(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
February 22, 1992
THEORYBE.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The New Tesla Electromagnetics and
The Secrets of Free Electrical Energy
(Part 1) by T. E. Bearden
Retyped Without Permission, 7/13/86,
by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_)
Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics
------------------------------------------
A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory
There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing
in conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presents a
summary of those flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion
of scalar longitudinal waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to
Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company,
1981 and 1982.
I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my
friends and colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain
anonymous. One of the two is an experimental genius who can produce
items that do not work by orthodox theory.
The second is a master of materials science and electromagnetics
theory. I thank them both for their exceptional contributions and
stimuli regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics
theory, and their forbearance with the many discussions we have held
on this and related subjects.
It goes without saying that any errors in this paper are strictly my
own, and not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.
(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass
are falsely made identical. Actually, on a charged particle,
the "charge" is the flux of virtual particles on the "bare
particle" of observable mass.
The charged particle is thus a "system" of true massless
charge coupled to a bare chargeless mass. The observable
"mass" is static, three-dimensional and totally spatial.
"Charge" is dynamic, four-dimensional or more, virtual and
spatiotemporal.
Page 1
Further, the charge and observable mass can be de-coupled,
contrary to present theory. Decoupled charge -- that is, the
absence of mass -- is simply what we presently refer to as
"Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge are all
identical.
Rigorously, we should utilize any of these three as an
"ether," as suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see
Max Born, Einstiein's Theory of Relativity, Revised Edition,
Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all three
of them are identically anenergy -- not energy, but more
fundamental components of energy.
(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-
dimensional spatial stress. Instead, it is the intensity of
a many-dimensional (at least four-dimensional) virtual flux
and a stress on all four dimensions of spacetime.
This is easily seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is
identically massless charged. (It is not "filled" with
charge; rather, it is charge!) Just as, in a gas under
pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further
stresses the gas, the accumulation of charge (spacetime)
stresses charge (spacetime).
Further, if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can
flow exclusively in time, exclusively in space, or in any
combination of the two. Tesla waves -- which are scalar
waves in pure massless charge flux itself -- thus can
exhibit extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector
waves do not possess.
And Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom in
which to move, as compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way
to visualize a tesla scalar wave is to regard it as a pure
oscillation of time itself.
(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the
electrostatic case, or at least thought of as "composed of
the same thing." For that reason, voltage is regarded as
"potential drop." This also is not true.
Rigorously, the potential is the intensity of the virtual
particle flux at a single point -- whether or not there is
any mass at the point -- and both the pressure and the point
itself are spatiotemporal (4-dimensional) and not spatial
(3-dimensional) as presently assumed.
Voltage represents the spatial intersection of the
difference in potential between two seperated spatial
points, and always implies at least a miniscule flow of mass
current (that is what makes it spatial!).
"Voltage" is spatial and depends upon the presence of
observable mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential
is spatiotemporal and depends upon the absence of observable
mass flow. The two are not even of the same dimensionality.
(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when
Page 2
in fact it is a very high value. Vacuum has no mass, but it
has great massless charge and virtual particle charge flux.
For proof that a charged vacuum is the seat of something in
motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of
static electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nature,
Vol. 285, 15 May 1980, pp. 154-155. In fact, vacuum IS
charge, identically, and it is also spacetime, and at least
four-dimensional.
(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and
relative in its context. A three-dimensional spatial hole,
for example, exists in time. If we model time as a
dimension, then the spatial hole has one dimension in 4-
space.
So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence. In the
vacuum 4-space, a spatial nothing is still a something. The
"virtual" concept and mathematical concept of a derivative
are simply two present ways of unconsciously addressing this
fundamental problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.
(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime
(vacuum) has been seperated into two parts. We can only
think of a space as "continuing to exist in time." To
separate vacuum spacetime into two pieces, an operation
is continually required.
The operator that accomplishes this splitting operation is
the photon interaction, the interaction of vector
electromagnetic energy or waves with mass.
I have already strongly pointed out this effect and
presented a "raindrop model" or first-order physical change
itself in my book, The Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill
Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 128-130.
(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an
aspect of (and connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it
is a separate, fundamental field of nature and it can be
entirely disconnected from the magnetic field. See Richard
P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-
Wesley Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to
15-14.
