From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



(This recording is a product of Audio Books, Inc., Box 16428, Fort

Worth, Texas 76133)



    Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is April 24, 1977, and

this is my monthly Audioletter No. 23.



    Two months ago in Audioletter No. 21 for February 1977, I

explained how America had been turned into a nation-wide energy addict

over the course of two generations and more, and how this energy

addiction is to be used against us by the four Rockefeller brothers in

turning off our national security; and just four days ago, on April

20, 1977, this process got under way in earnest by way of David

Rockefeller's revolutionary energy program announced to the world by

his employee, Jimmy Carter. To the casual observer it must seem

incredible--a new administration under a new President, with no

previous experience in Washington, has in only three short months done

what no previous administration has ever succeeded in doing: developed

a comprehensive, detailed energy program for the most complex economy

on earth. Furthermore, Mr. Carter tells us that we must do as he tells

us in order to avoid "a national catastrophe"; and he says we must act

now. Why the rush? Why this sudden urgency? And why does he go out of

his way to call his energy program "the moral equivalent of war"? The

answer lies in what I warned you about at the end of monthly

Audioletter No. 22 just last month.



    The CIA is hard at work arranging what is to be the CIA's crowning

achievement--the staging of a horrendous act of terrorism that is

intended to cause war to erupt in the whole of the Middle East. This

is to set in motion a modified, up-dated version of the detailed war

plan I revealed in monthly Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975. This

plan includes a limited nuclear strike from the Sinai to cap off Arab

OPEC oil wells except those in Libya, which is controlled by the CIA.

This will lead immediately to very harsh energy rationing in the

United States, and the Federal government will at last get to issue

those precious gas rationing coupons that have been awaiting use now

for over three years. So the Carter energy plan with its underlying

warlike atmosphere is actually the first step in a gradual shift unto

a war footing for the United States. It has the same purpose as the

declaration of national emergency which President Franklin D.

Roosevelt proclaimed in May 1941, six months before Pearl Harbor, to

start getting America ready for war he was helping to bring about. The

second major step in our progressive shift onto war footing is

intended to occur the time of the cut-off of Middle East oil, by war.

This will provide a perfect excuse for an actual Declaration of

National Emergency, and that in turn will activate all the dictatorial

presidential powers spelled out in Executive Order 11921 signed by

President Ford very quietly in June 1976, and described in my

Audioletter No. 14 for July 1976.



    Audioletter No. 14, of course, is also the issue in which I first

revealed the presence of Soviet underwater missiles and bombs in our

own territorial waters. The terrible Middle East incident now brewing,

which I fervently hope and pray will somehow be sidetracked by its

advanced exposure, is to cause a limited nuclear war in the Middle

East. That in turn is supposed to initiate a chain of events,

culminating in Nuclear War One between the Soviet Union and the United

States of America. Originally this was to have been a carefully

programmed war for the mutual benefit of the Rockefeller cartel and

their Soviet allies, with the Rockefellers and their intimates riding

out the war safely in the nuclear-safe zone across the northern United

States; but ever since the Soviet Union began its double cross of the

Rockefellers last summer 1976, the plans for war have been undergoing

frantic revisions. Even the insane Rockefeller concessions to the

Soviets, embodied in the Red Friday agreement of October 1, 1976

(which I revealed that month in Audioletter No. 17) have failed to

fully reinstate the Rockefeller/Soviet alliance--so now anything can

happen. The Rockefeller brothers, who for so long have tried to play

God with their immense power, are now finding out that they too are

fallible and human, even if they still refuse to consciously admit it.

Today, my friends, the power of the Rockefeller empire is in the

process of destroying itself; but just as Samson pulled down the

temple around him, the Rockefeller brothers threaten to pull down

modern civilization around their heads as their power runs out of

control and collapses into the inferno of nuclear war.



    Earlier this month, on April 7, 1977, Prime Minister Rabin of

Israel resigned. The press has played up his resignation as if it were

another Watergate, but actually it was only a technicality having to

do with a modest bank account held here in Washington, D.C. by Rabin

against government regulations. Overnight Rabin was out of office, and

his public career has been described as ruined; but the real reason

for Rabin's lightning exit from Israeli politics was that he learned

of the CIA plot to ignite war in the Middle East, and he wanted no

part of it. It's almost a replay of Sir Harold Wilson's sudden

unexplained resignation as Prime Minister of Great Britain on March

16, 1976, just over a year ago; and as I explained then in monthly

Audioletter No. 10, Wilson resigned because he had learned of the

coming war plan and wanted nothing to do with it. And so the build-up

toward war continues, and our rulers know it. But what of the American

public in general? How many know what danger we are in? And

especially, how many believe it enough to do something about it? My

friends, most Americans today are on vacation from reality, but

reality will have to be faced one day in the not too distant future.



