From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is January 21, 1976, and

this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 8.



As we begin to celebrate the Bicentennial of our Independence, let us

reflect for a moment on our past. Out of a vast wilderness our people

created a nation with astonishing speed. Our Forefathers brought forth

a nation with the highest and most stable form of self-government ever

conceived by man. It was unique in the entire world, a prescription

for freedom simple enough for everyone to understand, yet truly a work

of genius. It's no wonder that from our earliest days as an

independent nation the eyes of the entire world have been riveted on

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.



What was initially called our noble experiment was spectacular in its

success, and America's banner of freedom became a symbol of hope for

oppressed peoples everywhere.



Would any of this have happened without the clear patriotic vision of

our Founding Fathers? Could it have come to pass without the courage

of George Washington who in 1776 led the famous surprise attack on the

far stronger British forces in Trenton? Would we have had our inspired

and inspirational CONSTITUTION if Benjamin Franklin's call for prayer

had not broken the impasse over representation at the Constitutional

Convention in Philadelphia in 1787? Could we ever have had a

government sensitive to the wishes of the people if the humility of

our early leaders had been replaced with the arrogant boasting

practiced by our corrupt rulers of today? And, would we have had a

nation such as ours if our Founding Fathers had believed in the

internationalism promoted today by the Rockefeller Brothers?



What would our Founding Fathers say today if they could see us

meddling in the affairs of other countries? How would they feel about

the tremendous sacrifices they endured if they could see our rulers of

today building up another nation to become our slave master at our own

expense?



We would all do well to look back once again at the patriotic words of

George Washington in his Farewell Address as President. He advised his

countrymen to extend commercial relations to foreign nations with as

little political connection as possible. He did not advise against

such commercial relations in themselves, nor did he object to

temporary alliances with foreign nations when needed in an emergency;

but he did give us a clear, strong warning that has an urgent

relevance to us today, and I quote:



"to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign

world."



Is this rule being followed today by our Rockefeller Rulers and their

client followers?



Since 1917 the Rockefeller empire has been allied with the Soviet

Union, with which we are to be merged against our will and with the

Soviets ultimately in the driver's seat!! As I explained last month,

and have often discussed on other occasions, we, the people are the

victims of an alliance between State Socialism in Russia and Corporate

Socialism here under the Rockefeller Brothers. And, my friends, this

is not an informal arrangement. Since at least the early days of the

Eisenhower Administration, which was actually run behind the scenes by

Nelson Rockefeller, there has been a White House Directive which I am

about to reveal to you for the very first time. It is short, but not

sweet. It establishes as a prime goal of federal policy, and I quote

here:



"to so alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably

merged with life in the Soviet Union."



My friends, I do not merely challenge, I dare President Ford or anyone

else in the White House to deny the existence of this Directive under

oath. They won't do so unless they have become so desperate that they

are willing to gamble on any bluff, because I have access to

documentary evidence on this matter that could immediately convict

them for perjury and lead to impeachment and/or prison.



Yes, this short White House Directive, my friends, quote: "to so alter

life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with life

in the Soviet Union"--that's the key to all of our domestic and

foreign policy today. It explains why we have become the factory for

the Soviet Union. It explains why so many multinational corporations

are being used to build up the Soviet economy while depressing our

own. It explains why the many huge Rockefeller-controlled, tax-exempt

Foundations, which are all working in this direction, are immune to

prosecution for their flagrant violation of their charters. It

explains why the Rockefeller-controlled banks and financial

institutions are so single-mindedly financing the Soviet Juggernaut at

American taxpayer expense.



It is little wonder that Nobel Prize-winning biologist George Wald in

an article a year ago about the runaway power of the multinational

corporations said, and I quote: "hence no nation so closely resembles

the United States as the Soviet Union."



My fellow citizens, it is essential that we halt this horrible

slippage backward into tyranny. If we are to survive as a free people

beyond this our Bicentennial Year, we, the people, must rise up and

make the Government that belongs to us turn its face forward once

again to the still new, still fresh ideals and principles that

launched our great nation. I am absolutely convinced that we can still

do it IF WE WILL.



