 (free 2 forward)-----------------------------(free 2 copy(*)



               J U D G E    B A R S    M E D I A   

              A C C E S S   F O R   M c V E I G H


By Ian Williams Goddard

The Associated Press (10/05/96) reports:

      DENVER (AP) - Oklahoma City bombing suspect Timothy
      McVeigh ... won't be allowed to meet the press.
      [ U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch ruled. ] 

      [ McVeigh's attorney ] Jones asked Matsch to
      grant the interviews, saying McVeigh needed to 
      counter his ``demonization'' and let the public 
      know there are two sides to the case.

      Prosecutors opposed the request, saying the inter-
      views..[were]..aimed at influencing the jury pool. 

To keep the jury pool free from improper influence, only the govt's 
-- i.e., the prosecution's -- case will be promoted continuously by 
the major media.  Not even once have I heard the defense's case in 
the major media, which, from what I have gleaned, is that more people 
were involved,  McVeigh is a patsy, and the FBI had foreknowledge of 
the blast.  The only case to be heard in the major media is the pro-
secution's case, which is: The only suspects are McVeigh & Nicholes.

On many occasions the major media has shown bereaved victims and 
family members saying, "Boy if I could get my hands on that McVeigh,
I'd..."  "If you put me in a room with McVeigh alone, why I'd..." It
seems as if the major media is not merely promoting only the prosecu-
tion's case, they're even warming up the electric chair -- the "let's 
kill him" lynch mob mentality.  This free flow of prejudical  hatred 
backed by calls for killing is an effective diversionary tactic that
prevents objective review and inquiries about the facts, such as: 

  INQUIRY: What about ATF / FBI foreknowledge of the bombing ?

  MAJOR MEDIA: Kill kill kill.

  INQUIRY: What about the primed bombs found inside the building ? 

  MAJOR MEDIA: Kill kill kill.

  INQUIRY: What about the reports of many demolition and munitions 
  experts who insist that blast damage patterns dictate that 
  supplemental demolition charges must have been used ?

  MAJOR MEDIA: Kill kill kill.

  INQUIRY: What about the seismographic recordings from the University 
  of Oklahoma and Omniplex Science Center both measuring TWO blasts ?

  MAJOR MEDIA: Kill kill kill.

You'll never hear these valid fact-based questions raised in the 
major media.  There are no questions in the major media, only the
govt-prosecution line is to be found in the major media augmented 
with the prejudical revenge / rage of victims hopelessly duped by 
the govt line.  But not all the victims are duped:

You'll not be hearing any more from Eyde Smith -- who lost her only 
two children in the blast -- because she believes and has the evidence 
that the ATF had foreknowledge, and her family plans to sue the govt. 
Eyde Smith was told by the govt to "Keep your mouth shut, don't talk 
about it" when she simply asked why she and her children did not 
have the same forewarning that the ATF had. 

After she reported this during a CNN interview -- the last to be heard 
from her in the major media -- Ms. Smith tells us that she was  visited 
the next day by agents from the ATF and the IRS no less.  KJRH-TV  then 
reported that after the  ATF's house call  she decided that the ATF did 
not  have foreknowledge.  Yet she told The Jubilee (May/June 1995) that 
she NEVER had such an intimidation-induced change of mind. Then her govt
compensation checks were  cut off and her mail began to arrive  already 
opened with checks sent by caring citizens removed, which she reported 
on Radio Free America (6/19/95).  These are gross examples of govt
intimidation, theft and fabrication.  Why is the govt going to 
all this trouble to shut her up if they are in the clear?

  INQUIRY: Major media, what about the reports and intimidation 
  of Eyde Smith, who lost her only two children in the bombing ?

  MAJOR MEDIA: Kill kill kill.

It seems that these things are just a little to complex for the 
major media to comprehend.  The AP (10/05/96) article continues:

      Prosecutors also complained that McVeigh was 
      hand-picking interviewers. 

Good grief! You mean the prosecutors where not to arrange the interviews 
for him, but he was to be free to speak to people of his choosing?  I am 
aghast!  Since suspects are to be considered guilty prior to trail, what 
would give this guilty man the right to such freedom of speech? The AP:

      Matsch said he was troubled by Jones' attempt to cast 
      McVeigh in a better light and refused to lift his order 
      restricting what can be discussed outside the courtroom. 

Wow, right there: Judge troubled by attempt to cast McVeigh in a "better
light." That clearly reveals that the only light he is to be cast in is a 
less than better light -- i.e., a bad light, a  "he's guilty" light.  Any-
thing that threatens this bad light must be barred from public sight. It's
obvious to see that the judge is controlling the "lighting" in this trial 
to cast the best possible light on the govt-prosecution's case. 

While they will not allow anything but a bad light for McVeigh, an FBI 
investigator has already come forward to cast a bad light on this bad 
light: the investigator says that crucial evidence used to cast McVeigh 
in a bad light was fabricated. The AP (4/10/96) reports (emphasis added):

      Prosecutors agreed to turn over letters from FBI 
      agent Frederic Whitehurts, who tested Mr. McVeigh's 
      cloths for traces of explosives. Mr. Whitehurst has 
      claimed that investigators FAKED evidence in the 
      bombing case.              ^^^^^ 

Well at least the prosecutors turned over some exculpatory evidence, when 
its existence was no secret.  The honest inquirer is forced to  question: 
what is the govt so afraid of that has required intimidation, fabrication 
and suppression to be necessary features of the govt's "legal" game plan??


************************************************************************
 IAN GODDARD <igoddard@erols.com>   Q U E S T I O N   A U T H O R I T Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 visit Ian Goddard's Universe  ----->    http://www.erols.com/igoddard 
________________________________________________________________________

 (c) 1996 Ian Wiliams Goddard - Free to copy nonprofit with attribute


