From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 20, 1976, and

this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 18.



As I speak with you today, we are drawing ever closer to being

swallowed up by the evils unleashed two generations ago by a tight

network of Foundation Trustees. Operating under a false cloak of

philanthropy, supposedly for the benefit of others, they actually

launched long-range programs designed to grab everything for

themselves.



Claiming to improve education in the cause of freedom, they actually

began replacing education with indoctrination in the cause of

collectivism. And while painting themselves as champions of peace,

they have led the world into war after war on the road to their

version of "peace"--that is, an all-powerful WORLD GOVERNMENT with

themselves in control.



Blinded by the insatiable greed for power, they could not see that

they were opening Pandora's box, setting forces in motion that would

ultimately prove impossible to control. Only recently, with disaster

looming up fast, have the present-day successors to those original

Trustees begun awakening to this fact, too late to regain control. Now

only the truth spread far and wide can avert total catastrophe.



Two years ago the United States of America plunged over the brink of a

devastating economic collapse as the result of deliberate measures to

create "stagflation", as I described in my 1973 book THE CONSPIRACY

AGAINST THE DOLLAR. But the process was arrested part way down because

other aspects of the Master Plan for world domination were slipping

behind schedule.



As I have related in detail in previous tapes, factors such as the

still concealed Fort Knox Gold and Plutonium Scandals, reverses in the

Middle East, Indira Gandhi's upset of the CIA in India, and other

things have caused our Unseen Rulers enormous difficulties for over 18

months. But time is running out, and it is do-or-die for those who

seek to enslave us. So now the United States has at last been pried

loose from its temporary economic foothold and we are falling slowly

but helplessly like a dreamer in a nightmare toward the dreaded

economic depression far below.



Politically, the phantom election plan I revealed last month by which

Nelson Rockefeller still plans to become America's chief executive is

proceeding so far exactly as planned. Sixty-eight per cent of the

voting precincts nation-wide had voting machines on November 2, 1976,

and where they jammed all across the country there was no provision

for paper ballots! Thousands of ballots were lost in certain areas,

the legality of thousands of others is being challenged, and re-counts

are under way in some places. The net result, exactly as planned, was

an extremely close popular vote and no landslide for anyone. President

Gerald Ford thought he had the election "in the bag", having been

promised by Nelson Rockefeller that he would carry New York State, but

the pained expression on Ford's face as his wife delivered his

concession statement on November 3 was nothing compared to the shock

that awaits Jimmy Carter if the plan now under way succeeds.

Meanwhile, as the stage is being set for economic and political shocks

in America, we drift ever closer to war and a "Declaration of National

Emergency" that could spell the end of our freedoms, and the dangerous

Intelligence gap created by Henry Kissinger continues.



When I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17 on October 26, last month,

I mentioned that the Soviet Union already knew where our lost Phoenix

Missile was in the North Sea but had not retrieved it. I had just

learned of the missile's location and revealed it in that tape. On

October 27, the following day, as soon as the tape was released, I

also relayed it to Military Intelligence. That same day Navy spokesmen

told the press that they still had not located the Phoenix; but using

the information I relayed to them, the Navy found and retrieved the

Phoenix Missile on October 31. The United States Government would have

you believe it is mere coincidence that they suddenly found the

Phoenix after I revealed its location, even though the Navy had spent

six weeks in a fruitless search prior to that!



There are also those who would have you believe that General George S.

Brown, the top military officer in the United States, met with me for

more than an hour on September 16, 1976 in his Pentagon office out of

idle curiosity. And especially there are many who want you to believe

there will be no reason for the Soviet Union to do as I have charged,

planting underwater-launched nuclear missiles within our own

territorial waters; but nothing, my friends, could be further from the

truth. What the Soviet Union has done and is doing is completely

logical and to be expected if we look at it from their point of view.

As Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, leader of the Conservative Party in

England, recently said, and I quote:



"The danger is our Western tendency to assume that other people will

apply our own standards and values. When considering international

matters, the important thing is not to look at other nations as if we

were standing in their shoes but as if they were standing in their

shoes."



If you depend, as most Americans do, on the controlled major media for

your understanding of the world, you will never learn to think this

way nor can you hope to grasp the real issues that govern military

survival; yet such understanding is essential if we are to see how to

correct our dangerous situation.



