From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 18, 1976, and

this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 19.



As our Bicentennial Year of 1976 draws to a close, the United States

of America is in grave danger. Our economy is ravaged by the twin

plagues of high inflation and high unemployment, a condition which I

named STAGFLATION some years ago. Our Republic is under attack in a

far-advanced plan to bring our country under dictatorship. Our very

lives are under the threat of extinction in a surprise nuclear attack

which would be the beginning of NUCLEAR WAR ONE; and all of these

terrible things have been brought about deliberately by a handful of

ruthless, powerful men here and abroad, bent on world domination.



"But how can this be?", you ask. "How can so few people control the

destinies of all the rest of us?"



After all, it is easy to imagine how far our Secret Rulers and their

henchmen would get if they tried to take over even one city, much less

all of America, with their own bare fists and brute force. They would

be stopped in their tracks in no time flat because everyone

understands that kind of threat and there are far more of us than

there are of them. But those who want to enslave us understand this

all too well; they know better than to try any kind of frontal attack

on us that would be widely understood. Instead, they have perfected

the art of harnessing our own energies so that gradually, step by

step, we are enslaving ourselves under their control.



The Hegelian principle of thesis, antithesis, synthesis is being

applied so as to gradually merge our life with that of the Soviet

Union at every level! The average working man and woman in America

would never knowingly allow this to happen, and yet it is

happening--gradually, year after year.



1. The first step, called Thesis, is to create and publicize a problem

in education, economics, or otherwise in our daily lives. In other

words, where there is peace, create discord and trouble.



2. Step 2, Antithesis, is to create opposition to the problem.



3. The final step, Synthesis, is to offer a so-called solution to the

problem.



This diabolical, roundabout approach psychologically conditions people

to accept things which they would otherwise oppose vigorously. Just a

look around with this in mind, and you will see that this technique is

being used all around you in a thousand ways; but the real key to the

success or failure of this method of manipulating the public lies in

something Abraham Lincoln said over 100 years ago, quote:



"With public sentiment, nothing will fail; without it, nothing can

succeed."



So long as we, the people, are simply told the truth about things,

public sentiment reflects the truth. Under those conditions, real

solutions can be found for real problems to everyone's benefit; but

when we are not told the truth, public sentiment reflects only what we

believe and we can be manipulated into supporting all kinds of things

that are not in our best interest.



Here in the United States a subtle, long-range propaganda

technique--known simply as MISINFORMATION--has been used to build up

an artificial and false picture of the world and our own nation. In

the areas of foreign policy, national security, politics, and

economics, the truth has been suppressed and replaced with an

elaborate structure of lies, distortions, and half-truths. This false

picture has come to be accepted as the truth with the result that the

truth itself has been rendered unbelievable. I don't think anyone in

his right mind could do what has been done to us. Our education, our

CONSTITUTION, our free enterprise system, everything possible has been

perverted in order to confer ever more power on our Secret Rulers.



Now, WAR IS COMING. The wars of this century have been fought far from

our shores, but this time it is coming here--to our land, to our

homes, to our people! It will not be a conventional war but NUCLEAR

WAR ONE. As in all modern wars, it will begin with a surprise attack.

Thanks to the silence of the United States Government and of the

controlled major media, most Americans will be caught completely by

surprise, believing in a lie called detente until thermonuclear

fireballs erupt all around our nation.



To show how different the truth is from what we are led to believe by

our Secret Rulers, I will discuss these three topics today:



Topic #1--WHY THE UNITED STATES WAS NOT FIRST TO LAUNCH AN EARTH

SATELLITE



Topic #2--WHY MOST AMERICANS CANNOT BELIEVE NUCLEAR WAR IS IMMINENT



Topic #3--HOW THE MAJOR TAX-EXEMPT FOUNDATIONS HAVE CLEARED THE WAY

FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK.



Topic #1--On the evening of October 4, 1957, Americans were stunned by

the announcement that the Soviet Union had become the first nation in

history to place a man-made satellite in orbit. Sputnik I, weighing

184 pounds, was circling the Earth every hour and a half sending out

beeps that became famous overnight. The world was thrilled, and the

world press heaped great praise on the Soviet Union. They inferred

from this accomplishment that the Soviet socialist system was superior

to our own in scientific and technical progress. It was a historical

first that can never be undone--the Soviet Union had beaten the United

States into space.



