From the Radio Free Michigan archives



ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot



If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to

bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.

------------------------------------------------



Hello my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is September 25, 1976, and

this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 16.



Last month I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 much earlier than

normal, on August 2, because of its extreme urgency. In that tape I

revealed the locations of multiple warhead missiles and hydrogen bombs

which had been planted by the Soviet Union in the coastal waters of 25

countries around the world--especially the United States, Canada, the

British Isles, and Western Europe. We were on the threshold of a

world-wide Pearl Harbor-type surprise nuclear attack, and yet no one

in the federal government had taken any official action whatsoever to

respond to my warnings about this terrible war threat. It was obvious

that nothing would be done in time unless public opinion forced it to

be done, and so I appealed to YOU.



I told you the truth about our desperate situation, and I asked you to

bring about the rescue of our beloved country by applying the kind of

pressure on the Government that only aroused, informed citizens can

bring to bear. Your overwhelming response was a major shock to the

United States Government; and as a direct result of your efforts,

action has been and is being taken. Thanks to you, the missiles and

bombs in American waters which I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No.

15 have been removed by the United States Navy. Likewise, those around

the British Isles and a number of other locations world-wide have also

been removed; but the grim fact is, my friends, that we are still in

very grave danger because the Soviet Union is not giving up. That

means you and I must not give up either.



The Soviet Navy is now struggling and maneuvering around the clock

trying to re-establish a commanding, strategic position for attack,

because an imminent nuclear attack on our country is still planned by

the Soviets. If this attack is to be prevented, two things must be

done:



First, they must be prevented from achieving the decisive edge in

battlefield position which they are now trying very hard to accomplish

at sea by means of submarines; and



Second, the fact that the Soviet Union is preparing to plunge the

world into thermonuclear war must be completely exposed, not only here

in America but world-wide. As I pointed out last month, in monthly

AUDIO LETTER No. 15, the audacious world-wide naval surprise attack

which is almost ready to be triggered makes the Soviet Union the

all-out enemy of every other nation on earth. Once this becomes known,

Russia's military posture will be very awkward indeed.



In order to bring you up to date on the events of recent weeks, my

three topics today are:



Topic #1--THE AUGUST MISSILE CRISIS OF 1976



Topic #2--THE UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE GAP AND A NEW ROUND OF SOVIET

UNDERWATER MISSILES



Topic #3--THE UNDECLARED SUBMARINE WAR NOW UNDERWAY



Topic #1--An increasing number of public figures in our country know

about the Soviet underwater missiles ringing our country, but so far

only one has come close to warning you about it.



At the Republican National Convention on August 19, 1976, Ronald

Reagan was invited to the speakers platform to say a few words

following the nomination acceptance speech by President Ford. After

some opening words of a personal nature and brief comments about the

Party Platform he had helped to forge, he turned to what was really on

his mind. He began, and I quote:



"If I could just take a moment, I had an assignment the other day.

Someone asked me to write a letter for a time capsule that is going to

be opened in Los Angeles a hundred years from now on our

Tricentennial. It sounded like an easy assignment. They suggested I

write something about the problems and issues of the day, and I set

out to do so riding down the coast in an automobile looking at the

blue Pacific on one side and the mountains on the other; and I

couldn't help but wonder if it was going to be as beautiful a hundred

years from now as it was on that summer day."



With a few words about various challenges we face, he then continued,

quote:



"We live in a world in which the great powers have poised and aimed at

each other horrible missiles of destruction--nuclear weapons that can

in a matter of minutes arrive in each other's country and destroy

virtually the civilized world we live in. And suddenly it dawned on

me: Those who would read this letter a hundred years from now will

know whether those missiles were fired. They will know whether we met

our challenge. Whether they have the freedom that we have known up to

now will depend upon what we do here. Will they look back with

appreciation and say, 'Thank God for those people in 1976 who headed

off that loss of freedom, who kept us, now a hundred years later,

free; who kept our world from nuclear destruction'? And if we failed,

they probably won't get to read the letter at all because it spoke of

individual freedom, and they won't be allowed to talk of that or read

of it. This is our challenge."



