From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is September 12, 1975, and

this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 4.



As usual, there is a great deal more going on right now than meets the

eye. The major media mislead the American people daily simply by

presenting only those portions of the truth about events that add up

to produce a desired impression. Thus you can't hope to grasp the true

significance of news events unless and until you learn to analyze the

scanty facts in the news for yourself. Learn to separate fact from

opinion. You are not given enough real facts to come to your own

clear-cut, logical decisions except perhaps in the area of sports.

Instead, the gaps are filled in for you by commentary designed to lead

you to conclusions that are not really your own. This is why I am

trying to open your eyes to the way things really work and to give you

key information that you need to have.



To this end, I want to discuss the following three topics today:



Topic #1--THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND "GOLD SALE AGREEMENT" AND

THE DETHRONING OF THE UNITED STATES DOLLAR



Topic #2--ASSASSINATION POLITICS AND SUBTLE MANEUVERINGS IN THE

COUNTDOWN TOWARD DICTATORSHIP



Topic #3--THE RAPIDLY MERGING OUTLINES OF THE PLANNED 1977 WAR IN

ASIA.



At the end I also hope to mention some brief hints about what you, the

individual concerned American, can do to help stem the tide and save

our beloved land.



Topic #1--In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975 I discussed

the setback which David Rockefeller experienced at the June meeting of

the "International Monetary Fund", or IMF. Speaking through his agents

in the United States Treasury, he had expected to succeed in

persuading the member nations of the IMF to sell all of the IMF gold,

and was ready to buy the IMF gold as soon as it was sold. Much to

David's surprise and chagrin he failed in June 1975 because of French

opposition based on their own awareness of the true status of Fort

Knox and America's gold reserves. As I mentioned in that AUDIO LETTER,

the Rockefeller interests went to work in a feverish search for a

means of achieving their objective--that is, a decision to sell IMF

gold at the next IMF meeting in September, this month. And if you paid

any attention to the news early this month, you know that this time

the Rockefellers did achieve a hasty compromise agreement. In a moment

I will explain exactly what was decided about potential gold sales at

the early September meeting of the IMF, but first I want you to notice

the startling quid pro quo which the Treasury accepted on behalf of

David Rockefeller as the price of selling the IMF gold.



For years now the United States Treasury has been debunking the

monetary role of gold as obsolete, barbaric, and no longer needed. In

this connection, the Treasury has been fighting for years to bar

Central Banks from buying gold on the free market. The reason for this

is to allow the interests controlled by David Rockefeller to corner

the gold for themselves while their deliberately-produced runaway

inflation ruins the rest of us stuck with paper money that has no

backing. But at the September 1975 IMF meeting this position which the

United States has stuck to uncompromisingly for years was suddenly

abandoned. Why? What was it that made the United States agree to let

Central Banks buy gold? They already had the right to sell it. What

caused such a total defeat for David Rockefeller and such a dramatic

reversal of a fundamental policy built up now for years?



My friends, what caused the result is the spreading effect of our

exposure of the Fort Knox Gold Scandal. The general American public

still doesn't know about it, thanks to the news blackout imposed by

CBS, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles

Times, and other major media which are controlled and intimidated by

the Rockefeller Brothers themselves. But the most knowledgeable people

in the financial community here and abroad increasingly do know that

something is very fishy indeed about the United States Treasury

Department. In short, the heat is on!



Since we revealed the existence of the Central Core Vault in July and

explained its role in the gold theft and fraud at Fort Knox, the

Treasury knows that we know exactly what they have been doing, and

how. The Conspirators know that if my associates and I ever are

allowed to present our evidence in a court of law before a grand jury

or in a Congressional investigation, their fate is sealed. Their game,

therefore, is to try to keep that from happening by keeping the public

fooled and unaware of the truth. To this end, the Rockefellers made

their big concession at the September IMF meeting in order to get some

IMF gold returned to the Treasury.