One organization which in my opinion does do an excellent job of

clarifying matters of defense and national security is the American

Security Council located at Boston, Virginia. Their zip is 22713. I

recommend the Council as an excellent source of information for every

concerned American.



To help in understanding the threat we now face and how we got into

such a position, I will discuss the following three topics today:



Topic #1--THE MUSHROOMING DEBATE OVER SOVIET MILITARY POWER



Topic #2--WHY THE SOVIET UNION WANTS NUCLEAR WAR



Topic #3--HOW GOVERNMENTAL AND PRESS SECRECY ARE DESTROYING OUR

CHANCES FOR PEACE.



Topic #1--Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has said over and over

again for nearly a decade, quote:



"Detente, or nuclear holocaust; there is no third way."



With this in mind, public discussion of American-Soviet relations has

focused for years on the alleged happy fruits of detente--the growing

thaw between East and West, etc.--but lately there has been an ominous

change. President Ford dropped the word "detente" from his active

vocabulary, and mounting of concern over the ragged condition of NATO

forces has been expressed increasingly by European and American

leaders.



Just last week two so-called prestigious groups burst upon the public

scene to churn up controversy over the issues of mounting Soviet

military power. First, on November 11 came the "Committee for the

Present Danger" urging presumed President-elect Carter to increase

military spending, instead of decreasing it as promised during the

election campaign. Then three days later a study group financed by the

Rockefeller Foundation proposed the opposite--that we undertake joint

military reductions with the Soviet Union, perhaps initiating the

process with selected unilateral reductions of our own. And the

warnings continue!



Just three days ago a representative of Boeing Aerospace Company

testified before Congress that in case of nuclear war, 98% of the

Soviet population would survive because of the elaborate Civil Defense

precautions being taken there. By contrast, of course, the United

States has no Civil Defense program worthy of the name. Obviously

detente is fading from the official scene rapidly. According to the

Kissinger formula, that means nuclear holocaust is on its way. But

where did he get that formula?



The word "detente" is just another word for what was termed "peaceful

coexistence" in the early 60's, and the Kissinger formula first

emerged in October 1959 in the form, quote:



"Peaceful coexistence or nuclear holocaust--there is no third way."



But the speaker then was not Henry Kissinger; it was Nikita

Khrushchev.



The peaceful coexistence idea which later became so-c alled "detente"

began 20 years ago when Khrushchev announced a major new Soviet policy

line--namely, that war with the West was not inevitable after all,

contrary to the teachings of Lenin. Instead, the nuclear age had made

peaceful coexistence necessary. To most Westerners, this sounded like

"live and yet live"; but to the Soviet Union it meant only the

avoidance of a war which could destroy the Soviet Union. It was all

right to continue to break off chunks of the free world by intrigue,

subversion, and so-called "wars of national liberation", such as those

which have occurred in Vietnam, Angola, and elsewhere. The Soviet

Union concentrated on selling the idea of peaceful coexistence for

five years from 1956 to 1961, ably assisted by their allies here in

the United States.



Then in 1961 a major new phase began as John F. Kennedy became

president of the United States. For decades the State Socialists, who

run the Soviet Union, had been in alliance with and supported by the

Corporate Socialists whose control over the United States was drawing

ever more complete. Now at long last the time was ripe to launch their

well-orchestrated joint program that was to lead to complete

dictatorial control of the United States by the Corporate Socialists,

Soviet conquest of vast areas of the world, piecemeal, with Corporate

Socialist assistance, and finally joint domination of the entire world

by the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance.



The basic idea of the program was for the strength and resolve of the

United States to be undermined and sapped while the Soviet Union would

be enabled to forge ahead into unprecedented world power. Communism

would be made to appear to be the wave of the future, while American

morale and faith in our free system of government would be steadily

eroded. Finally according to plan, the United States would be in the

process of increasing encirclement and vulnerability, more and more

countries becoming Soviet satellites with the unseen help of American

Corporate Socialists who would share in the spoils. Economic disaster,

military vulnerability, and the collapse of our own self-confidence

would, according to plan, open the door for dictatorship here in

America.



The single, most critical step in this long-range plan began to be

taken in 1961--the progressive shut-off of critical research and

development programs for future military technology.



If research uncovers a basic new concept at a given point in time, it

will ordinarily be 5 to 15 years before it can be translated into a

new operational technology. In between there must be development,

experimentation, evaluation, and full-scale production programs. By

the same token, if research and development are cut off, at some point

5 to 15 years later you will not have the new technology available

that would otherwise have come into being.