It is no coincidence that nuclear missiles came to Ronald Reagan's

mind as he looked at the waters off the California coast. We had been

in telephone contact with one another since August 11, and he knew all

about the Soviet underwater missiles when he said those words of

warning I just quoted. But most of his audience never realized what he

was driving at, thanks to the total absence of any other clues about

the Soviet threat from the Government or the major media. So the fate

of our beloved nation, and therefore of the whole world, rested during

the month of August 1976 in the hands of those who heard my charges

and acted on them.



Here is what happened: During August the United States Government came

under steadily mounting pressure from people like yourself all over

the world who sent copies of my tapes, relayed my charges, and

demanded action. The first sign that this was beginning to take effect

came on August 14, 1976. On that date I learned that a secret code

name had been assigned to the Soviet Underwater Missile program.

However, action to remove the missiles still had not been approved,

and was not going to be approved unless such action was forced by

public opinion. Meanwhile the first concrete action in the August

Missile Crisis of 1976 was taken--not by the United States, but by

Canada.



On August 17, 1976 the Canadian Navy had found the Crescent Beach

missile near Vancouver, B.C., but lacked the capability to retrieve

it. Prime Minister Trudeau, receiving no cooperation from the United

States Government at that time, called Soviet Charge d' Affaires

Nikolai Makarov in Ottawa and demanded that the Soviet Union itself

come and remove the missile. And remove it they did. On August 25 the

Vancouver area was visited by three Soviet ships--two destroyers, the

Sposobny and the Gnevny; and a tanker called the Ilim. Rear Admiral

Vladimir Varganov arrived aboard one of the ships, using this 'good

will' visit as a cover. By the following afternoon, Canadian divers

confirmed that the missile was gone.



Meanwhile Great Britain had also begun taking serious action in order

to rid herself of the 12 underwater missiles and bombs ringing the

British Isles. On August 18, 1976, Prime Minister Callaghan called a

special Cabinet meeting at 11:00 A.M. London time. Present were the

First Lord of the Admiralty, the First Sea Lord of the Admiralty, and

several Fleet Commanders. The purpose of the meeting was to listen to

my monthly AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 which had gone to England by

diplomatic pouch. They already knew that my information was accurate

because of the Soviet missile discovered the previous day in the

waters near Vancouver, so the Royal Navy wasted no time in taking

action. By August 27, 1976, all but one of the missiles had been

removed; and that one, too, was retrieved shortly thereafter.



By late August the United States was at last taking action too,

prodded into it by still-building public pressure. For once President

Gerald Ford acted on his own, over-ruled Rockefeller agent Henry

Kissinger and gave the go-ahead for the Soviet bombs and missiles

surrounding the United States to be removed.



Having been unleashed at last, the United States Navy worked fast,

acting on the information in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15. By the

evening of August 26, 1976, seven of the Soviet weapons in our

waters--six missiles and one hydrogen bomb--had been removed; and by

August 31, 1976, the waters along the American coastline had all been

cleared. At this point the threat to the United States that I had

spelled out last month had been eliminated at last, using the very

information I had made public. But the Government in general, and the

Military in particular, were still under heavy public pressure; and

under the assumption that the Soviet threat was now over and done

with, they chose a technique which has become standard practice in

Washington today. It's called "plausible denial"--a particular type of

bureaucratic double talk. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and the United

States Navy had just completed an operation to remove the missiles

around our country, a job potentially so hazardous as to defy

imagination. In short, they had done their duty; and the Navy

especially deserves our thanks for accomplishing their task without

anyone being hurt.



They should be acclaimed as heroes, and our whole nation should be

rallying behind them with justified pride. But, my friends, in the

nightmare world of step-by-step surrender to the Soviets called

"Detente", it doesn't work that way. Even our Military leaders are so

thoroughly hemmed in by the "One-World" web that the only way that

they can do their duty in the face of such a Soviet threat is to hide

the fact that they are doing it. And so, as soon as the missile

removal operation had been completed around our shores, "plausible

denials" of my charges began being issued by the United States

Military. This began on August 31, 1976, when Vice Admiral B. R.

Inman, Acting Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, answered an

inquiry sent to the Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld weeks before by

Senator Harry F. Byrd, Jr. of Virginia. Admiral Inman's letter gives a

number of arguments as to why any prudent government, including the

U.S.S.R., would presumably refrain from planting such missiles and

bombs in our waters. But the real crux of his plausible denial letter

is the following sentence, quote:



"There is currently no evidence indicating the Soviets have placed

underwater nuclear devices, including missiles with multiple warheads,

within the territorial waters of the United States."