Curiously, this fact has been proven for years, yet it has
been almost completely ignored in the West. The
"(triangle)x" operator, when applied to the A-field, makes
B-field.
If the (triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" A-
field possesses much-expanded characteristics from those
presently allowed in the "bound" theory. Specifically, it
becomes a scalar or "shadow vector" field; it is not a
normal vector field.
(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental
constant of nature. Instead it is a function of the
intensity of the massless charge flux (that is, of the
magnitude of the electrostatic potential) of the vacuum in
Page 3
which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and masless charge are
one and the same, one may say that the speed of light is a
function of the intensity of the spatiotemporal vacuum!).
The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the vacuum, the
faster the speed of light in it. This is an observed fact
and already shown by hardcore measurements.
For example, distinct differences actually exist in the
speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the
earth as compared to measurements in space away from
planetary masses. In a vacuum on the surface of the earth,
light moves significantly faster. For a discussion and the
statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of
the Velocity of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics Journal,
No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42 (original in Russian,
translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.)
The Russians have used this knowledge for over two decades
in their strategic psychotronics (energetics) program; yet
hardly a single U.S. scientist is aware of the measured
variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western scientists
simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!
(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In
fact, energy arises from vector processes, and it can be
disassembled into more fundamental (anenergy) scalar
components, since the vectors can.
These scalar components individually can be moved to a
distant location without expending work, since one is not
moving force vectors. There the scalar components can be
joined and reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy"
appearing at a distance, with no loss in between the initial
and distant points.
For proof that a vector field can be replaced by (and
considered to be composed of) two scalar fields, see E. T.
Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society,
Volume 1, 1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can be
replaced by two coupled scalar waves.
(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave
of energy from a time-varying, electrically charged source.
In fact, an exact solution of the problem does allow this
longitudinal wave. See T. D. Keech and J. F. Corum, "A New
Derivation for the Field of a Time-Varying Charge in
Einsteins Theory," International Journal of Theoretical
Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp. 63-68 for the proof.
(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely
limited, and do not permit the explicit consideration of the
internal, finer-grained structures of a vector or a
scalar. That is, a fundamental problem exists with the
basic assumptions in the vector mathematics itself.
The "space" of a vector field, for example, does not have
inter-nested sublevels (subspaces) containing finer "shadow
vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has
Page 4
already discovered that electrical reality is built that
way. Thus one should actually use a "hypernumber" theory
after the manner of Charles Muses.
A scalar is filled with (and composed of) nested levels of
other "spaces" containing vectors, where these sum to "zero"
in the ordinary observable frame without an observable
vector resultant.
In Muses' mathematics, for example, zero has real roots.
Real physical devices can be -- and have been -- constructed
in accordance with Muses' theory. For an introduction to
Muses' profound hypernumberss approach, see Charles Muses'
forward to Jerome Rothstein, Communication, Ogranization and
Science, The Falcon's Wing Press, Indian Hills, Colorado,
1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers:
Computational Convepts," Applied Mathematics and
Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also Charles Muses'
"Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation,
January 1978.
(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation
of energy law is required. Let us recapitulate for a moment.
The oldest law called for the conservation of mass.
The present law calls for the conservation of "mass and
energy", but not each separately. If mass is regarded as
simply another aspect of energy, then the present law calls
for the conservation of energy.
However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental
concept. Since the energy concept is tied to work and the
movement of vector forces, it implicitly assumes "vector
movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible
concept.
But as we pointed out, Whittaker showed that vectors can
always be further broken down into more fundamental coupled
scalar components. Further, Tesla discovered that these
"coupled components" of "energy" can be individually
separated, transmitted, processed, rejoined, etc.
This directly implies that energy per se need not be
conserved. The new law therefore calls for the conservation
of anenergy, the COMPONENTS OF ENERGY.
These components may be coupled into energy, and the energy
may be further compacted into mass. It is the sum total of
the (anenergy) components -- coupled and uncoupled -- that
is conserved, NOT the matter or the energy per se.
Further, this conservation of anenergy is not spatial;
rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of at least four
or more dimensions.
(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement
about fundamental physical reality. In fact, it is only a
statement about FIRST ORDER reality -- the reality that
emerges from the vector interaction of electromagnetic
Page 5
energy with matter.
When we break down the vectors into scalars (shadow vectors
or hypervectors), we immediately enter a vastly different,
far more fundamental reality.
