From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is April 24, 1976, and this

is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 11.



This year of 1976 is of course our Bicentennial, the 200th anniversary

of the founding of our beloved country. It should be a time for

reflection on our hard-won unique heritage and for thankful

celebration of it. At the same time, it is only fitting that we also

look ahead and give some thought to our future destiny and that of our

trusting children. But on all sides we Americans are being bombarded

with propaganda enticing us to focus only on the future without

bearing in mind the lessons of the past. Bicentennial programs and

articles dealing with our nation's early days keep the spotlight

narrowly focused on the Revolution itself most of the time instead of

on the wonderful free Republic that was the product of that

Revolution. This is no accident. It is intended to gradually make us

more revolution minded in order to make the so-called "Second American

Revolution" being promoted by John D. Rockefeller III seem more and

more acceptable to us.



The wise first President of our Republic, George Washington, left us

with advice in his "Farewell Address" that was so forward-looking that

it is still valuable today, and time after time he referred to

experience as, quote: "the surest standard" by which to judge existing

and planned governmental measures. This stands in stark contrast to

the approach that is preached regularly by the man who wants to

preside over the end of our free Republic, Nelson Rockefeller. He

keeps saying, quote: "Forget the past and let's look to the future."



To what sort of future does Nelson Rockefeller ask us to look if it

has nothing to do with our past? It is the future that was spelled out

as early as 1924 by the father of Nelson and his brothers, John D.

Rockefeller, Jr., in a talk to a group of students. John Jr. was

quoted by his attorney, agent, and biographer Raymond B. Fosdick as

saying on that occasion, and I quote:



"We are standing tonight on the mountain top with the world spread out

at our feet--your country, your country, my country, all of us--so it

may come to pass that some day, some day the people of all nations

will stand on the mountain top together and no one will speak of 'my

country' but we will speak of 'our world'."



So, my friends, the real question of America's destiny that now

confronts us is one which has been forced upon us by the Four

Rockefeller Brothers--David, Nelson, Laurance, and John D.

III--pursuing this objective spelled out by their father. It is

essentially the same question that faced President Abraham Lincoln

just over a century ago: whether or not the United States of America

was to be destroyed. The threat then was one of destruction by

dismemberment and fragmentation, and it was met by the use of federal

powers to maintain the Union. The threat today lies at the opposite

extreme of overcentralization of power, and it can be met only by

reasserting individual and State powers and rights under the

CONSTITUTION.



To explore the radical change of direction in America's destiny that

is being plotted and manipulated by the Four Rockefeller Brothers and

their allies, I want to talk about the following three topics today:



Topic #1--HOW INDIVIDUALS ARE BEING REDUCED TO SACRIFICIAL PAWNS IN

THE ROCKEFELLER PROGRAM TO PROTECT AND ADVANCE THEIR OWN INTERESTS



Topic #2--HOW NATIONS ARE BEING MANEUVERED INTO WAR AND DESTRUCTION AS

PART OF THE ROCKEFELLER SCHEME OF PROGRESS



Topic #3--HOW WE ARE BEING PUSHED AND TRICKED INTO DISCARDING OUR

HERITAGE OF FREEDOM TO ACCEPT ROCKEFELLER DICTATORSHIP.



Topic #1--One of the strangest and most sensational kidnap episodes in

history began on February 4, 1974, when a young lady named Patricia

Hearst was kidnapped from her apartment in Berkeley, California. Her

kidnappers soon identified themselves as a radical group called the

Symbionese Liberation Army, or SLA. Thus began a nightmare of

impossible demands, tape recordings, merciless publicity, shoot-outs

and unrelenting pressure behind the scenes for Mr. and Mrs. Randolph

Hearst.



On April 3, 1974, a tape recording announced a "new twist" that Patty

Hearst had joined the SLA under the new name Tania, and a few days

later Tania helped rob a bank as if to prove what she said. Just for

good measure, a few days after that Tania was seen spraying bullets

from an automatic rifle to cover SLA member William Harris as he left

a store where he had allegedly been shoplifting.