Less than a month later Sputnik II was launched. It weighed over half

a ton and carried the first live passenger into space, a dog. The dog

died within a week but it was another startling achievement

nonetheless.



Meanwhile poor old America was struggling along trying to put a tiny

16-pound satellite into orbit by means of the Navy's Vanguard rocket.

Two launches were attempted, but both failed. In one case the rocket

lifted a few feet off the pad only to settle back into a tremendous

fireball as it exploded. It made exciting footage for the television

news that evening. Finally on January 31, 1958, almost four months

after Sputnik I, America launched its first space satellite from Cape

Canaveral, Florida. It was called Explorer I, and it was launched not

by the Navy but by the Army. We were in space at last, but only after

being thoroughly humiliated before the entire world.



After the Sputnik shock, space flight and rockets were suddenly the

"in" thing to be interested in. Even then Senator Lyndon B. Johnson

arranged for a new "Aeronautics and Space Committee" to be set up,

with himself as its Chairman. He was thereafter as visible as possible

in connection with space matters, and today the manned space flight

center in Houston bears his name. At the time, I could hardly imagine

anything more hypocritical for Johnson to do. Even though I was a

lawyer, I had been a member of the then named "American Rocket

Society" for a number of years and had vivid memories of Johnson's

attitude toward space in the early 50's. At that time, four or five

years before Sputnik, I was a member of a group headed by Dr. Wernher

Von Braun who approached Johnson in hopes of obtaining support for a

space program. I'll never forget Lyndon Johnson's reaction to the

whole idea. He did not merely say "No", but jeered at the whole

concept as ridiculous and worthless!



A few years later the United States was deprived of the chance to be

first in space, but not by Lyndon Johnson. What I am going to tell you

does not affect our national security now, but it does provide a

typical example of what has been happening to America for many years.

And as Wernher Von Braun lies on his death bed in a hospital near

Washington, D.C., I believe the time has come for the truth to be told

about why we were not the first to put a satellite into space.



In late 1955 or early 1956, the Joint Chiefs of Staff began the first

act of planning for an American space program. Their goal: To have the

United States initiate the world's first successful space flight at

the beginning of the International Geophysical Year that was to begin

on July 1, 1957. After some controversy as to which Service should

sponsor the space project, it was concluded that the Armywas most

capable of doing the job. This was agreed to and approved by the Joint

Chiefs and by then Secretary of Defense Charles Wilson.



The Army's Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Al abama was fortunate in

having the services of the world's foremost rocket expert, Dr. Wernher

Von Braun. From a very early age Von Braun had been fascinated with

the idea of space flight, and he had spent his life working with

rockets. During World War II Von Braun was pressed into service by

Hitler, and the German rocket program was far ahead of other countries

by the end of the war. When the war ended, many of Von Braun's

subordinates at the German rocket base were taken prisoner by the

Soviet Union and it was they who were forced to develop and direct the

Soviet missile and space programs; but Von Braun himself had resolved

well before hostilities ended that he would surrender to the United

States, and he succeeded in doing so. Our Government then prevailed

upon him to enter governmental research where he would have the money

and resources to pursue rocketry in earnest.



When the Earth Satellite project came under consideration years later

in the mid-50's, the Joint Staff project officers interviewed the

Redstone Arsenal officials along with Von Braun himself to ascertain

their capability. Von Braun stated that his group could engineer a

space vehicle and have it ready for orbit in only a few months. The

Joint Staff pushed for the Von Braun project; and after it was

approved by the Joint Chiefs and Secretary of Defense, it went to

President Eisenhower for final approval and allocation of Defense

Department funds--but there it stopped! Strangely there was a long

delay in getting the expected presidential approval. Finally the word

came down to the Joint Staff from the President. Incredibly, they were

to disregard the Army's capability and give the Space project to the

Navy instead. Such a decision was all but unbelievable. The Navy did

not even have a blueprint for such a space vehicle! They would be

starting almost from scratch; but the decision stood, so several large

aircraft companies and Navy scientists gathered to initiate a program

called "PROJECT VANGUARD."