Last month I recorded AUDIO BOOK No. 6 entitled "WHAT WE CAN DO TO

SAVE AMERICA" to explain the strategy which I believe can and will do

the job. And already alert citizens all over America are listening to

this message, getting to work, and making suggestions. If YOU will

join in the task, we can do it. Meanwhile I intend to keep informing

you about what we are up against, how events are progressing, and what

plans are being formed behind the scenes. To this end, I want to talk

to you today about three topics that all reflect the drive to merge

life in America with that in the Soviet Union.



Topic #1--OUR CHARGES FOR A CITIZENS' INDICTMENT ON THE FORT KNOX TWIN

SCANDAL COVER-UP



Topic #2--ROCKEFELLER PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN THEIR DRIVE TO DRAG OUR

ECONOMY DOWN TO THE SOVIET LEVEL



Topic #3--SO-CALLED "DETENTE" AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON



Topic #1--It is essential that I give special attention to the first

topic today, but I will deal with the remaining two topics as fully as

I can in the time that remains for them.



Almost two years ago in April 1974 during Congressional testimony

before a subcommittee of the "House Banking and Currency Committee" I

first revealed that the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox had been

looted of its gold. I stood ready to present evidence to substantiate

my charges, but nothing whatever was done! Having been failed by

Congress, I then took my story to the public through lectures, radio

Talk Shows, and publication of my charges in a national weekly

newspaper. Faced by this public pressure, the Government responded by

setting in motion a well orchestrated cover-up, a cover-up far more

massive and more serious than that of the Watergate scandal which

removed our last elected President from office.



The actual cover-up began on September 23, 1974, with the carefully

staged visit of Congressmen and newsmen to Fort Knox. I have detailed

the ensuing cover-up, among other things, in my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on

the "FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU." I have also

given you continuing updates since June 1975 by means of my monthly

AUDIO LETTER. In October 1975 I revealed what I had just learned at

that time that makes a "twin" super scandal of the Fort Knox

situation--namely, the presence of about 60 pounds of radioactive

liquid super poison processed from deadly plutonium-239 in the Central

Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox. The canisters of

poison put there in 1968 by the CIA are corroding and leaking faster

and faster, endangering the health and even the lives of millions of

Americans in the southeastern United States.



The Government's response to thissecond, far more serious half of the

Fort Knox Scandal, has been the same as to the first--COVER UP. I've

explained in recent months how first Senator Frank Church and then

Congressm an Otis Pike, Chairmen respectively of the Senate and House

Intelligence Committees, have become parties to the Fort Knox

plutonium scandal cover-up; and how bureaucratic gobbledygook is being

used by Government officials to avoid giving straight, honest answers

about the situation.



But now, the Fort Knox Scandal cover-up is getting even worse. It has

recently entered a new phase of outright lying and of masking the

evidence concerning my charges. They are going for broke, and they

have long since passed the point of no return. The same tactics of

lying and cheating by the Government that are standard practice in the

Soviet Union, into which we are to be merged, are now being used here

in the United States, and these tactics are far more effective here

than in Russia because Americans, unlike Soviet citizens, have not yet

learned to expect their government to lie to them continuously. Up

'till now the main cover-up approach has been one of evasion, but now

an atmosphere of desperation on the part of the wrongdoers is becoming

increasingly apparent. For the very first time Treasury Secretary

William Simon has made the fatal mistake of actually lying, in writing

no less, about a crucial matter--the existence of the Central Core

Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox. We have challenged the

Government to either confirm or deny its existence in the past; and we

have identified it not only by this name, "Central Core Vault", but

also by describing it to avoid any possibility of misunderstanding due

to terminology.



In a letter to a friend of mine dated December 10, 1975, Simon said

the following, and I quote:



"The allegation that plutonium 239 is, or ever has been stored at Fort

Knox in a central core vault is false, and the Army has just conducted

an extensive test of the Bullion Depository and has found no evidence

of radioactivity. I should add that there is no such thing as the

Central Core Vault."



Notice that Simon's denial of the presence of plutonium-239 at the

Depository is tied right in with his denial of the existence of the

Central Core Vault. Obviously if there is no Central Core Vault then

it cannot contain plutonium-239! But on the other hand, to have any

faith that his denial about the plutonium is truthful, you must also

believe his assertion that there exists no Central Core Vault at the

Depository. If he would lie about one, he would lie about the other.