Soon the SLA was all but wiped out in the spectacular shoot-out in Los

Angeles, but somehow Tania just happened to be elsewhere watching it

all on television. Tania had escaped, and for more than 16 months in

spite of an alleged manhunt nation-wide by the FBI, she and her SLA

companions William and Emily Harris reportedly continued to evade

capture. But finally on September 18, 1975, the manhunt suddenly ended

as abruptly as it began. Tania and the Harrises were found right in

San Francisco, no less, where it all began, and the trio were quickly

rounded up without much fuss.



I mentioned briefly in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 7 that the SLA was a

CIA operation, and that its purpose, in which it was successful, was

to bring about a Rockefeller take-over of the huge Hearst empire. But

now I believe the time has come to tell you more, for two reasons:

First, I fear for the life of Tania, the impersonator of Patty Hearst

who is currently in custody; and second, I am now convinced that Mr.

and Mrs. Hearst, Patty's parents, do not know that the girl captured

last September is an impostor.



Until very recently there were indications that they knew this but

were keeping their silence about it to protect the rest of their

family. For that reason I have refrained from discussing the details

of the Patty Hearst case other than to tell you about the Rockefeller

take-over of their holdings. The Hearsts of all people have good

reason to fear additional CIA-engineered reprisals against them and I

would never want to usurp their personal prerogatives; but I have at

last obtained evidence which convinces me beyond question that Mr. and

Mrs. Hearst are still in the dark. And it is for their sake and for

the sake of the life of the girl whoever she is, that I am about to

reveal the truth in the Patty Hearst case, for I truly believe that

the truth even when it is unpleasant, is always to be preferred over

lies no matter how pleasant or convenient; and only the truth can

provide the basis for justice to be done.



The Hearst newspaper chain first incurred the wrath of the Rockefeller

Brothers three decades ago when they led the campaign to expose major

abuses spawned by the Rockefellers. For example, it was the Hearst

chain that publicized secret Congressional testimony showing that

America's atomic secrets were handed over to the Soviets--not stolen

by them--even before our first atomic bomb was finished; and that the

Rockefellers were directly involved in this. This was very easy for

the Rockefellers, by the way. The world's first controlled nuclear

reaction was achieved at their own University of Chicago late in 1942;

and the Manhattan Project worked outward from there. Even this name

"Manhattan" for the atomic bomb project was chosen as a subtle

acknowledgment of the real bosses of both atomic energy and the

nation's power centers in Manhattan, the Rockefellers.



The Rockefeller interests launched savage counterattacks on the Hearst

empire, using financial and other means to force many of the Hearst

newspapers out of business, just as they are presently strangling the

Star here in Washington by means of an advertising boycott. But the

Rockefeller Brothers never forget, and their ultimate goal was to

eventually take over complete control of those portions of the Hearst

business complex that managed to survive the initial Rockefeller

counterattacks. Patty Hearst was the pawn they used in order to do so.



The first tapes after Patty was captured were full of fear  and

urgency, and relayed crushing demands to her parents as conditions for

her release. Mr. Hearst was coerced into incredible outpouring of his

resources in a giveaway program only t o have the demands from the SLA

keep rising until they became unreachable. Then, after a period of

silence, came the first Tania tape claiming that Patty was disgusted

with her parents and was joining her captors. But, my friends, the

real Patty Hearst was no longer alive by that time. On February 28,

1974, just 24 days after her abduction, Patty was drowned in a bathtub

by three SLA men against whom I am told Patty put up a tremendous

fight. Afterward cremation was used to prevent any chance that her

body might be discovered and identified. This is common practice in

covert CIA executions, by the way and I am reliably informed that this

was also Jimmy Hoffa's fate after his abduction late in July 1975,

which I discussed in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3.



The rest of the charade up until the capture last September of Tania,

the impostor who is alleged to be Patty Hearst, had just one

purpose--to maintain unmerciful pressures on the Hearsts in order to

crack their control of the Hearst interests. And the prime pressure

point in this campaign was Tania herself who was used in order to

convince the Hearsts that their daughter Patty was still alive.