As a direct result of this decision, the Soviet Union was able to put

Sputnik into orbit while the United States was still struggling

unsuccessfully with Vanguard. Joint Staff project officers were most

perplexed about the American political decision to allow the Soviet

Union to beat us in this endeavor when we had the capability to be far

ahead of them. It appeared to follow a pattern of withholding American

capabilities and allowing the Soviet Union the advantage. Later, an

aide to President Eisenhower explained confidentially what had

transpired.



A select group of scientists and financial leaders got wind of the

American space satellite plans at an early stage. The group, headed by

a man who was later awarded the Lenin Peace Prize by the Soviet Union,

went to the President and pressed him to sponsor a purely American

space project with only native Americans working on it. They didn't

want by any means for a former German, such as Wernher Von Braun, to

give the world and future historians the impression that the Germans

of all people were superior in the field of space science. This group,

who were actually doing the bidding of the Rockefellers on behalf of

their Soviet allies, were instrumental in forcing America to take a

back seat in the early years of the Space Age when we were fully

capable of being supreme!



Finally, after two Soviet Sputniks and two humiliating Navy Vanguard

failures, Eisenhower became exasperated and told the Defense

Department to get Von Braun into action. Just six weeks after he

received the go-ahead, Von Braun's Army team launched Explorer I. He

did exactly what he had said he could do two years earlier--and the

very first time he tried it; but the special place in history he so

richly deserved had been denied him forever, just as it had been

denied to the new homeland of his choice, the United States of

America. The anti-German argument that had been used on President

Eisenhower was, of course, a total fraud.



When Sputnik I was launched a short dozen years after World War II,

the Soviet rocket program was even more dependent on the efforts of

captured German scientists than was true in the United States. Thus

only one thing was really accomplished by delaying the Army satellite

effort under Wernher Von Braun: A tremendous propaganda coup for the

Soviet Union and a setback to American prestige and self-confidence

that persisted for years. It is a grim fact that accolades go to the

spoilers and traitors among us, but no acclaim to our true heroes and

men dedicated to American principles.



Under the enthusiastic leadership of Wernher Von Braun the United

States was able to come from behind to win the race to the Moon, but

soon the world press will have relegated him to the footnotes of

modern history. Like General Douglas MacArthur, Wernher Von Braun will

"just fade away."



Topic #2--When Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger was fired by

President Ford just over a year ago in November 1975, he said, quote:



"Some years from now someone will say, 'Why weren't we warned?' and I

wanted to be able to say: 'Indeed you were.'"



But most Americans when reminded of this parting statement by

Schlesinger tend to be surprised. It is as if his words have gone out

into thin air, leaving no lasting impression at all. This is a perfect

illustration of the way in which the American public have been left

comfortably asleep by the controlled major media of our country,

oblivious to the steadily mounting threat of war.



Around the world the alarms of impending nuclear disaster are jangling

louder and louder; but these alarms are muted, muffled, and silenced

by the time they reach you. When isolated facts about American or

Soviet military developments are reported, it is done in such a way

that it has little lasting impact on most people. Thus, for example,

you may hear a news item concerning the debate over the new B-1 Bomber

which the United States Air Force is developing. Taken in isolation

you may well wonder what all the shouting is about and, for that

matter, why such a new bomber is even being considered in this age of

missiles. Or you may hear a brief news item mentioning that the Air

Force wants to buy some F-15 Fighters to augment our air defense

system.



Perhaps these things would make a little more sense to you if you knew

that the Soviet Backfire Bomber began to be deployed operationally

over three years ago! The Backfire is a supersonic long-range bomber

capable of delivering nuclear weapons to targets here in the United

States--and that, my friends, is precisely its purpose, not the

so-called peripheral missions mentioned by some. Knowing this, perhaps

it would have struck you as a little strange that in 1974 after the

Soviet Backfire Bomber began being deployed, the United States

virtually dismantled its air defense system. At the very time that a

renewed Soviet bomber threat was developing, our network of

interceptors was reduced to just six active Air Force Squadrons plus

six more in the Air National Guard! The extensive network of Nike

Hercules Antiaircraft Missiles under Army command was shut down

completely. But now, with war threatening to break out, the Defense

Department is reversing its position on air defense without telling

you why.