Early justifications for the dwindling R&D program were based on fond

new hopes for disarmament in connection with the new Soviet stance in

favor of peaceful coexistence. Later, as the conflict in Vietnam grew

into a major war, it became easier to leave important R&D items out of

the already swollen Defense budget.



Another key ingredient in the overall plan was to be the use of Cuban

troops as proxies in Soviet so-called "wars of national liberation" in

Latin America and elsewhere. The Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961, a few

short months after Kennedy took office, could have produced a serious

setback for the Rockefeller-Soviet plans for overthrow of numerous

governments, so Kennedy's advisers carefully steered him away from

making the invasion a success.



Meanwhile the Soviet Union constructed long-range plans to take

advantage of the American disadvantage in military technology that was

being arranged to occur in the mid-1970's. While our R&D began to

decline, theirs accelerated. By knowing exactly what to expect, the

Soviet Union was able to target its military development toward

achievement of a dominant position 15 years later; and that time has

now arrived.



In 1962, however, a gamble by Nikita Khrushchev almost caused the

whole plan to come apart. For more than a year a prominent United

States Senator, Kenneth Keating, had been sounding warnings that

offensive nuclear missiles were being placed in Cuba by the Soviet

Union; but his charges were denied by the Administration, just as my

charges about Soviet underwater missiles are being plausibly denied

now. But President Kennedy finally decided to look into it himself

personally, instead of accepting blind assurances that there was

nothing to it from his advisers. He found out that the charges were

true and the Cuban Missile Crisis was upon us.



The Cuban Missile Crisis led to the elimination from the scene of both

Kennedy and Khrushchev. First, as I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER

No. 3 for August 1975, President Kennedy was murdered because he was

becoming increasingly dangerous to the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance. He

had come into office lacking any real grasp of the realities of

international politics--but he was learning, and learning fast. It was

clearly only a matter of time before he would get around to reversing

the cutoff of our critical R&D programs. Already he was initiating

steps intended to turn off our involvement in Vietnam. Khrushchev, for

his part, took longer to oust since his power had to be chipped away

carefully by his enemies in the Kremlin; but finally he was removed

for jeopardizing the long-range plan of conquest with a dangerous

gamble that failed.



Looking ahead toward the increasing opportunities that would present

themselves for the Soviet Union to benefit at America's expense, the

"Institute of the United States of America" was founded early in the

1960's in Moscow. This Institute, whose purpose is to study the

vulnerabilities of the United States, was founded with the help of

financing from the Rockefeller Foundation.



Once the Oval Office was inhabited by Lyndon Johnson, the grand plan

proceeded onward without further difficulty! Secretary of Defense

Robert McNamara played an especially important role in several ways.

The period during which he served, from 1961 to 1968, was one in which

research and development carried out prior to the R&D cutoff would

potentially be continuing to bear fruit; but McNamara, doing the

bidding of those who had placed him in that position, succeeded in

causing the cancellation of important advanced weapons programs,

decommissioning of many Defense installations, physical scrapping of

huge quantities of Defense materiel, and costly concentration of

effort on ill-fated programs, such as the F-111 multipurpose Air Force

Navy fighter. He also championed the impressive-sounding theory of

warfare called "Measured Response" which guaranteed the escalation of

Vietnam into a major war by preventing clear-cut, decisive wins in

battle. As his reward for such 'valuable' service, McNamara was made

president of the World Bank. Can you imagine?



With the inauguration of President Richard M. Nixon of January 20,

1969, the Kissinger era of foreign policy emerged in full bloom.

Kissinger had been an influential voice in Government since the early

60's, thanks to his association with Nelson Rockefeller that began in

1955. Now he became one of the most important Rockefeller-Soviet

agents in the United States Government! Following the outlines of the

long-range plan, he became known as the architect of so-called

detente, repeating Khrushchev's old formula--"peaceful coexistence or

nuclear holocaust"--almost verbatim.



In 1972 detente entered a new phase. The SALT I Agreement was signed

in Moscow by President Nixon in May of that year. Meanwhile, the same

year, the Soviet Union launched the massive drive in Civil Defense

that has lately started attracting attention. The Soviet Union could

see that the long awaited opportunity to pull ahead of the United

States was fast approaching. That same year, 1972, saw the expansion

of so-called detente to Red China. Kissinger also played a central

role in this development; but far from promoting real peace, Kissinger

was undoing a golden opportunity for freedom for a quarter of the

world's people--and possibly peac e for the entire world.