Under the terms of the Agreement, five-million ounces of IMF gold is

to be returned to the United States, from whence it came. This gold

was originally promised for sale to the "insiders" within the

Rockefeller circle, but now they wanted instead to display or use it

in gold auctions to keep the public fooled. In this connection, on

August 21, 1975, shortly before the latest IMF meeting, the Treasury

even held a well-publicized meeting with private gold dealers to

discuss the question of holding auctions. This was pure propaganda and

bluff, and intended to lend weight to any future auctions of gold

obtained from the IMF. The frantic maneuverings to snatch some IMF

gold for propaganda auctions is simply a replay of what they did last

December to have a little gold to auction off. On December 9, 1974,

the Treasury illegally emptied the tiny "Exchange Stabilization Fund"

of its two-million ounces of gold, as I have mentioned in previous

tapes. That was done simply to have something for the Treasury to sell

in small propaganda auctions, since the rest of our gold reserves were

long gone.



With this important perspective in mind, listen please to what the IMF

did on August 31, 1975, at the beginning of their so-called September

meeting:



No. 1--The widely publicized "Gold Sale Agreement" of the IMF is an

agreement in principle, a conditional agreement. The IMF is to meet

again in January 1976 in Jamaica to discuss the Exchange Rate

question. If, and only if IMF members agree on that in January, then

the conditional Gold Sale Agreement, which has just been announced,

will take effect. The stakes are so high for David Rockefeller and his

partners in crime that I predict agreement will be reached at the

January meeting in Jamaica. The political will is there. The IMF gold

will then be officially released, although I am informed that steps

are already being taken now behind the scenes, illegally and

prematurely, to take possession of the five-million ounces of gold and

put it back in Fort Knox.



By the way, there have been rumors lately that Mrs. Mary Brooks, the

Director of the United States Mint, has tendered her resignation, but

that it has not yet been accepted because it would look so bad. There

are indications that her superior said, in effect, quote: "Just hang

on for a few more months, Mary, while we get this whole thing about

Fort Knox out of the way. Then you can go, if you like." Be that as it

may, we had one of our sources contact Mrs. Brooks, and here is what

she said, quote: "There is nothing amiss at Fort Knox. I was there

recently. I have never tendered my resignation, and I don't intend to

do so. I don't know why these rumors keep coming up." Asked if she

knew about the rapid retrieval elevator system to the Central Core

Vault, she did not deny it but just replied, quote: "Those kind of

rumors come along all the time." Our source suggested to Mrs. Brooks

that it would be a simple matter to open Fort Knox wide open to prove

Dr. Beter wrong and, quote: "put an end to this matter once and for

all." Her reply--and this is her exact reply--and I quote: "Oh, no! It

would take weeks." All I can say to that, my friends, is: "Yes, Mary,

it will take weeks to get the five-million ounces of gold back in Fort

Knox." That is why I am informed there is some activity going on right

now in Fort Knox. Meanwhile Mary Brooks is trying to brazen it out.



Returning to the IMF Gold Sale Agreement tho ugh, I should point out

one other thing: Should there fail to be an agreement about Exchange

Rates by the IMF in January in Jamaica, an unlikely event, than we

will be back to Square One on IMF gold sales. Should that happen,

David Rockefeller and his fellow "insiders" will have used the IMF

gold sales decision as a scare tactic throughout this fall of 1975 to

run down gold prices and take all the gold they can out of weak hands.

Also, they made billions of dollars going "short." When the public

becomes aware of this, gold prices will start up again.



No. 2--The interim or conditional Gold Sale Agreement specifies the

following:



Of the approximately 150-million ounces of gold now owned by the IMF,

one-sixth or 25-million ounces is to be sold on the open market or to

member Central Banks. The latter is what will actually occur. True to

Rockefeller tradition, by the way, this IMF gold sale to suit their

own purposes has been painted as a philanthropic move to raise money

to aid poor and developing nations.



Another one-sixth or 25-million ounces is to be returned to member

nations of the IMF in proportion to the amounts of gold each nation

originally contributed. Each nation may then keep or sell this

returned gold, but you can bet they will keep it. Their own citizens

will hang their Central Bankers if they don't.