The mounting controversy over the relative military strength of the

Soviet Union and the United States has taken many people by surprise.

Almost 3-1/2 years ago the warning was sounded that the Soviet Navy

had become stronger than the United States Navy. That's what the

world's foremost naval authority, Jane's Fighting Ships, said in July

1973; but if you saw this reported at all by the major media, did it

make any impression? Or consider the matter of long-range ballistic

missiles. Over four years ago on November 27, 1972, the Soviet Union

successfully test-fired a submarine-launched ballistic missile with a

range of 4,500 miles! By comparison, the most advanced American

sub-launched missiles have a range of less than 3,000miles. In

addition, the development of a whole new series of Soviet missiles was

underway.



Early this month the Soviet Union began a 20-day period of tests of

the new submarine-launc hed SSNX-18 Ballistic Missile, firing them

into a circular zone 100 miles in radius in the North Pacific

southeast of the Aleutian Islands. The SSNX-18 now has a multiple

warhead capability; and these tests, which are full-operational tests,

extend over the full range of the missile which is now more than 5,000

miles! Particular attention is being given to warhead performance in

these test-proving flights. If all goes as planned, the SSNX-18 will

be committed to full production and operational status within a year's

time. The SSNX-18 will give the Soviet Union a commanding lead over

the United States in the realm of submarine-launched ballistic

missiles. But what have you learned from network news reports or other

major media about this missile? Practically nothing.



But the most tortured reasoning I have seen yet appeared on December

6, 1976, in the New York Times. An editorial on that date entitled:

MOSCOW'S SUBMARINE MIRV begins with the incredible words, and I quote:



"The Soviet Union's first successful test of a submarine-launched

ballistic missile armed with MIRV multiple nuclear warheads is good

news paradoxically for the United States and the world."



The editorial then argues, in effect, that since this will eliminate

the one remaining missile advantage held by the United States, it

opens the door for the Soviet Union to make concessions in SALT

negotiations that could prevent either side from acquiring a

first-strike capability.



Such Alice-in-Wonderland reasoning may still serve the purpose of

lulling millions of Americans back to sleep, but it would not sit well

these days with most NATO Defense Ministers. For the first time many

officials of NATO are generally alarmed by the continuing relentless

build-up of Soviet power in Europe where the best Soviet troops are

concentrated.



For example, consider Denmark which sits astride the channels which

lead from the Baltic Sea to the North Sea. Soviet activity in the

Baltic has grown more and more ominous of late. Early in September a

Soviet task force suddenly materialized off the southeast coast of

Denmark, then left, then reappeared. All kinds of Soviet naval war

games are now being carried out practically on Denmark's doorsteps so

close that they could suddenly turn into attack that would give

practically no warning. Danish Foreign Minister K. B. Andersen said

recently,



"I'm astonished at what is going on. This is completely contrary to

the expectations created by the Helsinki agreement."



And yet our kept press would have you believe that the new Soviet

SSNX-18 missile I just told you about is unimportant or even good

news, because of possible agreements the Soviet Union might make about

it.



At the NATO Defense Ministers' meeting in Brussels earlier this month,

Admiral Sir Peter Hill-Norton of Britain warned that the trend of the

military balance between East and West is continuing to move in favor

of the Soviet bloc. He declared that more money and better planning

are needed if NATO is to match what he called the "relentless

determination" of the Warsaw Pact countries to achieve military

superiority. He warned that NATO can no longer rely indefinitely upon

the superiority of Western technology because massive Soviet spending

on research and development have resulted in vast improvements in

Soviet weapons.



As Dutch Defense Minister Vredeling said on December 8, the day after

Sir Peter's speech, quote:



"The situation as far as the balance of forces world-wide is more

serious than many people think."



And there are many other examples of genuine alarm at the

vulnerability of Western Europe to a devastating surprise attack.