With that in mind, please listen now to an excerpt from another

letter--this one written to one of my associates by a retired

Lieutenant General, John L. Ryan, Jr., a former Commanding General of

Fort Knox. General Ryan probably knows more about the Depository than

anyone else who ever commanded Fort Knox. He spent two tours of duty

there before he returned a third time as the Commanding General; and

when the gold was moved to Fort Knox to be stored there for the very

first time in 1937, it was he who was placed in charge of the actual

physical movement of the incoming gold into the Depository. With

regard to the disputed Central Core Vault, he says, quote:



"When I use the word 'vault' I am referring to the central core of the

Depository where the bullion was stored. This vault was below ground

level and could be entered only through a specially constructed

bank-type door that opened onto a screw lift. This door was in the

Receiving-Shipping area of the Depository. The Receiving-Shipping room

was above ground level. The vault was below ground level. Around the

vault proper, or central core, below ground level was a passageway. On

this passageway were a number of cell-like compartments. There was no

means of entering the vault from this passageway."



My friends, the passageway with its compartments are all that the

visitors saw in September 1974. The existence of the Central Core

Vault, which is where the gold, if any, should have been, is

absolutely confirmed by General Ryan; and as his letter makes clear,

the 1974 visitors had no chance of finding out about it while

wandering around in the passageway and looking at the small

compartments you heard and read about in the news.



Such bald-faced lying is bad enough, but the mounting desperation of

the Rockefeller Brothers and their lackeys over Fort Knox now goes

even beyond mere lying. It is standard practice whenever an extremely

damaging secret is in danger of exposure, to distract attention from

it and confuse the issue by deliberately exposing something

else--something far less serious and dangerous than the secret being

hidden yet shocking enough to satisfy the public's appetite for the

truth.



With our totally manipulated government of today, a good rule of thumb

is whenever something that looks really damaging is revealed, ask

yourself: "Why are they letting this out of the bag? What is it that

is worse that they are trying to distract my attention from?" Thus,

for example, Sen. Church's sensational revelations last summer about

deadly shellfish toxins and the like fooled many into believing they

had been given the whole ugly truth about CIA misdeeds, but actually

he was covering up what he knew about the insane nuclear super poison

at Fort Knox--something a thousand times worse than anything he

revealed.



Now in the same way a cover-up campaign has been launched in regard to

the leakage of the plutonium-239 super poison from Fort Knox, and it's

horrible. A few days ago on January 12, 1976, a truck carrying

radioactive waste just "happened" to have an accident in eastern

Kentucky, smack in the heart of the area now most heavily affected by

radioactive poison leakage from Fort Knox. Fourteen of the 32 drums of

waste on the truck fell off, and 8 of them broke open and leaked. The

newspaper stories around there about it contained the usual assurances

that there was no danger, that it had been cleaned up, etc., but

leakage had occurred.



Just six days later on January 18 newspapers contained big articles

about still another alleged radioactive waste leakage problem in

Kentucky.



The truck I mentioned a moment ago had been on its way to a nuclear

waste dumping ground at Maxey Flats, Kentucky, which had been in use

since 1963, and now we are suddenly told that the leakage is occurring

there too. Federal investigators, those wonderful watchdogs we are

supposed to trust and admire, claimed that radioactive waste in steel,

wooden, and even cardboard drums has been just dropped into trenches

and covered up with dirt; and after 12 years they have just now

abruptly discovered that some of it has gotten loose and is spreading

through the ground, through the water, and through the air. And a

study by the General Accounting Office, while it gives the standard

assurance that there is no immediate danger, recommends a crash

program to correct the situation and develop systematic standards for

safe disposal of radioactive waste.



Now, why all of this sudden concern about leakage of radioactive

contamination? And why does the spotlight on actual leakage cases just

happen to be on Kentucky? After all, there are vastly more serious

problems of this sort elsewhere in the United States, for example, in

New York State--but so why Kentucky? Two reasons, my friends. For one

thing, they are using the opportunity to continue the nuclear "con

game" that has been pulled on you for years by assuring you even when

there are nuclear waste leakages that you don't really have to worry

about it. But, more importantly, in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 7 last

month I posed a direct challenge to the federal government to either

prove or disprove my charges; and I spelled out a fair, objective way

to do it. What is going on now is their answer to my challenge by

spreading stories about other kinds of radioactive waste leakage in

the general vicinity of Fort Knox, and possibly by deliberately

causing such releases--such as occurred in the truck accident--they

are feverishly tampering with the evidence.