What I am about to tell you is top secret, and I am revealing it for

the very first time.



Some years ago an international entrepreneur (whom I will call

"Smith") was in the act of selling a large European bank when he was

approached by a Chinese on a business venture involving a retired

Chinese general (whom I will call "Lee"). Lee had known both Chiang

Kai-shek and Mao Tse-tung very well during earlier revolutionary days,

and was still closely associated with six regional military chieftains

in Red China who were all genuinely anti-Soviet in every way.

Moreover, after the turmoil that took place in Red China in 1957 and

later, these Chinese military chieftains became completely

disenchanted and disgusted with Mao's program of using young hoodlums

to terrorize and murder all suspected opposition to his dictatorial

and oppressive programs. Mao's euphemistic term, cultural revolution,

for these cutthroat methods of bending the people to his will, did not

impress them. They contacted Lee and queried him as to the possibility

of getting American support in case they should decide to overthrow

Mao and establish a republic using the customary parliamentary form of

government. Those who preferred the security of Socialism would be

allowed to live in communes, but the government would foster a

free-market system for the country as a whole.



General Lee arranged through the United States Department of State to

send envoys through the Bamboo Curtain to make the necessary

arrangements; but someone in the State Department leaked the

information to Red Chinese officials, and all of the envoys were

quickly apprehended and put to death. Nevertheless General Lee

persisted. He asked Mr. Smith if he could arrange for broadcasting

equipment to inform all of Red China what was taking place, why the

military deemed it necessary to overturn Mao, and what form of

government would be established. Smith agreed to contact certain top

officials in the United States Government close to the President,

however General Lee emphasized that he must circumvent Henry Kissinger

and get the ear of Mr. Nixon only, since Lee did not trust Kissinger

nor anyone else in the State Department. The contacts were made, but

unfortunately a member of another agency heard of the plan and briefed

President Nixon about it in front of Kissinger. Almost immediately

arrangements were made for Kissinger to visit China to meet secretly

with Mao.



This meeting took place, and at the meeting Kissinger informed Mao

that he would be overthrown by a military coup unless Mao's regime

chose to cooperate with those who held the real power in the United

States. To sweeten the deal for Mao, certain secret agreements were

made concerning the future course of American relationships with the

Republic of China on Taiwan. The outgrowth of the meeting was

ping-pong diplomacy--the Nixon summit trip to Peking in February 1972,

and so-called detente between Red China and the United States. In

return, Mao Tse-tung's ironhanded dictatorship over Red China was

rendered secure once again. Red China would thus continue to be a

controllable threat to the Soviet Union. With any real threat to the

Soviet Union from the direction of Red China taken care of, the

Rockefeller-Soviet plan continued.



Last year the Helsinki Accord gave the Soviet Union essentially what

she had wanted for 20 years--a ratification of her conquests in

Eastern Europe. By thus signaling to the imprisoned countries behind

the Iron Curtain that we consider them to be within the Soviet sphere,

we reduce any tendency they might have to revolt in case of war. The

Soviet western flank is thus made far more secure than before.



In the past several years, countries have been falling into the Soviet

orbit at a quickening pace with their domination shared secretly by

their Corporate Socialist allies here in America. At the same time,

the declining military might of the United States and the fast

increasing threat from the Soviet Union has finally become too obvious

to hide any longer. This stage, too, was foreseen and planned.



All of the economic, political, and military factors are intended to

lead to a "Declaration of National Emergency" here in America,

dictatorship, and war!



But, as it turned out, there is a terrible joker in the deck that has

been dealt by the Rockefeller empire in its hidden collaboration with

the Soviet Union. The war to come, NUCLEAR WAR ONE waged primarily on

American soil, was supposed to be neatly limited and controlled with a

"Nuclear Safe Zone" set aside for the Soviet allies here in America,

as I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 last May; but the Soviet

Union has for months been maneuvering to carry out a double cross at

this critical stage in America's increasing vulnerability. They want

to seize all the marbles for themselves.



Topic #2--For many years American strategic defense strategy has been

based on a concept called "Mutual Assured Destruction", or MAD. The

idea here is that should either the Soviet Union or the United States

launch a nuclear attack on the other, the victim of the attack would

be able to destroy the attacker in return. In this concept,

furthermore, the targets are cities, not military targets such as

enemy missile installations. An ICBM attack under these conditions

would have only one basic purpose--to kill tens of millions of

innocent civilians. This is the so-called "balance of terror" we often

hear about.