What did Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who was and is a CIA

operative, have to say to the NATO ministers? He gave a brief nod to

the wide-spread concern over the Soviet build-up, but what you heard

reported in the news emphasized the following, and I quote:



"I think the alliance is healthy. I leave my post as Secretary of

Defense next month with a good deal of optimism about the Atlantic

alliance--the fact that it survived some 26 years; the fact that it's

working, I think reasonably smoothly at the present time; frankly

reassured by the fact that there is an Atlantic alliance, that it's on

watch and doing its job."



And so, my friends, we can all go back to sleep, comfortably

reassured.



Topic #3--One week from today will be Christmas 1976. On that day most

Americans will be celebrating the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ by

giving gifts to one another. The joy of giving is something most

everyone understands to a greater or lesser extent. When presents are

opened on Christmas Day, for example, parents of small children

usually get their greatest fun out of watching their children open

presents, not from opening their own gifts.



In the same vein, people usually feel good about it when they give a

portion of what they have to help others or to support a worthy cause.

This is the foundation of what is known as charity--but unfortunately

there are always a very few among us who are motivated not by a spirit

of sharing but by runaway greed. Their only pleasure in life comes

from amassing more and more of this world's wealth for their own

coffers and extending their power to control the wealth of others as

well. Ultimately those who are motivated this way reach the point

where they have so much wealth and so much power that it is no longer

enough just to add to it just still further. The only thing left in

life for those who have acquired wealth and power through greed is to

use that power and that wealth to play with the lives and destinies of

people. In short, they try to play 'God'.



You may ask: Why would the Soviet Union go to war? Would the

super-wealthy of America want to create a dictatorship here with

themselves in control? You might as well ask: Why does the mountain

climber want to climb the highest mountain? Common answer is: Because

it's there--just like the United States, the richest country in the

world, is there. What a prize.



Early in this century a systematic long-range program was begun by a

small group of immensely powerful people. The goal of this program was

to acquire ever greater control over American society. This was to

lead ultimately to America's merging into a One-World Government with

themselves and their heirs in control.



The method by which this would be accomplished was the dismantling of

the basic structure of American society and its reconstruction in the

image desired by those who had decided to play 'God'. And to carry out

this long-range program, powerful tax-free Foundations were

established and given the halo of philanthropy. They were explained to

the public as simply a special means the wealthy had devised for

giving to the public at large. Each Foundation was thus given the

image of an institutional Santa Claus.



Instead of questioning what they did, the American people were led to

accept their activities in the confident belief that they were just

showering wonderful gifts on our society day in and day out. This is

the picture that is still accepted as the truth by most Americans.

They believe it just as fervently as millions of small children

believe in Santa Claus. The raw truth about this network of

Foundations may therefore sound unbelievable--just as it sounds

unbelievable to a small child if he is told there is no Santa Claus.



For months now I've been referring to the role that has been played by

these Foundations in undermining American society and placing us in

the extreme peril we now face. Now I have been given permission to

reveal one of my primary sources of information about these

Foundations, and to repeat for you his own words about them. He is my

friend Mr. Norman Dodd. Mr. Dodd was Director of Research of the

special committee of the United States House of Representatives to

investigate tax-exempt Foundations in 1953 and 1954. The late

Congressman Carroll Reece of Tennessee was chairman of this very

important committee.



Recently Mr. Dodd gave a rare speech here in Washington, D.C., and he

has given permission to repeat it here for you. I will now be quoting

him.



-------------------



" This is not going to be a speech. This is a sharing of ideas born of

experience, and I'd like to begin by qualifying myself in your minds.



I am a product of a strange type of education and schooling. The

education of which I am a product featured the importance of the

question 'WHY?' and then went on to try to instill in us the

importance of the question plus our responsibility as individuals to

find the answers. I happen to have taken this education and schooling

seriously and I have lived accordingly.



In this schooling to which I was subjected, great stress was laid upon

the history of this country to illustrate the feature I have just

mentioned. As a result I participated in and was witness to something

in the nature of a discovery--which was that in the 200 years of our

history many more truths made themselves self-evident than motivated

our Founding Fathers. One of these truths bears heavily upon the

experiences that I shall recite to you.



The truth, were it to be put in words, would read something like this.

I'll repeat it slowly because it is quite significant and deserving of

considerable thought:



The condition or state of the members of any nation at any given time

reflects the use to which the wealth they have produced is being put

by others than the ones who played a part in its production.