    My three special topics for today are: Topic #1--THE PRE-WAR

SABOTAGE OF AMERICA, Topic #2--THE COMING NAVAL BATTLE FOR THE UNITED

STATES AND THE WORLD, and Topic #3--THE UNTOLD PERSONAL SACRIFICE OF

GENERAL GEORGE S. BROWN.



Topic #1--In the early days of the 20th century the

Rockefeller/Standard Oil monopoly had already become supreme in the

United States, but abroad it faced two powerful competitors in oil.

One was the British Empire, whose destruction by means of two World

Wars I've discussed in a number of my past talking tapes. The other

foreign competitor was even bigger than the British Empire in oil, and

it was attacked and destroyed first. That competitor was Czarist

Russia. After the Bolshevik Revolution took place in 1917, property

owners and businessmen of all kinds were dispossessed and liquidated

in great numbers. And included in this, by design, was the utter

destruction of the oil fields, refineries, oil tankers, everything

having to do with oil. The small band of revolutionaries under Lenin

and Trotsky who had been sent into Russia with the help of Rockefeller

financing had done their job well; and within a few years the new

Communist regime of the Soviet Union welcomed the Rockefeller/Standard

Oil interests with open arms to re-develop the huge Russian oil

reserves. Ever since that day, right down to the present, practically

all of the oil leaving the Soviet Union has been carried in oil

tankers of the Rockefeller/Standard Oil empire under various names,

nominees, and national flags. For a thorough and most unusual expose

of the oil competition presented to the Rockefellers by Czarist

Russia, I highly recommend a new book by Robert V. Tolf, entitled THE

RUSSIAN ROCKEFELLERS--THE SAGA OF THE NOBEL FAMILY AND THE RUSSIAN OIL

INDUSTRY published by the Hoover Institution Press, Stanford

University, Stanford, Calif. 94305--the price is $15.95 postpaid.



    For decades following the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet rulers

were absolutely dependent upon an uninterrupted flow of transfusions

from the West of money, technical know-how, food, and arms. The

Kremlin ruled a huge nation with an iron fist, and the Rockefellers

shared this rule with the Kremlin. The Soviet Union, therefore,

appeared to be the perfect vehicle for bringing the entire world under

the control of the super-rich Rockefellers and their intimates. All

that was necessary, or so they thought, was to gradually build up the

Soviet system while bleeding to death the harder to control United

States and the western world. This was the situation the four

Rockefeller brothers inherited long ago-they literally grew up with

it, and could hardly imagine things being any different. But now

things are different. The Soviet Union can now survive without

continued outside help, and now they have been double-crossing the

Rockefellers and we the people will have to suffer for it. Now, both

the Rockefellers and the Soviets are maneuvering, playing a tricky

game, and all the while trying to emerge supreme from the conflict to

come. But, just as it was planned before the Rockefeller/Soviet

alliance began coming apart, the main and prime battleground is to be

the United States of America. The Soviet Union is busy at work trying

to weaken America here and abroad so that we can be defeated in

Nuclear War One; and the Rockefellers are trying to turn our nation

into a complete dictatorship under their domination. Both are trying

to bend the weakening of America's freedom to their own special

advantage.



    The centerpiece of the Rockefeller program to completely take over

America right now is the so-called CARTER ENERGY PROGRAM. Recently the

CIA s-u-d-d-e-n-l-y upgraded its estimates of Soviet spending for new

military equipment and installations to four times the previous figure

so as to alarm us. In a similar vein, the CIA has also provided Jimmy

Carter with grist for his energy mill to grind us into submission by

issuing a report saying world oil reserves are much lower than

previously thought. Both CIA reports are rubbish, issued purely for

propaganda purposes; so the CIA under Admiral Turner, who is a

Rockefeller man, is continuing with the preparations for the limited

nuclear strike from the Sinai in order to get the war started.