Any loving parents in the position of Mr. and Mrs. Hearst would cling

desperately to the hope of having their child returned to them, and

the Hearsts are no exception. So long as she was not captured there

would be no chance for the Hearsts to discover Tania was an impostor;

and by allegedly being spotted from time to time, the assurance was

maintained that she was still alive. Thus in the best Rockefeller-CIA

traditions, Mr. and Mrs. Hearst were tricked into believing that they

were bargaining for the life and for the return of their daughter

Patty even after she had actually been murdered.



This deception continued for nearly a year and a half until at last

the CIA achieved by way of the SLA what the Rockefellers had sought

all along--a transfer of the control of the far-flung Hearst interests

to the Rockefeller Brothers. As soon as the arrangements were made for

this transfer of control, the bargain was for Tania (alias Patty) to

surface, and surface she did. This was a simple matter since the FBI

had known even before Patty's kidnapping that her abduction was

planned, and was aware of her whereabouts and that of Tania, Patty's

impersonator throughout the so-called manhunt of 19 months duration.



The Hearsts gave up practically everything in a deal to get their

Patty back; and the last most critical part of the SLA operation was

to convince them that they had gotten what they had bargained

for--namely, their daughter Patty. Tania, therefore, had to be

captured and convince the Hearsts that she is their daughter Patty;

and the psychological profiling techniques which were so useful in

Watergating Richard Nixon and his aides out of the White House were

also used on the Hearsts in order to minimize the risk that they would

see Tania as a fraud.



The Patty Hearst-Tania manhunt was dragged out over 19 months, and

during that entire time the Hearsts were subjected to cruel

psychological pressures of all kinds for the purpose of damaging their

capacity to perceive anything from a normal perspective. During most

of that time the Tania charade was utilized to get them gradually

accustomed to the idea that if they ever did see Patty again she would

be drastically changed by her ordeal and therefore not like they

remembered her. And Tania, for her part, was herself schooled and

psychologically programmed in order to be as convincing as possible in

brief encounters with the Hearsts after her alleged capture.



Even in spite of all this, the whole elaborate trick almost broke down

when Mr. and Mrs. Hearst first got to see their alleged daughter after

her capture. She was even more different than they had imagined, and

afterward Mrs. Hearst sadly said to the press, quote: "That girl just

isn't our Patty." She apparently meant it in a figurative sense, but

her words unconsciously expressed the literal truth. But the natural

deep-seated wish to believe that Tania is Patty apparently won out,

reinforced by all the inhuman pressures which even now still rest

heavily on the Hearsts. For the moment the Rockefeller Brothers have

won their gamble, they have fooled the Hearsts.



Now there remains just one more detail to be attended to--the girl

herself, Tania, the girl who is alleged to be Patty. She has now

completely served her purpose and it is her turn to be double-crossed.

The one thing the Rockefeller-CIA agents cannot permit to happen is

for Tania to be released and have extended contact with Mr. and Mrs.

Hearst. It is one thing for Tania to hoodwink the Hearsts into

believing she is Patty during brief encounters under tense unnatural

conditions in unfamiliar surroundings and against a two-year backdrop

of nightmarish events. But it would be quite another matter for Tania

to return home with the Hearsts and continue to convince them she is

their daughter during the course of an ongoing relationship in what

should be familiar surroundings. The Hearsts would without any doubt

soon see that something was terribly wrong about the girl who is

supposed to be Patty Hearst, and that, my friends, is why I fear for

the life of this girl who has called herself Tania in the past. She

cannot be allowed to go free; and now that her job is finished as far

as the Rockefeller Brothers and the CIA are concerned, she has become

a liability for them. If she is very fortunate she may just be locked

up out of sight and the key thrown away; but I fear for her life

because if she is silenced, the deception of the Hearsts will have

been sealed permanently and any chance that she herself might some day

blurt out the truth will be ended as well. If this happens, Tania will

have gone the way of Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby, and many others

before her.