That brings me to two experiences which I will describe to you.



The first was my response to an invitation from the president of the

FORD FOUNDATION in his offices in New York. His name: Rowan Gaither.

Upon arriving there I was greeted with the following:



'Mr. Dodd, we invited you to come because we thought that perhaps, off

the record, you would be kind enough to tell us why the Congress is

interested in the operations of Foundations such as ourselves.'



Before I could think how best to reply, he volunteered this:



'Mr. Dodd, we operate here under directives which emanate from the

White House. Would you like to know what the substance of these

directives is?'



My answer was: 'Yes, Mr. Gaither, I would like very much to know.'

Whereupon he said:



'The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we

shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States

that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.'



Needless to say, I nearly fell off the chair. As soon as I could

recover myself to reply, I said:



'Mr. Gaither, legally you are entitled to use your grant-making power

for this purpose, but I don't think you are entitled to withhold this

information from the American people to whom you are beholden for your

tax exemption. So why do you not tell the American people what you

have just told me?'



His answer was:



'Mr. Dodd, we would not think of doing that.'



That was one experience that was very informative. It was incredible;

nevertheless, it is the truth.



The next experience involved the acceptance of an invitation from the

CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE. This invitation came in

response to a letter which I had written the Endowment asking a few

pertinent questions. By 'pertinent' I mean that they related to the

effort of the Congress to determine if Foundations were engaged in

what the Congress said could be 'un-American activities', without

defining 'un-American.' I arrived at the office of Dr. Joseph Johnson,

who was then president of the Endowment. He was the successor to Alger

Hiss. Present were two vice-presidents, relatively new men, and

counsel (a partner in the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell). After

amenities, Dr. Johnson opened the conversation this way:



'Mr. Dodd, we have received your letter. We can answer the questions

but it will be a great deal of trouble. The reason for its being a

great deal of trouble is that with the ratification by the Senate of

the United Nations treaty, our task was done; and so we bundled up

everything in the way of records and sent them to the warehouse, and

adopted a policy of constructing a building across the street from the

United Nations which will serve as a facility for the benefit of those

many organizations which from this point on will be bound to follow

the activities of the United Nations. So we have a counter suggestion

which is as follows:



If you can spare a member of your staff and send him to New York for

two weeks, we'll provide a room in our library and also make available

to him the Minute Books of this corporation from its inception.'



My first reaction was that he had lost his mind. I had some suspicion

of what these Minute Books might well contain; but here was counsel

and there seemed to be no disagreement on the part of the

vice-presidents--and all of them were relatively young, so my guess

was that none of them had ever read the Minutes themselves. As a

result, I accepted the invitation and did send a member of my staff to

New York. That member brought back to me on dictaphone belts the

following:



We are now back to roughly 1908 when the Trustees raised the question,

asking themselves:



(1) Is there any way known to man more effective than war, assuming

they wish to alter the life of an entire people?



They discussed this question academically and in a scholarly fashion

for almost a year, and came up with the conclusion that WAR is the

most effective means known to man, assuming that objective.



Then they raised question No. 2:



(2) How to involve the United States in a war?



This was in 1909. I doubt if there was any subject more removed from

the minds of the people in this country at that time than the

possibility of involvement in war. There were intermittent shows, you

will remember, in the Balkans; and my guess is that not many people in

the country even knew where the Balkans were. They answered the

question this way:



'We must control the diplomatic machinery of the United States.'



That brings up question no. 3, which is:



(3) How do we secure control of the diplomatic machinery of the United

States?



and the answer comes up:



'We must control the State Department.'



That fits in with prior findings which we had uncovered; namely, that

the hand of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace inside the

State Department was a fact.



Finally, we are in a war. These Trustees have the brashness to

congratulate themselves on the wisdom and validity of their original

decision because already the impact of our participation in World War

I has indicated its capacity to alter our national life. They even go

so far as to word and dispatch a telegram to President Wilson,

pressuring him to see to it that the war does not end too quickly!



Finally, the war is over. The Trustees then take up the problem which

they face: namely, of preventing, as they put it, a reversion of life

in the United States to what it was prior to 1914. They came up with

the conclusion that:



To gain that end, we must control education in the United States.