American F-15 fighter bombers are now available in the Sinai and would

hit all of the five or more Arab target areas with ease; and the

special low-yield nuclear weapons for the job are already on the

scene, currently stored underground at the so-called American

Monitoring Station in the Sinai. The bombs themselves are atomic, not

hydrogen, very clean, with primary blast effects confined to a radius

of only 300 to 400 yards--just right for a so-called surgical attack

to wipe out the oil wells in the target areas.



    As for America, even though the Alaskan oil is supposed to start

flowing through the pipeline this summer, it will not come into the

lower United States. It happens to be high sulphur oil of a type which

west-coast refineries cannot handle even though there have been ten

years to get ready for Alaskan oil. Instead, the Rockefeller plan is

to ship this oil to Japan at a handsome profit, of course, and make up

the difference with more imports of, guess what--Arab oil. When the

Arab oil is cut off, there will be some attempts to ship some of the

otherwise useless Alaskan oil to the Gulf Coast by small, inefficient

tankers through the Panama Canal, which is targeted both by underwater

missiles and by missiles in Guyana. The sharp drop in our oil supplies

will also help to intensify the reduction in food supplies, which is

already resulting from drought here in America. Many factors are

contributing to the drought situation, including not only the Soviet

weather modification activities I've mentioned in the past, but also

activities under Rockefeller control. For example, I mentioned in

Audioletter No. 9 for February 1976 that for years the Rockefeller oil

companies have been knowingly lowering the underground water table in

many areas of the Midwest and Great Plains by means of excessive

pumping from their oil wells; and now, in many of these very areas,

the problem of low ground water is adding to the drought crisis.



    Meanwhile, the Rockefellers never lose sight of their objectives,

no matter how much they are forced to change their tactics along the

way. Their objective for America is DICTATORSHIP, according to the

pattern spelled out in their secret New Constitution, which I revealed

in my Audio Book Talking Tape No. 4 released in July 1975. Under the

guise of "governmental reorganization", the provisions of their

dictatorial new constitution are being imposed on the United States

piecemeal, gradually, while our real Constitution is increasingly

"interpreted" out of existence.



    But of all the things that determine whether a nation will survive

or succumb in time of crisis, the human spirit is still the most

important. A strong spirit and deep resolve can overcome seemingly

insurmountable obstacles, and it can make a people impossible to

conquer; but a weak spirit, without convictions or values, leaves a

people defenseless--defenseless no matter how much armor they may wear

or what weapons they may command. This is why the human spirit has

been the most consistent target of all, both of the Rockefeller "One

World" group and of the rulers of the Soviet Union.



    Last month in Audioletter No. 22 I pointed out one of the extremes

in church philosophy that has been promoted wherever possible for

generations by the Rockefellers and their collaborators. This extreme

is to divorce the moral and spiritual lessons of religions from daily

decisions and actions, as if the two had no relationship to one

another except for lip service. For whatever reasons, this extreme is

personified today by one Jimmy Carter. The opposite extreme is equally

deadly, if not more so. This is to dilute the spiritual teaching for

which churches originally existed and replace it with preaching about

economic, political, and social issues. To do this is to play with

fire; but this is exactly what the National Council of Churches and

its sister organization the World Council of Churches have been doing

for decades. Prior to November 28, 1950, the National Council was

known as the Federal Council of Churches. For many years the Federal

Council had been dominated at the national level by the Rockefellers

and their agent John Foster Dulles, and was the recipient of several

grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. But the Federal Council became

so totally identified with political activism in support of socialist

causes that it became an object of increasing distrust. Accordingly,

the name was changed to the National Council of Churches, and its

tarnished halo was polished up with public assurances that this was a

new organization which would devote itself to the real business of the

church. There were many influential laymen in the churches under the

umbrella of the National Council who wanted to help insure that the

supposedly new organization would truly devote itself to proper areas

of church concern. Asa result, a National Lay Committee was brought

into being under the chairmanship of the late J. Howard Pug h, a truly

great American, who was the director and president of the Sun Oil Co.

when it was still free of the grasping clutches of the Rockefellers.

The National Lay Committee existed from March 28, 1951, until June 30,

1955.



    The whole story of what happened to the National Lay Committee of

the National Council of Churches is told in the "Chairman's Final

Report" by J. Howard Pugh. Unfortunately this important report has

long been suppressed and buried. I have in my possession one of the

very few copies still known to be in existence; therefore I will read

a few brief passages from the Chairman's Explanatory Letter, which

serves as a Foreword to the Report as a whole. These quotations are

taken in sequence; and although they do not do justice to Mr. Pugh's

complete explanatory letter, much less the entire 316-page Report, I

believe you will find them revealing:



   "In the failure of this most important effort to bring about an

enduring partnership between the clergy and laity, I feel a very real

responsibility to provide a comprehensive and factual account of those

steps which led to the Board's action--discontinuing lay

participation."