The program I suggested to use offsite measurements to detect leakage

from the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox would, as they can now argue,

no longer prove anything conclusively about my charges because of

these other radioactive leakages which alleg edly have also suddenly

been discovered in the same region. I, for one, would like to see the

whole business about Fort Knox laid to rest once and for all, and I

know you would too. I know that my charges about the gold and about

the plutonium poison are true; but for the sake of argument IF I were

wrong, I would rather be honestly proven wrong about any or all of

them and be made a laughingstock than to have the American people's

worry over this matter dragged out endlessly like this.



Whatever the truth is, I want you to know; but the Rockefeller lackeys

in the Government know only too well that the truth is exactly what I

have told you, and they don't want you to know. They will do anything

and everything to try to save themselves regardless of how many other

human beings they may doom in the process. And so, my friends, this is

the vicious reality behind the smooth mask that our

Rockefeller-controlled federal government wears. We, the people, must

bring the pressure to bear that will cause these things to be honestly

investigated and corrected.



The United States is under the thumb of modern outlaws; and if we do

not bring them to justice, they will bring us and our children to

total ruin. So far the United States Congress has not seen fit even to

consider my charges about the gold, about the plutonium, about

anything! The problem is not that I don't have the evidence, but that

I have too much of it. The same applies to the Justice Department, the

General Accounting Office, the White House, and so on, so on.



But recently a Congressman who heard my testimony in Congress about

the missing Fort Knox gold in April 1974 and who went to Fort Knox in

September 1974, gave us a tiny opening, whether wittingly or

unwittingly. His constituents have been pressing him continuously for

some answers about Fort Knox; and in recent replies which were

forwarded to me, he in effect challenged us to do exactly what we have

wanted to do for nearly two years--to present our charges and evidence

in a proper legal forum. Our response is a six-page "Open Letter" by

my able co-patriot, Mr. Edward Durell of Berryville, Virginia. The

letter is addressed to Congressman John B. Conlan of Arizona--but it

is open, because based on past performance we have little reason for

optimism that he will take any constructive action unless he is forced

to do so by public pressure.



The letter presents charges which parallel completely, even in legal

form, the impeachment charges leveled at President Nixon by the House

of Representatives. It is a legal document, and YOU are the

nation-wide Grand Jury. Under our CONSTITUTION, it is ultimately we,

the people, who constitute the highest human authority in our land,

and it is UP TO YOU to decide. Do our charges deserve an open,

complete, honest investigation in a proper legal forum or not? If so,

it is UP TO YOU to return a "Citizens Indictment" by demanding that

your elected representatives provide a legal forum through

Congressional investigation or formal Grand Jury proceedings.



Here now is Mr. Durell's letter to Congressman Conlan of Arizona. I

will be quoting from the letter from here on all the way to Mr.

Durell's signature. Mr. Durell's letter is dated January 7, 1976:



"Dear Mr. Conlan,



Your letters of December 5, 1975, to Mrs. Mary Barrow and Mr. Art

Bentley both of Lake Havasu City, Arizona, have been sent to me for

comment. To that end I write direct to you, with copies to them and

other interested parties.



In your letter to Mrs. Barrow you state among other things that,

quote: 'Grand Juries are empaneled to investigate criminal

wrongdoing', and that if, quote: 'you personally have evidence of

crimes committed in connection with our nation's gold holdings, please

let me know so that I can put you directly in touch with appropriate

officials of the United States Justice Department who would have

jurisdiction in this matter.'



In your letter to Mr. Bentley you state among other things that while

you have, quote: 'some misgivings' about the gold situation, quote: 'I

can assure you that exposure to any radioactive poison would have

caused me serious illness. Neither I nor anyone else who went to Fort

Knox has suffered any such illness.'