Under this clause the United States is to receive about five-million

ounces worth about $700,000,000 at current market prices. This amount,

I am informed, has already been promised to the "insiders", but events

may undo this when the Fort Knox Gold Scandal breaks nationally and

world-wide. It is this five-million ounces of gold, equal to only

about two percent (2%) of what the United States Treasury officially

claims to have, that the Conspirators want desperately to get their

hands on in case they need it for propaganda auctions or even another

carefully-staged "peep show" at Fort Knox.



The remaining two-thirds of the IMF gold, or about 100,000,000 ounces,

is to "stay put" in the IMF for the time being. There it will remain

as backing for the so-called "Special Drawing Rights", or SDR's, of

the IMF. The SDR is to become the new international monetary unit or

standard of measure, the yardstick; and then the other strong

currencies that now make up part of the basket of the 16 currencies

which constitute the SDR's, will be the reserve currencies of the

future, at least for the next two years. The dollar, therefore, is

giving up its sovereignty as a sole reserve currency. The joker in

this deck is that over half of an SDR is made up of the American

dollar and British pound sterling, both of which lack gold backing. In

the tremendous inflation ahead, the SDR will therefore be hobbling

around on one leg with its only real support consisting of the strong

gold-backed currencies which comprise less than half its face value.



No. 3--and very important. Beginning January 1976 the IMF members have

agreed not, repeat NOT, to affix an official gold price for a period

of two years, provided the January 1976 agreement on Exchange Rates

takes place. This is exactly the development I have been warning about

for over a year, based on information from my own confidential

sources. They are behind schedule in obtaining this agreement, but the

agreement itself is precisely on track. Once it is in place, they can

easily make up for lost time in their plan to visit economic

catastrophe on the United States and the world.



What the IMF agreed to in principle is to allow its members, including

the United States, to ask their respective governments to abolish the

official price of gold, which is now $42.22 an ounce, once the

Exchange Rate agreement is reached in January 1976. This means that

for the following two years there will be only a "market price" for

gold, subject only to supply and demand plus massive massages by the

Rockefeller interests to cause the price of gold to skyrocket. In

other words, gold will be going private for two years starting in

January 1976. The gold zoom signal of $180 an ounce, which I explained

in my AUDIO BOOK recorded in October 1974, will be penetrated and

cataclysmic inflation and economic chaos will erupt. After two years

of this, with the economy of the world and especially of the United

States in smoking ruins, David Rockefeller--the man who orchestrated

the whole thing in the first place--presently plans to call an

"International Monetary Conference" to at last restore gold to its

traditional monetary role. David's plan is to officially repeg gold

then at $2,000 an ounce--twenty times the current official price of

$42.22 an ounce!



No. 4--After the two-year period just mentioned, according to the Gold

Sale Agreement just reached by the IMF, Central Banks will be allowed

to buy all the gold they want. As I have already pointed out, this

complete reversal of a key feature of the Treasury's long standing

gold-debunking campaign is directly traceable to the steadily building

pressure of the Fort Knox Gold Scandal and the desperate need of the

Conspirators to keep it covered up.



No. 5--Until January 1976 no sales of gold will be made by the IMF to

world gold markets or to Central Banks at market prices. It would not

yet be legal to do so, but I fully expect that agreement will be

reached at Jamaica in January, and that IMF gold sales will then take

place according to plans. Thus the United States dollar is now way

over-valued.



The United States Treasury is most anxious to get its house back in

order, in appearance at least, to prevent the public from becoming

aware that Fort Knox is truly empty of its gold. The Treasury now

holds less than 800,000 ounces of gold--a mere pittance left over from

the 2,000,000 ounces it illegally took from the Exchange Stabilization

Fund on December 9, 1974. The rest was used for the propaganda

auctions by the Treasury in January and June of this year.



Gold fever will spread across the land in the near future as soon as

the full significance of the IMF action is widely understood, and then

the only questions will be not the price but the availability of gold.

The gold market today is very thin as it is, and the "insiders" had to

scare the weak sisters in order to make them disgorge their holdings.