They realize this is a prodigious piece of work so they seek and

obtain the assistance of the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION. They then divide

the task into parts, giving to the Rockefeller Foundation the

responsibility of altering education as it pertains to domestic

subjects. They retain for themselves the task of altering our

education as it pertains to subjects bearing on our international

relationships. Then they decide together that the key to this is an

alteration in the teaching of American history, so they approach three

of the then existing prominent historians with the proposition that

they alter the manner in which, up to then, they had presented the

subject. They are all turned down flat.



They then decide that it is necessary for them to build their own

stable of historians. They approach the GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION, which

specializes in the awarding of fellowships, and suggest: When we

discover a likely young person who is studying and looking forward to

becoming a teacher of history, we will take him to London to pursue

his studies. So they take 20 to London, and these 20 are briefed in

what is expected of them. These 20 return and eventually become the

most active influence in the American Historical Society.



This coincides with the appearance which perhaps you will remember of

bo ok after book the contents of which cast aspersion on the Founders

of this country, cast aspersion on the ideas which prompted the

founding of this country, and relegates them to the realm of myth!



Finally toward the end of the 1920's the Endowment grants the American

Historical Society $400,000 for the sole purpose of rendering a report

as to what the future of this country promises to be and should be!

This appears in seven volumes. The seventh volume, of course,

summarizes the contents of the other six, and it ends on this note:



'The future belongs to collectivism administered with characteristic

American humanitarianism and efficiency.'



Well, in essence this was the whole story written down; and Mr. Reece

who was chairman of the investigation--the last investigation of

Foundations--hoped to be able to accomplish this. He was not able to

do this owing to the disinterest on the part of the committee's

counsel and the violent activities of one of its members. I might

mention that that member whose activities barred the way was none

other than Wayne Hays--who has come to the end of his career, although

this marked the start of it."



-------------------



Mr. Dodd concluded his talk with some additional comments which I want

to save for another discussion, since they go beyond the subject of

Foundations alone. But you may want to replay what I have just recited

from his speech, noting carefully how different the truth is from

appearances. And remember, the truth has many enemies!



And so it is that the 20th Century has been an unparalleled era of

increasingly destructive warfare, violence, and terror on a world-wide

scale. By pursuing with relentless determination the goal of merging

the United States into ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, the Trustees of the key

group of major Foundations have brought us to the threshold of NUCLEAR

WAR ONE--to be waged primarily on American soil.



As I first revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 for May 1976, some

of the present-day Trustees of these Foundations have been awakening

to the threat of a Soviet double cross in the grand plan for world

domination--and last summer this double cross got underway with the

planting of short-range underwater-launch nuclear missiles within the

territorial waters of the United States, as well as of many other

countries. But the world-wide economic and political empire that is

today presided over by the Four Rockefeller Brothers is so huge that

it includes many individuals who still do not believe that any Soviet

double cross will take place, much less that it is already underway.



CHEMICAL WARFARE ALREADY UNDERWAY



For example, last month I reported that 18 Soviet submarines were

deployed along our west coast preparing to inject plutonium particles

into the air on November 20, 1976. And our own EPA--the Environmental

Protection Agency--was cooperating by telling us that on that date a

radioactive cloud from a Chinese atomic test would begin passing over

our west coast, when actually the radioactive cloud from China had not

yet left China's own borders! By interesting coincidence, Russell

Trane, the head of the EPA, arrived in a presumably safe location,

Moscow, on November 19--the day before the plutonium was to be

released by the Soviet subs. With appropriate irony, he arrived there

as head of the United States delegation to the "Soviet-American

Commission for Cooperation in Environmental Protection." Can you

imagine?



The plutonium was released by the subs as scheduled on November 20;

but just as happened when this was done the first time in early

October, unusual weather conditions kept the United States from being

badly contaminated. The plutonium cloud drifted across the upper part

of the United States and had little effect at ground level. But, my

friends, the Soviets never give up.



