From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



This recording is a product of AUDIO BOOKS INC., Box 16428, Ft. Worth,

Texas 76133.



   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is May 28, 1977 and

this is my monthly Audioletter No. 24. This issue concludes the second

year of the Audio-letter. But only if we are blessed by a true

miracle, will the third year ever be completed, because as I speak to

you today a tragedy has already been set in motion that is beyond

human comprehension. Not since last July and August, 1976 when the

Soviet Union began planting underwater bombs and missiles in our own

territorial waters has the situation been so grave and urgent as it is

now. For that reason I will dispense with any further introduction

today in order to discuss these three topics: Topic #1--The Fall of

Babylon Revisited; Topic #2--The Handwriting On The Wall For America;

and Topic #3--WATER, THE ULTIMATE WEAPON.



Topic #1--We live today in a world that grows more complex and more

confusing with each passing day, but in spite of that we Americans are

fond of praising ourselves for the great man-made wonders of our age.

And whenever the obvious dangers to our continued existence as a

nation prey on our minds, we are always reminded that we, the great

United States, have already survived fully two centuries since our

Republic was founded. And scarcely a day goes by that we are not

reassured by our rulers, elected and otherwise, that we are the

mightiest nation on earth. Our technology, we are told day in and day

out, is so wonderful that it is impossible that any other nation on

earth, especially the poor, backward Soviet Union, might surpass us in

any important way. In other words, we are technologically impregnable.

And lest we become prematurely concerned over the impact of the recent

radical changes in our weather, certain news reports recently have

told incredible lies to the effect that the United States has a

two-year surplus of grains in our storage bins. In all of this, the

behavior of the United States today is like that of countless

civilizations before us--just before they perished. And in some

respects the greatest similarity of all is with that of ancient

Babylon just before its abrupt fall from power. The origins of the

United States, unlike Babylon, were strongly moral and spiritual in

content, and the system of government set forth in the United States

Constitution, which freed men in a way unparalleled in human history,

was conceived by men who understood man's place within God's creation.

This heritage still lives today in the hearts of many Americans, but

it's rapidly being snuffed out under the bondage of rulers who are

superimposing the pattern of ancient Babylon on our beloved land. The

Babylonian pattern is totally evil, and those who choose to bow down

to such Satanic rule thereby make themselves part of it. The origins

of ancient Babylon are lost in the midst of time, perhaps 5,000 years

ago, but it reached its peak around 600 B.C., at which time it was

undisputed as the most powerful empire the world had ever seen. The

City of Babylon was the Rome of its day, the most important trading

center, the most powerful military force, the greatest cultural

influence, and even a center of tourism because of its remarkable

hanging gardens and other man-made wonders. The huge city of Babylon

was surrounded by city walls so high and so thick that they were

impregnable by any military technology of that day; and inside the

city there was a two-year supply of food, making any attempted siege

against Babylon unattractive. And there was no lack of water either,

because no less than the mighty river Euphrates ran through the city.

Yes, Babylon was powerful, wealthy, and so secure in material terms

that potential adversaries were hardly even taken seriously. Even when

it became clear that the increasingly powerful joint empire of the

Medes and the Persians had designs on Babylon, there was no real

concern. With all their means of protection against invasion and their

unrivaled prosperity, the Babylonian attitude was simply "It couldn't

happen here." And so when the Medo-Persian army of Cyrus and Darius

laid siege to Babylon, the only response of the ruler of Babylon was

debauchery, feasting, drunkenness, and mocking any real power greater

than himself. At this point, we're told, the Babylonian feast was

interrupted by the appearance of a hand in midair writing words on the

wall that said Babylon's rule was at an end, that its ruler had been

weighed in the balances and found wanting, and that the kingdom would

be divided and given to the Medes and Persians. The handwriting on the

wall said the impossible was about to happen--Babylon, the impregnable

city, was about to fall--How could this be? No one in Babylon had ever

had experience with invasion and so could not imagine such a thing;

and yet, within a few short hours, before the drunken feast even

ended, the impossible happened. First, the water level in the mighty

Euphrates river, flowing through the middle of Babylon, started

dropping rapidly. It dwindled to a trickle, and soon stopped

altogether. Cyrus, the Persian, had worked out of sight of Babylon and

had diverted the Euphrates out of its normal channel. Now the great

impregnable walls of Babylon were left with huge openings--namely, the

river bed no longer filled with water, and in marched the Medo-Persian

army, conquering Babylon without resistance. And today, the United

States is under siege by the Soviet Union with the cooperation from

within of quislings. We are threatened by the joint Rockefeller/

Soviet empire just as Babylon was besieged by the joint Medo-Persian

empire. And now, as then, we are told there is nothing to worry about,

"It just couldn't happen here." But, my friends, just as happened in

ancient Babylon, the handwriting is now on the wall for America. The

America we know today is a perversion of the pattern originally laid

down for our beloved land, and America as we know it is about to come

to an end. And as with ancient Babylon, WATER is our Achilles heel and

the means by which we are to be reduced to surrender without a fight.