As of now, David Rockefeller still plans for gold to be pegged at

$2,000 an ounce, and for the new SDR's to be the standard unit of

measure. The United States dollar will lose its status as a world

currency reserve. Even now David Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank is

already linking some of its loans to SDR's. After all, who should know

better than David that dollars are to be avoided?



For the next two years after January 1976, those countries having gold

in their Central Banks will be able to enjoy a fast markup in the

value of their gold reserves of 20 to 1. Can you imagine!--20 to 1.

Therefore during that period, Central Banks will buy up at market

prices the 25,000,000 ounces that will be for sale by the IMF. That

gold will never reach the private gold market at all. But the United

States has been deliberately made gold poor by the Rockefeller

Brothers.



Having no gold left of any significance, we are now in the same leaky

boat as Britain. And look what is happening to Britain, which is

already on the road to advanced socialism! Cataclysmic inflation,

deepening unemployment, and social and economic upheaval on the way to

dictatorship are in store for all of us soon if the gold situation is

not rectified. And so, my friends, we are in a race against time.

David Rockefeller and his collaborators in and out of the Treasury

seek delay, delay, delay. They want to use the IMF gold and other

tricks to keep the American people fooled  until it is too late. Time,

unfortunately, is on their side. Those of us who would like to see our

nation saved, on the other hand, are pressing with every means at our

disposal for a full, open, honest INVESTIGATION of the whole thing

without further delay.



In this connection, Iwant to read some telling words from the front

page of the Daily News Digest for the week of September 1, 1975.

(Their address, by the way, is: P. O. Box 27496, Phoenix, Arizona

85061 .) The headline is just one word: "WHY?" I now quote:



"The Fort Knox gold story is far from dead. There is something rotten,

and the stink has spread across the land like a fog. Thousands of

readers have followed our series closely. Like them, we have waited in

vain for satisfactory answers to questions raised by Dr. Peter David

Beter and his associate, Ed Durell. An exchange of letters with the

United States Bureau of the Mint has produced nothing but double talk.



The key question regarding the Central Core Vault still remains a

mystery. Is the gold there or isn't it?



Why is it so difficult to send a delegation to Fort Knox, open the

Vault and reveal its content--or lack of content? Why have no members

of Congress taken it upon themselves to settle this matter? Is courage

such a missing virtue in Washington that this can't be or won't be

done?!



Why has the nation's press avoided the story with an intensity that is

amazing? Is this not perhaps the biggest news story in the civilized

history of the world? It certainly has that possibility. An evil group

of individuals that can loot a nation's Treasury, as has been charged,

to the tune of $11,000,000,000 certainly deserves some attention,

doesn't it?



And the radio and TV industry didn't even mention the initial charges,

and covered only the "peep show" staged at Fort Knox last September.



But the newspapers, where are they? Why the blackout on the Fort Knox

story? Is there some powerful force that scares them into submission?

Or would they lose so much advertising that they can't run the story?

Or do the major editors think the story is so outrageous as to merit

no attention? Outrageousness certainly didn't prevent Jane Fonda and

others from getting front-page coverage!



Yes, something stinks. IS THE GOLD THERE OR ISN'T IT? Which of our

Congressmen has the guts to find out?"



Finally, here is an item for you to think about if you are tempted to

swallow the Rockefeller propaganda about the swaggering economic power

of the Arabs and oil-producing states:



On September 5, 1975, a reporter posed the following question to Dr.

Abdul-Rahman Al-Atteqi, Minister of Finance of Kuwait, at the National

Press Club, quote: "None of the oil-producing states spoke during the

World Bank and IMF meetings. Why not?"



Dr. Al-Atteqi answered, quote:



"Addressing people seems to be of no meaning. If the United Nations or

World Bank meetings had a time to listen exactly as good listeners

should, everyone would speak, but most of the speeches just go into

the air. Nobody hears it--whispering, most of the delegates out of the

room--and then it is a text in a book. If it happens, sometimes

somebody reads it. This is why. And secondly, it is known who runs the

policy of the Monetary System of the world, and we cannot for the time

being compete with them. We are in their hands. So this is a fact. We

have to live with it unless we break through--and we are looking for

that time."