Please allow us firstly to answer your letter to Mr. Bentley. It is

common knowledge in nuclear medicine that if one is exposed to alpha

particle radiation of plutonium, death due to cancer can come in a

matter of months or years. It all depends upon dosage level and

duration of exposure. In this respect we would suggest that you

contact Dr. John Gofman, former professor of Medical Physics emeritus,

University of California at Berkeley; or listen to him by way of a

one-hour tape cassette obtainable from AUDIO BOOKS, INC., P. O. Box

16428, Fort Worth, Texas, 76133; special tape No. 2 for $6.00

postpaid.



(Editor's note--1981 address is:



The Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER Suite 5092, 1629 K Street, N.W. Washington,

D.C. 20006.



Current price is: $7.50 postpaid.)



In this tape Dr. Gofman speaks on the effects of radioactive poison,

among other things.



In addition, over 18% increase in cancer deaths in the first seven (7)

months this year over last year has taken place in the central-eastern

states, which has left medical authorities in the dark as to the

cause. They felt they had made such tremendous cancer advancements in

the last few years, and then to have such a high upsurge in the first

seven months this year over last year in that area alone, is baffling.



One more thing about this radioactive poison in the United States

Bullion Depository at Fort Knox--hereinafter called 'Fort Knox.' We

know from sources in the Intelligence industry that this plutonium

poison was part of the plutonium-239 stolen by members of the

Intelligence community in 1966 and that this most deadly substance was

processed in four plants--two in Kentucky, one in North Dakota, and

one in California--into radioactive liquid poison. It was then

taken--60 pounds each--to Peru, Panama, Bolivia, and Argentina under

cover of a multinational cement corporation by a CIA officer, Harold

Leroy White, for the sole purpose of threatening to contaminate the

United States-planned and built water aqueduct systems in those

countries for political and economic pressure. Sixty pounds, however,

intended for use in Argentina, was brought back by Mr. White and

placed in the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox where it has been stored

ever since late 1968. The casks are now corroding, causing leakage and

contamination over the entire areas east and southeast of Kentucky,

and as far away as Cuba. This contamination is endangering the lives

of over 40-million people in this country. Can we afford to allow

these people to be expendable?



The federal government has now publicly admitted our charges that

opium and morphine--150,000 pounds and 24,000 pounds respectively-are

stored at Fort Knox. Why will it not admit the existence of the

plutonium?



It is suggested that to do so might subject the Government to

thousands of legal actions involving hundreds of millions of dollars

under the Federal Tort Claims Act and/or the Price Anderson Act, the

1954 Atomic Energy Act as amended, Title 42 Section 2011 and following

for, quote: 'extraordinary nuclear occurrence'--that is, quote: 'any

event causing a discharge or dispersal of source, special nuclear or

by-product material from its intended place of confinement in amounts

off site or causing radiation levels off site and which has resulted

or will probably result in substantial damages to persons off site or

property off site.'



And why will it not admit the loss of our gold reserves? For the same

reasons--legal actions including those criminal in nature. And in the

latter connection, we would like here to pursue your suggestion to

Mrs. Barrow and list the charges of the high crimes committed relative

to disappearance of the people's gold reserves.



On behalf of the American people it is herein charged that the United

States Treasury Department--hereinafter called 'Treasury'--in

violation of its Constitutional duty to protect the people's gold and

in violation of its Constitutional duty to take care tha t the laws

relative to the safeguarding and custody of said gold be faithfully

executed, has failed so to do in that between January 1, 1961, and

January 1, 1974, prior and subsequent thereto, Treasury engaged itself

through its officers/agents and in concert with others in America's

corridors of financial power in a course of conduct or plan designed

to convert unto themselves the people's gold entrusted to it for

safekeeping for the avowed purpose of profiting unjust enrichment; and

in a course of conduct or plan designed to cover up, conceal and

protect those responsible and to conceal the existence and scope of

other unlawful covert activities.