The Patty Hearst case is a tragic example of the way in which

individuals are seen as nothing more than pawns to be pushed around on

the chessboard of power by the Rockefeller Brothers and their helpers.

But you do not have to be a Hearst, or a Nixon, or a Hoffa to become a

Rockefeller CIA pawn.



I revealed in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 5 for October 1975 that

electronic psychological programming techniques are being used by the

CIA to program people like human robots to do all kinds of things they

normally would not do. There is now a rising demand by the CIA for

people who can be made to run involuntary errands for them this way,

busy as they are with bombings, terrorism and other projects to warp

America's Bicentennial to Rockefeller purposes. But people vary

considerably in their receptiveness to such programming, and a catalog

of highly receptive individuals is therefore of great interest to the

CIA. Therefore the CIA has secretly aided in the establishment of a

chain of centers which offer to help you quit smoking, lose weight, or

stop drinking almost overnight.



What they use are psychological conditioning techniques which are

related to the very much more advanced techniques used by the CIA; and

if you go to such a center and your therapy reveals a very high

susceptibility rating, your name, with or without the knowledge of the

particular center you visit, will end up in a special CIA file for

possible future use. If you contemplate using such therapy, you should

be warned of this hidden liability. If you have already used it, I can

only suggest that you exercise due caution whenever you must receive

medical care, especially if hospitalization is involved. If possible,

stick with your family doctor or others you know you can trust.



On March 24, 1976, President Ford announced still another effort to

treat us as pawns, and this time every man, woman, and child in the

United States is intended to be involved. I refer, of course, to the

trumped up Swine Influenza threat, and the proposal to inoculate

everyone against it.



The stated medical reasons for this totally unprecedented project are

so patently flimsy that everyone from the World Health Organization to

individual doctors all around the country have sharply questioned what

is proposed. Many doctors have gone so far as to ope nly ask what the

real political reason for it is, so unconvincing is the medical basis

for it. Meanwhile the Rockefeller-controlled major media are beating

the drums in favor of it. Some groups have questioned whether perhaps

something sinister is to be added to the vaccine; but while this could

be done, it is not the underlying reason for the Swine Flu program.

The whole Swine Flu swindle is an elaborate cover-up, the most

diabolical so far of the truth about the horrible CIA radioactive

plutonium super poison which is now contaminating the entire

southeastern portion of the United States and is even beginning to

show up now in traces nation-wide. This is the poison which was stored

in the Central Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, as I

first revealed in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 5, October 1975.



As part of the federal government's cover-up, they made matters a

thousand times worse when they deliberately dumped it into underground

streams under Fort Knox during January, as I have previously reported.

Now they are beginning to realize the hideous extent of their folly;

but instead of honest remedial action, their response is still

cover-up.



First, the Swine Flu campaign began by alarming everyone with its

alleged threat. Then it was pointed out that even those who do get the

vaccine run a considerable risk of getting sick anyway due to side

effects. And to cap it off, officials expressed public doubt by the

end of March that it would be possible to produce and administer

enough vaccine to inoculate everyone by late this year, when the

Government allegedly fears a Swine Flu epidemic.



The whole thing is intended to condition us all to the idea that this

will be the cause if and when Americans start dying like flies in some

area soon due to poisoning from the spreading CIA plutonium poison

from Fort Knox. And just for good measure, preposterous stories have

also found their way into print recently, alleging in effect that

plutonium is practically harmless based on records which have

'suddenly' been discovered recently about people who were injected

experimentally with plutonium years ago. It's all big game of "look

over there"; and you, your children, and your loved ones are the pawns

in this cold-blooded game.



Topic #2--Down through the centuries, war has always been an evil

which the vast majority of individuals have feared and wanted to

avoid, yet we all know they keep right on happening. And why? Because

there also have always been small groups of men who have viewed war

from a very different perspective. To them, war is just one more tool

to use in both the exercise and the expansion of their own political

and economic power.



In the 20th Century, wars have become bigger, more frequent, and more

savage than ever before. For nearly three generations, one place or

another around our planet has been aflame with the fires of war and

revolution; and now, having already suffered two World Wars, we are

stepping across the threshold of a third!