In this reality superluminal velocity, multiple universes,
travel back and forth in time, higher dimensions, variation
of all "fundamental constants" of nature, materialization
and dematerialization, and violation of the "conservation of
energy" are all involved.
Even our present Aristotlean logic -- fitted to the photon
interaction by vector light as the fundamental observation
mechanism -- is incapable of describing or modeling this
more fundamental reality. Using scalar waves and scalar
interactions as much subtler, far less limited
observation/detection mechanisms, we must have a new
"superrelativity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic
reality uncovered by Nikola Tesla.
(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always
occurring with -- and locked to -- mass. Indeed, charge is
not necessarily quantized, just as it is not necessarily
locked to mass. Ehrenhaft discovered and reported fractional
charges for years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored.
See P.A.M. Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's
Conception of Nature", Sumposium on the Development of the
Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Merha, D.
Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 12-14 for a presentation of some
of Ehrenhaft's results.
Within the last few years Stanford University researchers
have also positively demonstrated the existence of
"fractional charge." For a layman's description of their
work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science News, Vol.
119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69.
Indeed, Dirac in his referenced article points out that
Millikan himself -- in his original oildrop experiments --
reported one measurement of fractional charge, but
discounted it as probably due to error.
(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through
normal space. Thus we use or model only the most elementary
type of motion -- that performed by vector electromagnetic
energy. We do not allow for things to "travel inside the
vector flow itself."
Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle flow inside
the first, and a third, even more subtle flow inside the
second, and so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and
out of energy itself -- and any anenergy component of
energy.
There are hypervectors and hyperscalars unlimited, within
the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know. Further,
these "interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized,
Page 6
allowing physical reality itself to be directly engineered,
almost without limits.
(16) We always assume everything exists in time. Actually,
nothing presently measured exists in time, because the
physical detection/measurement process of our present
instruments destroys time, ripping it off and tossing it
away -- and thereby "collapsing the wave function."
Present scientific methodology thus is seriously flawed. It
does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth, but only a
partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great
scientific oversights.
For example. mass does not exist in time, but mass x time
(masstime) does. A fundamental constant does not exist in
time, but "constant x time" does. Energy does not exist in
time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space itself
does not exist in time -- spacetime does.
We are almost always one dimension short in every observable
we model. Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and we have
developed instruments that detect and measure spatially
only. Such instruments can never measure and detect the
phenomenology of the nested substrata of time.
By using scalar technology, however, less limited
instruments can indeed be constructed -- and they have been.
With such new instruments, the phenomenology of the new
electromagnetics can be explored and an engineering
technology developed.
(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of
virtual state (particle physics) and orthogonally rotated
frames (hyperspaces). Actually, the two are identical, as I
showed in the appendix to my book, The Excalibur Briefing,
Strawberry Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 233-235.
A virtual particle in the laboratory frame is an observable
particle in a hyperspatial frame rotated more than one
orthogonal turn away. This of course implies that the
hyperspatial velocity of all virtual particles is greater
than the speed of light.
The particle physicist is already deeply involved in
hyperspaces and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing
it. In other words , he is using tachyons (particles that
move faster than light) without realizing it.
(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is
not an observable, and therefore it cannot be measured or
detected. According to this assumption, one must always
infer time from spatial measurements, because all detections
and measurements are spatial.
With this assumption, our scientists prejudice themselves
against looking for finer, subquantal measurement
methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present
limitation is the result of the type of electromagnetics we
Page 7
presently know, where all instruments (the "measurers") have
been interacted with by vector electromagnetic energy
(light).
Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is
continually absorbing and emitting photons, and in the
process they are continually connecting to time and
disconnecting from time. If time is continually being
carried away from the detector itself by its emitted
photons, then the detector cannot hold and "detect" that
which it has just lost.
With Tesla electromagnetics, however, the fundamental
limitation of our present instruments need not apply. With
finer instruments, we can show there are an infinite number
of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level time"
which is continually being lost by vector light (photon)
interaction.
By using subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to
deeper levels of time -- in which case the upper levels of
time ARE measureable and detectable, in contradistinction to
present assumptions.
(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered
to be, a continuous dimension such as length. This is only a
gross approximation. Indeed, time is not like a continuous
"dimension," but more like a series of "stiches," each of
which is individually made and then ripped out before the
next stitch appears.