Topic #2--Not long ago the Carter administration's Ambassador to the

United Nations, Andy Young, made the remarkable statement that:

"Communism has never been a threat to me." He also has a habit of

patting Cuba on the back for the so-called 'stabilizing influence' of

Cuban troops in Africa, and otherwise has repeatedly shown a very

amiable attitude toward World Communism. Many Americans have wondered

why Andy Young is allowed to go on saying such things without being

restrained in any way by Jimmy Carter.  But Carter has now answered

that, in a major foreign policy speech given at the University of

Notre Dame on May 22, 1977. This speechis as important as the famous

Iron Curtain Speech of Sir Winston Churchill a generation ago at

Fulton, Missouri. White House aides stated t hat the Carter speech at

Notre Dame was specifically intended to "send some messages to foreign

governments"--and it did. The foreign press is filled with headlines

about the major turn that has just been taken in American foreign

policy. Yet, here at home, many Americans have not grasped what has

happened. The most basic theme of that Carter speech is an elaborate

echo of Andy Young's statement, that is: "We are no longer afraid of

Communism." Is this because Communism is withering and dying? One need

only look at a map to see how fast Communism is eating up the world.

What Jimmy Carter is telling us and the world, is 'We can get along

with Communism'; and just to prove it, one of America's most

important, efficient intelligence operations to keep an eye on Soviet

naval movements and other important matters is being closed down. This

intelligence unit, known as Task Force 157 and run by the United

States Navy, has a budget of well under 1/10 of 1% of that of the CIA,

and yet it is being shut down--supposedly for budgetary reason.

Meanwhile the signs of war to come are all around us. So great are the

dangers facing us that military men are speaking up in increasing

numbers in an effort to warn America before disaster arrives. Since

they are subject to military law and subordinate to civilians who do

not want them to speak up, it's no small thing to speak out in this

way. So, consider what Major General John K. Singlaub said in an

interview on May 19, 1977. General Singlaub, the third-ranking U.S.

Army General in Korea said: "If we withdraw our ground forces on the

schedule suggested, it will lead to war." And why did General Singlaub

speak up? His answer was: "The question asked after United States

setbacks in Korea and Vietnam was: 'Did the military people in the

know express themselves loudly and clearly enough that the

decision-makers understood?' We want to make sure." In speaking this

way, General Singlaub was doing no more than expressing the consensus

of practically every knowledgeable military man about the Korean

situation. For example, the same Washington Post article that quoted

General Singlaub also quoted another headquarters Army officer in

Korea as saying about the Carter plan to withdraw our troops: "I don't

know anybody who is not staggered by it. There's no military or

strategic logic for withdrawal." The plan to withdraw from South

Korea, in other words, is strictly political--in line with the

newly-announced American foreign policy that it is no longer afraid of

Communism. The reason General Singlaub's words had such an impact in

this country is that his name was attached to his warnings. The words

I just quoted from the other anonymous Army Officer are just as

startling as what General Singlaub said. But people will just read

those words once, frown, and then forget about it. But everyone knows

about General Singlaub's warnings because, deliberately or otherwise,

he allowed himself to be identified as the source of the warnings;

and, for daring to warn us, he was promptly relieved of his Korean

command by Jimmy Carter. The situation in Korea illustrates the

direction in which events are now moving, but other events are due to

occur long before the pullout of our troops from South Korea. The real

threat to our security is no longer in Korea or in Europe but right

here in our own backyard.



   Another military man who is actively trying to warn America is

Major General George Keegan, who retired at the beginning of this year

as Chief of Air Force Intelligence. General Keegan is one of the

West's greatest intelligence analysts, and the story he has to tell

should be continuous headline news throughout our nation. General

Keegan has been speaking on radio and television talk shows, giving

speeches, accepting interviews--in short, using every channel open to

him in an effort to wake up America before it is too late. One of his

most comprehensive and important speeches was the one delivered on

March 11, 1977, at a press conference sponsored by the American

Security Council here in Washington, D.C. To find out in more detail

what General Keegan had to say, I would urge every American to obtain

a copy of that speech. Write to the American Security Council, Boston,

Va., 22713 for information. It was published as the April 1977

Washington Report of the American Security Council.