What's wrong? It's said that "From a little acorn, a mighty oak will

grow"; and where war is concerned, a very important acorn was planted

shortly before World War I. The Trustees of a tax-exempt foundation,

known at that time as the "CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE"

which involved an alliance with the Rockefeller and Carnegie

interests, spent a full year debating just one question: Is war the

best way by which to alter the life of a nation? And incredibly, my

friends, the conclusion they decided upon was: Yes.



Shortly thereafter World War I began. President Woodrow Wilson, a

Rockefeller puppet, was enthusiastically supported by the Trustees of

the Carnegie Endowment when he got America into the war; and on at

least one occasion, they even sent Wilson a telegram urging him not to

let America's involvement in the war end too soon! They did not want

to cut short all those desirable changes in America that were to be

expected as a result of our involvement in that war--"desirable"

according to their criteria, of course, not yours or mine.



By the time World War II was brought about by the Rockefeller

interests and their allies, this philosophy was even more entrenched

and more powerful. The United States was deliberately dragged into

World War II by means of Pearl Harbor with the active help of

President Franklin D. Roosevelt; and as in World War I, World War II

was also deliberately dragged out longer than necessary, in order once

again to bring about major changes in national life--not only in the

United States but in other countries as well. For details on this

subject I refer you to the recent two-volume AUDIO BOOK talking tape

No. 7 entitled "THE TRAGIC TRUTH ABOUT THE FDR ERA" recorded in

February 1976 by Colonel Curtis Dall and myself. FDR was Colonel

Dall's father-in-law, and Colonel Dall speaks from personal knowledge

about many very important things.



Three years ago in my book "THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR", I

pointed out the very intimate connections that linked politics,

economics, and matters of war and peace. And in this regard I tried to

call attention to the very powerful, important new economic and

political forces now emerging in Asia, and I ended my book in these

words, and I quote:



"If the new Asian forces are not understood, but are met with

ignorance and arrogance, then the world will indeed be headed not for

a 'generation of peace' of which President Nixon has so proudly

boasted, but for World War III."



In the same context, I referred to the crucial importance of the

Panama Canal, and on June 1974 on a radio program in Dallas, Texas, I

relayed Intelligence information I had just received confirming that

the Temehri Airfield in the Republic of Guyana, next to Venezuela, is

now ringed with atomic missiles aimed at the Gatun Locks of the Panama

Canal and at cities in the United States. But, as usual, the federal

government still refuses to this very day to permit an honest

investigation of this life-and-death situation. And, by the way,

Temehri Airfield is being used by Cuba nowadays to ferry its

mercenaries and supplies to southern Africa for more wars there.

Temehri Airfield, 25 miles outside Georgetown, Guyana, is larger than

our Kennedy Airport in New York!



In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 last November, I was able at last to

reveal the whole grand strategy of the coming war, including the

opening rounds in the Middle East and the succeeding stages by which

it is presently intended to mushroom into a full-fledged world war.

And on April 19, 1976, just five days ago, the United States

Government gave the official green light for the Middle East war to

begin. On that day, April 19, the White House quietly dropped its

previous opposition to all outside military intervention in war-torn

Lebanon.



All of the blocks in the Middle East war plan are now falling rapidly

into place. On March 13, 1976, Saudi Arabia sealed its own doom when

the negotiations with American top oil people in Panama City, Florida

ended in an agreement for Saudi Arabia to buy the remaining 40% of the

assets of ARAMCO, the four-company Rockefeller oil combine that

operates in Saudi Arabia. Oil minister Sheik Yamani revealed that the

take-over transaction will be carried out all at once within four to

six weeks. What they do not realize is that after the Rockefellers get

their money, the oil wells will be bombed out of existence by an

American limited nuclear strike emanating from the Sinai. The White

House go-ahead signal April 19th to get the ball rolling in this war,

came exactly five weeks after Sheik Yamani's announcement.