The means used to implement this conduct or plan have included one or

more of the following:



1. Treasury has failed to render a true account of the amount of gold

shipped out from the United States Bullion Depositories from 1961 to

1968 under color of the 'London Gold Pool Agreement';



2. Treasury has failed to reveal the true prices, if any, received for

the sale of said gold or reveal the names of the ultimate purchasers

of said gold;



3. Treasury has failed to give a true account of the amount of gold

shipped out of the United States Bullion Depositories from 1968 to

1974 under color of an ad hoc committee composed of the Chairman of

the Federal Reserve Board, the Chairman of the Council of Economic

Advisers, the Chairman of the White House Council on International

Economic Policy, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of

Treasury, among others;



4. Treasury has issued a statement dated August 31, 1974, purporting

to list 24-million ounces of good delivery gold at Fort Knox when in

actual fact the Secretary of the Treasury admitted December 3, 1974,

that such listing is false or misleading;



5. Treasury has taken, December 9, 1974, without lawful authority,

two-million ounces of gold from the Exchange Stabilization Fund by a

simple bookkeeping device and four days later announced by way of the

General Services Administration that there would be an auction of

two-million ounces of gold on an 'as is' basis January 6, 1975. In

addition, a Dutch auction was held June 30, 1975, with the remainder

of said gold based on a price not considered best for the taxpayers of

America;



6. Treasury has caused a statement to be issued April 11, 1975, which

is false or misleading in that it purports to list all of the gold

shipments out of Fort Knox when in actual fact such list omitted among

other things a shipment of gold consisting of four (4) tractor-trailer

loads on January 20, 1965, which shipment consisted of 1.762-million

ounces valued over sixty-one million dollars ($61,000,000) at $35.00

per troy ounce--the par value for official gold at that time;



7. Treasury has in its immediate possession and control the necessary

keys, combination numbers, and time-control data for the vaults,

depositories, and their mechanisms. It thus has the highest duty to

take care that its trust be faithfully executed, but it has acted in a

manner contrary to its trust and subversive of responsible government

to the great prejudice and to the manifest injury of the people of the

United States by acting in concert with others to aid and abet, to

surreptitiously remove the gold under the cover of legal right;



8. Treasury has made false or misleading statements for the purpose of

deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a

thorough and complete inspection and audit have been conducted with

respect to allegations that Fort Knox contains no significant amounts

of gold and not accounted for, in that an inspection trip to Fort Knox

September 23, 1974, revealed one (1) cell-like compartment, No. 33, to

contain only copper-hued bars. Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the

Mint, Treasury, said, quote: 'It's all here.' Her statement is

analogous to the so-called Audit of October 1974 of only three (3) of

the cell-like compartments at Fort Knox, which Audit calls the Report

to be submitted to Congress February 10, 1975--also based on a belief

that, quote: 'It's all here.'



Further, the inference given by the inspection trip and the Audit was

that the gold at Fort Knox was of good delivery form and the remaining

ten (10) cell-like compartments were full of good delivery gold;



9. Treasury is withholding relevant and material evidence or

information from the American people in total disregard or violation

of the Constitutional right of the people to know what has happened to

its gold reserves and to its right of freedom of information for

purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or

any other lawful functions of Treasury in that the Central Core Vault

at Fort Knox was concealed from the inspection group of over 100 news

media people, six (6) Representatives, and one (1) Senator of the

United States Congress;



10. Treasury has unlawfully utilized its authority to cause the

General Accounting Office to fail to take care that the laws be

faithfully executed in that the General Accounting Office, a

legislative entity, was forced to have only two (2) of its own people

on a settlement committee to audit the alleged gold at Fort Knox,

whereas Treasury had thirteen (13) of its own people on said

committee;



11. Treasury has not caused to be made an annual physical inventory of

the people's gold since 1953. Thus Treasury has failed to take care

that Title 31 USC be faithfully executed by failing to make the

required annual physical inventories.



In all of this and more, Treasury has acted in a manner contrary to

its trust and subversive of Constitutional government to the great

prejudice of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people

of the United States; wherefore, Treasury through its officers, agents

and others in concert with it, by such conduct or plan, warrant such

parties be brought before appropriate legal authorities to answer

these charges; and, further, for the restitution of the people's gold

except that portion which is contaminated by radioactive poison in

which case said parties shall be ordered to pay the current market

gold price and for such other appropriate action as may be deemed just

and proper in the premises.



In support of the charges, please be informed that former Congressman

Frank Chelf's AFFIDAVIT dated April 7, 1975, in which he deposes and

says among other things, and I quote: 'that the United States

government was moving quietly as a church mouse out of Fort Knox' and

that the gold was, quote: 'constantly and surreptitiously on the

move.'



Fort Knox is located in former Congressman Chelf's Congressional

District. He further deposes and says that, quote: 'In response to my

previous requests for gold removal information, Treasury officials had

been courteous and most friendly but always non-committal or evasive.'