   We're frequently told by syndicated columnists that the CIA is our

first line of defense, but General Keegan said in his speech: "The

ultimate function of a nation's intelligence is to render carefully

assessed judgments and forecasts regarding the threat. When I look

back upon my experience with this nation's highest estimating body, I

have the impression of having taken part in a Charles Dickens novel.

The sense of make-believe and unreality has to be experienced to be

believed." Further on he says: "The intelligence estimators, heavily

dominated by the CIA and the State Department, have been wrong about

Soviet purposes in pursuing detente. They have been shockingly

deficient in their estimates of the risks and the advantages to the

United States and the free world of the so-called technology exchange

with the Soviet Union." And he adds: "If there has been a Watergate in

this country, and there has been, but ignored, it has been in the

monumentally incompetent judgmental processes of this government

regarding the nature, character, and growth of the Soviet threat as it

has evolved from year to year." General Keegan goes on to make crystal

clear that the deficiencies in our intelligence estimates are not due

to any lack of our ability to collect information or to analyze it

technically. The problem, instead, has to do with what is done with

that information. To begin with, the intelligence estimation process

at the highest levels in America today is not objective, but is

manipulated to fit political purposes. In General Keegan's words, and

I quote: "The United States intelligence estimative process cannot be

understood unless it is first appreciated that national intelligence

estimates must perform three functions. First, they must support the

decisions of the President, both for the record of history and for the

avoidance of impeachment. Second, they must substantiate or help to

justify the decisions of the White House 'Office of Management and

Budget.' Finally, the intelligence estimates must, whatever other

purpose they may serve, rationalize the foreign security policy

initiatives of the Secretary of State." Continuing, General Keegan

says: "I appreciate that those are extremely important allegations to

make, but I submit to you today that it is not possible to understand

the workings of the United States intelligence community unless one is

willing to open his mind to the influence of those three factors."

This situation is illustrated vividly by General Keegan's discussion

of the controversy over the Soviet Back-Fire Bomber. As I've told you

for many months, the Supersonic Back-Fire is an inter-continental

strategic bomber, capable of striking the United States with nuclear

weapons. General Keegan says: "The central issue all along has been

whether this bomber posed a threat to the United States. The Soviets

argued that it did not, and the CIA and State Department rather

consistently accepted the Soviet point of view." General Keegan

proceeded to acquire analysis of the Back-Fire's capability from "the

most competent analysts in the free world." The available intelligence

information was provided to three American aircraft companies with

experience building strategic bombers--plus, for good measure, the

Royal Air Force and the Royal Aircraft establishment in England--and

the results: "every single one of these organizations independently

agreed that the Back-Fire had an intercontinental capability. Yet my

word was not good enough, nor was that of the American and British

heavy-bomber designers and builders. CIA and State chose to believe

the Soviets." General Keegan is not in a position to express it this

way, my friends, but his description of the Back-Fire controversy

illustrates what I 've been trying to tell you over the months--that

the Rockefeller cartel has more faith in the Soviet Union than in our

own United States. Finally, General Keegan explains, the sheer weight

of analysis made it more and more apparent that the Back-Fire was

truly intercontinental: "however, CIA and State now judged that the

Soviet Union had no intention of using the Back-Fire as an

intercontinental bomber"--this in spite of the fact that the second

model of the Back-Fire has been given even greater range. The history

of the Back-Fire controversy up to this point is very disgraceful, and

still generally unknown to the American people. But listen now to the

final chapter in General Keegan's words, and I quote: "Seemingly

undaunted by the most extensive analysis of a foreign bomber ever

performed in the United States, the CIA, in one final, super-secret,

uncoordinated effort, proceeded over a period of 18 months to

undertake an analysis designed to prove that the Back-Fire Bomber

could not reach the United States. This effort, in which small bits

and pieces of controlled information were provided to

McDonnell-Douglas Aircraft, designer and builder of fighters,

represents one of the most artful contrivances I have ever observed.

It is one which I suspect may have been designed to salvage a SALT

accord. Finally, when the CIA surprised everyone by surfacing its new

analysis, months of painful and extensive analysis were required to

show that the books had been rigged. Artificially high G-loadings had

been assigned to the design of the Back-Fire along with excessive

engine-drag and other factors which were designed to reduce range."