In World War II, Hitler used V-1 buzz bombs and V-2 missiles in

exactly this way against the civilian population of England instead of

against military targets, thinking to terrorize England into

submission. But as we all know, it didn't work. The British learned to

dig into bomb shelters, absorb the civilian deaths and damage, and

meanwhile redoubled their efforts at military installations to strike

back at Hitler in more important ways.



The MAD mutual terror defense strategy is nothing more than a nuclear

age version of the very technique that was proven to be useless over

30 years ago. We've all heard countless times, quote: "The last thing

the Soviet Union would ever want is a nuclear exchange with the United

States." This comforting statement tends to make one accept the

foolish MAD defense doctrine, if it is to be believed; but it is

wrong. The announcement by Nikita Khrushchev in 1956 that all-out war

was not inevitable with the West after all, appeared to be a

renunciation of a basic Leninist principle, but it was not. It was

simply the beginning of an elaborate 20-year ploy to make us lower our

guard so that when the inevitable all-out conflict did come, the

Soviet Union would be in a position to win.



History is repeating itself. In the late 1930's many people made the

mistake of believing that Hitler did not actually want war but was

willing to risk it in order to obtain concessions, so the concessions

were made with the idea that this would prevent war. Only too late was

it realized that Hitler was determined to have a war one way or

another.



In the past, the Soviet Union has been notably cautious when skirting

the fringes of a possible nuclear war, but that was while she was

still at a disadvantage militarily. Now for the first time the Soviets

are emerging into a totally new situation in which their military

power is second to none. With the rapid collapse of free governments

now occurring around the globe, the over-all correlation of forces, as

they call it, is shifting rapidly in favor of the Soviet Union. The

Soviet Union is now No. 1  in military power, while the United States

is No. 2--a situation that has never existed before.



The time is now ripe for the Soviets to press their advantage in an

effort to seize control of the world. The standing threat from Red

China is often mentioned hopefully as a major factor tending to offset

any Soviet ideas of waging major war against us; but this, too, is in

error. The Soviet fear of Red China, far from acting as a brake, is

spurring them on. Right now Red China is leaning on the United States;

but should the United States be knocked out of action by a Soviet

hammer blow before China could take adva ntage of the situation, China

would then be isolated. Red China would then have no choice but to

patch things up with the Soviet Union and cooperate, at least on

pragmatic matters. Of course with the United States defeated, and the

two Communist superpowers joining forces once again, the fate of the

rest of the world would no longer be in question. Thus, as I stated in

monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15, if we fall, the world falls; and that is

the basis of Soviet strategy.



Thus the Soviet Union does want nuclear war with the United States

provided the Soviet Union is prepared to survive with losses limited

to acceptable levels, and provided the United States can be destroyed

as a military rival in the process. The Soviet rulers emphatically do

not think of nuclear war as something that could only happen as the

unwanted result of a confrontation, even though this is how we tend to

think of it. To them war, including nuclear war, is a tool of conquest

to be used whenever it is advantageous to do so.



People have asked the question: Why would the Soviet Union plant

underwater missiles in our waters when they already have ICBMs,

missile-launching submarines, and so forth? Even some officials who

know about the Soviet missiles raise this question in various forms as

a smoke screen to create doubt. For once you understand the basic

Soviet viewpoint I have described, the reasons for the planting of

underwater missiles become far easier to grasp.



To begin with, the underwater missiles constitute a first-strike

capability for the Soviet Union--that is, they are concentrated on

military targets. Specifically, they are intended to wipe out our

naval bases, major ports, and a good fraction of our naval fleet in

one sudden, surprise blow without advance warning. This type of first

strike is quite different from those usually discussed, but would be

extremely effective. Consider the choice faced by an American

president immediately after such a sudden strike by the Soviet Union

by means of its underwater missiles followed by a Soviet ultimatum to

surrender! True, the American naval forces at sea around the world at

the time of the attack would be unaffected and our missile subs could

give the Soviet Union an unpleasant pasting. Even our ICBMs might

still be available to fire, but what then?