   "We lay people found ourselves not only deeply in the minority but

often poles apart from the clergy who invariably out-voted us 10 to 1

in these sessions."



   "The members of the Lay Committee were often misunderstood in their

urgency to keep the churches out of politics and their insistence on

the promisee evangelism. Our premise was that instead of appealing to

government, the church should devote its energies to the work of

promoting the attributes of Christianity--truth, honesty, fairness,

generosity, justice, and charity in the hearts and minds of men. We

attempted to emphasize that Christ stressed not the expanded State,

but the dignity and responsibility of the individual."



   "Their philosophy, it seemed to the Lay Committee, looked to an

ever-expanding government."



   "With few exceptions, the members of the Lay Committee had agreed

to serve only because they had been assured that the new National

Council would avoid the political involvements and controversies of

the old Federal Council of Churches, which was now superseded."



   "Most of the members of the Lay Committee came finally to the

realization that a wide chasm existed between the thinking of the

laity and the clergy and executives of the denominational bodies which

comprise the National Council."



   "Thus, on June 30, 1955, the Lay Committee ceased to exist as a

committee of the General Board."



   "The members of the Lay Committee believed, and so stated, that the

political adventures of the National Council in the fields of economic

and political controversy would seriously hinder and not further

Christian leadership in the pressing fields of evangelism, fellowship,

and education."



   "It appears from the record that the National Council could find no

room for opposition to the philosophies and practices carried over

from the old Federal Council. Lacking the patience to resolve the

basic problem, it has sought to bury it."



Thus ended, my friends, more than 20 years ago the last major effort

to deflect the Rockefeller-dominated National Council of Churches away

from its political programs and toward concern for spiritual matters.

After more than four years of frustrating effort, the National Lay

Committee was dissolved. This signaled the end of any influence of the

general church population of America on the policies of the National

Council of Churches. The National Council proceeded on its way,

proclaiming to the public that it represented 34,000,000 Protestants,

while using this power base to help undermine our free Republic. The

National Council has done much to help dull and weaken the spirit of

millions of Americans, softening our approach in opposition to

Communism. Let us hope and pray that in these dangerous days they will

at last see the light and begin to work at last to build up the

American spirit, instead of destroying it.



Topic #2--In monthly Audioletter No. 15 for August 1976, I explained

that the planting of short-range underwater-launch nuclear missiles in

our territorial waters was part of the Soviet naval strategy for the

United States and world conquest. The same continues to be the case

now. Admiral Gorshkoff, who has commanded the Soviet navy for more

than 20 years, has built it into a fighting force that is radically

different from any other navy the world has ever seen; and as we near

the very threshold of war, it is no accident that the Rockefeller

insider who now heads the CIA is also an Admiral--4-star Admiral

Stansfield Turner. The CIA has become the most powerful military

organization in the United States, and Nuclear War One will revolve

around naval strategy. Both the importance of the Soviet Navy and its

great difference from our own United States Navy can be illustrated by

just one fact: When the supersonic Backfire long-range bomber entered

operational service in the Soviet Union late in 1974, it did so

simultaneously with the Soviet Navy as well as with the Soviet Air

Force. This is like giving our own new supersonic bomber, the B-1, to

our Navy to fly--or, since we still do not have the B-1 to counter the

Soviet Backfire, having our navy fly B-52s. Of course our own navy

does not fly strategic bombers. The United States Navy, like the

British Navy and most of the other great navies of history, has as one

of its primary missions the protection of our sea lanes of commerce--a

war which is basically defensive in nature. Since World War II our

navy has also acquired offensive missions which have gradually assumed

greater importance, including the ability to attack an enemy from the

sea with the submarine-launched ballistic missiles. But the

traditional defensive mission of protecting our sea lanes can never be

neglected. Admiral Gorshkoff, however, has been able to concentrate on

building a navy which is almost totally offensive in character. Soviet

fishing trawlers, some of them genuine, roam the world; but the Soviet

Union does not depend for its survival on the sea nearly as much as

the United States. So the Soviet Navy is designed first and foremost

for offensive operations; and this not only includes the ability to

interdict enemy sea lanes and attack enemy naval forces at sea, it

also includes an unprecedented emphasis on projecting naval power

ashore. This in turn means not only the ability to carry out

amphibious assaults and tactical bombardment, but strategic attack--a

role we usually tend to think of only in terms of the Soviet Air Force

with its ICBMs and bombers.