Five days ago on December 13 I learned that Soviet submarines were

lining up along the northwest coast of the United States for the third

time for this purpose. This time there are 21 submarines loaded with

plutonium poison to inject into our atmosphere. According to my latest

Intelligence sources, 16 are deployed along the coast from Seattle,

Washington to Eugene, Oregon, while five (5) more lie between Eugene

and Eureka, California. All of these are within 20 miles of the

shoreline.



I've already explained in detail the connection between this

radioactive chemical warfare and the Swine Flu hoax being perpetrated

by the United States Government, particularly in monthly AUDIO LETTER

No. 17. Therefore it is significant that the so-called Swine Flu

inoculation program was halted with great publicity two days ago owing

to death and paralysis suffered by many who have taken the vaccine.

This serves to focus the nation's attention once again on the terrible

threat Swine Flu is said to be just at a time when the Soviet

submarines are once again prepared to inject a poison into our

atmosphere that can produce severe flu-like symptoms. It may be that,

as was done the past two times, the Soviet submarines will wait for

another announcement from the United States Government that it will

serve as a cover story, such as a Chinese nuclear test, before

releasing the plutonium into our air. But now they have acquired some

experience and it is possible that they will release the plutonium at

any time.



Meanwhile the build-up for war continues. While the mounting Soviet

threat to Europe is fraying the nerves of NATO Defense Ministers, the

most immediate threat to Europe is once again emerging in the Middle

East. In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 over a year ago I revealed the

over-all plan that existed at that time for war to begin in the Middle

East. I ask you now to listen to that AUDIO LETTER No. 6 again. All is

nearly ready once again for the long planned war in the Middle East to

be ignited. The Rockefeller oil interests now have gotten most of

their money out of the Arab region. Now the title to all the oil

fields have been sold to the Arabs themselves.



The Middle East war will also leave the United States in an even more

defenseless position that we are now in if the Soviet surprise attack

on our country is allowed to take place.



CONTINUING THREAT OF SOVIET UNDERWATER MISSILES PLANTED WITHIN AND

NEAR UNITED STATES BORDERS



Last month I explained in detail why the underwater missiles that are

being planted along our shores by the Soviet Union are so crucial to

them in their plan to defeat the United States in NUCLEAR WAR ONE, but

I also explained that they are no longer being removed by the United

States Navy.



Since I recorded that tape, 57 more nuclear missiles have been planted

in our own territorial waters. Added to the 36 I mentioned last month,

this brings the total to 93 Soviet missiles in the waters of the

United States including Alaska and Hawaii. In addition, four (4)

missiles still threaten the Panama Canal, and five (5) more missiles

now threaten Canada.



I declared last month that I would no longer reveal the locations of

these missiles unless and until responsible arrangements are made to

inform the public of the deadly threat we are under. Our Secret Rulers

had been using my information from October 1st onward only for their

own benefit--and that is not what it is for.



I intend to continue to hold my silence until action is taken for

everyone's benefit. Nevertheless I am going to make one exception at

this time--it involves Hawaii. World War II began with a devastating

surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and now no less than nine (9) Soviet

underwater missiles now threaten Pearl Harbor and the Island of Oahu

with the same fate a second time.



I will now give the coordinates for these nine missiles only, in hopes

that this time action will be taken to protect the United States

Pacific Fleet from the attack that could come at any moment. These

coordinates are:



Missile #1: 21 degrees/13 minutes/47 seconds North 157 degrees/46

minutes/28 seconds West



Missile #2: 21-18-37 North, 157-57-21 West



Missile #3: 21-17-31 North, 158- 4-17 West



Missile #4: 21-21-19 North, 158- 9- 7 West



Missile #5: 21-36-12 North, 158-12-48 West



Missile #6: 21-36-33 North, 158-11- 6 West



Missile #7: 21-26-54 North, 157-47-17 West



Missile #8: 21-19-27 North, 157-38-36 West



Missile #9: About 25 miles east of Oahu and 8 miles north of Molokai

at 21-21-13 North, 157-15-26 West.



I continue to hope, my friends, that a war can still be prevented. To

find out what you can do in the event war does come, I suggest you

read issue 135 of McKeever's Multinational Investment and Survival

Letter, 1012 Russell St., Baltimore, MD 21230, but my prayer is that

you will never need that kind of information.



Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may

God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