Technically, Admiral Inman was telling the truth, because as of August

31, 1976, when he wrote this letter, all of the evidence--the missiles

and bombs--had been removed from our waters; but the impact of his

letter, if read casually, would seem to be that my charges never had

been true!



By the same token, General George S. Brown, Chairman of the Joint

Chiefs of Staff, wrote me the following day on September 1, 1976. His

letter has been photocopied and sent all over the world by the

Pentagon. I will now read it in its entirety:



"Dear Dr. Beter:



Your recent tape report alleging that Soviet nuclear warheads and

hydrogen bombs have been planted in the coastal waters of the United

States has been brought to my attention. I have investigated these

assertions and find not a shred of truth to any of your statements in

this regard. Let me assure you of this country's capability to detect

any such aggressive actions by the Soviet Union or any other world

power.



We stand ready to evaluate and comment in advance on any such

information you may acquire in the future which impinges upon the

vital issue of our national security.



Sincerely, George S. Brown General, U.S.A.F."



The seeming impact of General Brown's letter, read casually, is that

my whole story about the missiles was a fake. But the real key, once

again, is the word "find" (present tense). Furthermore, in the last

sentence, General Brown actually signaled me that the door would be

open if I acquired more such information; and by the time his letter

reached me, I had more such information because as I said before, the

Soviet Union is not giving up.



Topic #2--On the afternoon of September 7, 1976, I received General

Brown's letter of September 1, which I just read you. Ironically, I

also learned on the same day, September 7, that "round two" of the

Soviet Underwater Missile Crisis was just beginning. Three underwater

missiles were now threatening Los Angeles, and San Diego was once

again targeted by an underwater missile close by. Accordingly I

answered General Brown's letter as follows:



"Dear General Brown:



Today I received your letter of September 1. I fully understand the

position you are taking at this time; however other governments have

not taken your position. They know the truth, I know the truth, and so

does President Ford; and the truth is that during the month of August

1976 a surprise Soviet nuclear attack of world-wide proportions has

been partially averted.



Make no mistake, the huge build-up of Soviet nuclear missiles on land

and in the sea world-wide, continues to be a clear and present signal

for an imminent surprise attack of immense proportions. In 1962 we had

a Soviet Missile Crisis in Cuba; in 1971 we had the Soviet Missile

Crisis in Canadian and United States territorial waters which was kept

from the American people; and now once again, in 1976, the world is

experiencing yet another Soviet missile crisis. The world must know of

the courage of President Ford as Commander in Chief in moving aside

unbelievable obstacles in order to begin to meet the Soviet challenge

last month.



In your letter you state that, quote:



'We stand ready to evaluate and comment in advance on any such

information you may acquire in the future which impinges upon the

vital issue of our national security.'



In view of this and the urgency of the situation, I respectfully

request to meet with you privately in your offices within the next ten

(10) days. At that time I will present evidence of the validity of all

my charges, and under specific conditions I will advise you of other

strategic locations of Soviet nuclear missiles planted in our coastal

waters and elsewhere of which you may not be aware and which

constitute a clear and present danger to our national security.



Sincerely yours, Peter Beter"



Shortly after my registered letter reached the Pentagon, Navy Captain

Sidney V. Wright, Jr. called on behalf of General Brown to arrange a

meeting with the General. We agreed on meeting in General Brown's

offices at 3:00 P.M., Thursday September 16. An associate accompanied

me to the meeting as a witness; and promptly at 3:00 P.M. the meeting

began with General Brown and Captain Wright, who tape-recorded the

meeting with my consent. In spite of the public posture which he has

so far had to maintain, General Brown told me that he had overruled

his staff in order to meet with me; and although he couched many of

his comments with considerable care, our discussion lasted for well

over an hour without interruptions, without telephone calls, and

without any cutoff because of time.



I gave General Brown a special tape for his ears only, revealing the

locations of 48 new missiles threatening the United States, and within

two days the United States Navy was already at work removing them. In

addition, General Brown made three commitments to me, and I made one

to him.