    The new Soviet Navy of Admiral Gorshkoff also differs from ours in

another way. Aside from missile submarines, the American Navy is

structured around the aircraft carrier; whereas the Soviet Navy is

built around the submarine. American task forces include all kinds of

ships designed to coordinate with the needs and capabilities of the

aircraft carrier. By the same token, Soviet surface ships of all kinds

are intended to support the huge submarine force in various ways. This

applies even to the new Soviet aircraft carriers which are now

beginning to appear on the scene since Soviet naval aviation is

heavily oriented toward anti-submarine warfare, although it has other

capabilities as well. The relative naval capabilities of the Soviet

Union and the United States have never been considered in the

Strategic Arms Limitations Talks, the SALT talks, except with regard

to sea-launch ballistic missiles; and yet it is the coming naval

confrontation that could all by itself determine the outcome of

Nuclear War One.  It is often forgotten, for example, that the North

Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is primarily a naval alliance. We

hear frequently about NATO in the controlled major media of the United

States as though the only problems were Army problems--such as rusty

tanks and lack of spare parts; and when the Supreme Allied Commander,

Europe, who is presently General Alexander Haig, is mentioned in the

news, he is often called the head of NATO, or some such, but actually

he's only one of three co-equal Commanders in NATO. The other two are

Naval Commanders--they are the Commander-in-Chief, Channel Command;

and the Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic, the latter based at

Norfolk, Va. NATO depends for its very life on its naval strength,

including the ability to keep open the vital North Atlantic sea lanes.

But now, Soviet naval Backfire bombers with air-to-surface, anti-ship

missiles threaten to cut those North Atlantic sea lanes in time of

war; and the Mediterranean, which was once dominated by the United

States Navy, is now heavily populated by the Soviet Navy as well.

While the Soviet Navy has undergone explosive growth over the past

decade to the formidable armed force that it is today, the United

States Navy has been allowed to shrink to half its former size with

more and more ships aging and obsolescent. When the Arab oil is cut

off by war soon, Europe will have to fall back on its meager reserves,

which will run out within 60 to 90 days. Interdiction of NATO sea

lanes at that point by the Soviet Union could cause all of Europe to

fall like a plum into Soviet hands. This is especially true in light

of the short-range Soviet underwater missiles in European territorial

waters, which I mentioned in Audioletter No. 22 last month. So far

only Great Britain shows signs of being able to withstand such a

course of events. As I mentioned last month, the British government

had requested the latest missile coordinates from me, and I had

supplied them. Of the 29 Soviet missiles around the British Isles at

that time, all but one had been removed by the Royal Navy as of April

18--6 days ago. However, I have been informed of 3 newly planted

missiles there, and I have relayed these to the British for action.

Great Britain also may have the benefit of her new North Sea oil

fields which, barring sabotage or the like, should make Britain

independent of foreign oil producers in the near future.