And this, my friends, is how our so-called first line of defense, the

CIA, looks after America's national security to the tune of over

twenty billion dollars a year.



   Elsewhere in his talk General Keegan also spells out the dangerous

manner in which our military intelligence capabilities have been

progressively over-centralized, compartmentalized, and taken over by

civilians "who understand little about the horrors of war--and these

are people who understand even less about military doctrine, strategy,

and weapons." The product of all these trends described by General

Keegan is the very intelligence gap that I discussed with General

George S. Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when I met

with him last September (1976). For years General Keegan has tried in

vain to obtain a series of post-mortem audits on the predictive and

estimative record of the United States intelligence community. The

audit would be performed by qualified but disinterested outsiders with

no links to the intelligence community so that their work would be

unbiased. Quoting General Keegan again: "Such audits would record

scrupulously where we had been wrong, where we had been right, where

we had fallen short of the mark or where we had exaggerated. Yet,

every such suggestion had been met with disdain and has been resisted

in the most resounding vocal and emotional way." He might as well have

asked for an honest audit of Fort Knox.



   General Keegan's speech contains many more things than there is

time to discuss in this tape, and they're all important. He reveals

many things about the military capabilities of both the Soviet Union

and the United States that you will never hear through the usual news

channels, but they all boil down to just two major conclusions, backed

up by many, many facts. One conclusion is that Soviet military

capabilities vastly exceed what we are being led to believe, both in

terms of quantity and quality. The other conclusion is that the Soviet

Union is firmly convinced that a nation can fight a nuclear war and

continue afterward as a functioning society; and based on that

conclusion from a Soviet study undertaken after World War II, the

Soviet Union has for more than 20 years been preparing militarily to

fight and win a nuclear war. The American approach, on the other hand,

is only to deter such a war, even though General Keegan says: "I am

unaware of a single definitive effort ever conducted by the United

States to determine precisely and in great detail what it would take

to deter."



   General Keegan also explains another very important principle--it

has to do with official judgments of the strategic balance and carries

over into public pronouncements by the Pentagon. This is the tacit

rule requiring the use of so-called 'agreed national intelligence.'

Says General Keegan: "Agreed national intelligence is derived by

committee, contains little that is controversial except in some

footnote or dissent; and it rarely contains meaningful reference to

the dynamics of strategic competition in terms of the new weapons, new

forces, and new capabilities being evolved by the Soviet Union." Thus,

whatever new threats are involved, whether it be the awesome particle

beam weapon warned about by General Keegan or the Soviet underwater

missiles I've been warning about for nearly a year, Pentagon

disclaimers dare not be accepted at face value today without

challenge. Those who accept these denials are playing straight into

the hands of our nation's deadliest enemies.



   Meanwhile the build-up toward the start of Nuclear War One is

gaining momentum. Two months ago Nelson Rockefeller visited Israel to

help speed up the preparations for a Middle East war. By mid April,

Israeli troops had begun massive maneuvers in the Sinai with live

ammunition, Reserves had been called up, and Egyptian maneuvers were

soon underway as well in the western Sinai. These maneuvers, headline

news in Europe and Britain, have gone unmentioned in the United States

except for the crash in the Sinai of a huge helicopter killing 56

Israeli soldiers. Then just a few days ago the extremists came to

power by way of the recent Israeli elections. The Middle East is now a

powder keg as a result, and the Carter administration is rapidly

disengaging and disassociating itself from Israel. So, when the

nuclear strike from the Sinai against Arab oil wells takes place, it

will not be recognized by the world or by most Americans for what it

really is. Perhaps General Keegan was also right about one other thing

he said in his speech: "We have reached a point in America where I

believe we are almost incapable, culturally, of being warned." If so,

my friends, it is we, the United States of America, who will have been

weighed in the balances and found wanting, like ancient Babylon.