Mr. Chelf had earlier made the same charges on the floor of the House

of Representatives, but to no avail. (See Congressional Record page

15522 - August 21, 1963.)



Further, Lt. General John L. Ryan, Jr., US Army (Ret.), in his

statement of September 26, 1975 before Congressman Otis G. Pike in his

office, has proved the existence of the Central Core Vault and in fact

has drawn sketches of it. In view of this, there is no valid reason

for the Secretary of Treasury to continue to deny the existence of the

Central Core Vault at Fort Knox unless there is something deeply

secret stored therein. There admittedly may have been the necessity

for some secrecy in the 1960's when all of the gold at Fort Knox was

stored in the Central Core Vault. Why the secrecy now, since the

Comptroller General has stated on February 10, 1975, quote: 'As of

June 30, 1974 about 55% of the gold claimed by the Treasury was stored

in thirteen (13) sealed compartments at the United States Bullion

Depository at Fort Knox, Kentucky'?



As further evidence, we call your attention to the balance sheets of

the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, which carry Gold Certificate accounts as

an asset to reflect astated amount of gold which, in turn, is

reflected as a liability on Treasury balance sheets; however it is

submitted these Gold Certificate accounts reflect assets--gold--which

do not in fact exist in Treasury vaults. This same situation prevailed

in 1943 relative to silver when, quote: '14,000 tons of silver from

the Treasury reserve backing American paper money was secretly taken

from Treasury vaults although carried publicly on the Treasury balance

sheets', cited in "Tragedy and Hope" by Professor Carroll Quigley,

page 855, 1966/1974.



We could go on, but suffice it to say that Treasury during our 18

months investigations has not moved to refute by evidence the basic

charges outlined above. Meanwhile our economy is suffering by those

twin disasters, inflation and deflation--high prices with high

unemployment--initially caused by the disposing of our gold reserves

in secret and its attendant game plan.



Mr. C. Gordon Tether in his December 11, 1975, article, quote: 'A NEW

TWIST OF FORT KNOX SAGA' in the Financial Times of London stated,

quote:



'But whatever the cost in terms of loss of face, might not the United

States authorities be well advised to do whatever is necessary to

demonstrate that there is no Fort Knox cover-up? In the light of what

has happened in the United States during the past few years, deeds

inevitably now speak louder than words; and the refusal to prove that

they have nothing to hide, is inevitably destined to go on fostering

precisely the opposite impression.'



Considering all of the above, would you please be so kind as to put

the undersigned and Dr. Peter Beter, as you offered to do for Mrs.

Barrow, quote: 'directly in touch with appropriate officials of the

United States Justice Department who would have jurisdiction in this

matter'? I am authorized to state that Dr. Beter concurs with the

contents of this letter and is fully prepared to give further evidence

before a United States Grand Jury and any Congressional investigating

committee in confirmation of the charges herein cited, among others.



Further, I would suggest you personally bring this letter to the

attention of the Chairman of the House Banking Committee of which you

are a member, for appropriate action. Failure on your part to do so

will lend credence to the fact you, yourself, have become part and

parcel of the cover-up on this vital matter; and failure on the part

of the Chairman of said Committee to take such action will further

lend credence to the fact that he himself is in league with those

underlying forces at work in America's corridors of financial power.



Most respectfully, EDWARD DURELL."



Topic #2--In my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on "THE FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND

WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU", I warned you to watch for the Stock Market

crash signal, meaning general unemployment in the range of 20 to 25%.

This was originally targeted by the Rockefeller Brothers for the fall

of 1975, but their schedules have been increasingly upset by their

preoccupation with the Fort Knox Scandal "cover-up" and by the

anti-CIA actions of Indira Gandhi last summer. Even so, they are

working frantically to get the pieces of their plan together again.



Here in America, the Government officially says that unemployment in

November 1975 was 8.3%; but my own confidential information, direct

from sources within the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is that the true

figure for November was over 15%--and still increasing! Therefore the

real unemployment levels are now moving closer and closer to the Stock

Market crash signal levels I revealed nearly a year ago.