To fulfill my own commitment, I sent the following registered letter

to him on September 17, 1976:



"Dear General Brown:



Thank you for affording me the opportunity to meet with you in your

offices yesterday for over an hour. During our conversation I

mentioned that the Soviet nuclear device which was removed from Seal

Harbor, Maine, had been taken to a location near Otis Air Force Base

on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and that it was still there as of the time

of my meeting with you yesterday afternoon. You requested that I

provide you with details about its location.



The facts are that the Seal Harbor nuclear device was in the process

of being retrieved by the United States Navy late Saturday, 28 August

1976, and was on the beach at Seal Harbor waiting transportation by

the afternoon of 29 August. That evening it left Seal Harbor by truck,

which took it to an airport at Augusta , Maine. On the afternoon of 30

August the nuclear device was flown from Augusta, Maine, to Otis Air

Force Base, Cape Cod, where the airplane touched down at 17:13 EDT, 30

August 1976. From Otis Air Force Base this nuclear device was

transported to a remote location on the west side of Buzzards Bay. For

over two weeks the device stayed in that location, which is between

one and two miles east of the small town of Marion, Massachusetts, on

a small peninsula, the tip of which is known as Butler's Point. The

coordinates are: 41 42' 0" North, 70 43' 30" West.



The Seal Harbor weapon remained there until about 2200 EDT last night,

16 September 1976; but then less than six (6) hours after my meeting

with you yesterday afternoon, it left this location. As of today, this

weapon is in a new location about 24 miles west of New London,

Connecticut, with the approximate coordinates: 41 19' 0" North, 72 31'

0" West.



If I had not known about this latest move, the result would have been

an echo of your letter to me of 1 September 1976, in which you state

that you, quote 'find' no evidence to support my charges. Your letter

of 1 September 1976, of course, was written 43 days after I first made

my charges and only hours after the Soviet missiles had all been

removed by the United States Navy.



Sincerely, Peter Beter"



My friends, General Brown is laboring under the handicap of an

Intelligence gap created by none other than Secretary of State Henry

Kissinger. Allied Intelligence sources inform me that they have become

gun-shy in sharing some of the information they give me with the

official Intelligence community of the United States because

invariably Kissinger betrays it immediately into the hands of the

Soviet Union. Large segments of the United States Intelligence

establishment are so independent that they do not consider themselves

accountable even to the President. Instead they work under the

direction of Henry Kissinger, who owes his power to the four

Rockefeller Brothers and who also works in the interest of the Soviet

Union.



Of course many of our Intelligence people are still patriotic and

loyal to our country and they are doing everything they possibly can

to protect our nation. Through their efforts the Joint Chiefs of Staff

first learned about 90 days ago that missiles and bombs had been

planted in American waters by the Soviet Union; but due to the

Intelligence gap, they were unable to obtain complete information

about them. Only when I publicly revealed this information last month,

did they obtain it; and even then had I related to them privately

instead of making it a public issue, Kissinger would still have been

able to block any action to remove them.



The signs of our growing Intelligence gap are all around us. A few

years ago the United States was believed to be far, far ahead in

multiple warhead technology for missiles; yet as far back as 1971, as

I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14, short-range Soviet missiles

with multiple nuclear warheads were found in our own waters.



A few years ago no real threat in naval aviation was anticipated from

Russia, but two months ago, July 1976, the first Soviet Aircraft

Carrier Kiev entered the Mediterranean through the Bosporus Straits

boldly violating the 1936 Montreux Convention as it did so; and

instead of the stubby little aircraft the Pentagon had expected, the

Kiev carries sleek advanced aircraft comparable to the American F-4

Phantom with the additional capability of vertical take-off! And the

Soviets are building at least four more carriers like the Kiev. It is

now in the North Sea to bolster Soviet air power, which is a weak spot

in that area for them.



The military philosophy of detente as expressed to me by a very high

military official is, and I quote: "We watch what they're doing, and

they watch what we're doing, and that's good. It prevents

miscalculations." But, my friends, this means we are in a perpetual

war game with all of our lives at stake; and because of the

Intelligence gap that now exists, a miscalculation cannot be

prevented. Instead, it becomes inevitable; and with it THERMONUCLEAR

WAR.



Topic #3--Yesterday, September 24, 1976, Secretary of the Navy, J.