Topic #3--When the sun came up on southeastern Idaho one day almost a

year ago, it looked like the start of just another beautiful late

spring day. It was Saturday, and two fishermen were looking forward to

a relaxing day in the shadow of the new Teton Dam. The Dam, over 300

feet high, had been completed the previous fall except for a few

finishing touches that remained, and had been gradually filling up

with water during the winter. Now, due to the run-off of melting snow

in the mountains, it was almost full. Further down stream from the

dam, tens of thousands of people were going about their business. Some

puttered around their houses doing weekend chores, while others were

at work at businesses or on farms; but for the construction crew who

arrived for work on the Teton Dam site that morning of June 5, 1976,

it was a different story. At about 7:30 A.M. it was discovered that a

sizeable leak had sprung, not through the dam itself but through the

section of mountain on one side where the dam was anchored. This was

reported immediately to the proper authorities, who directed that

steps be taken immediately to start lowering the water level behind

the Dam. Why the leak had appeared so suddenly was a puzzle, since

inspection of the Dam by personnel around nine o'clock the previous

evening had turned up nothing wrong. But there was no time to solve

this puzzle, because soon a second leak developed. Like the first,

this second leak also appeared to break through the anchoring mountain

side rather than the Dam itself. Now the situation began to

deteriorate at an alarming rate. Soon a leak found its way through the

earthen dam itself, and a growing torrent of water gushed from it. Two

bulldozers raced to that location to try to stop the flow by moving

more earth into position, but the leak grew so fast that the

bulldozers were lost, the operators leaping and scrambling to safety

barely in time to save themselves. Like a nightmare come true, the

Teton Dam crumbled, collapsed, and released tons of water into the

valley below. The day ended abruptly in tragedy for the two fishermen,

and others who lost their lives as well. For two days, flood waters

from that ruined dam continued to spread, ultimately covering an area

of 300 square miles including several towns and 50,000 acres of farm

land. One of the major purposes of the Teton Dam, like many others

around our country, had been flood control. Now the man-made flood

unleashed by the collapsed dam had caused damage estimated to be in

the range of $350- to $500,000,000 in addition to the loss of life.

The bursting of the Teton Dam provided America with a preview, on a

very small scale, of what the Soviet Union plans to do to our entire

country.



   Last month in Audioletter No. 23 I reported hard intelligence I had

received to the effect that 21 major lakes and dams in 10 western

states have hydrogen Soviet bombs planted in them. But the information

I gave you then, my friends, was only the beginning. Since recording

Audioletter No. 23, I have been under an avalanche of ongoing

intelligence reports concerning the ongoing Soviet program of planting

nuclear weapons in our inland lakes and reservoirs. I can now reveal

that this Soviet program began at a relatively slow, careful pace as

much as 18 months ago. For example, a Soviet nuclear device was

planted over a year ago at a dam known as the Dalles on the Columbia

River east of Portland, Oregon, and it is still there now. The Teton

Dam disaster appeared to be just a great big accident, but it brought

to everyone's attention the fact that dams can be made to collapse

under certain conditions and that the consequences are devastating.

Meanwhile the border of Idaho with Canada has become an important

entry point for Soviet agents who are bringing nuclear bombs into this

country. On Monday May 16, I received an alert from my intelligence

sources that Soviet agents were at that time in the process of

transporting nuclear weapons into the northern United States by truck

through several entry portals along the Canadian border. The greatest

focus of that activity was at the Idaho entry points of Porthill and

Eastport. For the next several days I was in frequent contact with my

intelligence contacts in Canada who were taking very definite action

to find and stop these Soviet intruders; but here in the United States

our attention is being focused on our border with Mexico by the

manufactured distraction of illegal immigrants. At the same time, we

are undergoing a wholesale invasion along our border with Canada by

the Soviet Union and not one thing is being done about it by the

United States. By late that first day, May 16, at least 16 Soviet

vehicles carrying nuclear weapons were known to have crossed into the

United States from Canada through entry portals into Idaho and

Montana; meanwhile 7 more were on Canadian Highway 3 from Vancouver,

British Columbia, Canada, heading toward Porthill and Eastport, Idaho,

to enter the United States. By that time the origination point in the

Vancouver area had been narrowed down to a barge in Horseshoe Bay. The

Canadians took care of the situation on their side of the border by

stopping and inspecting trucks in the appropriate area, and by early

May 18 all seven trucks driven by Soviet agents had been stopped and

rounded up just short of the border. At that point, however, their

next step was to wait for further instructions from Ottawa, and I have

not yet been informed as to what further action was taken. Meanwhile

the only public hint of what was going on was contained in a short

item printed in Vancouver newspapers on May 19. It stated that trucks

were being stopped and searched along Route 3, but did not give the

reason. For my Canadian friends, now you know! But it was a different

and sad story here in the United States.