His answer met with knowing applause. It expresses not only the

predicament of the oil-producing nations: it expresses yours and mine

as well.



Topic #2--On September 5, 1975, in Sacramento, California, a dress

rehearsal was held for the assassination of our figurehead president,

Gerald Ford. A young woman named Lynette Fromme got to within two feet

of the President before being stopped by a Secret Service agent. As

she was bundled off by the Secret Service with a look of horrified

surprise on her face, she reportedly shouted: "It didn't go off!"



The very next day the news media were filled with the entirely

predictable conclusion of officials connected with the case. Miss

Fromme, they assured us, had acted alone. The possibility of a

conspiracy--that "dirty word"--was quickly pooh-poohed and discounted.

True, she had been given the gun by someone else, but that couldn't

mean anything. And, yes, her landlady did reportedly say that just

lately Miss Fromme had suddenly started paying her rent with $100

bills, but that can't be anything but coincidence. To give due credit

to the officials involved though, it should be mentioned that some of

them did become predictably excited about one thing--namely, the

often-stated need to disarm the populace under the banner of "gun

control." One official even ranted that this is so acute and so

immediate as to call for, quote: "wartime measures."



Well, everybody, it so happens that the incident on September 5 was

not intended to injure President Ford. On July 17 and 18, 1975, I said

in a speech at the Santa Monica Civic Center in California, and I

quote: "By September 1975 we will know if Rockefeller is to be

stopped. Some very important developments are in the making." By this

I was referring to the all-out power struggle that is now going on out

of the public view, and the potentially decisive importance of this

month, September 1975, in the Rockefeller timetable for Dictatorship

in America. This power struggle, though it is well hidden from the

general public, is escalating to the vicious level of assassination

politics which burst onto the American scene twelve years ago with the

murder of President John F. Kennedy. Assassinations have been a

recurring part of the American scene ever since, including those of

Dr. Martin Luther King, Robert F. Kennedy, and recently Jimmy Hoffa,

among others. And this volcano of violence threatens to erupt yet

again, now, as rival factions within and close to the Rockefeller camp

jockey for position in the Dictatorship now forming.



Last month, by the way, in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3 I revealed for

the first time the truth about how and why President Kennedy was

killed. The response to my comments on that subject has been so

overwhelming that I believe the following footnote is worth mentioning

here.



As you will recall, I revealed last month that President Kennedy was

riding in an elaborately-rigged limousine--the murder car. He was

killed not by a sniper but by a well-aimed blast from inside the car.

That blast was in all probability set off by a radio signal from

outside the car by someone in a position to tell just when to do it.

My confidential technical sources now believe they know where the

radio signal came from.



If you have followed the various accounts that have come out about the

J.F.K. assassination over the years, you have probably heard of the

mysterious man with the umbrella. This was an onlooker who was right

on the scene of the shooting in Dallas. Reportedly he abruptly raised

his umbrella and opened it just as the President's car went by, and at

that moment the several snipers all began firing. After a few seconds,

he is said to have closed the umbrella and put it back down, and the

firing stopped. He then melted into the crowd and quickly vanished.

Others have theorized that the man with the umbrella was the signal

man who used the umbrella to coordinate the firing of the snipers for

maximum confusion and effect. I believe this is correct, but based on

my own confidential information, I believe he also had the additional

role of sending the radio signal to set off the fatal blast inside the

murder car at the height of the din from the snipers. The upraised

umbrella would have made a perfect radio antenna to transmit the

signal, and the signal itself could have been triggered with a button

on the umbrella handle. It was important though to avoid focusing

suspicion on the murder car itself, which was destroyed within 48

hours. Therefore an ordinary umbrella looking like the one used by the

mysterious onlooker, was no doubt left somewhere nearby for people to

find, while the real umbrella equipped by the CIA with a tiny radio

transmitter, was spirited away. When the ordinary look-alike umbrella

was found discarded on the scene, the natural reaction would be to

say, "Look here. I guess the guy with the umbrella got rid of it so it

wouldn't hamper his get away." And that would be that.