First, the damage we could now inflict on the Soviet Union would be

minimized by the mammoth Civil Defense preparations that have been

under way in the Soviet Union for five years and more. If the

president did choose to counterattack, several million Soviet citizens

would possibly die and a small portion of the military and industrial

facilities of the Soviet Union not underground would be destroyed. But

the vast majority of the Soviet population would survive our

counterattack as would a large part of their military-industrial

complex. Now it would be their turn again.



The price we would pay for disobeying the Soviet ultimatum would be

awesome. A salvo of ICBMs, not the whole Soviet ICBM force, perhaps

but a few hundred nonetheless, would rain down on the United States,

hitting both military targets and big cities. Thanks to the well named

MAD defense strategy we have followed, we have no Civil Defense and

the carnage would be beyond imagination, especially since Soviet

nuclear warheads are many times more powerful than ours.



As for our naval forces, attacks by Soviet antiship cruise missiles

would rapidly take their toll; and the inability of returning to port

for fuel and more weapons would cause our navy to wither away as a

fighting force. It would only be a matter of time until our vital sea

lanes of commerce were totally destroyed. The process might continue

perhaps for some time, but the outcome would not be in doubt. The

Soviet Union would be able to outlast us and outblast us once the

initial crucial strike against our navy was made with the underwater

missiles.



The secret of success of the Soviet plan is their use of a weapon

system that would enable the first strike against our navy to be a

complete surprise with extremely reliable results. The greatest

possible surprise, of course, would have been achieved if our navy had

never even known the missiles were there off our shores until the

moment they were fired. That was the surprise element that my monthly

AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 were intended to remove last summer.



Another element of surprise has to do with the warning time if a

missile is actually launched. With ICBMs, satellite surveillance can

provide a warning time of 20 minutes or so--plenty of time to launch

our own missiles in retaliation if the decision is made to do so.

Submarine-launched ballistic missiles may cut the warning time to a

few minutes. But in the case of the short-range underwater-launch

missiles, there is virtually no warning at all since they must travel

only a short distance and the time of flight is brief. By the time

they are detected and our defenses alerted, they will be exploding

over their targets.



There is only one other kind of warning, which is probably the most

important of all--advance warning of impending attack through

Intelligence channels and through reading the meaning of political

tensions. Up to now, for example, NATO defense planning has assumed

that any attack on Western Europe by the Soviet Union would be

preceded by a warning of at least three weeks. And 35 years ago there

were several advance warnings before the attack on Pearl Harbor

beginning a week or so ahead of time, but at that time these warnings

were deliberately blocked at high levels of the United States

Government because certain individuals wanted to insure that the

attack did occur! And now the chance of obtaining advance warning of

impending attack is once again reduced, thanks to the Intelligence gap

created by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger!



When the Soviet Union decides the time is ripe to attack, they do not

intend to telegraph their intentions in advance. In this regard, the

underwater missiles lurking along our shores can be invaluable to

them. Their ICBMs have too long a warning time and insufficient

accuracy and reliability for the Soviet rulers to employ them with

full confidence in a world-wide naval Pearl Harbor attack, such as I

described in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15. And if they chose to use

their missile-launching submarines for that purpose closing in to

short range to produce short flight times for their missiles, they

would risk alerting our navy that something was up because of the

peculiar deployment of their submarines.



On top of that, a world-wide surprise attack of the kind contemplated

by the Soviets depends for its success on a simultaneous strike

everywhere. Not an easy thing to achieve with missiles launched by

numerous submarines all over the world; but the underwater missiles

are made to order for a surprise attack. They lurk unseen for days,

weeks, or months until they are needed; then when they are to be

fired, the preparations for the attack can be made without any outward

sign at all, deep inside a Command Post in the Soviet Union. To launch

the attack itself, a signal need only be flashed world-wide from the

Command Post, while the observable activities of the Soviet Union,

military and otherwise, proceed in normal patterns giving no hint of

the impending attack!



When the surprise attack plan of the Soviet Union is known, the

question is no longer: Why would they plant those underwater missiles?

The question becomes: Why wouldn't they do it?



The Soviet Union is prepared to wage war with several times our own

nuclear firepower. At the same time, they are prepared to survive such

a war as a viable society with population losses of perhaps no more

than 2%. That's around five-million lives, and it is indeed very hard

for you and me to imagine deliberately accepting such losses for a

political purpose. But remember, the Soviet bosses think their way,

not our way; and if they were to suffer losses that large, our  own

losses could be 50- to 100-million!