   The Federal government is taking no action whatsoever, proving that

there is a continuing collusion between the Rockefeller empire and the

Soviet empire. At the State level, one would hope that the chances of

obtaining action would be a little better, but so far that has not

been the case. Concerned citizens who have tried to bring my warnings

to the attention of their Governors and other high State officials

have encountered basically two reactions--one is that "This is

something for the Federal government, so we'll refer it to them"; and

of course there it ends. The other main response is to the effect:

"Naturally even if we did find a bomb in the lake next to the dam, we

would not make it public--after all, we don't want to excite the

people." But, my friends, that is like an air raid warden refusing to

turn on the siren during an attack because it might frighten people.

At the local level though, one would hope that some action could still

be expected, but No; during the period of May 16 I tried in every

possible way to get local and state police in northern Idaho to simply

check out some very specific reports I had been given, but to no

avail. Several Soviet trucks were known to be heading southward in

northern Idaho toward the town of Sandpoint, and I was informed of the

approximate positions where it should have been possible to intercept

them on the highway; but when I relayed these reports to State and

local police in the area, both directly and through a brave local

citizen in that area, it turned out to be impossible to persuade them

to take action. As one police sergeant told me, "We're wondering why

the Federal government hasn't stepped in on this." And since they had

not, even after being notified, the assumption was that there must not

be anything to it, therefore it was not even going to be investigated.

And so there, my friends, is a part of the handwriting on the wall for

America.



   Most all Americans have been tricked into accepting the idea that

only the Federal government counts or is able to do anything, even

though this idea is totally alien to our Republic as originally

founded. All the Federal government has to do is not act or to remain

silent about a matter, such as Soviet missiles in our waters, and

people conveniently leap to the conclusion that there must not be any

missiles. As General Keegan says, we're becoming incapable of being

warned; and, my friends, if we don't snap out of it, we will suffer

horribly. The fact that something was afoot in the area of our

nation's water supplies should have been realized four years ago when

Nelson Rockefeller started his "National Commission on Water Quality."

This he started at the same time as his much better known "Commission

on Critical Choices for Americans." And just as the Commission on

Critical Choices was absorbed into the Federal government in

everything but name, the same was done with Rockefeller's Commission

on Water Quality. But even if it was clear that water was to become a

political tool in some way, I doubt that anyone in his worst

nightmares imagined what was actually afoot. Over the past several

years, Federal and State water quality control boards have built up a

comprehensive and up-to-date picture of our nation's water resources

and requirements--and all this data has been turned over to the Soviet

Union! So now, the Soviets know exactly where and how to strike at us

through our Achilles' heel of water, just as the Medes and Persians

were able to calculate how to attack ancient Babylon through its water

source.



   In the alliance between the Rockefeller and the Soviet Union

empires, the Rockefeller brothers still want to rule the American

continent under complete dictatorship; and the Soviets still want

America to become their complete satellite--a nation of slaves. But

the Rockefellers realized long ago that this country could not be

brought under the total control they desire without the benefit ofcru

shing disasters to force us into that mold. And the Soviets for their

part realize that to extract the benefit from America that they seek,

it is not enough simply to conquer us in war. Afterward there must be

a core of turncoat managers, quislings, to run America for them. Soon,

the Rockefellers expect to obtain the "Declaration of National

Emergency" that they want in response to events which can be triggered

by the Soviets. The Declaration of National Emergency, they believe,

will make their dictatorship all but complete. At the present time the

Soviet Union has at least 158 underwater missiles in our territorial

waters along our coastlines. In addition, the Great Lakes now bristle

with smaller, single warhead Soviet underwater missiles--a total of 53

as of my latest information. The fact that the Soviet Union has been

able to invade the Great Lakes and place missiles there is shocking;

and it is even more shocking to know that Soviet agents are fanning

out all over the United States, unhampered, to sow seeds of nuclear

disaster throughout our land. It's hard for most people to imagine how

such things are possible; but as I know from my own sources, they are

being facilitated from within our country. For example, one of the key

steps which has been taken by the Carter administration to permit

these things recently was publicly confirmed by former Congressman

John Rarick of Louisiana. Congressman Rarick publishes a very

informative monthly newsletter entitled "You've a Right to Know",

about which you might write to him at: Drawer E, Saint Francisville,

La. 70775. Quoting from his March 1977 issue, "The Soviets are hauling

United States cargo in intra-coastal shipping illegally against the

provisions of the Jones Act. Russian vessels can be seen in the river

loading from barges, and also unloading on two barges, as if they

constitute an integral arm of the United States Maritime Service.