At any rate, we stand on a threshold of a possible new era of

assassination, intimidation, and misinformation of the public even

worse than that which followed the Kennedy assassination. The

September 5 dress rehearsal for Ford's assassination was for two

purpose s. First, it was to give him a not-so-subtle hint that he had

better fulfill his deal with Nelson Rockefeller and vacate the White

House soon - or else. Second, it was staged on camera, you will

notice, for the benefit of you and me--the public.



This incident is a part of a multi-faceted campaign to condition your

mind to accept the departure of the Fords from the public scene one

way or another. Witness, for example, how CBS, which is thoroughly

under the thumb of the Rockefellers, set up Betty Ford as a clay

pigeon on the August 10, 1975, CBS television show "60 MINUTES." There

Betty Ford bared her private life and thoughts in public in a way

which has brought down ridicule and shame on her head. In this and

many other ways, the Fords are being belittled in the public mind, so

that our first appointed President won't be missed when he is replaced

by our second.



Yes, the behind-the-scenes power struggle which has so far kept Nelson

Rockefeller from seizing the presidency which he had planned to do by

June, three months ago, is beginning to erupt into the open. What we

are witnessing is the latest phase of an elaborate multistepped coup

d'etat with its major milestones spaced roughly a year apart so that

public apprehensions will largely die out between steps.



Just over three years ago the coup d'etat began with the Watergate

break-in. Two years ago Vice-President Spiro Agnew was eliminated from

the scene. This activated the 25th Amendment, which Nelson Rockefeller

had manipulated into the Constitution several years before to be used

in the planned coup. Just over one year ago Richard Nixon became the

first President in American history to resign--the victim of

Watergate, which was conceived by Nelson Rockefeller, engineered by

his CIA, and given a final assist in the form of blackmail by Nelson

Rockefeller's long-time agent, Henry Kissinger. Now it has been

another year and it is time for the next step--namely the ousting of

figurehead Gerald Ford from the White House so that our

president-in-fact, Nelson Rockefeller, can make himself President in

name also. And Rockefeller must do this soon because he is becoming

more and more unpopular by the day. If this is accomplished according

to plan, the coup d'etat itself will be complete.



After that, there will only be one step left to go--our ratification

of Nelson Rockefeller's status as our DICTATOR on election day

November 1976, just over one year from now. On that day we are to

return our then incumbent president, Nelson Rockefeller, to the White

House and at the same time we are to accept, by national referendum,

the new Rockefeller Constitution--which has already been written and

which will give him a nine-year term as our first Dictator. Every

possible avenue is being pursued in order to pave the way for this

bicentennial death of our Republic! Not the least of these

preparations involve the conditioning of your mind through the massive

controls over the mass media exercised by the Rockefellers. For

example, various component provisions embodied in the secret "NEW

CONSTITUTION" keep popping up here and there, seemingly at random but

actually as parts of a well coordinated master public relations war

being waged on the unsuspecting American public by the Rockefellers.



To cite just one example--and they are everywhere these days if your

eyes are open--there is the article in a recent issue of Business Week

entitled, quote: "The big new push for federal chartering of

corporations." Business Week, it should be mentioned, is published by

McGraw-Hill, one of the hundreds of major companies under Rockefeller

control. McGraw-Hill is a particularly useful voice for the

Rockefellers, since it publishes a series of special industry

magazines which established high prestige long ago and are therefore

very influential now. Anyway, the article says that there is a rapidly

emerging push to replace State chartering of corporations in America

by federal chartering, and that surprisingly some of the most powerful

backing for this move is coming from leaders of major corporations

themselves, such as General Electric. The article fails to point out

though that all of these big corporations cited are Rockefeller

outfits, and federal chartering is one of the keystones of the

corporate-socialist economic structure spelled out in the new

Rockefeller Constitution. The impetus for this big new federal

chartering campaign is stated to be a couple of Supreme Court

decisions which may look (quote) "conservative" on their face since

they effectively removed the federal influence over corporations that

had long been exerted through Rule 10-B (5) of the Securities Exchange

Commission. This ruling looks, at first glance, to be a move away from

federal meddling, but its actual purpose is to whip up sentiment in

Congress to pass legislation which will go much further than the old

SEC rule.