    Since I spoke to you last, action has been taken in another area

also. Acting on information which I relayed, of the 8 missiles around

southern Africa, seven have now been taken up. At last report,

however, the missile lying off Mozambique targeted on Rhodesia was

still in place. Such removals of missiles are better than no action at

all, but they are still no more than holding actions. What is needed,

if war is to be prevented, is for this deadly cat-and-mouse game to be

stopped altogether by revealing to the whole world what the Soviet

Navy is up to. Late last September, as I revealed in monthly

Audioletter No. 16, the United States had a golden opportunity to do

just that, and to do so while the Soviet underwater missile threat was

only a small fraction of what it is now. At that time, a Soviet

missile-laying mini-sub equipped with sonar-defeating design features

entered Chesapeake Bay and became trapped there, due to a malfunction

that ultimately killed the crew. It was a perfect opportunity for the

United States to pick up the sub, display it on television world-wide

by satellite, and tell the Soviet Union that the jig was up; but

instead, as I revealed in Audioletter No. 17 the following month, the

Red Friday agreement on October 1, 1976 reinstated a strained alliance

between the Rockefellers and the Soviets, and the Soviet Navy was

allowed to enter Chesapeake Bay under cover of darkness and recover

the mini-sub. But now, a similar opportunity exists once again--not in

American waters but in those of Norway. In March 1977 a Soviet

submarine entered the fjord of Folda on the north coast of Norway. The

Norwegians detected its presence and sealed off the exit to wait for

the sub to surface. On April 4, 1977, the story was broken in European

press, although the location was not mentioned. To my knowledge,

however, it has received no mention anywhere in the United States. I

strongly suggest to the Norwegian government that before the Soviet

submarine be allowed to escape, a search be made at the navigational

coordinates 64 35' 23" north, 10 23' 14" east. This location is not

far from where the Soviet submarine is trapped and is the site of one

of the seven Soviet underwater missiles that have been planted

recently in Norwegian waters. Should the government of Norway so

request, I will naturally provide the other locations as well, through

proper channels.



    As for the United States, there continues to be no effort at all

to clear our waters of the Soviet nuclear weapons which threaten our

country. As of my latest report a few days ago, not one of the 158

Soviet missiles and hydrogen bombs lurking in our territorial waters

has been removed, and I have not been approached in any way by the

United States government with requests for their locations. Meanwhile

the Soviet plutonium cloud attacks on the United States are still

continuing by means of the new canisters which are being deployed

close to shore along the West Coast, which I mentioned last month. Of

the 16 canisters which were deployed at the time I recorded

Audioletter No. 22 last month, 11 had been discharged as of April 15,

but by then there were 17 new ones. At last report, these canisters

are being deployed along the entire West Coast from San Diego to

Seattle. These are extremely easy and simple to deploy--for example,

they are dropped from aircraft flying under our radar like the Soviet

Bear bombers that we were told about by news reports the other day.

They are also planted by Soviet trawlers, since they are allowed to

enter our new 200-mile fishing zone to catch certain fish there. The

fact that this is being done was proven by the arrested Soviet trawler

Taras Shevchenko which was carrying plutonium canisters in a

compartment near the stern of the ship.



    Thus the maneuvering in preparation for Nuclear War One continues

with a strong naval emphasis. At one level, Rockefeller agents in

America appear to continue to cooperate in the joint plan of conquest

with the Soviets; but on the real level the Soviets and the

Rockefellers are both jockeying for a decisive knock-out blow. In

this, time is on the side of the Soviet Union, so they're trying to

delay war slightly while the Rockefeller brothers are trying to hurry

it up; and to condition us all for it, the Carter Administration is

flexing its muscles to show us how strong it is when it comes to the

Soviets. In short order it has forcefully espoused Human Rights,

handed the Soviets an ultimatum on SALT talks, seized Soviet fishing

trawlers, chased Soviet Bear long-range turbo-prop bombers away from

the southeast coast of our country--and what's next? A photo of a

Soviet submarine in our waters? Already the Rockefeller position has

decayed further in the past several months because of the further

deterioration of their CIA undersea super-missiles in the Atlantic and

Pacific. Of the fleet of 14 such missiles which I described in

Audioletter No. 20, January 1977, all 5 in the Pacific have now sprung

leaks and are no longer usable. Of the 9 in the Atlantic, 4 have now

failed--missiles #4, 6, 7, and 8. That leaves only 5 of the original

fleet of 14 CIA missiles still available for Rockefeller threats

against their Soviet partners. Meanwhile the Soviet short-range

missiles in our waters in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf

of Mexico are now being used by the Soviets to further weaken our

position as a nation.



    But, my friends, that's not all. For the very first time Soviet

missiles have now been planted in the Great Lakes. From there they now

threaten Chicago, Racine, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Bay City, Erie,

Buffalo, Rochester, and other cities of our industrial heartland. At

present there are exactly 50 such missiles in the Great Lakes. These,

however, are single warhead, short-range missiles, and are even

smaller in size than the multiple warhead missiles that have been

planted along our East, West, and Gulf Coasts. As if this were not

enough, I have just been alerted that Soviet agents are now fanning

out across America planting small hydrogen bombs in selected inland

lakes. The primary targets here are major dams, but some other  targets

are also involved. Since the Federal government refuses to take

action, it's imperative that State governments--especially those in

the West--take action now to protect their citizens. Security patrols

around major dams and lakes should be beefed up immediately and placed

on full alert. In addition, search operations must be performed to

locate those bombs that have already been planted so that they can be

removed. Already, Soviet underwater nuclear devices have been planted

in 21 places within the United States, and more are being planted.

Nineteen (19) of the targets are dams, the other 2 are cities.