Provided they have the ability to disable the United States Navy at

the outset with the surprise attack they have planned, the Soviets

believe th ey have little to lose and everything to gain now by their

standards in a nuclear war; and that is why the Soviet Union wants

nuclear war now.



Topic #3--Since early July 1976 short-wave radio communications

world-wide have been disrupted by what one ham radio operator

describes as, quote: "A super-enormous strong signal that sounds like

a buzz saw." Not only hams have been affected but maritime,

aeronautical, and telecommunications channels have been rendered

practically useless in some cases. The signal is a rasping sound that

pulses 10 times per second, originating from Soviet transmitters.



The monitoring branch of the Federal Communications Commission has

received a flood of complaints and has written four complaints to

Moscow about it, without any reply whatsoever. According to Robert

Kutz, chief of the FCC's International Operations Division, this

silence from the Soviet Union is very unusual, quote: "Usually they

have been very cooperative, unless there's something particularly

unique about this situation."



Indeed there is something unique about these Soviet radio signals, my

friends. They are transmissions between Moscow and Soviet submarines

world-wide by means of the Advanced Communications System I mentioned

in a recent monthly AUDIO LETTER. It is no accident that these signals

first began early in July 1976. That was the month when I first

revealed the existence of underwater missiles in American and Canadian

territorial waters planted by the Soviets. It is also no accident that

transmissions like this were first heard in 1962 during the Cuban

Missile Crisis.



The Government professes not to have any idea what these signals are

all about, but they know better. These signals are being used to

maintain tight coordination of Soviet naval activities, especially

submarine movements, in preparation for war. But one lie leads to

another; and just as you are not being told about the Soviet

underwater missiles that threaten your life and your freedom, you are

not being told the true meaning of the Soviet buzz saw signals.



There are at least 13 transmitters broadcasting these powerful signals

located mostly in Soviet or Soviet-occupied territory. Transmitters

are operating at Archangel, Leningrad, Moscow, Kiev, Odessa, Gdansk,

the Bosporus Straits, Rostov, Minsk, Warsaw, Prague, East Berlin, and

of all places Loch Ness in Scotland. The Loch Ness transmitter is

aboard a small submarine that entered the northeast end of Loch Ness

by means of the canal that connects Loch Ness to Moray Firth. If there

wasn't one before, there certainly is a Loch Ness monster now,

compliments of the Soviet Union.



These Soviet transmissions make use of a technique known as "pulse

modulation." Each of the 10 pulses per second sounds like nothing more

than a meaningless rasp to the ear, but in fact each pulse contains a

superimposed signal in code. The possible codes are endless, and a

computer is required both to create the coded pulses for transmissions

and to decode them where they are received. Therefore unless and until

Intelligence information becomes available on the details of the exact

code, it is practically impossible to intercept and understand the

Soviet messages to their subs.



But matters even more blatant than the Soviet mysterious signals are

being hidden from you. For example: Do you know about the joint Soviet

and Cuban naval and aviation maneuvers that took place from September

15 to September 23, 1976, in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico?

These war games utilized not only the new Soviet submarine base at

Cienfuegos Harbor not far from the United States naval station at

Guantanamo Bay but also Marianao and Havana, right across from

Florida! These war exercises carried a clear threat for the Panama

Canal, Puerto Rico, and our base at Guantanamo Bay; and, in addition,

ranged all along our Gulf coast as far west as Galveston, Texas. Yet

our so-called Defense Department said not one word about it, and our

sleeping press, following the non-existent lead of our controlled

major media, said nothing about it either.



Since "Red Friday", October 1, 1976, our Military from General George

S. Brown on down have been muzzled, ordered to flatly deny charges

about Soviet missiles in our waters, if pressed to comment on them.

Meanwhile, top secret Civil Defense exercises are now under way here

in Washington, D.C. and other sensitive areas for top Government

officials only, while the rest of our people are left in the dark not

only without protection but without even any official warning that war

could be imminent!



But the last straw came in just the past several days, my friends.

Last month I reported that immediately after the "Red Friday"

capitulation by President Ford to the Soviet demands advanced by

Andrei Gromyko, Soviet submarines along our east and west coasts

performed a chemical warfare experiment. Clouds of radioactive

plutonium were released into our atmosphere to drift inward and

contaminate the United States while the United States Government

cooperated by claiming that we were being plastered with radioactive

fallout from a Chinese nuclear test 10 days earlier. As I reported

last month, we were spared major effects from that experimental

plutonium release due to weather conditions that did not behave as

predicted by the Soviets. But now they are poised to do it again!