Meanwhile Prime Minister Vorster of South Africa injected his country

into the Middle Eastern fray by making a secret visit to Israel two

weeks ago for the sole purpose of obtaining military hardware in

exchange for raw materials. By doing so, he also left his country open

to infiltration by a client state of the Rockefeller-controlled CIA.

On top of that, he inflamedthe Arabs and most all of Black Africans.

So, South Africa has jumped from "the frying pan into the fire." And

Henry Kissinger on his African trip will be handing out millions of

Ameri can dollars to the so-called Liberation Fronts who are bent on

liberating Rhodesia and South Africa for the Rockefellers. And so the

Black leaders here and abroad will be used by the Rockefellers in

their attempt to help their ally, Soviet Russia, do the dirty work for

them in southern Africa for the rich mineral resources there.



The war situation we face, my friends, is increasingly dangerous; and

as far as the first stages of it are concerned, imminent. But before I

leave this subject, I should add that we must now not allow ourselves

to lose our resolve to halt this trend into disaster. I believe we can

still do it, and WE MUST DO IT!



Until recently, Rockefeller propaganda sought to create false optimism

about our foreign policy, military posture, and other factors in our

national strength. But now people are waking up. They know something

is wrong. So now we are entering a new phase of defeatism propaganda

designed to ruin our morale so that we will just lie down conveniently

to be conquered.



An example of this on the domestic scene was the statement by Senator

Frank Church last summer to the effect that Americans would have no

way to resist in the event of a take-over by a dictator, so vast are

the spying abilities of the federal government. This alleged warning,

greatly exaggerated for effect, came from one of the earliest

accomplices in the cover-up now in progress about the hideous CIA

plutonium poison!



Other voices are also lending their weight to the defeatism campaign

but on an international scale. One voice stands out above all

others--that of the allegedly exiled Soviet author Alexander

Solzhenitsyn. A recent quotation from Solzhenitsyn, which is a

condensation of practically everything he publicly says today, is and

I quote: "I wouldn't be surprised at the sudden and imminent fall of

the West." Then he goes on regularly and at great length to build up

an image of Soviet power, supposedly matchless in its propaganda and

quickly becoming invincible militarily. He speaks of all this in

disapproving terms, thereby sounding as if he is on our side; but the

image he paints, my friends, is still one of defeatism for us and

imminent victory for our real enemies. He spreads seeds of

hopelessness--not of hope as some would have you believe. Such

hopelessness could cause the West to be defeated from within, just as

France was in the 30's and early 40's. Even when he admits for a

moment that the West could still save itself from complete

take-over--which it still can, my friends--he follows that up by

putting down any notion that he actually expects that to happen. But

Solzhenitsyn is very powerful in his use of words, and he has become a

Pied Piper with patriotic, freedom-loving individuals and

organizations following in his train.



What will be the effect, my friends, if a year or two from now with

war and economic and political chaos on all sides, Solzhenitsyn should

dramatically announce: "The West is doomed, I'm going back home to the

home of Communism, the wave of the future"? Might not this be the

crowning stroke the Soviets need to collapse remaining patriotic

morale in the West? Apparently the Rockefellers and their Soviet

allies think so.



That's why their controlled media are now giving Solzhenitsyn

tremendous publicity; and according to highly reliable intelligence

information I have received recently, this is the real purpose for

which Solzhenitsyn was sent to the West, while other Soviet dissidents

remain unable to follow his path.



Whether Solzhenitsyn himself is consciously involved in this, or

whether he is simply the victim of psychological profiling and

programming, the defeatism he is spreading could prove to be one of

our most mortal enemies. Remember, it was Lenin who also was in exile

in Zurich and who longed for the collapse of Russia! So why could not

Solzhenitsyn, who also is supposed to be in exile in Zurich, long for

the collapse of the West?



Topic #3--If you have one of the newly-issued $2.00 bills in your

pocket, please take it out and look at the back, which depicts the

signing of the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE in 1776.