CALIFORNIA has 4--Oroville Dam north of Sacramento, Castaic Dam north

of Los Angeles, Shasta Dam in north California, and Otay Reservoir Dam

near San Diego. ARIZONA also has 4 bombs--Glen Canyon Dam, Coolidge

Dam, Theodore Roosevelt Dam, and Lake Pleasant Dam near Phoenix. NEW

MEXICO has 3--the Navajo Dam, Blue Mesa Dam, and Alfa Butte Dam.

MONTANA has 3--Fort Peck Dam, Yellow Tail Dam, and Hungry Horse Dam.

NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NEVADA, and WASHINGTON STATE so

far have 1 bomb each, threatening dams which are among the world's

largest--these are respectively Garrison Dam, Oahe Dam, Fort Randall

Dam, Hoover Dam, and Grand Coulee Dam. IDAHO has 2 bombs, both

threatening towns--one is in the north end of Cour d'Alene Lake,

threatening the town of that name; the other is in the north end of

Lake Pend Oreille near the town of Sandpoint. My friends, this would

not have been possible had it not been for the destruction of the FBI

beginning with the murder of J. Edgar Hoover. God help us all.



Topic #3--With our military situation so serious, one would naturally

expect someone to come forward to take action against the Soviet

underwater missiles. For example, General George S. Brown, Chairman of

the Joint Chiefs of Staff, brought about the removal of many of these

ocean and gulf missiles during August and September 1976. But where is

he now?!! My friends, here is what has happened to General Brown. No

matter how much the tactics of public manipulation change and shift,

some things never change. I mentioned several months ago in connection

with the disgraceful Sputnik One episode that nowadays accolades and

awards go to the spoilers and traitors in our midst, while the true

heroes who dare to raise their heads are beaten down, suppressed, and

forgotten. Today there is no more grim testimony to this fact than the

current predicament of General George S. Brown.



    As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Brown is the top

military officer in the United States, and therefore in some respects

in the entire free world. As I revealed in detail in monthly

Audioletter No. 16 for September 1976, it was he, General Brown, who

more than any other person in the United States government, prevented

a surprise Soviet nuclear attack on America during August and

September 1976. Under extremely adverse conditions, he obtained the

go-ahead to remove Soviet underwater missiles and hydrogen bombs then

planted in our own territorial waters and then ordered the United

States Navy to do the job, which it did quickly. And on September 16,

1976, I met for over an hour with General Brown in his office at the

Pentagon to discuss the continuing Soviet underwater missile crisis

and to relay new information to him which had been prevented from

reaching him through normal channels. In meeting with me, General

Brown was accepting terrible personal risks, and he knew it. He had

overruled his entire staff in order to meet with me, and the meeting

itself was completely free of interruptions of any kind. Nor was there

any cut-off due to time; the meeting simply continued without pressure

until we finished the business at hand. Then I left, along with an

associate who had accompanied me to the meeting as a witness. We drove

away from the Pentagon that day in a driving rainstorm; but the brave

patriot whose office we had just left now faced a far worse personal

storm--thanks to his efforts on our nation's behalf. I warned my

listeners about this in monthly Audioletter No. 16 last September, and

asked that everyone strengthen his hand by expressing their support

for him.



    General Brown, alone among the top echelons of the United States

government, had stood by us and had saved millions of our lives in the

process. Now he was depending on us to stand by him in his continuing

efforts to carry out his Constitutional duties to the letter. Some of

us did so, my friends, but far too many of us did not. During August

and early September 1976, the Joint Chiefs of Staff were flooded with

demands for action against the Soviet underwater missiles; but after

that action was taken, there was no such massive outpouring of thanks

for General Brown's crucial leadership or support for the continued

positive efforts needed to save our country. Far too many of us forget

that it is not enough just to complain about what is wrong; we must

also actively support that which is right, or it will wither and die.

After the crucial actions taken under General Brown's leadership late

last summer, far too many of us just relaxed and went back to sleep,

leaving General Brown to fend for himself.