Meanwhile the Dow Jones averages lately are streaking upward

artificially in a dream world of their own, totally divorced from

reality. The stage is being set for a dramatic visible plunge downward

if the Rockefeller Brothers cut the cable on the Stock Market

elevator.



And New York City, supposedly safe from outright bankruptcy by federal

loans, is already far behind in its schedule for raising funds to stay

afloat under that loan program. At the same time, the Nation's banks

are again the subject of widespread concern, and no wonder. Recently

front page stories have deliberately been planted in major

Rockefeller-controlled newspapers about the alleged shakiness of the

mammoth Chase Manhattan Bank and in even larger First National City

Bank of New York, both of them Rockefeller controlled. This is partly

an attempt to lower the Rockefeller profile by saying: "See, we have

problems too." But more importantly, it is a deliberate effort to

undermine confidence in our whole banking system. Banks and their

customers should therefore watch for trouble. A publication which is

doing an outstanding job of keeping on top of the banking situation as

well as many other matters is the Daily News Digest, Box 27496,

Phoenix, Ariz. 85061



This month's meeting of the International Monetary Fund in Jamaica

produced no communique, no general agreement, only reflecting

continued confusion there.



Pressed by the smoldering Fort Knox Scandal on one hand and the

imminent war in the Middle East on the other, the primary goal of the

Rockefeller Brothers has now shifted to just one thing--to abolish the

official price of gold in America so that the non-existent American

gold hoard can be quietly dropped from Treasury and Federal Reserve

balance sheets. Most of the IMF gold is beyond their grasp for the

time being.



SO-CALLED "DETENTE" AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF GEORGE

WASHINGTON



Topic #3



Last summer Indira Gandhi cracked down on the CIA to stop the

Rockefeller take-over of her country, India. Existing war preparations

were immediately diverted to a new direction, and since that time a

major new Asian war has been brewing. In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6

two months ago, I spelled out the basic strategy for this war,

including the role to be played by the Middle East conflict in paving

the way for the Asian War. Plans are proceeding rapidly.



A few days ago Japanese Prime Minister Miki fell into a Soviet trap.

Reacting to brusk and uncooperative Soviet treatment, he announced

that Japan will sign a treaty with Red China that includes the

anti-Soviet hegemony clause desired by China. At the same time, as you

may have noticed in news reports, American business men are rapidly

packing up and leaving Japan, supposedly because their Japanese

understudies are now ready to manage things themselves--but actually

because the Rockefeller Brother interests are bailing out in advance

of war, just as happened a few months ago in Lebanon.



To set the stage for the big Asian War, hostilities are first to break

out in the Middle East to provide an excuse for a limited American

nuclear strike to cap off Arab OPEC oil wells. This will result in

cementing the Sino-Japanese alliance for war, neutralizing Europe and

producing real suffering there, and causing gas rationing in a major

body blow to our wobbly economy here in the United States.



The terrorist attack on OPEC oil ministers in Vienna last month,

engineered by our own CIA, was supposed to get the ball rolling in all

of this. Two key oil ministers were supposed to be killed, leading to

escalating reprisals and war--but the job was botched. For bungling

this top priority operation, the man in charge, Richard Welch, the CIA

station chief in Athens, was judged unreliable and executed by the CIA

itself.



And now Lebanon, which was primarily a distraction earlier, has now

become the new springboard by which the broader Middle East conflict

is to be enlarged. All of this, my friends, is part and parcel of

so-called "detente" with Soviet Russia on the way to a world

collectivist dictatorship. Rockefeller Brothers internationalism,

which is always portrayed by them as the path to peace, is actually a

prescription for war, destruction, and enslavement. To them it is

"progress."



On December 31, 1975, President Ford said on the eve of our

Bicentennial Year, and I quote: "Liberty is the most precious

possession of our past." But, fellow citizens, it is up to us to

restore liberty to our future as well. Had we simply been heeding

George Washington's wise warning to avoid permanent foreign alliances,

the horrors I have been discussing would not exist. In his Farewell

Address, he also left us with many other equally wise observations

that have direct application today. Washington's words and e xample

helped launch the greatest nation on earth, and they can help get it

moving forward again IF WE WILL ALLOW THEM TO. In this, our

Bicentennial Year, I plan to return frequently to the forward-looking

sage advice left to us by our great first President.



Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless each

and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