Barges loaded by Soviets have been followed up the river through

inland waterways and small canals to where their cargoes have even

reached the Chicago market." Congressman Rarick further reports that

the Soviets are able to get away with this because Secretary of the

Treasury Blumenthal waived the provisions of the Jones Act as applied

to Soviet vessels. Thanks to such generous help from within the United

States has been thrown wide open to offensive Soviet actions. As a

result the planting of nuclear devices in our inland waters--rivers as

well as lakes and reservoirs--is mushrooming at a tremendous pace. To

begin with, additional bombs have been planted in some of the huge

dammed-up lakes that I named last month. For example, Hoover Dam had

one bomb when I recorded Audioletter No. 23, but now it has 3--one

next to each end of the Dam itself, the third upstream some distance

from the Dam. Another example is Oroville Reservoir in California.

Last month it had one bomb, now it has 4. But more serious than this

overkill of a few dams is the vast number of targets throughout

America where Soviet bombs have been and are being planted. City water

reservoirs of any significance throughout America are targeted. Many

already contain bombs, while others are scheduled to receive bombs

from the many trucks fanning out across America with Soviet agents at

the wheel. Flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric dams of all

kinds are targets as well; and major rivers are also being seeded with

bombs at strategic points.



   To indicate the magnitude of the Soviet attack plan, I will report

the current status of just one state--Texas, which is a major target.

As of my latest intelligence, over 100 bombs have already been planted

in Texas; and I have been provided so far with a partial list that

specifies 33 of the lakes involved. These are: Toledo Bend Reservoir,

Sam Rayburn Reservoir, Steinhillyers Reservoir, Lake Vernon, two lakes

northeast of Houston which provide water for the city, Conroe Lake,

Somerville Reservoir, Lake Waco, Lake Whitney, Malakoff Lake,

Frankston Lake, Lake Livingston, Millwood Reservoir, Lake Texarkana,

Lake O' the Pines, Cedar Lake, Lake Tawakoni, four water reservoirs

for Dallas and Fort Worth, Lake Texoma, Arbuckle Reservoir, Lake

Bridgeport, Hubbard Creek Reservoir, Lake Kemp, Lake Arrowhead,

O'Folla Reservoir, San Angelo Reservoir, Twin Buttes Reservoir, Lake

Thomas, and White River Reservoir.



   A number of rivers around the country are also known to be involved

already. These include the Mississippi, the Missouri, the Illinois,

the Ohio, the Columbia, the Potomac, and the Susquehanna. In the

Mississippi alone there are already 31 bombs located near dams, and

locks, and other strategic points. The farthest to the north is a bomb

about 5 miles downstream of Little Falls, Minnesota. From there, they

have all been planted all the way down to New Orleans of Louisiana,

where 2 bombs are in the river. There are also two other bombs near

New Orleans at the east end of Lake Pontchartrain.



   My friends, the Soviet Union is striving to be in a position to

suddenly, decisively rob America of our water resources. While we are

distracted with arguments over weapons delivery systems, such as

bombers and missiles, the Soviet Union is striving for the reliability

of weapons that are already on site at the target. When war comes, the

Soviet Union plans to be able to just push a button, detonate nuclear

weapons all over America, devastate our country with floods and the

pestilence that they bring, and still have all their missiles and

bombers still in reserve. But before war comes, the Rockefeller/

Soviet alliance plan to lay the groundwork for a Declaration of

National Emergency in the United States.



   One option still available to them is war in the Middle East

causing a cutoff of Arab OPEC oil supplies. But a horrendous new

capability is now in place as an alternate means for creating our

national emergency; and, my friends, there are ominous signs that this

capability is going to be used, very soon. Lurking deep in the waters

around the Philippine Islands there are now 7 fission-fusion-fission

bombs planted there by the Soviet Union. Such a bomb is essentially a

hydrogen bomb with a jacket of uranium 238. When it's set off, the

nuclear reaction converts much of the jacket material to plutonium

239, which in turn explodes as well. The Soviet Union is the only

nation that has ever set off such a bomb--16 years ago on October 30,

1961. In doing so, they set an ugly record that still stands--the

biggest nuclear weapon ever fired in the atmosphere. Its yield was

something over 50 megatons--that is 50 million tons of TNT, 2500 times

as large as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Theoretically,

there's no limit to the yield of such a bomb, but for 16 years it has

been thought of in the West as unusable because it produces such vast

quantities of fall-out that it would endanger the country that used

it. But the Soviet Union has found a way to use it--deep under the

ocean for geophysical warfare in an environment where the radio-active

products are relatively confined, producing little fall-out. The

Philippines sit like a keystone among a long arch of sub-sea trenches

and faults that comprise the most earthquake-prone areas on earth.