The seated gentleman that is No. 7 as you count from the left is

supposed to be Robert Morris according to the original painting of

this scene by John Trumbull. Morris was then a wealthy financier who

gave his all for the cause of freedom and independence, and ended up

penniless as a result. In his original painting, Trumbull honored

Morris for his sacrifices in the cause of freedom by depicting him

prominently in a shining light with a proud look of determination on

his face. After all, if it had not been for Morris, the rag-tag Army

of the United States might have collapsed for lack of funds.



On the new $2.00 bill, Morris' important role is also symbolically

acknowledged--but by people who want to undo the freedom which his

sacrifices helped bring about. On the bill, Morris is darkened into

obscurity, just as our Unseen Rulers want to obscure and blot out our

freedom. As I have mentioned before, such subliminal propaganda

messages and signals are all around us--such as the State flag postage

stamps which say "Bicentennial Era", code words which refer

specifically to the so-called "Second American Revolution" program of

John D. Rockefeller III.



In more direct ways, too, Rockefeller propaganda is designed to

advance their program toward dictatorship. On April 18, 1976, the

Rockefeller-controlled Atlantic Richfield Oil Co., known as ARCO,

began taking out full-page ads nation-wide for something they called a

"Tricentennial." It pictures a mock American flag consisting of 300

white stars on a field of blue with the number 2076 in computer-style

numerals against a field of red, and below that it encourages you to

write and tell what changes you want to see in America--without even a

passing nod to the fact that you might like some things to remain as

they are. The crux of the whole ad is contained in the words, and I

quote:



"In about six months we plan to gather your responses, analyze them,

and make a full report of what we found out." And, quote: "We'll make

sure it reaches the people who are in positions to consider and act on

it."



What people do they mean? The Rockefeller Brothers and their helpers,

that's who! The new ARCO Tricentennial campaign is nothing more or

less than a replacement for John D. Rockefeller III's National

Committee for the Bicentennial Era, which was forced to shut down a

while back after its Bicentennial Declaration ad of a year ago was

exposed as the kickoff for the secret new Rockefeller Constitution.



Meanwhile, Rockefeller progress toward implementing their secret and

dictatorial "New States of America Constitution" is proceeding as fast

as they are able. During the first week of this month, April, a

so-called "critical appraisal" of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION was

held in Philadelphia with over 100 attendees representing

universities, business, labor, civil rights groups, the judiciary,

Congress, and others.



Prominent names from the WATERGATE investigation were on the list,

including Henry Ruth, Jr., who served as the Watergate Special

Prosecutor in the final phases. Can you imagine?



Labor was represented by Victor Gotbaum of the AFL-CIO; and Stephen

Schlossberg, General Counsel of the United Auto Workers.



On the business side were Board Chairmen of three corporations: J.

Irwin Miller of Cummings Engine Co.;  John DiBold of the DiBold group;

and Fletcher L. Gramm of Coppers Company, an especially outspoken

proponent of ideas which appear in the Rockefeller "New States

Constitution."



The Presidents of the Council on Foreign Relations, the League of

Women Voters, and Common Cause were there; as well as the Executive

Director of the American Civil Liberties Union; and the Co-Director of

the admittedly radical, anti-capitalist Peoples Bicentennial

Commission, Jeremy Rifkin.



Top representatives were present from Time Magazine, the Federal

Reserve System, and the American Bar Association. Nearly a dozen

federal judges were in attendance; plus a retired Supreme Court

Justice; and the head of the General Accounting Office himself, Elmer

Staats.



It's hardly any wonder that Professor Marvin E. Wolfgang, President of

the sponsoring American Academy of Political and Social Science,

confidentially declared at the meeting, and I quote:



"Neither the Congress nor the White House can ignore what we say

here."



And this is no idle academic comment, my friends, because on May 12,

1976, the Philadelphia World Affairs Council, a unit of the Council on

Foreign Relations, plans to come to Washington to begin seriously

pressuring Congress in preparation for formal adoption of both the

dictatorial Rockefeller "New States of America Constitution" and the

treasonous "Declaration of Interdependence" first introduced last

October in Philadelphia.