"Vector light" photons interact one at a time, and it is
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change
itself. The absorption of a photon -- which is energy x
time -- by a spatial mass converts it to masstime: the time
was added by the photon.
The emission of a photon tears away the time, leaving behind
again a spatial mass. It is not accidental, then, that time
flows at the speed of light, for it is light which contains
and carries time. It is also not accidental that the photon
IS the individual quantum.
Since all our instruments presently are continually
absorbing and emitting photons, they are all "quantized,"
and they accordingly "quantize" their detections. This is
true because all detection is totally internal to the
detector, and the instruments only detect only their own
internal changes.
Since these detections are on a totally granular quantized
background, the detections themselves are quantized. The
Minkowski model is fundamentally erroneous in its modelling
of time, and for that reason relativity and quantum
mechanics continue to resist all attempts to successfully
combine them, quantum field theory notwithstanding.
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are
considered mutually exclusive. Actually this is also untrue.
Page 8
In 1974, for example, Santilli proved that electrical field
and gravitational fiend indeed are not mutually exclusive.
In that case one is left with two possibilities: (a) they
are totally the same thing, or (b) they are partially the
same thing. For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and
Gravitation: Some Puzzling Questions," Annals of Physics,
Vol. 83, No. 1, March 1974.
With the new Tesla electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in
time itself can be produced electrically , and
electrostatics (when the charge has been seperated from the
mass) becomes a "magic" tool capable of directly affecting
anything that exists in time -- including the gravitational
field. Antigravity and the intertial drive are immediate and
direct consequences of the new electromagnetics.
(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of
physics, and not affected by physical means. Literally, the
prevailing belief of Western scientists is that man is a
mechanical robot -- even though relativity depends entirely
upon the idea of the idea of the "observer."
Western science today thus has essentially become dogmatic,
and in this respect borders on a religion. Since this
"religion," so to speak, is now fairly well entrenched in
its power in the state, Western science is turning itself
into an oligarchy.
But mind occupies time, and when we measure and affect time,
we can directly measure and affect mind itself. In the new
electromagnetics, then, Man regains his dignity and his
humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to
science. In my book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already
pointed out the reality of mind and a simplified way in
which it can be modeled to the first order.
With scalar wave instruments, the reality of mind and
thought can be measured in the laboratory, and
parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific
discipline.
(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not
permitted or severely discouraged in the present theory. For
one thing, integrals of multiple valued derivative functions
have the annoying habit of "blowing up" and yielding
erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not
allow multiple types of time!
This leads to the absurdity of the present interpretation
of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a
single observation) at a time. So if one believes as
"absurd" a thing as the fact that more than one person can
observe an apple at the same time, the present physics
fails.
However, the acceptance of such a simple proposition as
multiple simultaneous observation leads to a physics so
bizarre and incredible that most Western physicists have
been unable to tolerate it, much less examine its
consequences.
Page 9
In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous
observation, all possibilities are real and physical.
There are an infinite number of worlds, orthogonal to one
another, and each world is continually splitting into
additional such "worlds" at a stupendous rate. Nonetheless,
this physics was worked out by Everett for his doctoral
thesis in 1956, and the thesis was published in 1957. (See
Hugh Everett, III, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A.
Wheeler, B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and
N. Graham; eds. Bryce S. Dewitt and Neill Graham,
Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press,
1973.)
Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely
consistent with the present experimental basis of physics.
The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for only
a single "rodl" or universe -- or "level."
The expanded theory, on the other hand, contains multiply
nested levels of virtual state charge -- and these levels
are identically the same as orthogonal universes, or
"hyperframes."
Multiple kinds -- and values -- of time also exist. The new
concept differs from Everett's, however, in that the
orthogonal universes intercommunicate in the virtual state.
That is, an observable in one universe is always a virtual
quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have
multi-level "continuities" and "discontinuities"
simultaneously, without logical conflict.
It is precisely these levels of charge -- these levels of
scalar vacuum -- that lace together the discontinuous quanta
generated by the interaction of vector light with mass.
However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one
requires a new, expanded logic which contains the old
Aristotlean logic as a subset. I have already pointed out
the new logic in my paper, "A Conditional Criterion for
Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," 1979, available
from the National Technical Information Center, AD-A071032.
Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum
electrodynamics, and relativity are drastically changed by
the Tesla electromagnetics, as I pointed out in my paper,
"Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons,"
Tesla Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030,
1980.
The present electromagnetics is just a special case of a much more
fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as
Newtonian physics is a special case of the relativistic physics.
But in the new electromagnetics case, the differences between the
old and the new are far more drastic and profound.
Page 10
Additional References
---------- ----------
1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental
Magnetic Charge (Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic
Energy)," 1981/1982 (private communication). Dr. Boren has a
cogent argument that the positron is the fundamental unit of
magnetic charge. His theory thus assigns fundamentally
different natures to positive charge and negative charge.
In support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the
"positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than
the "negative" end. In other words, the circuit works simply
from higher accumulation of negative charges (the "negative"
end) to a lesser accumulation of negative charges (the
"positive" end).
Nowhere need there be positive charges (protons, positrons,
etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. Borens theory, though
dramatic at first encounter, nonetheless bears close and
meticulous examination -- particularly since he has been able
to gather experimental data which support his theory and
disagree with present theory.
2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity
Phenomena," philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No.
191, December 1939, pp. 694 -701.
3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size
and Weight of Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of
Magnitude r = 4 x 10(-5) cm. to 5 x 10(-6) cm., as well as the
Production of Real Images of Submicroscopic Particles by means
of Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. II
(Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 30-51.
4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the
Existance of Charges smaller than the Electron - (a) The
Micromagnet; (b) The Law of Resistance; (c) The computation of
errors of the Method," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. V
(Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225-241.
5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic
charge, in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.
6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New
Foundation for Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press,
Smithtown, NY, First Edition, 1981, pp. 15-20.
7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational
Waves in Plasma," Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July
1981, (U.S. Translation, Consultants Bureau, NY, JAnurary
1982), pp. 593-597.
8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics
to the power conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys. Review
A, Vol. 20, no. 4, October 1979, pp. 1614-1618.
Page 11
9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems
With a Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available
through the Defense Technical Information Center (AD 773188).
10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the
Direction of current flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982,
pp. 311-312
11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New
Scientist, 17 September 1981, p. 723.
12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the Free-Fall
Acceleration of a Relativistic Charged Particle. II. A
Cylindrical Solenoid in a Time-Independent Field of Inertial
Forces," Izvestiya VUZ, Fizika, No. 7, 1979, pp. 28-32.
English Translation: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp.
829-833.
If one understands the new, expanded electromagnetics, this
Soviet paper indicates a means of generating antigravity and
pure inertial fields.
13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts
in Physics and Advanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited,
No. 12, Winter 1981, pp. 15-20.
14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity,
Library of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive
compilation of measurements of the speed of light. Clearly
shows the speed of light is not constant but changes, sometimes
even daily.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy
Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much
more fundamental electromagnetic theory discovered by Nikola Tesla
at the turn of the century.
Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very
high electrical potential -- something on the order of 200 million
volts, with respect to a hypothetical zero charge.
Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" -
- which has the same potential as the vacuum -- actually has a non-
zero absolute potential.
This circuit ground has a value of zero only with respect to
something else which has the same absolute electrical potential.
Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass"
current (even if only a miniscule flow), is, by definition, a
difference dropped in potential when a charge mass moves between two
spatially seperated points.
What we have termed "electrical current" only flows where there is a
suitable conducting medium between things which have a difference in
absolute potential.
Page 12
Furthermore, between any two points in any material, there is
considered to be a finite resistance -- if we apply a voltage ahd
have a mass current flowing between the two points!
Rigorously, to have one of the three is to have them all. To lose
one is to lose all three. Immediately we see a major error in
present theory: One can have a "difference in scalar potential"
between two points without having a "voltage drop" between them.
Specifically, if no mass current flows between them, no resistance
exists between them, and no voltage drop exists between them.
In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum
without a voltage wave. In that case, the wave has no E-field and no
H-field.
The only reason one has an E field around a statically charged
object is because the charged electrons accumulated on the object
are actually in violent motion. It is this motion of the charged
masses that produces E-field -- as well as H-field whenever that
entire E-field ensemble moves through laborotory space.
Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in
present electromagnetic theory. For example, let us examine a bird
sitting on a high tension line.