    Now I must tell you what has happened to General Brown as a

result. For many months now I have been cut off from direct contact

with General Brown; and in recent months General Brown has seemed like

a completely different person than in the past whenever he appears in

public. In place of the outgoing personality which has been General

Brown's trademark in the past, there is nothing but resignation and

acceptance of the dictates of his civilian superiors. The change has

been so dramatic that it has even been commented upon by syndicated

columnists, who are mystified. What has happened to General Brown, my

friends, is known to very few. I myself have been able to confirm it

only within the past few days. General George S. Brown, the nation's

top military officer, is now virtually under house arrest. This is

exactly the same kind of confinement that was meted out, for example,

to Army Lieutenant William Calley during his court martial for the My

Lai massacre in Vietnam. But there are two differences in General

Brown's case. First, there has been no court martial. Instead, he is

living under the threat of a court martial, for its twisted evidence

and perjuring witnesses have already been assembled. Second, General

Brown's isolation at the Pentagon and confinement to his Fort Myer

residence are not absolute. Instead, they are interspersed with very

carefully controlled appearances at official functions, since his

absence from these would quickly arouse suspicions that something was

terribly wrong. Now, should General Brown attempt again to step out of

line and defy those in high places by giving orders to remove the

missiles, doing his Constitutional duty, the suspended threat of court

martial would instantly come crashing down upon him. By means of the

elaborately doctored and falsified evidence I've already mentioned,

General Brown would be railroaded into certain conviction for treason

for doing his duty. Already alleged statements by General Brown have

been published recently to make him appear to be a dangerous man. Were

General Brown to be courtmartialed with falsified evidence, it would

destroy him personally. It would also prevent his efforts from

producing any benefits to America--such as a resumption of the removal

of Soviet nuclear missiles from our waters. Any such orders of his

would be rescinded; and his courtmartial would be used to make any

attempts by him to warn America useless, by destroying his

credibility.



    As long ago as October, 1976, just a month after my meeting with

him, General Brown was given a powerful demonstration of the ability

of his enemies to crucify him publicly. As I discussed that month in

Audioletter No. 17, a six-month old interview of General Brown was

dredged up and used to subject him to intense public embarrassment and

criticism. A few alleged statements of his from the interview were

made public and played up by th e controlled major media  to such an

extent that he was forced to make a public apology on nationwide

television. Can you imagine? All of that for a few relatively

insignificant comments which, if he really made them at all, had

attracted no attention six months earlier. This episode had just one

purpose--to prove to General Brown that if the falsified charges of

treason should ever be leveled at him, he would have no chance at all

either to defend himself or to do a service to America. His only

recourse now would be to himself publicly demand a court-martial, but

even that would not be successful without a massive outpouring of

public support for him ahead of time--and that, my friends, has so far

been denied him to the everlasting shame of our entire nation. Should

General Brown come to any physical harm, the responsibility for it

will rest squarely on the shoulders of David, Nelson, Laurance, and

John D. Rockefeller III; but meanwhile, he's a secret captive, keeping

millions of Americans reassured that all is well merely by his

presence on the scene. Whenever a public or official appearance or

statement by General Brown is called for, it's arranged and carried

out under the watchful eyes of a heavy escort, although this is not

always apparent. Otherwise the openness, the accessibility, and warmth

that has always distinguished General Brown among newspaper reporters

is now gone. He's a virtual prisoner at the Pentagon, held practically

incommunicado except for the carefully controlled communications and

appearances I have already mentioned. As soon as this Audioletter is

released, you can expect to see things happen that may seem to

disprove what I am telling you--for example, General Brown may become

more visible publicly for a while. It is even conceivable, though

highly unlikely, that this might even be carried to the point of

having General Brown publicly deny that he has come under any new

restrictions in recent months as the result, say, of the unfavorable

publicity he received some months ago. Should that happen, keep in

mind that General Brown is now a prisoner of war, imprisoned by the

enemies within our own midst; and we've already seen many examples of

the kinds of things American prisoners of war are forced to say for

propaganda purposes.



    Yes, my friends, General Brown stood up for all of us only to have

too many of us let him down by failing to follow through with our

thanks and our overwhelming support; but there is one way that we can

still keep General Brown's great personal sacrifice on our behalf from

being in vain, and that is for us, each and every one of us as

individuals, to begin right now to do whatever we can to save our

beloved country. My friends, there's no vacation from reality. It's up

to you to do what you can--there's no one else; and even though you

may not be able to do more than write a letter or two, do it. You

never know how far your few words may spread. They may pass from one

person to another, finally reaching the ear of someone you don't even

know, someone with far more resources than you have who may play a

vital role in saving our nation, yet who may never hear and never act

if you fail to do your part. If all you have to offer is 5 loaves and

2 fishes, offer it; you just might be amazed at the results.



    Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and

may God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