William Middendorf II, delivered a very important briefing at the News

Media luncheon of the American Security Council held at the Army-Navy

Club here in Washington. He spoke of things that every American should

be alerted about, but the major news media treated it as a non-event.

The Baltimore Sun and the Washington Star carried stories which dealt

with splinters from Secretary Middendorf's speech but missed the basic

thrust of his comments. The Washington Post and the New York Times and

the rest of our major media said nothing at all. Here at home another

attempt to warn the American people has so far been muffled and

silenced!



But half a world away, Radio Australia did give Secretary Middendorf's

speech the attention it deserves--and they did not miss the point.

Here is what Radio Australia had to say at 8:00 o'clock this morning

EDT, quote:



"A warning that the growing strength of the Soviet Navy has created an

emergency situation for the United States has been sounded in

Washington by the Secretary of the Navy, Mr. William Middendorf. He

also said that the emphasis being placed by the Soviet Union on Civil

Defense has another ominous trend.



Mr. Middendorf said the Soviet Union now has 345 submarines, many of

them nuclear-powered and armed with missiles capable of hitting every

city in the United States. In contrast, the United States has only 169

submarines. Mr. Middendorf said that it is evidence by the Soviet

Union that the 40,000-ton Kiev-class Aircraft Carriers, with four more

believed to be under construction, was another ominous change for the

near future. Mr. Middendorf said that while the Soviet Union was

producing submarines and warships by leaps and bounds, the United

States Navy had been almost cut in half to 474 ships over the past six

years."



Is the Secretary of the Navy crying "Wolf"? I submit he is not,

knowing what we know. In International Law, mining the harbors of

another country is an act of war. The Soviet Union has already invaded

our territorial waters, not merely with mines but with hydrogen bombs

and multiple-warhead nuclear missiles. By contrast, we have placed no

such weapons around the Soviet Union--so the actions already taken by

the Soviets are acts of war and pure aggression.



As I say these words, an undeclared submarine war is going on between

the Soviet Union and the United States in the waters surrounding our

country. So far it is still at the stage of maneuvering for attack on

the part of the Soviets, who now have nearly half of their submarine

force surrounding the United States. The challenge before us now is to

prevent this from escalating into all-out war, as planned by the

Soviet Union. To do this, we must all understand what we are up

against.



As I explained several months ago in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 13, WAR

DOES NOT JUST HAPPEN! It is planned and triggered deliberately by

those whose lust for power is more important to them than the lives of

their fellow men. Conspiracy and double-cross are standard practice in

such things. The threat of nuclear attack by the Soviet Union that

hangs over us right now is tied directly to a three-way power struggle

involving the Rockefellers on one side, the Soviet Union on the other,

and in the middle Henry Kissinger who serves both sides!



The four Rockefeller Brothers, of course, have been double-crossing

and using the American people for decades--economically, politically,

and in wars for their own enrichment and expansion of power. These

things I've revealed in my previous tapes, but in particular they have

been working hand in hand with the Soviet Union. Now, the Soviet Union

is double-crossing them, trying to use their immense military might,

which has been built up with Rockefeller aid, in order to seize

complete world domination in a flash.



For 20 years Henry Kissinger has been a key Rockefeller agent in the

Rockefeller-Soviet alliance, and in recent years has been the

exclusive--I repeat, the exclusive--negotiator with the Soviets in

many sensitive areas behind closed doors. But Kissinger sees the

handwriting on the wall. He knows Nelson Rockefeller is trying to push

President Gerald Ford aside to take over. Now if that happens,

Rockefeller will be within reach of the Dictatorship he has craved for

so long, and Kissinger will have outlived his usefulness to the

Rockefeller Brothers, becoming instead a dangerous liability because

of what he knows.



Kissinger has now tilted towards the Soviet Union, whom he thinks will

be the winner in this struggle. Not only has he created the

Intelligence gap I told you about earlier, but he has also used his

unique position to withhold certain critical information even from the

four Rockefeller Brothers! Not only did he negotiate the agreements

between the Rockefellers and the Soviets concerning the "NUCLEAR SAFE

ZONE" for the benefit of the Rockefeller Brothers in the planned war

to come; but it is he, Henry Kissinger, who also conspired with the

Kremlin for the Soviet double-cross that is now under way! The

military threat we now face is tied very closely to political

maneuverings here in the United States. Nelson Rockefeller at this

late date still wants to get Ford out of the way as quickly as

possible in the hope that he can turn even this dangerous situation we

now face to his own benefit.