On Wednesday November 17 a large Chinese atmospheric hydrogen bomb

test was announced, and immediately we were inundated with

announcements that the radioactive cloud would reach our west coast

only three short days later--today, November 20, 1976. Last time they

claimed that the Chinese cloud took 10 days to cover the same

distance, but that was because the Soviet subs were not ready at that

time to use the Chinese blast as a cover for their chemical attack

against us. This time they can hardly wait.



As of noon yesterday, November 19, 18 Soviet submarines were deployed

at even intervals along our west coast within about 35 miles of our

shore line. They are not missile launchers but are equipped

specifically for the injection of plutonium into our air today. The

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is telling us not to fear the

Chinese nuclear cloud alleged to be passing over our country, but is

cooperating completely with the Soviet Union in providing a totally

false cover for the Soviet radioactive plutonium attack on our

country! In actual fact, the radioactivity created by the Chinese test

itself has not yet gone beyond Red China's own borders.



The media are reminding us how terrible Swine Flu might be, and we are

also being told of the disappointingly low number of eligible

Americans who are taking the free Government Swine Flu shots. We are

told that Swine Flu, if it breaks out, could spread like wildfire; and

now certain persons in the United States Government are cooperating

with the Soviet Union in an attack on our nation by means of

radioactive plutonium, the effects of which can be mistaken for severe

"flu" if intended dosages are achieved.



My friends, the so-called mysterious signals from the Soviet Union

stopped temporarily on November 2, but then on November 10 they

started up again because Soviet war preparations were resuming. Since

I talked with you last, 36 new missiles have been planted in our

waters in addition to those I referred to last month.



I have not given the locations of these to anyone, and for now I do

not intend to do so. Now let me tell you why. On one hand there are

those factions within the shell of a Government left here in

Washington who are actively cooperating with the Soviet Union. Some of

these are outright Soviet agents; others are part of the Corporate

Socialist network that cooperates with the Soviets for mutual

advantage at the expense of the rest of us. Some in this second group

still do not believe that a Soviet double cross has been under way for

months in the form of the underwater missiles in our waters. On the

other hand, there are many who are honestly trying to counter the

Soviet underwater missile threat acting within constraints imposed on

them.



Prior to October 1, missiles were being removed as they were pl anted

by the Soviet Union, acting on information I was providing to General

George S. Brown and to Military Intelligence. In this capacity, I have

been acting as an information channel to go around the Intelligence

gap created by Henry Kissinger.



But where is all this leading? What will happen if traitors in our

midst continue to cover up the truth about the Soviet underwater

missiles, and if patriots in our Government cannot summon the courage

to tell the truth, regardless of the consequences? What is going to

happen if that situation continues, my friends, is THERMONUCLEAR WAR

and DICTATORSHIP here in America!



Even if the United States Navy were to continue removing Soviet

missiles as they are planted--which they have been ordered NOT to do

since October 1--this would not prevent disaster. The Soviet Union is

able to plant missiles far faster than we can remove them. So the

information I have been relaying is really being used now for just one

purpose--to enable our leaders to keep abreast of the chances of

attack, and to minimize those chances until they are ready to run and

hide in the 96 underground cities of the "Federal Relocation Arc" to

ride out the war--then war can come, scorching the land and consuming

our people.



The top-secret information provided me by my sources, often at the

risk of their own lives, is not intended for the private use of

cold-blooded traitors and spineless leaders in the American

Government. It is intended to bring about exposure of the truth as the

one and only thing that can prevent a war.



If war comes, it will be a devastating surprise to most Americans. The

perverse behavior of our public officials in misusing my information

threatens to condemn millions of us to a nuclear holocaust. Therefore

it is only right that they condemn themselves at the same time.

Without the missile locations I am now withholding they, too, will be

caught in the lightning surprise attack by the Soviet Union that

threatens to engulf the rest of us. Millions of our lives apparently

mean nothing at all to them compared to their service to the Soviet

Union, and their jobs, and their pensions. But now their lives are at

stake along with the rest of us. Only if the truth about the Soviet

underwater missiles is exposed will I turn over the new information I

have on which not only our lives but theirs, too, now depend.



Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may

God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.


 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