Meanwhile the four Rockefeller Brothers continue working to position

themselves to take full command of the dictatorship they hope to

create soon. Front man Nelson is rapidly emerging now with the

publicity campaign I mentioned he was planning in my monthly AUDIO

LETTER No. 9 two months ago, and he is pulling out all the stops. On

one hand to one audience he says: "Forget the past, and let's look to

the future"; but to another audience he professes to be an unabashed

believer in, quote: "the old-fashioned virtues." Can you imagine? He

says living by example is his key religious precept; but, of course,

he doesn't mention any of the examples of his past record that I

revealed for you in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 1. Most recently he has

even begun lashing out at old friends and allies, even close family

friends of long standing--such as Dr. Dorothy Fosdick of Senator Henry

Jackson's staff--in his consuming ambition to harness for himself the

so-called "Conservative sentiment" that is now sweeping across

America.



Nelson Rockefeller and his brothers are still playing their deadly end

game of tactical maneuvering to meet contingencies, trying to time

political and economic events here in the United States to mesh with

fast-breaking events overseas in the build-up for war. To this end, my

latest information is that two prime options have now been developed

for Rockefeller's take-over of the presidency; and, as usual, I reveal

them in the hope that by doing so such actions as may be necessary may

be taken to prevent their happening.



Option 1 may be exercise of the forces for Middle East war that have

now been unleashed to progress very rapidly leading to war there and a

"Declaration of Emergency" here before the conventions this summer. In

that event, President Ford may be removed from office one way or

another before the Convention, in which case Rockefeller will become

President and serve out Ford's term until January 20, 1977.



But, my friends, Option 2 is now at the top of the Rockefeller

preference list. I can now reveal that Nelson Rockefeller plans to use

his infamous 25th Amendment to the Constitution again--but in a

different way. He has already made Ford to agree that he be his

Vice-Presidential candidate. Rockefeller now plans for Ford to be

nominated for President and himself for Vice-President regardless of

what happens in the Primaries! Then, after the Convention, the plan is

for President Ford to be incapacitated for one reason or another,

thereby activating Clause 4 of the 25th Amendment of the United States

Constitution.



Under this Clause, and I quote: "...a majority of the principal

officers of the executive departments"--who are now 99% Rockefeller

client followers--will send a written declaration to the President pro

tem of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives

that, and I quote: "...the President is unable to discharge the powers

and duties of his office..." Thereupon Vice-President Nelson

Rockefeller, who himself is the President pro tem of the Senate,

quote: "...shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the

office as Acting President."



Now get that, Acting President! Rockefeller plans to achieve this on

or about September 19, 1976; and in this capacity under the provisions

of the 20th Amendment he will serve, quote: "...until a President

shall have qualified..." But that could be indefinitely, because part

of the plan is also to call off the elections because of the very

abnormal circumstances and attendant confusion--all of this paving the

way for acceptance of their dictatorial "New States of America

Constitution" by a National Referendum!



And if you think such a thing just couldn't happen, just remember: The

banks were closed and the people's gold was confiscated by FDR in

1933--and the people accepted it because of the abnormal

circumstances.



And World War II--Japanese Americans were rounded up and herded into

Concentration Camps. An unthinkable act, yet it was accepted due to

the abnormal circumstances.



And would you have believed, just four years ago that both a

Vice-President and a President could be hounded out of office and be

replaced by two appointees?!!



My friends, our Founding Fathers realized that the day might come when

our governments, both federal and state, would fail us and their

Constitutional duties to represent the people. It was for that reason

that they included ARTICLE X of the Bill of Rights. Often it is called

the States' Rights Amendment, but it should be called the Peoples'

Rights Amendment. It reads, and I quote:



"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,

nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states

respectively, or to the people."



I repeat: "reserved to the people." So we have to look to ourselves,

and it has now come down to that--to you, to me, to all the people of

the United States! It is time for us to highly resolve, as did Abraham

Lincoln:



"...that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom;

and that government of the people, by the people, for the people,

shall not perish from the earth."



Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless each

and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