The financial scandal against President Ford that Rockefeller has had

ready to spring for many months is now under way in the form of the

investigation of Ford by the Watergate Special Prosecutor's office.

But the Soviet threat is real, the time is short; and, therefore, as

Nelson Rockefeller himself keeps saying, "Anything can happen."



Once he seizes the power of the presidency, Nelson Rockefeller will

have the option of declaring a "National Emergency" to help meet this

missile threat, thereby activating all of the dictatorial controls

that are provided for in Executive Order 11921, which I discussed in

monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14. This is not affected by the bill signed

by President Ford on September 14, 1976, which has been falsely

represented in some quarters as eliminating the emergency powers of

the president.



Meanwhile Soviet military forces are now being deployed in offensive

positions. In Europe over 4000 Soviet tanks have now been deployed

along the borders next to West Germany and Austria. Soviet naval and

amphibious forces are ready for action in the area of the Baltic and

North Seas, but most ominous of all is the deployment of Soviet

submarines around the shores of the United States. In recent days,

Soviet submarines have been swarming into position at battle stations

along our East, West, and Gulf Coasts. As of today, September 25,

1976, there are at least 142 Soviet submarines in position, lined up

at precise intervals up and down the East and West Coasts of the

United States and concentrated especially in the Gulf of Mexico. The

number of Soviet submarines now in position around us is almost equal

to the entire submarine force of the United States--which are

scattered world-wide.



One major advantage the Soviet Union has in this situation is the

ability of the Soviet Naval Command to maintain continuous contact

with any or all of its submarines. This is a capability which the

United States Navy has been trying to obtain for over a decade by

means of "PROJECT SEAFARER" which has been thwarted time and time

again. But the Soviet system of communication with its submarines is

far more advanced even than our Project Seafarer would be, and enables

the Soviet submarine force to operate in close coordination, reacting

quickly to any changes in plans.



Most of the Soviet submarines now at battle stations around the United

States are in readiness for direct participation in warfare. However,

certain subs are also still at work planting underwater missiles along

our shores. For this purpose, the Soviets have a special type of

missile-laying sub that is small, highly maneuverable, and able to

operate in shallow waters and relatively tight quarters. The missiles

themselves are also relatively small due to their short range and

their use of satellite guidance. And these special submarines are very

difficult for our Undersea Sonar Detection Nets to pick up because the

hull is treated in such a way that it absorbs sonar signals instead of

reflecting them. By moving slowly, these submarines also avoid making

sound that might be picked up by passive sonar sensors. Thus they move

in and out of our waters at will, planting missiles and bombs wherever

they choose. Thanks to the detailed information handed over by Henry

Kissinger, the Soviet Union has been able to turn our undersea sonar

nets into another Maginot line.



Since I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 last month, additional

missiles and bombs have been planted around the world in certain

locations besides the United States. In particular, the British Isles

were ringed by 23 new underwater missiles as of September 21, 1976. On

that date, I relayed complete information to British Intelligence so

that the Royal Navy can once again take action to remove them.



Elsewhere around the world the situation has not changed drastically

except in the case of Latin America. As of last month, the Soviet

Union still had not planted underwater missiles in positions to

threaten Latin America; but now they, too, are targeted. Mexico has

six missiles in its coastal waters. British Honduras, Honduras, and

Guatemala have one each, while three missiles now infest the waters

off Costa Rica.



The underwater missile which originally threatened the Panama Canal

from the north end has been removed by the United States Navy, but now

the Soviet Union has planted three new missiles to the south of the

Canal in the Gulf of Panama.



One is at Latitude 7 52' 20" North Longitude 79-35-22 West



The second Panama missile is at 18-19-24 North 78-58-12 West



and the third is at 7-57-17 North 78-37-54 West.



One missile lies off the coast of Surinam, two missiles lie off

Ecuador, and Peru is also targeted by two missiles. Chile has three

missiles in the waters nearby. Argentina and Brazil are targeted by

two missiles each.