This is a perfect example in which the real purposes of political

actions are the exact opposite of the surface appearance. And if

anyone doubts that the Supreme Court is knowingly being guided to do

the Rockefeller will, just consider, for example, our Chief Justice

Warren Earl Burger. One of the ways in which he established the

credentials which led to his Supreme Court appointment, was through

his contribution as a so-called "outside expert" to the writing of the

secret new Rockefeller Constitution. The idea to eliminate the right

of trial by jury, which the "NEW CONSTITUTION" does, came from Burger.



The art of politics, as it is practiced at the national level today in

America, has been reduced to continual deception and trickery. A

perfect example is the plan which has been concocted by Nelson

Rockefeller and his long-time friend and supporter, George Meany, to

recast Rockefeller's image in a conservative mold. Imagine! This has

become necessary because it is now the Conservatives who hold the

balance of political power in America. No doubt you've noticed the

wide publicity which has been given lately to the supposedly

conservative views which are preached by Nelson Rockefeller these days

in his speeches. Never mind that his entire public career for more

than 40 years is a sordid history of well-documented but little-known

piracy against the American ship of state. Never mind that he has

always espoused, quote "fiscal integrity", and that without exception

this has been translated into higher taxes, increasing public debt,

swelling unemployment, and mushrooming welfare rolls. And, never mind

that his public career is littered with broken promises and double

crosses. He now says things which the Rockefeller-controlled news

media label "conservative" so we are to take them at face value.



But many Americans will not be taken in by Rockefeller's own

statements alone, so going along now on a parallel road as a fellow

traveler is one George Meany. Meany has lately made a great show of

not letting the longshoremen in his AFL-CIO load wheat bound for

Russia supposedly until the American consumer is protected against

inflation and whatnot. This stand has been painted in the news media

as evidence of Conservatism on his part; but now that this political

harvest has been reaped, the grain is being loaded once again and sent

on its way to Rockefeller's Mother Russia.



Just to enhance this conservative image, Meany is also throwing snide

remarks at Henry Kissinger. Kissinger has now done his job for

Rockefeller and is about to be thrown to the wolves so as to appease

the Conservatives and to fool them into thinking they are gaining

ground. Thus Meany is building a conservative, anti-Communist image as

fast as possible; and since he is not a self-serving politician, this

apparent development of a conservative streak will be taken by many as

genuine. He will therefore be in a perfect position, when the time is

ripe, to throw his arm around Nelson Rockefeller and give him his full

political support. Rockefeller will thus be transformed into an

instant Conservative, anti-Communist, anti-Soviet in the eyes of many

trusting Americans.



One of the most diabolically clever and cruel twists in this plan has

been the way in which Nelson Rockef eller through his agent George

Meany, used exiled Russian author Alexander Solzhenitsyn to further

his own political plans. Very few Americans grasped what happened, and

Solzhenitsyn himself has no inkling at all of the treachery that

surrounded his recent visit to the United States. Solzhenitsyn is a

true and great Russian patriot who has suffered terrible things at the

hands of the imperialist, Communist regime that now enslaves his

people. He would never have knowingly permitted himself to be used by

the very people who perpetually finance and sustain the Russian

Communist police state, but he did not reckon with the craftiness of

the Rockefeller Brothers. Meany said in his introduction to one of

Solzhenitsyn's speeches under AFL-CIO sponsorship that Solzhenitsyn

is, quote: "a voice that demands to be heard; a voice that will not be

denied."



The Rockefeller approach to anything they cannot suppress is to

harness it, and that is what they did to Solzhenitsyn. They harnessed

him. First, the United States Government agreed with Russia not to

accord him any official recognition before he was released. Hence the

widely-publicized snub by President Ford. Next, George Meany latched

on to him even before he came out of Russia and sewed up a commitment

from the famous Russian exile to speak under AFL-CIO auspices in the

United States. Then when he reached America, his great AFL-CIO

speaking tour consisted of only two speeches--one in Washington, D.C.,

and the other in New York City. As a result, Solzhenitsyn's actual

words, which I believe every American should hear, were heard by very

few people. But the fact that he had spoken under George Meany's

sponsorship was publicized nation-wide in the Rockefeller news media,

and this explains why the New York Times gave it broad coverage. The

net result: A few people heard the truth from Solzhenitsyn, but vast

numbers of people were deceived by all this into thinking: George

Meany deserves the Conservative label now being stuck to him by the

Rockefeller public relations machine. A more convincing lie would be

difficult to imagine.