Starting just north of New Zealand, a band of geological instability

runs northwestward toward the Philippines, then northeastward past

Japan to the Kamchatka Peninsula, eastward along the Aleutians to

Alaska, and then southward along the west coast of the United States,

Mexico, Central America, and  onward all the way to Chile. This long,

irregular zone around the Pacific rim is often called the "Ring of

Fire." The 7 Soviet bombs planted in Philippine waters are there for

the purpose of triggering major earthquakes, which, thanks to the

peculiar convergence of faults and trenches in that area, are intended

to work their way by chain reaction all around the Pacific rim,

devastating Washington State, Oregon, and California in the process.

The 7 bombs in the Philippines are in the so-called gigaton

range--that is, each one is equivalent to a billion tons of

TNT--50,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb and therefore

big enough to trigger massive earthquakes. And the Soviets believe

they can safely use such warfare, treaties or no treaties, because

most of the Soviet Union has no history of earthquakes. The Soviet

gigaton bombs in the Philippines are located at navigational

coordinates which I will now reveal. No. 1 is at 17-23-23 north,

117-7-23 east; No. 2 is at 14-48-48 north, 119-2-18 east; No. 3 is at

14-0-40 north, 118-23-53 east; No. 4 is at 13-0-0 north, 117-42-8

east; No. 5 is at 12-0-54 north, 126-4-55 east; No. 6 is at 13-50-36

north, 125-21-45 east; No. 7 is at 19-48-3 north, 123-51-57 east. But

to make sure that our west coast is devastated by the effects of a

seeming natural disaster erupting in the Philippines, a series of 7

conventional but large hydrogen bombs have been planted off our west

coast by the Soviet Union. These can be set off in conjunction with

those in the Philippines, and at the right moment to produce tidal

waves which would sweep in from the Pacific with devastating effect

along our west coast. Bomb No. 1 west of Seattle is at 48-0-0 north,

127-50-0 west; No. 2 west of Eugene, Oregon is at 43-29-18 north,

127-55-5 west; No. 3 west of San Francisco is at 37-8-45 north,

125-42-30 west; No. 4 west of Monterey is at 36-31-0 north, 125-26-30

west; No. 5, also west of Monterey, is at 36-26-30 north, 124-56-0

west; No. 6 west of Los Angeles is at 33-25-15 north, 122-23-50 west;

and No. 7 southwest of San Diego is at 31-45-35 north, 120-36-0 west.

In my Audioletter No. 20 for January 1977, I referred to a warning

document issued in December 1975 by Mr. Tony Hodges of Hawaii. In that

document Mr. Hodges presented evidence of the feasibility of

underwater missiles. He also warned of the dangers of bombs on or in

the seabed designed to generate earthquakes or tidal waves.

Unfortunately, it turns out that Mr. Hodges warnings were all valid.



   The dictatorship and war plans are being speeded up now; the world

will be stunned by what will look like a massive, natural disaster in

the Philippines that also spreads around the Ring of Fire to decimate

our west coast. And when it happens, Jimmy Carter will have the excuse

David Rockefeller wants him to have to declare a National Emergency

and in effect suspend the United States Constitution. The President's

dictatorial emergency powers spelled out in Executive Orders 11490 and

11921 will be activated, and the complete bureaucracy of dictatorship

set in motion under circumstances designed to stifle all dissent; and

the elaborate prescriptions for complete governmental control of all

of our water resources spelled out in Executive Order 11921 will be

activated under conditions which enable this to be sold to the people

as necessary for our best interest. Soon thereafter, with the

Rockefeller dictatorship in place, Nuclear War One itself is planned

to come. Dams and reservoirs all over America are to be destroyed at

one blow by the Soviet Union; and the quislings from the Trilateral

Commission, who now control the Federal government, will use their

control over what little remains of our water supplies to make their

domination of us total. The saddest thing about all of this is that

only when it happens will people believe. By total exposure there is a

chance to prevent the West Coast disaster; but without exposure, there

is no chance whatsoever.



   My friends, it's only by the grace and power of our Lord Jesus

Christ that I've received the information I revealed over the recent

past; and it's my solemn duty to pass on this information to you--it's

not meant for me alone. And in the same way, it's not meant for you

alone--it needs to be known by every one. And so, my friends, this

completes two years of my monthly Audioletters. I want to thank you

for all your words of encouragement, your support, and especially your

prayers. Again, thank you; and may God bless each and every one of

you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