Last month I mentioned that the nuclear missiles in Guyana which were

formerly located around the huge Atkinson Airfield near Georgetown had

been moved south to a new location. As of now, they have been moved

again, slightly north and west to the new position: 5-29-33 North

58-55-53 West.



In addition, there is now a Missile Resupply Base for Soviet subs

northwest of Georgetown, Guyana, at 6-56-24 North 58-25-27 West.



At present the Soviet submarines are also being resupplied with

nuclear missiles at stations in Cuba and Nicaragua where Castro has

been working very quietly. In Cuba there is a Nuclear Depot near the

north coast northwest of Camaguey at: Latitude 22-7-37 North Longitude

78-21-32 West.



Until recently, offensive missiles were also installed in undersea

concrete silos along the north and south coasts of Cuba, ready to fire

at the southern United States and the Panama Canal, but these have now

been taken up.



In Nicaragua the Nuclear Depot is on the east coast at: Latitude

12-49-42 North Longitude 83-50-45 West.



These resupply depots are making it possible for the Soviet submarine

fleet to give the United States Navy a very difficult time.



On September 16 I gave General Brown a list of 48 new sites around the

United States where missiles and bombs have been planted during the

first two weeks of September. Two days later the United States Navy

was fast at work picking them up, and by now has removed practically

all of them; but we pick up one and the Soviets lay down another.



Using their missile-laying submarines, the Soviets have planted seven

more missiles in new locations around the United States since my

meeting with General Brown. As of yesterday afternoon, the United

States Navy had already found and removed two of these new ones--one

northeast of Vero Beach, Florida; the other southeast of Jacksonville,

Florida.



As of today, four of the other five are still in place in the

following locations:



Near Miami, Florida at: 25-19-0 North 80-12-50 West



In the southw est end of Pamlico Sound, North Carolina, at: 35-4-20

North 76-30-20 West.



In the northeast end of Pamlico Sound about 20 miles south of Kitty

Hawk, North Carolina at: 35-40-0 North 75-38-50 West.



And near Valdez, Alaska, at: 60-51-50 North 147-5-0 West.



The other new missile was planted Sunday night, September 20, 1976,

near Bloodsworth Island in Chesapeake Bay at: 38-12-25 North 76-11-55

West but is now being removed.



The Bloodsworth Island missile is a special case, and I will have more

to say about it in a moment. Before I do that though, it is important

to mention a diabolical new trick the Soviet Union is now trying in an

effort to confuse the United States Navy long enough to replant enough

missiles in our waters for an attack. Some sites which have been

cleared by the United States Navy are now being used to replant new

underwater missiles very close to the exact location used before. The

Soviets anticipate that when these locations are given to the United

States Navy they will be entered on the Master Plot in use by our

Navy, and at that point it will of course be noticed that the new

report corresponds to a location where a missile has been removed. The

natural assumption would be, therefore, that such a new report was

simply a repetition of an earlier report and was now out-of-date. If

this happens, the new missile will be overlooked and will not be

removed. Just to make sure, however, the Soviet Union is placing the

new missiles just far enough from the previous location to prevent our

Navy from discovering them by anything less than a complete new search

of the area.



As of approximately noon yesterday, I can confirm two new missiles

which have been newly planted at old locations this way.



One is near Gulfport, Mississippi, at Latitude 30-17-20 North

Longitude 89-18-25 West.



The other is near Mobile, Alabama, at Latitude 30-38-40 North

Longitude 87-59-0 West.



Both of these sites are almost identical to the ones which I gave to

General Brown on September 16 and which had been cleared by September

21.



A moment ago I mentioned a new underwater missile that was planted

last Sunday night, September 20, in Chesapeake Bay near Bloodsworth

Island, which is about midway between Baltimore, Maryland, and

Norfolk, Virginia. The small missile-laying submarine installed the

Bloodsworth Island missile at 10:30 PM EDT, and then headed back south

toward Norfolk, Virginia. As of 10:00 AM the following morning, Monday

September 21, this small submarine with at least one more

thermonuclear weapon on board, was close to the mouth of Chesapeake

Bay, but had stopped and was playing possum on the bottom. Its

location was about 10 miles northeast of Norfolk, Virginia, at:

Latitude 37-6-20 North Longitude 76-7-10 West.



