Jim Ryan 02 May 84 MCI Mail : JRYAN Notes on the FidoNet System Tom Jennings has outlined, in his article dated 30 Apr 84, a proposal for FidoNet-- a communications network for Fido and other message systems. I have some comments and suggestions for improvement of the FidoNet system. ----- If FidoNet were to use a structure similar to DecNet, the networking system for Digital computers, a person could send a message using the syntax : To : -F01 Tom Jennings meaning "Send this message to FidoNet Node 1, addressed to Tom Jennings". A message to all could be coded as : To : -F01 All and a message going to all systems could be coded as : To : -F All The originating Fido system could keep a log of all messages in all areas that are flagged to other FidoNet nodes, and send them with a record indicating there originating node, and area description : Message : 25 From : -F01 Tom Jennings To : All Subject : FidoNet List (Area : General ) ----- In my opinion, the major drawback to the FidoNet system is the reliance on the SysOp to foot the bill for the long distance charges to all the FidoNet nodes he needs to send mail to. This may make the system prohibitive to smaller users. An alternate idea would be to send the FidoNet mail through an alternate system such as MCI Mail or Compuserve. In this manner each sysop would only be paying the charges of the various host systems instead of the long distance charges to each FidoNet node. 1 For example : If Tom (or some other willing volunteer) would write a FidoNet mail system on Compuserve, a sample session might run like this (with the FidoNet computer handling the input/output) : host : Welcome to Compuserve User Id : XXXXX,XXX Password : ____________ Compuserve Information Service XX-XXX-XX at XX:XX:XX FidoNet Host System Login : FIDO-01 Pass : XXXXXXX Welcome FIDO-01 Checking for mail Ready to send mail (CIS sends mail to FidoNet node) Ready to recieve mail (FidoNet node sends mail to CIS) Thank you for using FidoNet (logoff) The disadvantages of this system (especially on CIS or the Source) would be transmission speed. Unless you want to spend the extra $12.00 per hour for 1200 baud service, your stuck with 300 baud. But the advantages would be a central point for all FidoNet messages, and probably much greater efficiency. ----- Well, those are my comments. I think the idea of a national BBS network is fabulous, but it's up to us to figure out the nit- picking details!!!!! Jim Ryan Delta MicroSystems, Inc. 2