The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass
electricity, because there is no significant difference in potential
drop between the bird and the line. Specifically, between the birds
two feet -- each in contact with a different portion of the line --
there exists no potential difference.
This is true even though, with respect to the vacuum, each foot is
at a potential that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass
current flowing. And it is true even though the absolute potential
of each foot may be some 200.1 million "volts," were a mass current
flowing.
Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through
the air to light upon the high tension wire. As he flies towards the
wire, he is flying through the massless electrostatic potential
field of the wire, for that field extends an infinite distance away
from the wire.
The electrostatic potential field -- pure 0-field -- is actually the
spatiotemporal intensity of the massless charge at a point. In other
words, as the bird flies to the wire, he flies into an increasing
"massless charge" potential, building up to 100,000 "volts" higher
than the earth.
However, very little (if any) "mass flow" potential difference is
experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so
essientially no "charged mass currents" are induced in his body.
Thus the little flier safely navigates into the teeth of a very high
electrostatic potential, lights upon the wire, and is not "fried" in
the process. When he lights on the wire, his body has reached the
electrostatic potential that each foot's contact point has.
Page 13
Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is immersed in an
increased flux of massless charge -- which is what the electrostatic
potential represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in that
charge represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical current.
The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow --
"scalar" current -- without any mechanical work being done in the
system.
All electrical work in a circuit is done against the physical mass
of the charged masses that flow. Rigorously, force is defined as the
time rate of charge of momentum. Even in the relativistic case
where F = ma + v(dm/dt), change of momentum requires mass movement.
No mechanical work, and hence no energy, is expended by massless
charge flow.
That is why the vacuum massless charge -- which is composed of a
very high flux of massless "particles" -- normally does no work on
our systems, and expends none of its very high "potential energy."
It is exactly the same as the bird which flew into an increasing
scalar field as it approached the high tension wire -- no work was
done upon the bird by the increasing scalar flux currents
encountered by its body.
By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are
as birds sitting on a high tension line! Until we create a
significant difference in potential, via our present electromagnetic
circuits, no current can flow -- anywhere.
Even if we produce potential differences, we must have a conductor
and charged masses to flow, if we wish to produce mechanical work.
Presently our electromagnetic theory allows us to create a
difference in potential within different parts of a circuit, but
only by moving and shifting charged mass.
We therefore have to do work on this electrical mass in moving it
around, and we only get back the work we have put into the circuit.
In other words, presently all we do is "pump" electrical mass.
Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we
substantially "pulsed" the potential on the line. Suppose we
"pulsed" it such that the bird's physical system -- considered as a
circuit containing a capicitance, a resistance, an inductance, and
many free electrons -- became resonant to the pulsing frequency.
In that case the "bird system" would resonate, and a great deal of
electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of the bird.
In the birds body, voltage would exist, charged mass current would
flow, work would be done, and the bird would be electrocuted.
Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector
fields are not produced (and a portion of the difficulty lies with
the actual vector mechanics itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves
continually penetrate the "space" where there is no mass movement.
This means there can exist a "delta-0" without a voltage or an E-
field. The present theory does not allow this, because it always
uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without belaboring
Page 14
the point, let us just say that is the mechanical spin of the
individual charged particle -- such as the electron -- which
"entangles" or "knits together" or "couples" independent scalar
waves into vector waves.
A vector wave is simply two coupled scalar waves. The entire force
field concept -- such as the E-field and the B-field -- is
operationally defined in terms of the force exhibited on a test
particle, or test mass.
Rigorusly, an E-field does not exist as a force field in a vacuum,
but as two coupled scalar 0-fields "tumbling about each other." When
these two coupled, tumbling fields meet a spinning electron, e.g.,
the force emerges on the electron mass. In short, movement of a
rotating mass changes delta-0 to "voltage", creating the V/I/R
triad.
By "accululating charged mass particles" -- such as electrons -- one
certainly can increase the value of 0, which represents the charge
intensity or "scalar electrostatic potential." However, that is not
the only way to increase it.
Resonance and rotation of charged mass can also be appropriately
employed to vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under proper
circumstances.
By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla
electromagnetic theory, it is possible to oscillate -- and change
the vacuum potential itself, in one part of an electrical system.
Thus by correct procedures a part of a system can be electrically
altered so that the absolute value of its "ground" (vacuum)
potential differs significantly from the normal vacuum-ground state.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 15