I now turn briefly to Topic #3.



In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3, last month, I revealed that major

revisions are in the works for up-coming war plans. These changes

stemmed from the actions of Indira Gandhi to stop the Rockefeller

take-over of India by way of their CIA. The Rockefellers want to

absorb India into their empire before proceeding to World War III, and

are therefore modifying their foreign intrigues accordingly. Their

plans I revealed some time ago for World War III--which is really to

be half a world war with America as the main battleground--have not

been abandoned altogether. They have simply been put on a back burner

while the focus shifts to India, which is the last remaining chunk of

the old British Empire that is not yet in Rockefeller hands. The

emerging build-up to war in Asia, which is now targeted to start about

March 1977 according to the Rockefeller plans, is a complex thing and

is being largely ignored by most observers right now. I plan to speak

more about it in up-coming AUDIO LETTERS, but I feel you should have

at least a thumbnail sketch now.



To begin with, the Helsinki Accord signed recently by Ford, Brezhnev,

and leaders of more than 30 other nations had only one real effect. It

formally ratified Russian conquests in Eastern Europe regardless of

all the official protestations to the contrary. That's why Soviet

Party boss Brezhnev had tears of joy in his eyes after all had signed

it. It gave Russia a secure border in Western Europe, and the ink was

hardly dry when Russian attention turned eastward to China.

Well-orchestrated attacks on Peking and the foreign policy of Chairman

Mao have appeared not only in high-level organs of the Soviet Press

but also in Soviet satellites such as East Germany, Bulgaria, and

others.



Russia fears that China might become the leader of the Third World of

developing nations, therefore Russia is trying to encircle China and

has been greatly helped in recent years by the Kissinger foreign

policy which has handed over Southeast Asia to Russia--not to China,

as some people think--and which has effectively neutralized American

influence elsewhere along the Chinese encirclement perimeter. The

encirclement threat to China, in turn, is giving impetus to the

forging of a Sino-Japanese Axis, which is forming right now.



Finally, this whole situation and its tensions are such that the

Rockefellers hope and expect to turn it to their own purposes. Through

their thorough control of Japan, an avenue is readily available to

guide events toward precipitation of the planned war against India on

schedule. This is especially so since John D. Rockefeller III, the

real ruler of Japan today, learned all about such things long ago when

he helped maneuver the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor. Finally,

once India is attacked, Russia will enter on India's side and America

will be used as a factory to supply Russia. The Rockefellers stand to

make lots of money through their involvement on both sides as usual;

and they expect to pick up the pieces in India after the smoke clears.



And so, my friends, on and on it goes unless we stop it! More and more

people are now asking: What can I do? I plan to say more about this in

the future, but let me just give you these brief hints for now, if I

may:



First--you must inform yourself. Know what is going on so you will

know what needs to be corrected.



Second--Inform others, and never think anything is too small to do.

Talk to a friend, a neighbor, write a letter to the Editor.



Third--Put pressure on your elected officials--locally and at the

State level, as well as Congress. Call or write--again, and again, and

again, and again until they learn you mean business and cannot be

shrugged off with routine, polite, meaningless replies.



Finally--Be specific about what you want your elected officials to do

to straighten things out.



In this regard I strongly recommend that you focus your energies on

the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL. Those who have perpetrated this fantastic

crime and cover-up are now running scared behind the scenes. The Fort

Knox affair is the one most dangerous issue for the Conspirators, who

are trying to trap us all in a DICTATORSHIP, so do all you can to help

us break it into the open so that the truth can be proven.



Until next month, then, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and God bless

each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