Upon receiving this information, I immediately called General Brown's

office and relayed this information to Captain Sidney V. Wright, Jr.



Here was a chance for the United States Navy to catch one of the

Soviet missile-laying submarines red-handed. By the time you hear

this, the Bloodsworth Island missile planted last Sunday night by this

submarine will be gone, thanks to the action now in progress by the

United States Navy; but as of now, the submarine is still there. This

Soviet missile-laying submarine will stay there complete with its

cargo of mass destruction until our Navy pulls it up and takes it away

because, my friends, the small Soviet submarine now resting on the

bottom of the Chesapeake Bay has become a tomb for its crew. Something

went wrong with its power plant, and now the Soviet crew is dead. The

sub itself, still loaded with nuclear weapons, has now become a

gigantic mine in the waters near the biggest naval concentration in

the United States, and so it will remain unless and until it is

removed by the United States Navy.



My friends, the threat of war from the Soviet Union has never before

been as great nor as imminent as it is now. But I remain firmly

convinced that, even now, a shooting war can still be prevented. Our

fate remains in YOUR hands; but now I believe more than ever that the

American people, when told the truth, are equal to the task.

Congressmen and Senators write letters to President Ford or Henry

Kissinger and get no satisfactory response; but YOU, you opened the

door for communication between General George S. Brown, who heads our

country's military establishment, and myself, and I thank you from the

very bottom of my heart.



Now I ask you to get behind General Brown in the same way. This is

more important than I can express because General Brown, handicapped

by the Intelligence gap created by Henry Kissinger, is confronted by

many opposing forces within the federal government who, unlike General

Brown, are not loyal to the United States.



As soon as you finish listening to this tape, I ask you, PLEASE, to

send a letter, telegram, or Mailgram to General Brown expressing your

support. It took great courage from the standpoint of his own career

for General Brown to see me at all, yet he overruled his staff in

insisting upon doing so. And under General Brown's command, with the

approval of President Ford as Commander in Chief, the United States

Navy has acted and has so far been able to fend off the intended

surprise nuclear attack by the Soviet Navy.



Send your letters and telegrams to:



General George S. Brown Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Washington, D.C. 20301.



Thank him for seeing me, thank him for taking action, and tell him you

are behind him. By doing this, my friends, YOU can help strengthen

Gen. Brown's hand against those who would rather see inaction or

outright surrender to the Soviet Union. Remember: YOUR VOICE COUNTS.



If God will grant us the time and the wisdom to do so, I believe the

war which is now so close can still be averted; but I would not be

honest if I did not urge you to take such precautions as you can for

your own protection in the event war does come. The Soviet Union has a

massive Civil Defense program to enable it to survive nuclear war. No

such preparations have been made in the United States except for the

so-called "Federal Relocation Arc", a network of 96 virtually

bomb-proof underground cities in which many of the Government

officials, who have betrayed us into war, will be able to ride it out

in safety and comfort. So the rest of us, who are considered

expendable, are left to fend for ourselves.



Almost two years ago, looking ahead to this situation, I recorded my

first tape for AUDIO BOOKS. INC. entitled: "HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF

DURING THE COMING DEPRESSION AND THE THIRD WORLD WAR." The exact

timetable and some other details have changed since then due to

unexpected obstacles and failures which the four Rockefeller Brothers

have encountered, including now their double-cross by the Soviet

Union; but the measures I suggested then are still the ones I would

suggest now in order to protect yourself and your family. Highly

informed individuals who know from their own sources that my present

warnings are correct, are actively preparing their own bomb shelters

right now just in case the worst should happen. But as I said in

conclusion to that first tape two years ago, what we could accomplish

to protect ourselves individually was one thing, and what we can

accomplish working together was quite another. Now, as then, that is

where my real hopes lie; and now, my friends, we are working together

to save our beloved country. If we will continue without losing heart,

and if we will all show our overwhelming support for General Brown,

then I have the feeling that we're going to do it. It may sound too

good to be true--but then, so did the concept of FREEDOM that became

the United States of America 200 years ago!



Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may

God bless each and every one of you.

------------------------------------------------

(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the

Radio Free Michigan site by S.P.I.R.A.L., the Societyfor the All files are ZIP archives for fast download.


 E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)

