replaced by the Bolshevik system of total control

over our lives.



   My friends, this is hardly the kind of message that I enjoy

recording just three days before celebrating the birth of our Lord,

Jesus the Christ, but it is He who said, "...you shall know the truth,

and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32) And my Christmas wish

for you and your loved ones is FREEDOM, now and in the future. Without

truth, freedom is impossible, but it is easy to be free once you know

the Truth.



   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and

may God bless and protect each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

